Friday, April 12, 2024

Top 5 This Week

Related Posts

WHY I KILLED GANDHI – Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

Gandhiji’s assassin, Nathuram Godse’s Final Address to the Court.

WHY I KILLED GANDHI - Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.
WHY I KILLED GANDHI - Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

Nathuram Godse was arrested immediately after he assassinated Gandhiji, based on a F. I. R. filed by Nandlal Mehta at the Tughlak Road Police staton at Delhi . The trial, which was held in camera, began on May 27, 1948 and concluded on February 10, 1949. He was sentenced to death.
An appeal to the Punjab High Court, then in session at Simla, did not find favour and the sentence was upheld. The statement that you are about to read is the last made by Godse before the Court on the May 5, 1949.
Such was the power and eloquence of this statement that one of the judges, G. D. Khosla, later wrote, “I have, however, no doubt that had the audience of that day been constituted into a jury and entrusted with the task of deciding Godse’s appeal, they would have brought a verdict of ‘not Guilty’ by an overwhelming majority”

WHY I KILLED GANDHI

Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined RSS wing of anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession.
I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other. I have read the speeches and writings of Ravana, Chanakiya, Dadabhai Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England , France , America and Russia . Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.
All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well-being of all India , one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan , my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.
Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them.. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day.
In fact, honour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita.. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.
In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India . It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to them.
The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way.
Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every thing; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible.
Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster. Gandhi’s pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India . It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India , Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani.. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect, it is spoken, but not written. It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma’s sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India . His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.
From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork. The Congress which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947.
Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’ and ‘peaceful transfer of power’. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called ‘freedom won by them with sacrifice’ – whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country – which we consider a deity of worship – my mind was filled with direful anger.
One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan , there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.
Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless. Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan . People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building.
After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House. I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi.
I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims. I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.

1205 COMMENTS

  1. Nathuram Godase was did the right thing. He killed gandhi but he killed him to late .because of gandhi we did not got the freedom because of gandhi we fot freedom to late.Today the condition of India is only because of Gandi he is responsible for imbalance of Hindu-Muslim fight in india . Gandhi is a criminal of our new youth.

    • yes Gandhiji is a criminal for the new youth but why because todays youth don’t want to go dee in facts….they lack patience and are in hurry to reach a particular thought….may god bless you dear….:)

      • I am allergic to BS and stay from it.. but I have to respond to this blog..
        All the pussies who tried very hard to get independence from brits and failed – they are all called non-Gandhian’s. These non-Gandhian, self-loathed a**wipes did not have strategic plan to get freedom but, they have enough energy to piss on his effort. This is the common indian mentality: we like to eat, sleep, and bath in s*** but we do not like to accept the real HERO [a.k.a Gandhi], who made it possible in better way. If not for him we would have been another SouthAfrica.
        At the end of the day Gandhi is damn good lawyer who knew what it takes to get the country back from the brits..
        So..all you self-loathing p***y non-Gandhians go and join the army and show what you got if you really care..
        For 1300 years we have been targeted by foreigners not a single man with balls was able to put a hindu back in to the leadership of this country and it took 20 years for Gandhi to do it.. how is that for some history 101 for you losers. Go pound sound or may be some s*** you mf’ers. You should be jailed for desecrating Gandhi.

        • Today’s entire generation is influenced with the teachings of Gandhi and other national heroes in our school text books, but what we do not realize is that these books are again controlled by the Govt. and we only study what they want us to read.
          As Indians we love our idols, may it be Gandhi , Shah Rukh Khan or even Anna Hazare, we idolize them so much that we expect them to do nothing wrong, forgetting the simple fact that they can be wrong as any other human beings.
          I have no doubt that Gandhi had the best interests of this nation in his mind , but that does justify every decision he made. We did this Gandhi , idolized him so much that even he came to think that he was always right, making a fascist out of him and today we are doing the same with Anna Hazare.
          We first need to learn to support causes and not the people. Gandhi was right in his demand for Independence , he was right in his efforts to eradicate the cast system, but there are a lot of other things where he was not right. However no one opposed Gandhi. If the Govt did he employed arm twisting tactics with Satyagraha. And I believe Godse was right when he identified this handicap that interfered with the future of the nation. Though I do not support murder of Gandhi, I am convinced there was no other way to control him at that time. The masses would always support Gandhi on every descision he made, irrespective of its affect on the nation. A non violent protest against Gandhi would brand you a Traitor and Gandhi would be more powerful. In these circumstances Godse did what he had to do.
          some one above commented that it was great of Gandhi to give up his suit and wear Khadi and he himself cannot do it. I am sure in the same context you would appreciate Godse when he gave up his future and his life for the future of the nation.
          There are lessons to be learnt from our past, one of them is to do with Anna hazare fiasco. Dear Friends please do support the Cause of ‘non corruption’ and a strong lok pal, but not do not just support Anna Hazare. If some one has a view point that is against Anna , give him a chance to express it instead of branding him a traitor.

          • nathuram godse should be given the bharat ratna for killing vigrous gandhi n in today there shouid be more godse so in order to eliminate muslims n in india why we innocent hindus should be killed in the hands of muslims n also gandhi family shouid be wiped out of our country n godse shouid be honoured as father of nation n nt only godse we r forgotting bhagat singh etc jai hind be proud to be hindu

        • helloo ass-hole i call u ass-hole first of all straight away because…..gandhi didnt get independence…..and for his fucking ideologies…….there was never an impact…….british left india……..not that gandhi gave us independence……..and british left india only because there was nothing much left to loot……if u got the balls……..just post an apt reply to godse’s version than speaking all non-sense ass-hole…….how come he didnt bother about the hindus in pakistan………at the time of independence…….didnt he know the consequences…….

  2. Inded he has done the right thing gandhi was not so tolerent he wants things to be by his own way and thats the reason why jinnah has left congress and eventually partitoned india. Because of his follessness we have lost the golden oppurtunity in second world war to liberate ourself and lost a leader like subhas bose

  3. silence is more than 1000 words …had Godase resisted him self from giving this speech his action might have carried some weight …..
    He has given the example of shivaji , gobind singh , ram , arjun etc etc ..but he has forgot that those were armed battles …Mahatma was not leading an army …he was leading common man …..common man has family ….he has some obligations ..his capacity to sacrifice is limited …so an armed struggle against British would have resulted in similar harsh measures as after 1857 …..
    mahatma integrity towards United India is unquestionable I ..he was the staunch opposer of Partition ….It was because of the few Hindu fundamentalists that few Muslims felt insecure and they succeeded in exploiting the insecurity and anxiety in minorities Muslims to carve a separate state of Pakistan… Mahatma Gandhi fasted because he wanted to prove to Muslims they will be safe in India but the people like Nathuram Godase made it easier for Jinnah to prove his Two Nation Theory …
    Its a shame that we killed our own Father and no amount of dipping in holy Ganga will absolve us from this sin ….

    • Dear Mr. Lal, I agree with you, but i would like to point out that, this fasting was uncalled for. Don’t you think that he was too much stuck up in his unconventional ways and his ideologies? I think at that time he would have done what was politically correct, would have made some political strategies that would have really paid off.Maybe his fasting did not mean anythin to the muslims and their muslim leaders.He would have done something that would have swung them into action and made them realize that India as an undivided nation could be a better place for all of us.

    • yes he fasted for muslims’ security in india thats good no doubt but he must have fasted for partition and till death … his fasts were nothing but hypocrisy … so called father ……!

    • those were armed battels because the person they were fighting with were armed so they took their arms too not like ghandhi who sat behind and watched his followers being showered with lathis and shooted by bullets…. who says to keep quiet if someone comes to ur house and try to snach what u earned all ur life and ill ur sons and other family members… i think that was the sickest thinking i ever heard to present other side of urs thats not been hit to enemy to hit and ruien ur dignity and self respect…instead of ghandhi nathuram should be given that title of father of nation who killed the enemy of humianity… salam to nathuram

    • Mr Babulal,
      What our ideology teach us weekness is our death.If we do not follow the right path where shold we go.what we get what we deserve how people like nathuram do not faith on mahatma gandhi because something has gone wrong the ideology of mahatma gandhi.He can save Sardar Bhagat Sing but Signed dominiance status pact and do not put the proposal to save them they too fighting for the nation week person cannot talk with strong person british people are strong and we should fight with them.The important thing is that at that time the treaty is signed when ever we find our freedom fighter we will handover them to british people.If you dont belive on me just read Transfer of power attorney act volume7.
      thnk that this is our country and we should know the truth
      jai hind jai bharat,vande matram

    • Dear Mr. Babu Lal,
      I do not agree with you, rather i strongly believe Nathuram Godse did the right thing. There had been incidents during our freedom fight where gandhi had been more in favours of muslims.
      He wasn’t a father of nation, if one really needs to call him a father of nation then that nation would pakistan. He created pakistan. We shouldn’t be shamed of ourselves for this act. Consider this as a surgery where cance affected body part was removed.
      The reports shows that he didn’t run after firing shots, and neither he denied it during hearings.

    • Hey Man,
      Please do not blame nathuram for the Partition.
      Analyse the events from 1920 since Gandhi had taken over the Congress and people considered him their leader.You will find the It was Ghandhi’s wrong policy that led to the partition of the country.
      Jinnah was puppat in the hands of fundamentalists Muslims. The biggest blunder that Gandhi did was allowing Muslims to stay in this part of country what we call India.

      • Just one question…do you think Jinnah was a extremist muslim?? If you have read all since 1920 then I think you would have came accross the speeches of jinnah tooo….:) thank you and God Bless You…:)

  4. Babu Lal,
    So according to your logic Indian Soldiers who defend this nation on the borders should not defend because they have families too. If we run away from what is to be done quoting such frivolous reasons we would be a nation of hemaphrodites (‘napunsaks’), so don’t try to justify an act like freedon struggle with the convenience of the people. You don’t fight such wars based on when and how many are convenient with it. Gandhi fasted because he wanted to be called ‘Great’ or ‘Mahatma’ as simple as that. Forget about Partition, i won’t even go there. Post partition, Sindhis and Sikhs were being butchered in Pakistan, women were raped and murdered or forcefully converted, children too were not spared. Gandhi asked these people not to come to India and die there so as to ensure the safety of Muslims in India. How is this even justified? Imagine your own relative being asked such a thing? In any case the only reason why i regret Godse killing Gandhi is because it only added Gandhi’s aura.

    • im just an interested 3rd party that has only read very little about gandhi, but was his mistake becomeing a political figure… becomeing a leader to the hindi people? Or were even his teachings flawed, not in respect of india to pakistan but to humanity as a whole? I’m an american atheist but have always respected gandhi and his fundemental teachings of peace but I never knew this side of the story. What I’m really trying to ask i guess is… Was gandhi put in his position of political power by the hindu people and then ttied to follow his own teachings leading to the attacks of muslims on hindu’s. Or did gandhi persue his position amoung hindu’s to bring about thier destruction? please reply via email, I am interested but respect that fact that I am not hindu so if you do not wish to I understand

      • what about his reaction in southafrica when he denied to share his jail cell to a black person by saying that they are only one degree higher than animal…. and the TATA’s saying that we spend more money than a devolped city to keep his place natural… and that didnt mean that all he did was just a showoff to keep his image higher.

      • Sean…here you will get only arrows in air without any aim if you are interested to know about Gandhiji please go through the Books and Biographies of different freedom fighters you may get it in any national library just be patient and read all those if you are desperate to know the REAL FACTS….I have been reading those since last 4 years and am still doing it…..here you’ll get different views which in HINDI we call “prithak drishtikon”….so run for facts which are still unpublished online. Thank you n God Bless You…:)

  5. Mr. Babulal
    Well said that gandhi was leading common man , but people killed in pakistan were common hindu or sikh or sindhi , coz thats what gandhi did sacrificed those common people for his popularity among muslims . What nathuram did was for those people and what was once called hindustan

  6. gandhi make us a beggar.i would love to die then beg.i salute Nathuram Godase, subhash Bhose, bhagat singh and all those freedom fighter who gave their life for nation.

  7. I am surprised at most of these comments. It seems extremist hinduism is alive and well in india today.
    I work and live now in US, and have had to study indian histroy without the prejudice with which it is taught in the subcontinent.
    Cold blooded murder is being commended, as well as lauded here by hindus. Using mythical legends in a peaceful and gentle religion I
    follow, violence and murder is being supported.
    You all are the same as all those muslim sympathizers of al-qaeeda
    and taliban. Just different names, but same nature.
    Very sorry you call yourself a Hindu.
    Jai Ram –
    Kumar

    • jairam kumar
      pls stop writing like this and increase ur studies in legal history, administration an jurisprudence then come forward

    • nothing like this kumar ji.. its about the thinking that was killed not that u kill innocent people … and when somebody ask for the clarification of ur deed u done not have answer….. atleast he had answer why he killed Gandhi not like al-qaeeda who kill people he dont even know and just kill them coz they belong to a country and without any arms….if al-qaueeda comes in front and fight literally and then he gives the reason for fighting then we will listen to him and decide if he is right or not, or to support his ideology or not…. untill now for me al-qaueeda is just challenging the technology and security of the countries he is against…

  8. I have to seriously doubt competency of Judge Khosla, especially in
    light of Godse’s opening statement…
    …..
    Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious.
    ……
    This man was brainwashed and totally confused.
    In his opening statement right off the bat, he says he is…A free thinker, unfettered by isms political or religious WHILE HE reveres Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culutre…intensely proud of Hinduism…?
    Either everyone here is totally blind, dumb and stupid including this Judge Khosla who reportedly made such a high opinion of a cold blooded murderer..or I am misquoting Godse’s own words.
    Jai Ram –
    Kumar

    • Dear Mr.Kumar,
      Do u know that when pakistan attacked on Kashmir, Mr.Nehru did the stop payment of the check of 55crores , which had been decided to give to Pakistan. When Gandhi came to know about the stop payment, he blakmailed Mr.Nehru (Prime minister of India)by telling that if mr.Nehru will not release the payment to Pakistan, he will go for as usual Indefinate?
      Ultimatly Nehru was compelled to release the payment.
      What more proof u want that he was pro-muslim and his did were at the expense of Hindu ?
      His So call Satyagraph was never a Satyagraph but actually a “Hathagrah” and more to that “Duragrah”.
      For god’s sake stop making any stupid comment and writing statement. U are far away from knowing actual reality.
      love
      Kaivalaya

  9. Hi friends,
    In person, there is two sides one is trying to get the reputaion from the work, another one is trying to do the work sincerly. Ghandi belongs to first choise. He has political power among other leaders. But Chandra bose oneman show. He could not get the right reputation like ghandi. But both persons struggle for one targer with different approaches. Finally the youth of india will always behind NETHAJI. Your the real truth of leader.

  10. What youth and what religion? Treat person as a human, instead of labeling him with a religion or caste,
    Godse said:We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other.
    I hope he said religious rules, Please try not keep your believes on future generation, let them choose whatever they want, I am proud to say I have friends who are muslim, they are my friends because I like their personality. Please dont put your thoughts on future generations, If you respect hindu culture, try to respect other people’s culture as well. Gandhi may be failed in some cases but it doesn’t give any right for godse to kill a human. Everybody makes mistakes and from those mistakes people will climb further. Please stop the obsessions over religion and treat people normally.
    In India-Pakistan cricket match try to cheer for players, respect them instead of their religion and country, admire a person if a person hits a six(whether he is Shahid Afridi or Sachin Tendulkar), they were able to achieve that because they worked hard not because they were born in some country.
    Atleast in future generations will change, I am not saying what wrote here is right or wrong, it’s my opinion and try to have your own opinions and don’t try to force them on your children.

    • So according to your logic Indian Soldiers who defend this nation on the borders should not defend because they have families too. If we run away from what is to be done quoting such frivolous reasons we would be a nation of hemaphrodites (‘napunsaks’), so don’t try to justify an act like freedon struggle with the convenience of the people. You don’t fight such wars based on when and how many are convenient with it. Gandhi fasted because he wanted to be called ‘Great’ or ‘Mahatma’ as simple as that. Forget about Partition, i won’t even go there. Post partition, Sindhis and Sikhs were being butchered in Pakistan, women were raped and murdered or forcefully converted, children too were not spared. Gandhi asked these people not to come to India and die there so as to ensure the safety of Muslims in India. How is this even justified? Imagine your own relative being asked such a thing?

    • hey boss,its not about cheering sachin and afridi.when zahir hits a six we also cheer for him.ok.its not abt muslims its abt pakistanis.when someone died in those families where the reason is terrorism then how it feels no one can understand.

  11. Guys,

    Let me give a brief opnion about this and also I request you to think positively and also look all the aspects of the matter. First of all Gandhi's idealogoies, I agree most of them were wrong & mileading. Even if what he did was wrong, who gave Godse the right to kill him. If everyone think like this and start killing the people to whom they think are doing wrong, then what is the need of Constitution, court, police, Law and order. In that case it is going to be a Jungle Raaj, where everybody has the right to decide and punish the guily. Moreover, blaming a community, caste, religion, country or a group of people for the deeds of individuals or a group of few people is basically wrong specially in country like INDIA which we called as Democracy and have Nnumber of religions and the special communal harmony. The people who play games using religious sentiments, infact they don't respect any religion, only they use it for the personal or political benefit, whatever religion they belong to.

    • Are yaar, jara socho agar hoi marata hai to wo agar galat hai; to kisi ko ye sochne pe majboor karana kitana galat? Ek Marathi me kahawat hai “mhatari melyacha dukkha nahi pan kaal sokavto” isaka matlab kisi dost se pata karna. Anyways na chahate hue bhi ye hota hai.
      To bade bade neta ye samaz le ki janata unaki jagir nahi. Agar baat had se age gayee to is duniya me unke liye bhi koi nathuram paida ho sakta hao.

    • @Jasmin,
      You do need to read Godse’s testimony again. In your language , let me ask, who gave Gandhi to play havoc with the lives of crores of Hindus.Ask the immense number of people who migrated because of partition totally homeless and with so much suffering and personal losses. But you do not call it Jungle Raj . Why ?
      Any patriot of the kind of Godse will have gone with a very clean conscience.

    • hey man, u r so much emotionalized… our esteem indian govt still categorizing the casts in the names of OC, BC, SC and ST so why shouldn’t we??? man india is great country but not indians.. if really we respect our constitution why we made 68 amendments till date?? do u have any explanation in that??? and finally what i want to say is our so called elders and great people are not really great… there are so many freedom fighters, even their names enlightened. gandhi is really nothing did in our fighting..

  12. Well I don’t like dwelling in the past and write too much either but i do have few points on my plate
    1. British were already sick of India.It was an investment that was proving unworthy of.So did Gandhi became a hero because British chose to talk to him.
    2. Was it his non violence that really shaped the ind of the British to grant independence.After having had 2 world wars did Brits want more of trouble.I think u get your answers from that
    3. Muslims are a missionary and contagious religion.Islam and its structure doesn’t allow peace with others.Here is where Gandhi failed.He wanted to be a saviour of both but didn’t understood that muslims and Hindus can’t co exist.Mark my word-either we all will be muslims (as has happened to people in Pakistan,Afganistan,Indonesia,Malaysia and Bangladesh where the inhabitants were some other religion and were swayed by sufis,terrorists and missionaries of islam by lure,coercion etc to become part of Islam) or alternatively all will grow so rich that religions will lose relevance(anyway religions are for poor)
    The question of Islam becoming moderate and accommodating or respectfully accepting other religions seems remote.

    • Well about your comment (religions are for poor). I would say that Jews who are one of the most religious lot are also amongst the most prosperous people.What do u say about dat?Regards

  13. unfortunate to realise what a shame that indian history has had to go thro
    but the more important question to address is we have not learnt from mistakes and history is waiting to rearrive

  14. i am not support godse but if any people read our indian history on that age of year then you can understand why godse took this decision and and why he did it this.
    we all knows that when we got freedom that time our total population is 40 cr including pakistan .pakistan (6 cr) peopls only but they get 1/3 of indian land for their own country and killed lakhs and lakhs of hindus and they still contud… pl. stop it

  15. Today I watched infamous assasin : Mahatma on history channel ,had argument on this subject with a paki colleague. millions of people were killed during partition….who is responsible. Gandhiji succumbed to jinha’s pressure for partition…..which he shud not. this has changed the whole political scenario of the world. No pakistan…..no talibaan….no al qaieda….no american base in asia(pak).This all started from 1947…..till date. Of allthe comments…the one posted on 15 august by rocky is the best.

  16. well done.very good work by nathu ram godse but its too late.gandhi ne tabh tak saara hindustan tehas-nehas kar diya tha.jiska natija hum aaj tak bhugat rahe hain.j sala bhagat singh,rajguru & sukhdev ki mout ka jimewar hai.inqlab zindabaad

    • ashfaqullah khan ko bhul gaye….bhagat singh,rajguru & sukhdev ke saath ashfaqullah khan ka naam to must judega….uska naam bhi le lete….

      • See this is what Gandhi has seeded in people like you. We all respect all the great Muslim leaders as well, we truely salute Ashfaqullah khan. Gandiji was reposbile of having our third of our land to become a foreign land on 15 Aug 1947. He was a politican not a freedom fighter like Ashaqullah Khan

      • sorry mr baig …but the act of ane muslim dosen proves all of them r right and if u r true then why the biggest crime force in world r muslims.. every terrist attack in your motherland r done by them …
        i truly belife that gandhi played a important role in indias freedom but he is not only couse
        i belife that india would be free without him even…
        but i cant understand is one thing…when bloody pakistan ask every hindu to leave pakistan then why we keep them in india
        imagin a india free of terrisom,over population,illiteracy and most important the contry would leave in peace n brotherhood

  17. Gandhi did Good or Bad for India that is Not a Reason In Our Country India People Just see like Dummies or like some Spectaculars what happening around them, They don’t observe any thing wrong or Right happened around them. More than 90% of our Population Ignore what is happening around them i.e negative position for Country and enemy i.e Terrorists or Non socialist Bodies are around us but we Ignore them. For People like Gandhi He was also right in few Situations but his More Decisions are totally Wrong. He is with British Govt internally but externally he shows he is a good Leader for Freedom.

  18. Agar Gandhi ko Nathu Ram Godse ke hatho se marna tha to use to khud nathu ram bhi nahi bacha pata aur vaise bhi azzadi ke baad gandhi jeekar kya karta wo tension me mar jaata……… ye maine kya kar daala
    apne hi desh ko kaat daala

  19. Gandhi was such a bad man that make our country worst. Unhone ne hamare desh ko aise kadar pe la k chod dia to sambhale nhio smbhalta . Gandhi khud bhi sambhal paya.
    He was responsible even for the death of Great Bhagat Singh.
    He used his mind for divide and rule policy.
    The best eg of his character is that he has more than 1 wife.
    Even the African Govt threw him away from their country.
    He such a bad man.

  20. Both Godase and gandhi were good for India,The basic difference between them are….One is freedom fighter for India and gave his life for the mass of hinds like us and the another one was politician cum freedom fighter…who had more for other and very less for India and Hindus like us…That is the result which we are facing today…now its up to you…that decide who is good or bod …

  21. It is a shame for us that the man who has done so much for indian independence is facing criticism in these comments posted by you people…………..who is nathuram…what he has done for india…..embarassing ..very very embarrasing that you people are posting comments in favour of nathuram……..but don’t forget till the end of this world MAHATMA photo will appear on indian currency…..and he will be forever

    • It’s a shame that, even after reading the above “final address” to the court, you are not able to appreciate the sacrifice done by Nathuram, at the cost of his life and honour. If you have any sense of nationalism, please read it again and understand the thought process behind Nathuram’s act. If you cannot understand – surely you cannot belong to Bharath and have no right to carry the legacy of Bharath on your shoulders. Please find an other country ….

    • At least consider re-reading the following – see if you can understand something :
      ====================
      It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.
      In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to them.
      My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.
      ====================
      Do you see the passion of Nathuram for his motherland – can you feel his heart ?. Now you can judge what Gandhi did to the nation – and what Nathuram did for yourself. If you simply want to praise Gandhi for his muslim appeasment, you are free to do so, but, Nathuram certainly is a great patriot compared to Gandhi.

      • I fail to understand if he was such a big ideologist and such a brave man with some nice political views and with such patriotism.Why did he not enter into politics and just try to change the nation he was so unsatisfied with. The nation would have surely learnt a lot from him.Someone plz reply…Regards

    • Kamine insaan world war 2 me gandhi ne angrego ki help karne ko bola tha ,aajadi gandhi ne dilwayee yahi indian Hizrapanti hai.aagar world war 2 me Ingland ki halat kharab nahin hoti to Gandhi aapna lund ukarte rehte ,nehru mount betton ki biwi ko chodte reh jate desh aajad nahin hota

    • Can u tell me what good has gandhiji done for india
      ???????????????? It is only an illusion to believe that it was becoz of gandhiji that we gained independence ;hat it not been for world war 2 india would have never got independence at all.Only stupid and naive people would believe that holding non violent march past would help gain independenc from a supreme power like the britsh .

  22. Basicaly i loved to read history aaj bhi jabhi news mai padti hoon hindu-muslim hindu-muslim to pata nai gandhiji naam per bht gussa ataa hai nathuram ne jo bhi kiya wo accha hi kiya gandhi is the criminal of our country.

    • personally speaking i think you (Archana)are a damn fucking bitch (pardon my language)someone throws some one sided argument shits and you jump on it just like that. as far as i am concerned
      nathuram’s argument is only from one point of view(especially hinduism). also since gandhi was a man of non violence & he did not do lathi charge on congress leaders to follow his orders . they respected him & hence followed him. just think how a man without any political background comes and influences others with his philosophy. dear Archana if you crosspath me then mail me at [email protected](same user as in facebook)….

      • i totally agree with u…..BAPU ji has 2 face all these critisism even now.how can any one call such a gr88 leader a criminal.pity on u guys who think so…i think u all guys who go against gandhi r all immatured enough 2 understant such a gr88 gr88 leader who has fought a war with love n nonvoilence n thrown the british out of our nation….gandhiji amar rahe….hamesha aap hamare dil mein rahenge…mere hisaab se bapu ke baaren mein baat karna bhi hum deserve nahi karte……mahatma gandhi ko jai…..

        • saniya i agree with ur statement.u r absolutely right.i dont know but pata nahi people kisi ki 100 achchaiyo ki jagah 1 burai ko itni importance kyon dete hain.

          • dear frndz u people cant get it today becoz u r living with a drop of liberty today imagine when ur children will b converted forcibly in ephemeral religions like in pakistan kashmeer iran iraq and other parts of the worlds … muslims abuse india in india i have heard 1000s of times this is becoz of so called mahatma …

        • Dear Saniya,I agree with you, but history teaches us some great lessons to be remembered for the future. So i don’t think that discussing the issue will be of any harm.Regards

          • becoz this one illness has been untreatable and cant b treated too india is still dying from two viruses one is gandhi and another is nehru. dont forget me one day u will see me explaining all things … but now now i dont hav enough time …

          • To Pandey,
            Please avoid statements that are not relevant to the discussion and merely give you a high from fantasizing about. “dont forget me one day u will see me explaining all things … but now now i dont hav enough time” – is of no practical interest to anyone here.
            Your criticism of Gandhi’s policies smacks of extreme communal Hindu ideologies which you present without any support in any of your posts. (“muslims abuse india in india i have heard 1000s of times this is becoz of so called mahatms” – examples, please?) Gandhi and Godse had for the most part disjoint beliefs and this was the source of disagreement between them. Gandhi’s views appealed to the masses of his time and becoming popular, he was chosen to lead them. And being made one, he expected people to follow his decisions.
            When you analyze Gandhi’s actions now, you automatically have to understand why he was liked by a majority of people of that age. When you judge his actions now, you have to see the consequences of his actions in our age. Although some of his principles were unhealthy, a lot of his tenets still form the driving force for Indian beliefs even now.

      • Rupesh tum c*****a ho Non voilence ke chakkar me 1 lakh public mari gayee thee bangal me usse jayada punjab aur Gujrat me ,Non voilence.behan ke land ek goli ki awaj suno ge to gand le ke ghar me chale jao ge .

      • jab teri maa ko koi harami ka pilla, beijaat kar raha ho to kya tu non voilence ka (gandhi) ka rasta aapnayega ya Bhagat, Chandsekhar, Nejtaji Subash, sirf itna batana.
        Aur kuch puchna hai to reply dena main uska jawab bhi dunga — ok ” JAI HIND “

      • Ideot,
        Are ‘nt u ashamed of speaking such absuive language to one lady? irrespective of any thing, do not u think that she has a right to expree her self?
        Even after doing so pro-muslim activity do u know how Zinha was calling him, KAFIRON KA LEADER Gandhi”
        He and muslim league had never expressed a single word of sympathy when Mr. went for indefinate fast, and that also he did inorder to protect muslim in bangladesh not to protect Hindu in lahore & karanchi?
        We are now bearing the fruit of hiss so called Satyagrah . i would call it Duragrah,HATHAGRAH.
        Mind the language first and then write.
        Kaivalya

      • Ideot,
        Are ‘nt u ashamed of speaking such absuive language to one lady? irrespective of any thing, do not u think that she has a right to expree her self?
        Even after doing so pro-muslim activity do u know how Zinha was calling him, KAFIRON KA LEADER Gandhi”
        He and muslim league had never expressed a single word of sympathy when Mr. went for indefinate fast, and that also he did inorder to protect muslim in bangladesh not to protect Hindu in lahore & karanchi?
        We are now bearing the fruit of hiss so called Satyagrah . i would call it Duragrah,HATHAGRAH.
        Mind the language first and then write.
        Kaivalya

  23. Hi..dusryawar comment karnyapekshya apan aplya deshasathi kay sacrifice kelay ka?karan fuktchya comments dene far sope aste.
    No one knows the reality.Independence is not got only killing,& fighting.

  24. I hate Gandhi I hate Congress Ihate Pakistan,,,
    Nathuram you had to do this if you would have done this before than we all could be together in one india…

    • hey Aamir Khan heres a situation for you.
      some bandits have overtaken your 10 acre property forcefully. now you have lived under them for 1-2 years in a dog like treated manner.you cannot get your property(including home & everything) by violence.
      you protest and finally they agree to hand back your prop. on one cond. that they will only give back 8 acre of prop, or nothing and everything will be as same , you live like a dog. will you accept it or not????mail me at [email protected] and no abusing.

      • Dear Rupesh, This was not the point here. I think i dare to differ from your viewpoint.It was not a question of some land and your example does not involve too many people who follow different faiths, like the hindu and the muslims.It was real unfortunate for us to be divided like this. Despite of Gandhi ji’s great efforts to please the Muslims. The Muslim leaders abandoned him anyway. So my point is that he was so much stuck up with his values and ideologies that he could not see what was coming.Its like he was living in some kind of a fantasy world. I would really like to discuss it with u.Please mailme at [email protected]

        • yeah… ur rite bapu himself stuck up much with his own values n ideologies.As one can see….he himself mentioned in his autobiography book…”There r two persons in my life whom i failed to convince 1.my muslim friend mohammod ali jinnah and 2.my own son harilal gandhi.” everyone has their respect 2 their own religions n values .there’s nothing wrong about it.But first above any religion may it be hindu/muslim/christ/sikh etc we all r gr8 humanbeings who can help each other n live in harmony n peace.Gandhiji intended the same view.He always intended 2 remove the “hatred evil feeling” among us thru his path of love n nonvoilence.

          • and through this way the hatred would be gone forever n washed out of one’s mind.coz if someone slaps me on one cheek n i smile n show the other cheek makes the guy feel ashamed of his act n intend not 2 repeat the same with others…on the other hand if i hit him back i display my hatred and hez not gng 2 b quiet he hits back which makes us enemies n this hatred feeling among us carries through out our generations 2 come.who wants such a destruction. godse was only speaking on one side hindu hindu hindu….but he forgot tht hez first a humanbeing.which bapuji conveyed it thru out his life….

    • Really…u r ryt…….Ham sab ikathhe hote no pakistan….JUST INDIA hota……powerful INDIA….Congress RAVAN hai…iska vadh krne ke liye BHAGWAN SHREE RAM JI ko dubara aana hoga…..

    • Yes satish, its very difficult to understand Gandhi. Only a few people like Godse , understood gandhi fully.
      its a shame we call him the father of the nation and also a Mahathma. If there is another birth and God really punishes the evil, its Gandhi who should be punished as if he is in hell. There is no salvation for him, whatever number of births he takes.Why you people are so scared to talk about gandhi. Why you people are brainwashed right from school,to eulogize and worship gandhi? Was he a true patriot. The gandhi/Nehru legacy is the one which is torturing and slow poisoning our India till this date.The world is yet to see a more spineless and selfish Leader like Nehru. Because he wanted to share the bed of mountbatens wife, he agreed to partition. He wanted to play around with chinese women, he supported china for the unsc and also the indo-chini bhai bhai and the humiliating defeat at the hands of the chinese in the 60’s. Still we do not have the guts to say “china keep off arunachal, kashmir, north east, assam”.
      DOES THE CONGRESS HAVE THE GUTS TO SAY THIS on the face of the chinese????
      Are you proud of all this satish??? If we are what we are today as a nation, it is because of the PEOPLE of india and not its congress leaders.
      I will and can only salute the people of india. Godse is really a great patriot of India, who really loved the nation and did what is just and correct. If what he did is a crime, how do you explain the thousands of deaths our people undergo everyday due to starvation, despite surplus food production and subsequent rotting of the grains in warehouses.,corruption, nepotism,injustice and power hungry politicians. I love my nation , India. To be a patriot of my country, there is no need to be a lover of Gandhi or Nehru or their policies.People like you , will never come out the illussion and brainwash that you have been subject to for many many years.
      jai hindh

  25. Nathuram Godse did a right thing. He killed gandhi but wasted two bullets. As far as gandhi is conderned one shot was enough for him. Had Nathuram used the rest of the bullets on Nehru, India would have been a better country today.

    • ur absolutely right.
      had behru gone and patil becme the PM there would have been no pakistan bugging us today, no kashmir problem and india would have been amuch more peaceful nation.
      above all we would have been free from the dynastic politics from nehru down to rahul gandhi

      • Hmmm..yes after reading the himalayan blunder,it seems that Nehru and his def minister both were unfit for the job.When someone attacks you,closing your eye wont make the enemy disappear.Our poor soldiers who were butchered during the chinese invasion.I think after 47years also we havent armed ourselves well enought to stave off an attack from the chinese.Recently in kargil also we lost soldiers because these babus from Delhi were not giving them orders to retaliate.The army should be empowered,only then can we survive.China has become so powerful that even the big bully,USA,is scared of them.China looks like its planning an attack soon and we are ill-equipped.Our PM is a good economist,but not a person fit for war strategies and statesmanship.Kya hoga is desh ka jahaan ye laloo leader paisa jamaa kar rahen hai?

    • I completely agree with you. Nehru was one of the worst Prime Minister. India is still facing Kashmir problem because of Nehru.

  26. Gandhi and godsa both are patr1ot of india. Both were working for india.Althogh gandhi was showing himself secular but both were insecular. Gandhi was to be pretend secular but godsa was the member of hardcore hinduwing R.S.S. who is trying today too make india a hindu Nation. In india many religions,many castes etc. people are living in India. So we should not remeber again again gandhi and godsa, and we should remeber Bhagat singh and his companions idelogy. We should not criticise any gandhi etc.,we should do today something for our nation.Everybody know that naxalite movment is increasing very fastly in india which is not good for nation. So we work hard and save our country from external powers. It will be true tribute to our patriots.At last i say gandhi and godsa true patriots there services can not declined

  27. Bhagat singh,chandrasakarazad,balgangadar tilak,subhas chandrabose,alluri seetharama raju-these all r freedom fighters .
    mahatma gandhi is freedom ….

  28. shame on you guys..shame on you…criticizing mahatma and supporting nathu fanatic and his speech…. how you all communal bent of mind writing against mahatma and in support of nathu…there is mahatma all over ..himmat hai to nikal ke dekh…mahatma is in your pocket..on currency..want to remove or burn that currency then burn mahatma from your pocket..bhikhari alias beggar ban jayenge aap log…mahatma paas hai to aap hai nahi to aap bhikhari hain…main likhta rahunga bapu ke favor mein ..i will wright in favor of bapu till the end of my life…and he will be forever till the end of the world…in every indian pocket

    • currency pe gandhi ka naam hai…iski karan hai Congress……usko “father of nation” naam diya tha congress. Shame on U man…..subhas chandra bose, bhagat singh, chandrasakarazad,balgangadar tilak…those r the real freedom fighter………

    • Ghandhi duniya ka sab se bara ch***a insaan tha,Nehru aur Birla family ke isaro pe chalta tha,12 saal ki larki ke sath nange sota tha,usne do sadiya ki thee . Nehru gandu tha uska affair lord mount batton ki wife se tha aur Lord ke sath bhee tha.History utha ke padho chutiyon aaj jo hindustan hai wo inhin kamino ke karan Randi bani huee hai

    • Mr baig i am not support to nathu ok and i agreed about your thinking but aur koi krantikari nahi hai kya unki naam pe currency nahi aa sakti kya is desh ki ajadi ke kebal unhone hi kurbani diye the itihaas badla ja sak ta hai Aur jo actual hero hai unke naam pe bhi currency ana chaiye jaise Sardar Patel,Subash ch Bose,Ashatullha khan,Lal bahadur Sastri ….ye log kya mahatma nahi hai itihaas badlega hum bhikari se amir banege ok…

    • Asshole…of all the things done by Gandhi…all you remember is his image on the currency?? This speaks a lot about you and your Gandu..oops…Gandhi.

    • u fool baig…no wonder u are supporting gandhi, becoz u seem to be a muslim and gandhi was famous for pandering to muslims…he wanted entire hindu race to suffer for his own lofty principles & ideologies…he wanted nehru to become pm of india, as nehru was his chela and real power would be with gandhi…jinnah was a more capable & iron willed leader who would have made a better pm…then partition would not have happened and thousands of lives, both hindu & muslim, would have been saved…but jinnah was immune to gandhi, so gandhi did not want him to be pm, as he would have no power then…he forced congress to give 55 crores to pakistan…pakistan today is the cancer of the world and breeding ground for terrorists…
      today he is being lionized & revered all over the world because since independence congress is in power & they have always portrated nehru, gandhi etc in good light, instead of the power mongers they were…
      Gandhi always use to go around with his arms around two women…why can’t he take support of men instead…and he says he has taken oath of celibacy…that proves he was a hypocrite…
      true patriots were people like bhagat singh, kartar & udham singh who willingly gave up their lives to inspire thousands of young indians to fight for freedom !!!

  29. All i would say is that Gandhi Ji’s teachings were too sacred and too divine for a human’s amateur mind to follow. His vision of Utopia was tried to reach by many great personalities like Jesus Christ, Lord Rama,etc. but was very difficult for a human’s amateur mind to follow. We’re humans and erring is one of our traits.Even the God’s could not change it.Every God who have tried to teach us this has been put through a lot of pain and misery by us humans and has met a similar end like Gandhi Ji.So well we can try to reach for it, but only few will be able to achieve it. And those who’ll achieve it will not be called humans anymore.Regards The revoltismine

    • no..i don’t agree with you,Gandhi’s policies made India to be divided into two parts.And because of this a hatred has been developed in the minds of the people concerning about religions.Hatred between Hindu and Muslims.This could have been avoided if Gandhi had changed his ways,had his thinking be a little practical,if he had ever thought of the consequences.Had Gandhi been alive now,he sure would have regretted his actions.

    • teachings decorated with absolute contradiction … pretentious in action … cant teach anything to any sensible and potent men …!

    • yes godsey i promise one day i will tell d truth to the people of world and gandhi will not be father of nation but he will be known as destroyer of the nation …

  30. O my god give me power to eliminate gandhian ideology as a whole … give me power to destroy the congress and so called secular parties of india give me power to make india a place free from terrorists and antihumans n r godsay may ur soul hav rest in heaven u will b always b in my heart i like as u liked all good things in gandhi but i cant forgive any hell whoever allowed india to hav a partition its shame on u gandhi where were ur non-violence truth and satyagraha that cant b defeated why did not u use that against the perpetrators of partition u did not live for india but u lived for nehru gave india in d hand of an impotent man ur ideology is no doubt good but for the people of paradise but ur action was disgusting after all i salute u n r godsey …!

  31. You are all brainwashed people. Gandhi was not responsible for the partition. That is like saying the surgeon doctor is responsible for the person who lost his leg because he operated on his gangeren leg.

  32. To A MUSLIM time is over for the words just wait and watch for action. and do not say what is of interest and what is not. who r u to say it is of no interest. how many people told u d points of interest. my dear friend why simi was established here in india don’t you know? what omar abdulla said don’t u know? why do we see flag of pakistan in kashmeer dont u know? these are all muslims none other. and no one else can be too. open your eyes and see .. but if u are blind then wait one day i ll gift u eyes. and do not underestimate anyone dear. its not good for health. once i was reading an article it was written by a journalist of Dainik Jagran in which it was mentioned that one muslim from Aligarh wrote a letter to the editor in which he said one day all hindus of whole india will b converted by us. i think the name of journalist was Balbeer Punj. and countless of examples r more.i dont blame muslims for this i blame our so called blind and hell headed leaders who gifted us HIV without any vaccine.

  33. C’mon, just leave it alone. Catch an indefinite break from this criticizing. Whats done is done, you can’t go back in time and change that, hope we’ve learned something from it. Just work hard N’ smart with what we’ve got and make our future generations feel proud of what we do today.

    • yes thanks mr inder what we have got let us improve it , develope it or at least save it , by developing a good character in our self, we can really change the other if we would be bad and saying to other that be a good person is too diffficult. Gandhi ji may be a good or bad person we dont need to catche the badness of him we have to accept the goodness of gandhi, he had told lot how to become a good person having good characteristics , his ideas to utter the name RAM and singing the vaisnava jana ko is great and it can really destroy the dirts of our mind and the society after .
      I salute both Gandhi and Nothuram godse because both were having the intention ot save india and its culture.

  34. nathuram might b right r wrong….bt by time gandhi had did watever good or bad he cud do 4 d country…n gandhi didnt imposed himself on anybody…ppl.of india accepted him….few f policies were questionable bt he is hero f our country.nathuram was a loser supported by bunch f other losers who cant do anything themselves xcept talking big n critize him!!!!!!

    • To kya tum ye sochate ho ki Nathuram ko Gandhi ko mar ke fansi pe chadhane ka shokh tha? Kya Gandhi ko desh ka aur nukshan karne ke liye khula chhod dena thik tha? Gandhiji se achha shikhane ke liye bahut he lekin us paristhiti me Nathuram ne vahi kiya jo karna chahiye. Shahid Nathuram ko hazaron salaam.Jai Hind.

  35. Gandhi was simply a P**P. He ruined the future of our country. He was just a piece of shit. I would like to share something which I recently came to know about our national flag. As we all know that from ancient times Hindus have considered the Saffron color to be holy and I believe the flags of all Hindu rulers were of saffron color, under which the fought pitched battles. When the concept of a flag for India, as a nation, was raised, Hindus wanted it to be all Saffron but, Muslims objected and insisted for Green colored flag. The flag of India could have been half saffron and half green if Hindus didn’t object to the touching of Saffron to the Green color of Muslims. It was thought to be too unholy to contemplate. Some retard ( I am sure someone from Congress or may be Gandhi or Nehru himself) suggested to put a white strip between these two colors to avoid contact of the Saffron and Green colored stripes. I have not conjured this story but it is a fact which was conveyed to me by my friend whose grandfather was an active politician and he revealed this to him. I was utterly shocked to learn that and later he asked me to relate that with the lyrics of the song of movie “Chak de India” where Sharukh Khan was shown singing – “teeza tera rang tha main toh…..”. Compare this with what we were taught in the school. The cock and bull story of Saffron for bravery, White for peace, and Green for prosperity. Sometimes I feel that I really don’t know the history of my country and I read and was taught what Congress Party of India wanted the people to learn. I know people would not instantly believe in this but before replying, give it a thought and then write your comments.

  36. I cant believe anyone could be as ignorant to say Gandhi was the cause of the division and he should have been killed. How can anyone even utter a bad word about him, those who can deserve to be killed, just as Godse was. Gandhi only ever wanted peace and good to take place. He in fact is the reason the fighting stopped, not that it started. He only ever brought good for India and Pakistan, gaining their independance. Godse was a dispicable being and should not have killed Gandhi, nothing he said in that speech justified his actions. How dare he kill a legacy. One thing he never acieved, neither will any of you hypocrites, is wipe away that legacy or stop him from touching lives of even those who were not alive when he was.

    • Are u living in peace now.? What we deserved was a much better independent India. With congress’s politics and Nehru’s submissive tactics for ruling India gave birth to what we are facing now. U need some introspection. Learn to see through the others also… With people like you praying false gods India will never be independent.

    • Better search for Reality of Gandhi on Google,then you will see how cunning and shrewd was Gandhi,and what he did to demolish hindu`s from the country.

    • @Annabelle,
      Looks like you are may be a muslim or close to congress gharana, did you ever knew what this gandhi’s have done with our country.Are you from INDIA or an outsider? Please go outside your home & see how india is badly suffering from population,poverty.We have been attcked thousands of time from pakistan ( A congress nation ) but there is no reaction from gandhi gharana.they think indians are made to die.Grow up go outside your home & see the world at least INDIA & Dont disrespect Mr.Godse as the assasination was in favour of our nation.Just because people like you india is very poor.Go & See gujurat,Karnataka,bihar,MP,Chatiisgarh is doing which is congress free state.

      • Sahi kaha Ashish Bhai….congress term should be used in place of parasite…..congress is full of people like Kalmadi,Rajiv alias Roberto and characterless persons like Nehru who had relations with Mountbatten’s wife…..Chavan’s who can sell even soldiers dead body to get a flat for themselves, tytler and sajjan kumar who killed innocent sikh’s and so on……..atleast Nathuram Godse had no personal gains in killing gandhi……he did it for his motherland

    • let me tell tou Gandhi was about to give 18 km wide area to pakistanis to connect them from east to west pakistan……..he forced Sardar Patel to evacuate migrant Hindus from Mosques in heavy rains……Can you justify that….He felt when non-hindus were killed but didnt said a single word when Hindus were killed….Is this not the reason for partition…….How can gandhi have seen only from one side when he was supported by both hindus and non hindus……….isnt it a reason for partition………….he gave money to pakistan at a time when everybody knew that the money given to pak will be used to buy weapons and not shelter……was it right then………can anyone do it ……he should have been Hanged by indian people for betraying from his country and supporting enemy…..can answer this….Gandhi was a traitor because he supported British and pakistanis against the wishes and interest of indian people…….at last I would say……Bharat Maa ke sacche sapoot…Shri Nathuram Godse aapko shat shat naman……….hum sab bhartiyon ko aap par garv hai……Bharat mata ki jai

  37. shaheed bhagat singh and rajguru , sukhdev …these three people shows the new morning to indian people but mahatma gandhi ji freedom….gandhiji only use the term of non-voilence..these three people also use that term..but the way of working both revolutinary are different.so i give the big salute to all the indian revolutionary specially for shaheed bhagat singh and rajguru, and sukhdev..
    i also give the big and big salute to the mahatma gandhiji…

  38. Gandhi was NOT a great, divine person. In fact i beleive he was a nuisance. He forced the British to leave leaving India half complete in terms of infrastructure etc. Look at the state of India and Pakistan now. the poverty and corruption….we can not say Independence for these two nations was a success. Him living in poverty was a show….he was mocking all the legit poor families, women and children of India. The disrespect he showed to the Sikhs was dispicable. Him stating that Guru Gobind Singh Ji was a ‘misguided patriot’and that he was a ‘common human’ and not divine. If he was such a holy man why didnt he concentrate on abolishing the caste system within Hinduism? Maybe he felt the ‘lower caste’ people deserved to be treated the way they did…..maybe he was sick in the head? I’m sure if he worked on improving relations between Hindu’s (lower and upper castes)and with Sikhs by not alienating them and showing such disrespect India would be a great nation today….with alot less poverty, discrimination and corruption. This unity would probably have got Independence for India even sooner and kept good relations with Muslims.
    In my eyes alot of India’s problems are due to him.

  39. A salute to nathuram Godsay for what he did. Yes after reading lots of books and this i came to the conclusion that Mohandash Karamchandra Gandi was the real cause of seperating whole india into India and Pakistan.When he gave power to Nehru, though Zinha deserved it, he made a blunder.

    • you have forgot the most deserving persons name tripti……Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel………Lauh Purush……..The silent worker of congress…….he combined 600 deshi states….Actually Gandhi had made many blunders like selecting Nehru as PrimeMinister…..accepting to send indian soldiers into World WarII…..going with the decision of britishers to hang Shaheed Bhagat Singh and so on.

      • I feel compelled to agree with you! Sardar Vallabhai Patel was the man who, quite literally, built the foundation of today’s India.
        PS. I am not disregarding Mahatma Gandhi’s effort or the effort of the hundreds of other patriots.

  40. Nathuram was only a frustrated man.Gandhi was not only person who was responsible for partition.If Jinna becomes PM of India than it was sure world would be witnessed a massacre by hindu and muslim riots.
    Gandhi never in favor of two nation theory.
    one thing we must know is “Kashmir samjhauta”which clearly says that Kashmir is not a permanent part of India and Pakistan is taking advantage of this by brainwashing kashmiri people.Kashmiri pandits are suffering the pain most.
    and afterall what is this ? this is nothing but shit dirty politics.
    White men has done what they want.
    We all need to learn from our past.
    Fight is never a solution of any problem and Gandhi was first leader who understand this.
    After Buddha, Gandhi was another great personality India ever witnessed.

    • yes i agree with u. i think that while commenting or expressing, one has to see both sides and then express. offcourse, i can understand that as an individual one has its own notions and way of thinking, but that does not mean that somebody should be blamed for everything what happened in past.

    • yes kamran u are right…fighting is not solution to any problem…so maybe people like shivaji maharaj, rana pratap, tipu sultan & prithviraj chavan who fought against foreign invaders were fools…maybe they should have resorted to satyagraha instead…even lord rama should have sat on a dharna in front of ravan’s lanka and pleaded for his wife to be returned…shri krishna was a moron when he urged arjun to fight for his rights in the bhagwad gita…instead the entire pandava army should have resorted to fasting unto death !!!
      do u know that gandhi was a stubborn person who was ready to let all hindus suffer for his own lofty principles & unpractical ideals??? he sat on a fast onto death to force congress to give 55 crores to pakistan…he also threatened to fast if hindu refugees sheltering in muslim mosques did not leave those places…he was ready to sacrifice the entire hindu race to please the muslims…
      jinnah was a very capable & iron willed person…if he had been made PM of india, then partition would never have happened and he would have managed the country better…but then power would not have remained in gandhi’s hands, as jinnah was immune to gandhi…so gandhi wanted nehru as pm and this was cause for partition which caused thousands of people to be slaughtered, both hindus & muslims…
      when kashmir was given option of staying with india or going to pakistan, they prefered to stay…pakistan then tried to take it by force, which india repelled…are u aware of all this history ???
      you are truly a great intellectual and a very foresighted person…according to u nathuram was a frustrated person…do u know that thousands of people who lost their near & dear ones in the partition would have gladly killed gandhi??? nathuram did what he felt was in the interest of the nation !!!

  41. i was the biggest fan of gandhian dynasty..but now i have learnt these “””gandhis “””are poisons..like cancer…..please please save this nation from “”dirty gandhian-dynasty”””….sonia gandhi, rahul gandhi, priyanka gandhi…ye sab desh ko-gumrah kar rahe hain…truly speaking these are “”FAKE-GANDHIS””..the actual and correct gandhi was mahatma gandhi…..these gandhis borrowed name from mahatma gandhi only for their personal intrests…but we indians are fools to some extent who couldnt guage these peoples properly…..( what nathuram godse did to mahatma gandhi in my view to some extent is good) because gandhi was in the favor of other peoples….in todays time wat we are suffering like…terrorism,,corruption,,garibi,,fearness,,…its all because of GANDHIS……”””ye gandhi dikhne mein acche lagte hain…lekin ye bade dokhe baaz hain….”””‘hamesha inki ek hi nara hota hai..garibi hatao garibi hatao…mein bachpan se ye nare sunte hua aa raha hoon…lekin na ye garibi hatayenge,,na khud htenge…elimnate this peoples..the crooked peoples…..jai-hind

    • Me bilkul tumhare jesa hi sochata hu.Lekin Bharat ke log pahale se hi vyakti-pooja me doobe rehna pasand karte he,jiska ye fake gandhivadi fayada uthate he.Koi baat bar bar doharayi jaye to vo sach ban jati he.Ye gandhivadiyo ne bhi yahi kiya.Natija yah he ki sab ki aankho pe fareb ka padada gira hua he,jis ko uthana bahut mushkil he.

  42. Guys , who ever has posted anti Gandhi comment with due respect to these comments i would like to say- whatever it may be done to India at that time. that man had guts to bring masses to Indian freedom movement. Whatever Bhagat Singh or other has done can be great contribution to Indian Political freedom but those people failed to bring feeling of nationalism among the common people of India . I am sure that many of you who has posted comments have not gone through hind swaraj , just commenting without appropriate evidence its really bad. I sure that the guts which Mr. M.K.Gandhi had was absent in any political leader of that time (even now also) . simply by saying that I hate Gandhi won’t bring the change in India or Pakistan. If u think that Gandhi was mother fucker , then raise ur standards and prove it . don’t just limit yourself to comments. Guys, remember in politics RIGHT and WRONG is used just to serve political objective. so,please UNDERSTAND things don’t take a STAND and if u feel that u can take a stand then prove yourself and then post comments , right of expression is not meant for hurting someone’s sentiments or using derogatory words for other people remember that !!!

    • sorry sir….i don’t agree with u.no doubt gandhiji was a great man.his deeds for the nation can not be ignore..but we have to feel the fact that every full moon has a dark side.some of his policies brought india into great danger.here we only want to say that in a country like india every man has his own rites.but at that gandhiji’s policy stood like an obstacle.and Bhagat singh was never failed to bring nationalism among people..he accepted a lot of pain for that only.but the socalled political leader of that time didn’t support him afraiding of his political popularity.we only want to say that nathuram godse was not a bad person…he only did what situation needed.in case of gandhiji ,a man whose opinion controls the whole nation should be that much impartial.but gandhiji never did it.we respect gandhiji from the bottom of our heart,but cant support his wrong decisions…cause wrong is always wrong.

    • i agree with you…. though gandhi was not “perfect”, just like everyone lse, he did have the “guts” or more aptly “brains” and “will” to stand up and do something for India. he had all the comforts in life… yet the choose to sacrifice it all and do something for the good of the people(unlike some self proclaimed idealists like nathuram godse who did the most cowardly act of assasination the great leader, if he, in reality cared so much about hindus, and wanted to “do” something for their betterment then he shud have bloody well DONE something worthwhile! rather than the dastardly act or taking the life of another who was better than him!)

  43. My Dear all Indians, whatever happened is for the wellbeing of all of us. we don’t know what were the situations at that time when Leaders took such decisions. We are not supposed to comment on them. They did what they felt right in their mind.Remember, for every decision you make there is always going to be good and bad part of it. we have to accept both. Now, we should only concentrate on what best we can do to have a better life.

  44. Only a Christian traitor in Bharat(Our nation is filled up with such bastards and our present leader is one such female)…will say that Gandhi did good for Hindus.
    These Christians are No1 supporters of Muslims and are currently ruling India through congress.
    We Hindus are fools that we suck up to them.
    One day we need another Nathuram to kill the present Italian ruling our cursed land.

  45. Gandhi still alives if you have eye you can see, if you dont have then pray to gandhi or read gandhi’s autobiography to get a eye.
    Gandhi is nothing but a living god.

    • kongress evolution by gandhi, bifore this was not any political parti in india, so gandhi a big politition. not any god……………………………………OK

      • hi,
        here i am not responding to any one person…….i am responding to all person without any discrimination of caste , creed, sex. I will say my opinon with an example.
        there are three blind persons came to their way. in thw way they struck by big thing. that thing was an elephant. 1st person touched tail of an elephat and say it is thin. 2nd person touched the leg and say it is like a tree.3rd person touched the head of an elephant and say it is broad like thing.and starts fighting.nobody knows the truth totally…like that.we do not the truth.and starts fight… i want to say that firstly we have to understand our responsibilty…..not to blame others responsibility…..and doing ….thanks.

        • Well, no one is blind in this forum. Everyone has got a uninamous statement that Gandhi is Gandu. Teach your blind story to your near and dear.

  46. Because of gandhi we had hindu muslim conflict today because of gandhi we lost 25 lacs indian in world war II, it was decided in 1942 when british government asked to gandhi send indian into world war 2, we will give you freedom after world war 2

  47. I would only say that history had given us chance to be true Hindu nation. But We miss that opportunity becasue of soome people thoughts. No one listened to visionary leader Veer Savrkar..
    Today, Hindu people organization are called Nazi in their self country..!

  48. It is always easier criticize but difficult to appreciate.. especially when things goes wrong.. I dont want to comment on the partition but It is Mahatma Ghandi the man with the great will power who really sacrificed the entire life for the integrating united india for independence.. He is the man who is main responsible for uniting india to fight against Britishers he does not limit only to the territory unlike some rulers, His contribution for independence is large&Imense.. Thats why he is called as Father of Nation..

    • Srini, Why was Burma liberated, why was there a partition, where is Bangladesh? Go to the Northeast, they dont know who Gandhi is. That is a part of India, why do they not know the “Father of the nation”. Gandhi was a political saint only for the main land of Indo-Pak region. He did not integrate india. SV Patel (Iron Man of India) did it, not with any directions from GANDHI. Why was Patel not considered for the first prime minister of India?

  49. I didn’t know which part of the story is correct.Although i am quite moved from the last speech of nathuram godse.I can only say that we live in a secular country where every religion is same and we INDIANS(hindus, muslims, christians, sikhs)should work together to build this nation by maintaining a communal harmony.
    Only and only then we can pay tribute to those who sacrificed their lives for the country whether it is gandhiji or nathuram godse.

  50. Mughals never demolished any Hindu temples and they didn’t killed hindus. These are only rumors and wrong facts. Today in India Hindus are in majority & their population is around above 80%. Mughals rules India for about 800 years if they wanted they would have eliminated all other religions from India. Today population of Hindus in India (above 80%) is great proof that Mughals didn’t force or killed anyone. So, Mughals killing or torturing Hindus are fake theories and assumptions.
    Iam an indian and iam proud of it& i dont need to prove this to anyone…
    There are bad elements in every religion, so dont say that jis desh ka khaate ho uska hi ghlat kar rahe ho…
    Those who are calling Muslims as terrorist, please reply / note:
    Who killed Mahatama Gandhi??
    Who killed Indra Gandhi??
    Who killed Rajeev Gandhi??
    Where is Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose???
    Shibu soren was involved in murder..
    Nithari killing….
    Narendra Modi (Terrorist no. 1)
    Dr. Amit Kumar Case: Source- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurgaon_kidney_scandal
    Sankararaman murder case in which seers Jayendra Saraswati and his junior Vijayendra Saraswati are the main accused. Source: http://www.kanchi-sathya.org/
    Madhu Koda case
    Kalmadi case
    A Raja case
    George Fernandes case
    Who is Uma Bharti, Mayawati, Mulayam Singh, Lalu Yadav
    Who is the owner of Sriram sena??
    Who is Raj Thakrey??
    Who is bal thakrey??
    Sanjay Dutt case??
    Who are in bajrang dal, vhp, rss??
    Who are naxalites??
    Its a long list there is no need mention who they are…One can write lakhs of books on these issues

    • I think where are you living. Just pickup Gujrat train and see what is happening. See how women are tortured, how singles are treated, then tell me which religion is doing that. Why every terrorist is muslim? I know that you are not a hindu that’s why you are saying this. Who compelled Godse to kill Gandhi? Gandhi was saying non-violence and by that way lapping the inner thought. It is normal behavior of human being to retaliate but he was making whole country ‘gandu”, so what he did was not totally wrong.

    • Abdul forgets that his ancestors were Hindus but had to either convert to Islam or pay the Jizia Tax. They chose the easier way out and converted. Was that not under duress? The original Mughals were outsiders and had conquered our land. So, does that now give them a right to claim part of the land as if it was originally their’s? Please do not fool yourself. Look around and see the truth. Read the newspapers and you will see that from petty crimes like pick-pocketing, burglary, thuggery to major ones like murder, kidnappings, extortion the names are predominantly from one community. Please wake up, be good citizens and contribute to the growth of the nation that feeds you. Otherwise go to Pakistan where you will not be able to open your mouth the way you can in this great country!

      • Who killed Mahatama Gandhi??
        Who killed Indra Gandhi??
        Who killed Rajeev Gandhi??
        Where is Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose???
        Shibu soren was involved in murder..
        Nithari killing….
        Narendra Modi (Terrorist no. 1)
        Dr. Amit Kumar Case: Source- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gurgaon_kidney_scandal
        Sankararaman murder case in which seers Jayendra Saraswati and his junior Vijayendra Saraswati are the main accused. Source: http://www.kanchi-sathya.org/
        Madhu Koda case
        Kalmadi case
        A Raja case
        George Fernandes case
        Who is Uma Bharti, Mayawati, Mulayam Singh, Lalu Yadav
        Who is the owner of Sriram sena??
        Who is Raj Thakrey??
        Who is bal thakrey??
        Sanjay Dutt case??
        Who are in bajrang dal, vhp, rss??
        Who are naxalites??
        Not over riding to your comments?

    • WHO CREATED MOSQUE NEAR KRISHNA JANM BHUMI AND WHY????
      WHO CREATED MOSQUE ON RAM BIRTH PLACE ONLY IN AYODHAYA?????WHY
      WHO CREATED MOSQUE NEAR BABA VISWANATH TEMPLE IN BANARAS……..?????
      DONT U THNK IT WAS ALL INTENTIONAL AND ONLY TO HURT HINDU SENTIMENTS…..

      WHO IS OSAMA …..
      WHO HAS DONE 26/11,……….THIS LIST HAS INFINITE LETTERS

      • log bina kuch makum hote hue tum log kisi pe comment kaise mar sakte ho jo bit gayi o baat gayi kuch ukhad nahi paaya kisi ne jisko jaha jana tha chle gaye (tum logo ne geeta nahi padhi kya jo hota hai o ache k liye hota hai reply padho.

    • hey man u blame only hindus and says muslims r ryt
      …………and u said many thingz abt mughals ,wat ur emoeror aurangzeb did to hindus,he killed alot of hindus daily .and if u want i can prove that …..bt iam honestly nt against d muslims …………..the name u mentioned r d corroupt and treacher indian which should be punished …….bt our impotent system sucks….

      • i think there is not quist of resposbleity
        because if the roots are parriesh then that all trees
        are parrishable
        so if yu see that now a day whatever going on about
        crime and bad politics of congress,so ofcourse therire
        has bad roots of them who was the gandhiji.

    • Ur at it again..everyone knows muslim didnt contribute to freedom struggle…ur totally unethical is saying narendra modi a terrorist..

    • You asked so many questions first let me correct your history – it is not 800 years, it is 400 years got it ?
      You asked so many question and if you notice yourself most of the names involved in curruptions – Wat about SIMI, attack on parliment, attacks in delhi, UP, Gujhrat, Rajisthan, Bombay blast, IC 814 hijacking. and he rightly killed gandhi if he has done great then he also responsible for partiion of India and killing of thousands innocent hindus, shikh, muslims. you said mughals didn,t destroyed any temple then who destroyed Ram mandir and now it is proved by Acrological survey of India that there was a temple like struture before mosque was built by mughlas. and mughal were so nice then why they killed 8th sikh and hindu guru Teg bahadur sahib and his sons ?

      • Hey guys…. Let us not point at each other, the topic was about mahatma GANDU, so called ‘father of nation’ and proved to be the father of pakistan. Seems like he was born to some muslim…..

    • Mr. Abdul,
      actaually I wanna say only one thing and this is very actual and important phrase 4 just like u type of ur type …… all muslims are nor terrorist but alll terrorists are muslims. i can prove it.if u want to know u can see everywhere

    • Mr abdul are you a mughal you know very well mughals are not indian origins.another thing is who is No-1 terrorist Osama Bin Laden and who is Dawood Ibrahim,I think you have no ideas about in our country 80% are not hindus Above 33% are muslims OK.Another thing i agreed with you jis des ka khate ho is ka ghata mat karo aur ek bat jis des ke ho is desh ke bare main thik se jono is desh ki itihas padho.sorry friend my english is not good Jai Hind…

      • my friend shivaji just ask Mr abdul kya paidha hoone ke samay yeh muslim theey hume toh pata hai ke yeh log toh hindu hi theey bas khatna hoone baad hi yeh musalman bane

        • Thanks Rajesh you undestand my emotions and that is real facts,its a shame for our indepedence daan main mil gaya.hum ko ajadi kisne di gandhi ne aur kranti kari margaye kya ye badalna chaiye ye history inhone hi banaya hai. Is desh main angejo ko nikal ke burma main pahela tiranga laheraya to Subash ch bose ne koi jan ta hi nahi.I talk about DHARMANIRAPAKHYA at that time gandhi ne mandir main koran padh te thee lekin masjid main geeta padh nahi paye kyon aoo sahas kyoun nahi kiya unko achi tara pata tha sachai kya hai.Another thing is in all crucial time gandhi was in fasting why he indirectly blackmailing

    • I love muslim and I love Muslim Community reason since birth 80% of my friends r muslims…… but coming to ur questions:
      1) where Islam born in India???? I don’t think so then what the fuck you’re doing in India, but still i want all the muslims to stay in India b’coz u r my brothers
      2) i love only 1 king that is Akbar nd rest were Fucking emperor
      Now you say who killed Gandhi—lemme answer you,, Nathu did so becoz he always favoured you guys instead of others
      Indira gandhi– Sikhs did that bcoz they want Kahalistan as you have pakistan they demand it for that and pakistan came from Jinnah’s gaandupanti
      Narendra Modi—he was brought up by a muslim lady and the time of gujarat case his village was the only village where no conspiracy happened
      Balsahab thakrey & bajrang dal— they are warriors because they are fighting for hindus right
      and for your kind info abdul Body guard of bal thakrey is a muslim when he do not have any objection than why u have so mny question
      now lemme ask you some question–
      who are Osama bin laaden, saddam hussain, kasaab , daud ibrahim,
      they are big fuckers they are niether muslim nor hindu
      jaha paisa mila waha ye gaand maraane pahuch jaate hai
      so be human do not fight on religion
      Jai Hindustan
      Jai Hind

      • Dear friend azad i never talk about indian muslims i talk about moghals they are not indian origin itihas padho. Aurangzeb bhi isi desh ka sultan bana tha kya kiya tha ……..Akbar indian origin nahi tha whoo last part of life kya kiya tha padho…….11th century ke badd jo is desh main aye sab ne loota hai abhi neta log loot rahe hain.Is desh sab ko bolne ka adhikar diya hai aur koi desh aisa hai batao aur azadji all indian kings are not fucker.Migrated sultan aurangzeb se bada fucker koi nahi tha sab ko bol ta hoon is desh ki bano ..Jai Hind..

    • laden , saddam hussain , daud ibrahim , kasab , major musharaff in sab ko marne ke bad ek aur terorist paida hogaya MR ABDUL

    • Great….
      Can you tell me one thing…how many Muslims were there in India before Mugals came ..All Hindus are forcefully converted to Muslim..its not the mugals came along with their family….
      Tell me how many Temples are there in Pakistan or any muslim country if you compare India?
      If there is no support from the Indian how they get in so easily….26/11 and lots of the other terrorism..yes I agree there are some groups are there (bajrang dal, vhp, rss) who is doing within a limit in India not to the other countries…

    • If it was not Marathas, Rajputs, and Sikhs, Mughals would have converted everyone into muslims like they did to your ancestors….if u think i m wrong, go to the states which were ruled by these three rulers, u will know what i mean and why there are not many muslims. if muslim ruler’s intention was right then why did they built mosques in all hindu sacred places??? go ..look at mathura…the mosque is very next to krishan birth place temple.., why masque was built at Ram janam bhoomi?? why mosque at kaashi ?? when is see them my heart fills with anger …but we r not criminals like mughals….. so i request you to leave all this aside and come back to your own brothers….. be a hindu, which you really are ..hinduism is the only religion which says that in this world every life is born as hindu, thats why we dont do khatna and baptize any child …bcoz its a process to convert them into their religion…. you are born as a hindu …be a hindu…

  51. For our national growth first of all we should stop the dynasty ruling policy, they alone not a god father of India. This is happening not only in central, but in all the states. Team work will leads to success, ofcourse it leads for corruption success also. Now spectrum issue in the top list of corruption , this is not due to single person, entire party is responsible. Corp. owners , cini actors & actress are virus for the national . We should not allow any actor or actress to act more than 20 films. For becoming political leader we should keep some basic new criterias. Like the family member should work in military as a soldier….

  52. WOW! a bunch of ignorant idiots (based on a few HIGHLY OPINIONATED responses I have read). You just simply cannot blame Gandhi for ever-exisiting tension between the Hindus & the Muslims and the partition was inevitable (it was going to happen someday). These are just facts. Gandhi was born in a tensed era where someone had to step up for the people. If it wasn’t for him, we probably would never have gained our independence. In essence, he was a HUMANITARIAN. What would you have done if in his place?
    Also, we are individuals with our own minds. Let’s be rational, it is us who are to be blamed for our ignorance & unwelcoming notions towards other religions. It is us to be blame for being so narrow-minded & not being able to accept other ideas/point of views.
    That’s it! 🙂
    I hope I haven’t offended anyone (because that is not what my intention was). But, my apologies if I have.

    • you ask me wat would have i done ?
      here listen, i would have gased jinha with zylon b then i will request all the indians who supported for the partition to get into the gas chamber then i will gas them too…problem solved …hindu and muslims can live in peace then…becoz the rest remaing will not quarrel for seperate state…wat u think dear kp

    • i would hv done the same thing what bhagat singh , chandrashekhar azad and many other freedom fighter did .aaj ke date mai agar border par sare soldiers dhoti aur towl lapate kar baith jaye to pakistani tumhare ek bhi kapade nahi chorenge . gandhiji chutiya banata tha tum mat banao .samjhe K.P

  53. Nathuram Godse had a different type thinking.He should have thought in a +ve way.He just saw shortcomings of gandhi.He was not trying to think about Mr.gandhi’s contribution towards Indian indeendence.
    Also,no one can say that Hindu-Muslim conflict is due to Gandhi .Gandhi never said anyone to fight .He always spread the message of communial harmony.O Indians!! think if you would not have been given freedom of speech (as in China).You are just becoming ungrateful to a man with whose grace you are able to speak freely.

    • India ‘s independance is not becouse of Ghandhi , India can never achieved freedom the way ghandhi does.
      It was becouse of world war II wchich make Britain very week. Colononisation was the main cause of two world war. After world war II there was common thinking among big country to give freeedom to the country so that future world war can be avoided otherwise life on earth will be destroy. Freedom can be achieved only by war. Britain has given india a freedom , india has not achieved freedom. Mentally still we are not independance.because we underestimate our culture , our country , our language. sorry my english is week .

      • Its important to understand what is freedom. As Godse said, there were many warriors earlier and Shivaji the great was one of them. Their violence was needed at one time, but did it acheive the kind of freedom that we have now. We never had a united India with a truly democratic form of governance.
        That is what Gandhis non-violence gave us. A sense of unity, where killing each other is not considered normal.
        Just look at where Pakistan is. A country that did not believe in Gandhi’s philosophy and Godse himself suggested. History has proven that a nation that followed Gandhi’s inner voice is much more solid than the one that didnt.

        • Totally agree my friend…its so easy to comment on something you read in books and experience through the writings of winners…..
          Its strange that we r totlly ignoring the fact that there are roles greater thab Godses, Gandhis and Nehrus that crfated and moulded the country we know today as Pakistan and Hindusatn ( India)and that is of Britsh Govrnment which by 1942 already knew that the time has come to a point where they no longer hold their fronts in INDIA and hence they theorised the whole partion so that they can furthe influence the South asian region. There are more than political implications of this decesion making by the then admnistration, its the new Economy which the Europeans had understood which lead to Partioion of our motherland ( which before Gandhi and Godse was land defined by there ruler. There was hardly any any nation before the britisher which actuly ( Politicaly) unit this country, through ruthless invades and exploited this land with the colonial sword ( the white men burden), so sud we go ahead and hail them for their mercy as they fill us with the sense of nationalism with cruel meanse and if not then perhapas we should not also hail Godse because he also tries the same thing with the act of cruelity and not even Gandhi if proved that he was reponsible for atrocities against Hindus.

    • Jennifer u say gandhi contribution; let me tell his fasting was only an black mailing and to rise above nation.If his principal was right then as an leader what is ultimate result PARTITION! then i want accept him as an leader.He was black mail by nehru,when patel was selected as president of aicc and he would become the pm of india.and he surrender to nehru when nehru said he will spilt aicc.and there will be chaos for transfer of power not freedom.THAT IS THE MISTAKE OF GANDHI.HE ALWAYS BLACK MAILED THE NATION.

    • Over all Gandhi and Gandhi family is fuckin family which spoiled our country by dividing India and Pakistan, if that fucker would have been killed early India and Pakistan would have been together you fuckin converted Das

    • Over all Ghandhi family is fuckin family which spoiled our country by dividing as India and Pakistan, if that fucker would have been killed early India and Pakistan would have been together you fucker converted Das.

    • Nehru was just wanted to be the prime minister of independent india,he was greedy for the leadreship. he was least bothered about the future india,where as gandhi took the wrong path of non_voilence….instead of that if azad,bhagath’s principles were used today we could have celebrated our 80 odd independence day….now what happened?? what we will tell our childrens when they ask why you were tortured these many years after learning the history?? it is always that “we must learn from history”..but none are bothered,just imagine if shubas chandr bose,bhagath singh and other reveloutionaries were been to power at that time, what would be the present india today?? i will tell this to all ma fellow indians what we learned in our school history was just the political mantra,the real history is something different from all those….it is tremendous.

    • Jennifer Das well you need to understand that there has to be a reason why some Indians are posting such comments. In India things are not what you westerners think. Freedom of speech is frequently quashed by wills and fancies of the politicians.
      You need to read Indian history and then read what Nathuram Godse says. Also you need to read Ramayan and Mahabharath.

      • Exactly I agree with Manu…Westerners has different idea about Indian History because of the book knowledge,but practically it differs how India is…If not these many Indains donot post comments against a great leader Gandhiji as we studied in our school days.Because its my own experience as I use to read books about gandhiji and thinking he is great leader where as once I started thinking logically and read about the death of Gandhi by Godse I felt Godse has taken a right decision but late….how ever thats past and we need to focus on present to achieve great future.

    • jennifer das a christian you people will always favour that gandhi because that person gave u all an opportunity to rule for more 20 yrs . has gandhi alone on his basis provided independence. what has he done for the country.even in satyagrah andolan if the people of india would not moved with him then he would not have taken a single step on his own. wht about other freedom fighters who died fighting for the country? just go and read history of india.gandhi ki chamchi:

  54. Over all Gandhi and Gandhi family is fuckin family which spoiled our country be dividing India and Pakistan, if that fucker would have been killed early India and Pakistan would have been together.

  55. Over all Ghandhi family is fuckin family which spoiled our country by dividing as India and Pakistan, if that fucker would have been killed early India and Pakistan would have been together.

      • gandhii was jst a tharkii budhaa
        who jst wnts cheeks around
        godhse u did a great job
        if gandhi was killed earlier den might 2day bhagat singh , rajguru and sukhdev would b dere wid us
        gandhii jst wants his party(congress)to b at top
        he did evry thng 4 his party n nt 4 d country……
        salaaaa budhaaaaaa

        • Same thing jabaap budhe honge tab koi yeh kahe ga tab dekhte hain aap kya likhenge.
          I do agree Bhagat Singh And many other leaders were great but freedom could not be won by a single person’s efforts everyone had to protest against the britishers.
          ‘I Don’T understand ek Article padhne se aap logon ke views itne kaise badal gaye and pls do understand agar koi aapka enemy hai toh vo aapke baare me bura hikahega naki taareef kaega har cheez ke liye Gandhiji jo hi blame kar rahe hain??? Itna agar present day politicians ke liye revolt kara jaaye toh India Me corruption Khatam hi ho jaaye.

  56. I think Nathuram took the decision very late. It became too late to kill him. The many evils and problems faced by the todays India were born by Gandhi. He is really the Father of Todays India. The Todays India is defined as the most ill governed, highly corrupt. The Nathuram Godse shall be conferred with the “Son of the India”.

  57. Guys who after reading this whole article still support Gandhi… It should not have been Mahatma Gandhi.. It must be made as Mahatma Godse… Wish he had taken this pious work of eliminating Gandhi little early some other Mr Godse would have came and eliminated that Nehru too India would have been prob free…
    And FYI Gandhi was not pronunced as Father of Nation by people of India.. It was just congress thought so and made it.. Justified person no doubt should have been Sardar Vallabhai Patel.. He was the real man for United India…

    • Godse’s action was a blunder.
      It turned Gandhi into an icon and martyr.
      This is being exploited by Congressis to this day.
      Gandhi was fast losing his popularity.
      He had provoked victims of Muslims riots in Kolkotta to such an extent
      that he was stoned and had to be rescuded.
      His assassination rescued his image, whitewashed his many failings,
      and was a severe blow to ideals being espoused by his detractors.

  58. Gandhi’s politics was full of hypocrisies. He was a convinient leader to british govt so the britons never tortured him in jail like our great freedom fighters. He was extremist, i.e. extremist of non violence. He never lived truth that’s why he had to experiment truth. At the age to some 80 years he tried to test is celibacy ( ? Potency ). He used to drink goat’s milk only. Gandhibaba when went to England, The goats were taken withi. People had to spend a lot to maintain his poverty.In his wardha’s home , which built like hut, I saw bath tub. When millions of Indian do not get a bucket of water to take bath, he used tub.

    • bath tub me nahaate the aur Khud charkhe se apne kapde banate the??British Govt. ke liye convenient leader the tab bhi protest karne par lathi se maara jaata tha?? Torture nahi kara jaata tha tab bhi faaltu mein jail me daal diya jaata tha?? iska kya answer denge aap???
      Blaming you for sumthing you’ve not done and no one to stand by your side even when when you are fighting for them isse bada torture kya ho sakta hai

  59. Hello Ladies and gentelmen ,its a nice topic to discuss and to share your opinions.Well Those who are in this blog first of all congratulations ,Bcoz you are those brains who are thinking of about our nation and its Heros.Truly its a great one.Coming to the topic in my notion both Nathram godse and Mahatma gandhi are great.We should not argue and defame any of them bcoz no only We indians are reading this blog ,The whole world is watching all these things.Just think the World is celebrating World non violence Day on the Birth day of our Father of the nation.So we all should think before we make any rubbish statement for such a great man.Dont think that i am contradicting NAthu ram Godse ,He is also a great man and a freedom fighter but if you guys will deeply go into his biography and will try to know and fell Nathuram to his vein and Heart,You will come to know that He loves and influenced by Mahatma Gandhi,Its his later life which fetch him to believe in Hindu Extremism and there is a lot of things which led him to assain the Mahatma.If i will seat to write the whole thing probably its not less than a book.You all are thinking that we should get freedom like other countries and should fought against the British but to my Knoweledge there are hundred and thousands of Indian martyrs who used Kranti as their weapon but failed to free our nation.I do salute them and bow before them for their bravery and grateness but noone of them really invade the British.I born in orissa ,which is the motherland of Netaji subash chandra bose ,but he also can not free our country,its other thing that the destiny is not with him.We should realise the fact that one old man who him self walks with the support of a stick walked across whole india and ignite the fires in the hearts of the millions of indians and give us the much awaited freedom with out the use of a single weapon.India is great bcoz of its unity in diversity and uniqueness .If we would have got freedom like other countries by fighting with the british then truly no one will recognise india and its ritchutious freedom history .India is unique for the unique way it got its freedom and the whole world appriciate it ,and the man behind everything should be worshipped.Martin luther king,Nelson mandela is influenced by which great man,President Obama is whose fan ,who show the path of non violence and truth to the universe should be placed as a icon in the hearts of at least we indians ,Have you ever seen any Pakistani citizen defame Mohd. ali jinnah so why should we indians should do this.You all know about Gandhi and Jinnha ,Gandhi never demanded anything from the country,if he wants he should have easily be the Prime minister or President of the country but he never do this .We should recollect all these things before making any statement about the Mahatma.You guys know their is a district in Texas,Usa named after gandhi,YOu know now also nobel commitee apologizes for not given thenobel peace prize to the Mahatma.ok guys bye and Long live INDIA ,mera bharat mahan.Jai Hind.

    • when all the freedom fighters were fighting for freedom , gandhiji was pursuing his studies.he was not the first to start the freedom fight . he had not suffered what other freedom fighter has suffered. he started his protest only when the britishers threw him out of the train . he was not fighting for the freedom of india but he fought for his own insult by the britishers. he knew it was the rule of british in india so he became freedom fighter in the eye of the nation but actually he was taking revenge of his own insult. after doing all this he became the national hero of the country.

  60. chhodo yaar purani baatein….but maja aaya aap sab logo ke comment padne mein..haste haste pet mein dard ho gaya….lol
    move on !

  61. Nathruram Godse was nothing but a jerk. He compares himself with Lord Shriram and perceived Bapuji as Ravan. He wanted to be a hero and nothing else! F**king publicity whore!

  62. Well we all know that there is a Gandhi cap I however have never ever seen Gandhiji wearing one Actually ” SAB KO TOPI LAGA DIYA ” On Hindsight good Pakistan got created or else we too would have been at a very sorry state of affairs

  63. Gandhi was a loser.
    Non-violence kabhi pet nahi bharta.
    Godse is GOD.
    Time has come to stand up and remove Congress from India forever.

  64. Gandhiji did some admirable things, but he did some dumb things as well. An example of something dumb was a letter he wrote to Hitler trying to reason with him. I don’t get what the point of that letter was. The policy of appeasement in Europe cost the lives of over 10 million people, when all that was needed was to get rid of Hitler to avoid WW2.
    Similarly the policy of appeasement towards Pakistan cost India many lives. We could have settled the Kashmir question for good in 1948 but stopped short because of the doves like Gandhi and Nehru. These people were blinded by idealism when what India needed at that time was a foreign policy and fiscal policy that would have made India a true superpower today.
    Time and again India in the early days sided with the wrong people and adopted wrong policies for example being Pro-Soviet Union and adopting a socialist planned economic policy. I think Gandhi’s departure ultimately benefited the nation as a whole.
    It is sad that Nehru ended up surviving for longer because I blame him for the blunder in China in 1962. The Nehru-Gandhi family benefited immensely by being in power for the better part of the first 50 years but those benefits never trickled down to the common man.
    Do I condone what Godse did? As an anti death penalty person I don’t wish harm on anyone and perhaps Gandhi would have realized the error of some of his policies if he were found guilty in the court of public opinion.
    But reading about Gandhi makes one believe that he was a stubborn human being who did not bother to realize his mistakes and not commit them again. Also he was extremely naive about nation-building which involves making tough choices, negotiating with countries or fighting wars. Gandhi was never capable to deal with the real task of running the nation.
    Gandhi was right about building the economy of rural India, the absence of which is noticeable in the terrible urban sprawl, unemployment and crime in our cities.
    In closing, I don’t approve of how Godse went about his job, but after all these years it is hard not to see the legitimate reasons about why he did it.

  65. people really talk as if they were there, and as if they know everything?
    what have any of u done for a country? or the people of a country for that matter?
    why do any of you think it was right for a man to take another mans life?
    “Nathuram Godase was did the right thing. He killed gandhi but he killed him to late

    the keyword was UNITY it is not anyones fault that people could not come together and live in the same country because they are too greedy or for whatever the reason may be

  66. Gandi nai Bhagat Singh ko murva dia. Shanti shanti kurta raha. Agar angraij shanti ko sumjtai to vo kub kai Indai ko shoor kai chalai jatay. Gandhi ko to bus rajniti chahia di angraijo kai janai kai baad or hum sub aaj tuk inko bhugat rehai hai. Aj india subsay jiada crupt logo sai bhara hai. Singapore, malasya , south afrika australia hongkong en sun desho pur raaj kia or shornai kai baad aj sabhi desh develeped countries kai rup mai hai aur hum… sub Young genration india shorh bahar bhaag rehai kio? Nathuram Godase sai bus etni gulti ho gai kai os nai HARAMJADAI GANDHI ko bahut late mara. He shuold be died before all freedom fighter i.e. BHAGAT SINGH.

    • Baaki saare deshon me Gandhi ko top political& influencial leaders me shaamil kiya jaa raha hai aur jis desh ke liye vo itna lade usi desh ke log unko Bura keh rahen hain.
      I’m presently in class 7 and in our textbooks we always read Gandhiji always fought for us And if he did not care about us why the hell did he go in prison accepting things which he did not even do.
      Don’t Po-tray a wrong image of Gandhi atleast not infront of them who consider Him as their role model.
      Aur ye joote marni wali baat karni hi hai toh abhi ke Neta Kum nahi hain.

      • The so called father of nation is called father of nation bcoz that ba****d f****d our nation
        mo**** f*****r should have died when he was born
        pata nahi uske maa baap ne kya paap kiye the ki aaisa harami unko pida hua
        Nathuram Godse JI ne jo kiya kash ohh kaam uske maa baap ne uske pida hote hi kiya hota toh aaj hamara desh kuch aur hi hota
        sala hamesha topless ghumta tha do ko leke
        chalu sala
        NATHURAM GODSE ZINDABAD

        • Very goog mite, such mai aaj hamara india kush ooor hota, only indian pur ajj is ki vaja sai aj sub dharmo main larhaee chal rehi hai or naita log is ka fedaa lai rehai hai or Rakshita jai log befakoof buntay hai or buntay rehai gai. kash BHAGAT SINGH nai dubara india main janam na lia ho nahi to vo khu ko aj phansi laga lain gai. Gandhi and Gandhi family ko Atomic bomb sai oda dena chaheay onlu atomic bomb tajo inki agli nasal bhi os area main dubara peda na ho sakai.All freedom fighters Jinda BAAD.

        • One thing more INDIAN and other, Here are our few indian girls and it will be good if we all use respectable and readable discusion. not corse language
          Thanks all

      • Rakshita, what ever you read in books, are witten by men. books are not alway right. i know may be are innocent but as you will grow up, u will relise that truth is different, it happent to me. Dunia kai two roop hotay hai jub tuk aap bachay hai masuum hai to duniya bahut ashi lugti hai bur iskay peeshay loga ka ak kala chehra hot ahai lalach ka,they can do any thing and dont care about any body sometime your mother land.try to read other’s books which tell you rear Gandhi about bad things. Kisi ko sumjna hai to yaad rakhna,oski ashi batay dikti hai but tumay uski buri baatay bhi dekho tub tum asli chehra pehchan paogai. Best of luck

    • tu chutiye,,, i agree that Ghandi is fuckr.. but he had not made bhagat singh die. bhagat singh ki apni hi chul thi. the main thing is that we INDIANs r chutiyas, we left england people come in INDIA, problem arises here,. . . .

      • Tu chutiya ho sukta hai jo england ko anay dega but not now. or duri baat agar to gali nikalni hai to siday baat kur to tumay batta hoon kai kon kis to choodta hai. Suna or agar baat Bhagat sing ja phir gandhi ki karni hai to siday muh kur.
        Or ek baat sun lai main gali ka javad gali sai nahi…. GOLI sai datay hai I AM A PUNJABI JUT, OR JUT NAAL PUNGA TAI BUS……!

  67. Gandhi is a father of pakistan. i hate nehru and gandhi families. they have spoiled future of india. indpendent pakistan was only demanded by Muslim league and not by all muslims of india. Most of the muslims were against the partition thats why they stayed in india after partition. Hyderbad Sansthan was also demanding for separate state but their protest was brkoen with the help of police and military force by Sardar Vallabh bhai Patel(Home Minister). we could easily broke the protest of muslim league and jinnah. Nehru and Gandhi could have avoided the partition and subequent 1962, 1971 and 1999 fights with pakistan.

  68. Abhi ek accha sa article padh liya godse ke baare mein uski wahwahi karne lage abhi thode der baad terrorists ki feelings ke baare mein padh lenge toh uke upar daya aa jayegi aur unko accha bolne lagenge.
    Atleast try to understand the reasons which forced him to separate the 2 countries. I’m in class7 and have great respect for him aur agar aap logo ko abhi bhi akalna aaye to FOX History me great assasinations dekh lena.

    • Rakshita i am really proud of you for the maturity and sense of understanding that you show after reading your comments & those of someothers who abuse Gandhiji & you said that you are in the 7th std is awsome,let me also add something its very easy to stand under the shade of a tree and not know what the hot summer offers unless you have to stand under the sun,so this is for the people who abuse Gandhi its very easy to pass comments now without knowing the reality of situation in those days you are only passing comments after reading some comments written by a writer who probably does not know the facts himself,this is for all those people who very easily abuse Gandhiji take a simple test go & stand in the middleof the road try to collect a crowd & make them listen to a matter that is concerned with todays time for eg ,the 2G scam or the hordings that are being put up by political parties or try to gather some support for making ladies toilets in all the platforms & see how many people gather around you & listen to you,i bet none & Gandhiji gathred whole ofindia to listen to him so please accept that ther was someting in that Man.

      • THankyou so much and I totally agree with u.
        The 2G scam was no small thing and atleast now I found sumone who is in favour of Gandhiji.

    • u in still in 7th, so u telling this,,, till u get graduation, ur opinion changes… he is real fuckr.. i read his many books,, he did many things wrong thngs. . .

  69. AAp log Gandhiji ko itna bura bol rahehain yeh sochiye gandhi naamme hi itna dum hai ki Sonia Gandhi jaisi politician jisne kuch nahi kra sirf apne naam ke aage Gandhi lagaa lene se itne badi politician ban gaye.
    And for ur kind information there were two conditions put before Gandhiji-
    1.Either you give Jinnah and Nehru their separate Country.
    2.Or be ready for a war. and after so much of struggle and death of so many leaders such as Bhagat Singh, Subhash Chandra Bose what else could Gandhi do . Kehna bahut aasan hai ki main unki jagah par hota to yeh karta vo karta Aur karna bahut mushkil.
    Abd by the way these conditions were put by THe British Viceroy.

    • Dear Rakshita realy i proud of you ,to know about SWARAJ aur AZADI.you write about Gandhi surname SANIA MAINO SE SONIA GANDHI kyun bana unka surname Gandhi kyun bana karan kya hai ye actualy not belongs to gandhi family ye Nehur faimily ko belongs kar te hain .Unki piche Gandhi kyun laga is ka sachai kya hai.Har koi Gandhi suname hone se great nahi tota.Abhi actual Gandhi family main koi hai, kya kar raha hai inka kitna bal bacha the kisi ko pucho koi bata nahi payega.yese bathut kuch sachai hai jo class book main padhaya nahi jata.Agar kisi ko pucho ge Swaraj hum ko kis ne de Gandhi ne Agar bolu hum nai di .Gandhi as leader agee the hum sab ne mil kar Azadi mila.Hum ko jo AZADI mila kis adhar par mila karan kya hai Gandhi to dar ke angrejo bhag gaya ya aur kuch karan tha ye programme bhi Fox History main aa raha hai dekho Padho.Koi SARDAR PATEL ke bare main nahi bolta ajj ka BHARAT unki baja se.Desh main pahela tiranga Burma main kis ne lahraya tha SUBASH BOSE ne kise ko pata hai kya GANDHI to great hai ye log kya great nahi hai kya.Jo hua is ko bhul kar Pragati kaise karenge is ke bare main sochenge JAI HIND…..

        • Dear Rakshita you alwayas talking about FOX HISTORY programme but I read lot of books about GANDHIJI what was the real fact to asked to your teacher or elders they can explain you better ok.From my knowledge doo karan inki katal ke peche 1)Failure of Indian intelegence. 2)Partition of AKHAND BHARAT and soft corner to other community. This is the real fact for his assasinations.Another thing GANDHIJI fault is always support to Nehur and his demand through Gandhi at that time aur bhi powerful aur talented neta the SARDAR BALBHABAI PATEL Actualy ye pehela Prime minister bante AUR Bhagat Shing ko phasi pe ye diplomacy kare nahi to unko phasi nahi hota .Rakshita aur bahot kuch hai jo explain kar na muskil hai tum ye sab padho research karo about Gandhiji to sachai pata chalega.Hum ek insan ki achai paadh rahi hain burai bhi hai….Realy Rakshita i salute you about your intreste on this age ok SWARAJ KYA HAI PADHO….JAI HIND..

      • oh sushmita. jin logo nai jaan dai di usko to koe jaad nahi karta gandhi gandhi kurtay rehtay hai. keo nahi sumjti kai jai sub kush politics hai. india mai aak kur gandhi nai kabi bi angrajo sai maar nahi khaee agara unki pitaee kurtay angraj to aj gandhi v kehta kai en angrajo ko goli maar dooo.
        And one thing very important, anfter world war 2, england ki arthik haalat bahut mundi thi aor india kai freedom fightero sai vo tung thay or vo ab oar indian ko chala nahi suktay thay. that was the more important reason to leave the country. No body knows about it. ask from other’s countries people. and try to read WHAT WAS THE REASON TO LEAVE INDIAN.

    • Hi Rakshita,
      What do u think we are indepedent today after that descision of Gandhiji. NO. Today NCP is handled by a women, whose nationality is not indian by birth. Why is it so? is it that we indians do not have r8 people to lead india. NCP’s prime target is just to stuck on chairs. Who says we people are united today irrespective of any cast. This is only government who gives cast certificate to people.Based on that reservation are given today , based on that cast certificate today son and daughter of any politician getting admission in reputed colleges. Future of india are fake doctors and engineer and they are going to make 2020 india??real talent is lacking behind, because of this sytem rich people are getting more rich and poor becomes more poorer , they dont want to make changes in society because of bloody votebank. Nathrum Godse was aware of this thing at that moment, NCP kept gun on Gandhiji’s shoulders and killed every Indian for their and their family member’s political carrier. Why today such importance is given to only gandhi family, Number of freedom fighter was there Bhagat singh,Sukhdav, Rajguru, Chandra Shekhar Azad, Bose, Sawarkar,Mangal Pandey,Shastri. we can see number of comments against gandhiji then why gandhiji is our national father why not all those who has given up their lifes for freedom?

  70. I am sorry if i hurt any one’s feeligs but past ke baare me discuss karne se accha hai ki presentke politicians par koi step liya jaaye aur kisi ke baare mein jitna bura bolna hai boliye but plz dont use abusive language coz my friends love reading eveyone’s opinions but we are still young and dont want our school teachers to think wrong about you.(these are our opinions baaki aapke upar hai)
    Rakshita,Ankita,Shrashti,Mahima

    • Hi Rakshita,
      It is said that we should always learn from the history and understand the history to avoid the mistakes in future.
      We should always be aware of our history.

    • Hey,Rakshita M agree with you we ever discuss about past but never learn from that.This is time to make a better present n future.corruption is in vain of every Indian from a citizen to a leader but we discuss only and never try to do something.Godse is no more gandhi is no more but what we left with corrupted nation.we can only discuss but time to take step as taken by our real hero’s in past.

      • It’s very true and i agree with u that we should discuus about the past and learn from our mistakes so that we don’t repeat the mistakes in future.
        Iagree with you that someone should really take a step forward to make a better presen and future.But Who??

  71. Gandhi was not ahinsawadi .Ahinsa means when u suffer nobody by ur actions but he suffered other peole alot even he did’nt fight with guns but bring people and let the britishers punish them but Gandhi was never beaten up by britishers only innnocent people.i do’nt know why peole say him ahinsawadi he was a hippocrate

  72. godse was done the right job for our country but if gandhi dies before independence map of our counrty is different no body was suffered during partition of our country gandhi was a fucker old guy about taking interest in womens and teenagars girls he was mahatma in fucking(idiot0

    • I think Godse has done what he felt right. but the important thing is that, Gandhi was the main person behind the partition. And agar partition hua tab bhi sare muslims ko Pakistan nhi bheja gaya…wo bhi uski hi chu****panti thi… And as said by Nathuram agar wo nhi marta to hum kisi aur k gulam ho gaye hote… may be Pakistan k hi… bcoz wo admi to arm power badane nhi deta pure desh me lathi batwa deta… And the most important thing is that agar kisi ko Gandhi se itna hi pyar hai to jiske liye usne itna kiya(muslims) wo kyon nhi usko apna rashtapita mante… to hum kyon mane… mere liye wo 1 freedom fighter tha bus…aur kuch nhi

    • who ever you are my friend but i love that you had said that gandhi is a ass hole.because of that fucker the real hero sadar bhagat singh died.

  73. everybody who has posted
    pls for some respect u cant disguise gandhiji’s dedication toward indian independence. whatever he did is why that we are posting here. we are free, fredom is what the indian wnated. earlier that was frm the britishers and now its the freedom to speak. human rights, women welfare etc etc….. we indian should praise him for his achievement but alas we are not even grateful to the grear indian warrior.
    regarding pakistan there are many things compared between them n us. india has emerged has an developed country but where is pakistannow?? they are still killing each other and their ministers. other countries mark pakistan as a poor country. they are attacking india in manhy ways…. in form of terrorists, economically etc.
    if people think gandhi was worng and they didnt wanted the partition , i think it was not gandhis fauld. it was jinnah and nehru who made it possible. if yet those indians who dont understand should leave india and get settle in PAKISTAN. india will surely help them there. gandhi’s soul will certainly look after them cos they belong to one mother land. INDIA. LONG LIVE GANDHIJI. The Father of Mother India. JAI HIND

    • hello sir gandhi is the villan of our country, i wil tell wat happend.In 1920’s britishers decided to give freedom to india at that time gandhi stopped to give freedom to india why bacause at that time no body don’t know gandhi.In 1920 subhash chandra bose spoken with hitler to free india from england at war is going in between germany and england.Hitler is ready to help india.Gandhi killed subhash chandrabose with perfect paln.And he stopped india freedom in 1920 and later he started revolution on england for his name to become popular.

    • jignesh…there is a joke that gandhi was the father of the nation, becoz he screwed our mother india…in several ways…he was a politician who hankered for power & influence…he was a hypocrite and a british sycophant…many of his ideologies are not practical in the real world…consider this…if the allies did not use force against hitler, he would have killed thousand of more people…would non-violence work against such a person??? at times action is need, not just sitting back & harping on ahimsa !!! if u believe in gandhi’s idealogies, then u have to condemn lord rama (becoz he killed ravan) and lord krishna, the pandavas etc…even our past teaches us that to protect what is ours, we should use violent means if necessary…

    • Hi Julian, indian people still support indian politics even they know that all are corupted. If gandhi was right that why Nathuram killed him and he was not only person that hate gandhi but still many people hatebecause they know truth, truth from inside not that shown by gandhi. You dont know but indian people are crazyyyy. Try to do some search on internet regarding bad things of gandhi.

    • Hi Julian, these words are from Suneel, I just pasted here for you to read again.
      “i wil tell wat happend.In 1920′s britishers decided to give freedom to india at that time gandhi stopped to give freedom to india why bacause at that time no body don’t know gandhi.In 1920 subhash chandra bose spoken with hitler to free india from england at war is going in between germany and england.Hitler is ready to help india.Gandhi killed subhash chandrabose with perfect paln.And he stopped india freedom in 1920 and later he started revolution on england for his name to become popular.”

      • My dear friend in 1920 Hitler was bed ridden and was under treatment after WW1. Even Netaji was no where in the scenario of Indian politics (age 23 that time). India was led in this era by Lal-Bal-Pal. As Bal(Tilak) died in 1920 there was vaccumn in politics. Gandhi was no one in Indian politics at the same time and was running party called Satyagraha Mahasabha. So it is misunderstanding that Gandhiji ruined plans to get freedom. Gandhi killing is nothing but jealous act by bramhin community in Pune. And today all this support comes out just to make bramhins proud. By the way apart from killing Gandhiji what was great contribution from Godse for country?? was it even equal to his political master Tatyasheb Savarkar? What if attempt of Madallal Pahwa was succedeeded? Then was there chance to gratify this Godse?? Is there any other political figure from India which is known to rest of world? World outside still definitely counts Mr. Godse as terrorist.

          • Rakshita,terrorist is one whose only aim is to kill some-one for his personal gain. Could you tell me what was the personal benefit of Godse for Gandhi’s death?

        • andy andy andy…some of your comments are so stupid & ridiculous, i really dont feel like wasting my time on refuting them…when u ask about godse’s contribution to india, i think he did a great favour on us by killing gandhi…otherwise gandhi would have handed over all the wealth of india to pakistan on a silver platter…the world considers godse as a terrorist because that is the view that has been painted about him by the nehru-gandhi family which has been in power ever since !!! remember history is written by the victors…gandhi was a politician and hankered after power & influence…he was not a patriot…he was a master at managing perception and selling his ideologies…for the western world it is a fad to praise gandhi & his ideologies…it is stylish…however godse is revered by lakhs of indians as a true patriot !!!

        • andy, read about the life of nathuram godse, if u wanna know his contributions…he was a freedom fighter and a patriot who initially was inspired by gandhi…but later when he felt that gandhi is forcing the congress to pander to muslims and this is causing hindus to suffer, he started to reconsider gandhi’s ideologies…gandhi was a very stubborn guy who was prepared to let all hindus suffer because of his own principles, which were not very practical…he sat on a fast unto death to force the indian government to give 55 crores to pakistan…he also fasted to force hindu refugees who were seeking shelter in muslim mosques to leave those…he shed tears when muslims were killed in india, but was unconcerned about thousands of hindus massacred…gandhi, nehru etc are the only political figures known to the world, becoz they have been extensively promoted by congress which has been in power since independence…at the cost of other true martyrs like shaheed udham singh, bhagat & kartar singh…

    • Hi Julian you are a diffrent mantality you love mk gandhi but gandhi not gave you the power your father and mother gave you the power ok…

    • hi
      Gandhi was a big fool, his actions postponed freedom by 20 years. He was so weak inside. Further, to promote Nehru, he did a lot wrongs

  74. friends… whatever d disputes or discussions we had here, it leads only one thing,, hindu wont like nuslims n vice versa. . . and we contributed some things to improve country, i ll tell u, the time u log off, u ll be busy wid ur boy/gal friend.. . so nothing is going to happen, n i dont want to do anything.

    • I thoroughly support Nathuram and his act.
      First gandhi killed Bose, then a conspiracy of hanging bhagat singh, rajguru, sukhdev to death.
      So many fastings just for the development of pakistan.
      Forced Indian govt to give 33000 Cr Rs to Pakistan.
      In simple language he was an British Agent.

        • rakshita…i think he said that in jest…that might be his brand of humour…truly gandhi’s actions were more of a british agent than an indian…he played into the hands of the british and caused the partition…

      • i think that gandhijis thoughts were right and by godse india losen off a great developement.Gandhiji loves pakistan and india also.ifgandhiji didnt devide india then more indianans …………..

  75. If u consider Nathuram Ghodse as a Muslim (with all his thinking as Muslim), then most of us would call him Terrorist.
    Wake up people. Such articles are only making Hindu-Muslim fight instead of making a “United” India. This is good only for the Politicians (BJP or Congress doesn’t matter). All politicians are eating India and we know it. And we are sleeping and supporting such articles.
    Jaago Re..

  76. Dear all,
    Was watching the movie “Gandhi” played by Ben kinsley, found that
    Gandhi work were amazingly great. then suddenly a question arise in
    mind, if work was sooo great then why would some one kill him? so
    searched google and came up to this site.
    If these were the real reasons for killing Gandhi, “Shaheed” Nathuram
    Godse did very right. but yes, as someone rightly said, this should
    have been done much earlier.
    From this site also learned few more things and following queries
    arise in my mind:
    1. if Gandhi was Peace lover and non violent, what was the reason for
    him to agree to send Indian Soldiers for Brits on WW2? he could ve
    refused straight, as i believe we were neutral during WW2.
    2. When Jinnah and Nehru were fighting for the leadership and when
    everyone (masses) were ready to follow Gandhi, blindly, and when
    Gandhi was actually looking for peace, harmony, non violence and well
    being of the Country, why did he chose Nehru to be the first PM of
    Free India, instead, he could have easily chosen some third person,
    neutral, good leader for this post??
    Well what has happened, is a history, i agree, that every one should
    know about the real history, but the point now is what have we
    learned out of it?
    We are paying taxes both directly and indirectly in numerous forms,
    is it just to fulfill the curropt leaders greed? our tax money is not
    being utilised for the reason we are paying it for. every year there
    is a new Scam emerging up, with more no. of zeroes in the amount
    being scammed. this is our money. did someone ever realise that?
    Curroption will give rise to inflation, indirectly, and we tax payers
    will keep paying more and more tax in some or the other way.
    India gained its Independence in 1947, almost 2-3 years after Japan
    was bombed. Japan was zero then. and look at the progress they ve
    made now. where do they stand and where are we in comparision to
    them. Japan is just an example here.
    Analysis: what was it we were lacking ? i dont think any thing except
    for good leaders.
    few years back, large Indian population was a problem for indian
    growth, but if we look at it in a different way, considering india to
    be a service providing country, this population of india can be
    considered as strength. more so, when the working age people ratio is
    more as compared to Old+child age population.
    then why is it still a third nation? why still a developing country?
    The geographic conditions are also favouring most parts of the
    country wrt agricultural source of income.
    I still fail to understand why is there no revolt in our country like
    that in Egypt or Libya?? why cant we have some great leaders like
    Narendra Modi (donno much about his other background) who has changed
    the state of Gujarat and done lots of reforms?
    i believe, we should each of us try and do our best to work for one
    ownself, be true to the society, vow to eradicate curroption, and
    work towards stopping the wrong, if this is followed by every indian,
    we will be in a better prosporing, developed country, much ahead of
    USA and other developed Countries of the world
    we should forget castes creeds sex and believe only in humanity.
    well, i think bahut zyaada ho gaya hai….
    Regards,
    Kiran Jain

    • Yes Kiran you r right but u know what is the problem with indian, mostly they think anly about themself they r greedy that cant think about country. I live in Australia and you know I feel very sad when any oz (Austalian) says that Indain r very cheater they never think before cheating and talking lie for reason. I am relising that mostly that the reason that we are still a developing country, See 2G spectrum, ISRO S-Band Scam, Commonwealth Games Scam,Telgi Scam,Satyam Scam, Bofors Scam and many more Even every single person knows about it. It is too hard to change but posible. Change the congress, BJP and any other party. Even its not end too many things to change, need a big revolution.

      • Hi,
        To an extent, after thinking very deeply, i believe, curroption is necessary for a country to develop. its infrastructure to develop at a faster pace. as far as the same is in limit is acceptable.
        But here in India, the curroption has made its roots sooo deep that every level there is curroption and that too of a very large dimension.
        to such an extent that the departments which are required to be involved in investigating / solving the case are not able to do so as they themselves are involved.
        17 lac crore scam (17000000000000) (hope i ve put right no of zeros) cant be done by a single person alone in such a big democratic country.
        This case will never be solved and just to make it look like “being investigated” i donno how much more money are we gonna spend 🙁
        this was just 1 example of the scam which has come into picture, i believe due to some unsatisfied leader who has not got his share of money (and not because someone was too honest)
        there are many such cases unsolved / unearthed and the same will never ever be solved.
        thx to our highly curropt leaders.
        This brings question again in my mind, why am i living in this curropt country. but when researched, many other countries including USA is as curropt.
        one should watch the movie SICKO – a documentary by Michael Moore – on American health care industry.
        why are we soooo greedy about anything. Finally, how much do u need to live very very happily?? how many Crores? is the figure enough ever?
        I believe people in the history were much more happier than what we are today. though they didnt have much of technology and modern amenities but they lived peacefully. or is it they were not aware of the outside world as the communication mediums were not so powerful and fast as they are today? whatever…..
        Regards,
        Kiran Jain

      • kamal…you come across as a hypocrite…inspite of being an indian, you have chosen to spend your life in a well developed country like australia…you have preferred to run away from your roots…we indians who prefer to stay in our own country don’t need such commentary from the likes of you…as for aussies slanging you, i feel that it is becoz of people like you…the aussies regard indians as parasites, who come to their country & try to take their livelihood away…rather then staying back in own country and using ones education & training to make the nation better…so don’t sit out there and talk about revolution in india…to cause such a revolution, u need to come down here and get your hands dirty…which u are obviously afraid of doing !!!

        • What do u thing what I do here; u can’t say that I need to come here. I do my best for, not for whole country but for my village. Helping poor people who doesn’t get any help for government from people like u who can’t help by living in India. I did my best for my city people
          Sometime u don’t need to dirty ur hands
          Sometime touch ur beautiful hand to make some once beauty
          Listen Mr. Mohan don’t talk if u don’t know any thing a person. Read or try to find like I do and other are doing to share discussions.
          Doesn’t blame only, do something if u can do OK?
          And dont feel bad we are friends.

    • I feel we really cant do anything in this society of “We the assholes of India”. Pardon me for the harsh language used, but believe me we deserve much more than this…
      Example 1: Was just talking to one of my colleages at work and he was proud to say, the mamu caught him and he gave him Rs100 bucks and it was all over. This is just an example of the many things that we do often and feel proud that we didnt waste our time/money in following the actual procedure..
      Example 2: We goto branded(Reebok, Nike) showroom to buy a pair of shoes, it costs us some 3-4k. Do we ever dare to ask them how that level of pricing just for a pair of shoes. Maybe they are right in the pricing, but do we ever care of what we are paying for? A coolie who asks you 100 bucks for example, we literally fight with them over the pricing…. great isnt it
      Example 3: When in college, we used to have fests. Students were assigned money for completing their part of work. Most of the students never returned the remaining amount, but showed fake bills to show that they overshoot the given budget, thus extracting more money from the college management!!….. same was done by Dear Kalmadi. Those students could do it for thousands/hundreds…as it was within their reach…and Kalmadi did it for 10k thousands…which was his reach!!!
      Becoming like Egyptians or Lybians wouldnt solve the problem alone, we need a reform on our own as well. We need to change our socitey… the way it is now. And the best part is we need to act now when we are at our deepest sleep 🙁
      You guys know termites ??? they slowly eats up the wood they live on and then move on !!! we are the same. Dont blame it on the Political parties who are rotting the country. We are all eating this country from everyway possible. If we call it Mother India, then must admit we are all motherF***ers.
      Change the way you see the society. Dont see it as a cashcow, instead look at it as our mother nation and treat it the same way you treat your mom.
      Some things which I can think of, which we can follow:
      1. Obey the traffic rules (I get irritated by the fellow drivers daily…so it came the first in my mind)
      2. Pay taxes regularly. Dont try to steal/hide taxes
      3. Report if you see an irregularity in any form. And just keep tracking it till closure.
      4. Dont allow anyone in your family to enjoy breaking rules(I guess easy one if you cant follow the 3rd point)
      5. Respect humans as well as animals. (Most Important… saw it in UK and it really feels great when you give respect to unknown people…try it…you will love the smile you get in return 🙂 )
      6. Treat the public machinery, equipments as best as possible.
      7. Keep your area clean, maybe can form a group and clean your building/house/local area. Clean Society>>Healty People>> better Thoughts>>great nation
      8. Try to give your best to anything you do.
      9. Be Positive and dont be guided by others false statments
      Following these above rules does not guarantee the End of All the Bad Things in our Society, but will surely create a healthy environment wherein we can lay the foundation for the next generation. 🙂
      As for Nathuram and Gandhiji, they are history now…time to move on buddy. Maybe both were right, maybe both were wrong. What do we have to do with it???? We cant change it now. But surely we can change the society we live in today…so lets work together to build a better tomorrow.

      • The information u gave is so simple but very amazing…because if all the assholes of India( Sorry for my language) follows this we can be a developed country rather than a developing country which I m learning from my school days…Hope who read u r instructions will follow to their best to change our country…Apart from citizens I feel politics is also playing a major role in hindering the Indian Development which has to be taken care.

  77. Gandhi and Nehru should have been killed earlier.It was too late had they been shot dead earlier INDIA would have been much better place.

    • Gandhi is great and new Indian weakness thats why he opted for no-voilence.If he opted for war,his own people would have back stabbed him. History of thousands of maharajas who were fighting each other lead to mughal and british rule thats the truth. Godse was a misguided emotional reckage. Its very clear in this article.His talk about Hindhu unity is an eye wash.Even today its very clear. Where the money collected for Ram Temple is gone. There was no muslims or Cristians in India. Why so many people got converted from a very easy way of life. Its atrocity and back stabing of our own Hindhus lead to all this.With one babri we have to spend lakhs of crores for the security related issues. The greed of coming to power has done this.Even today its thousand of casts,regions streets….for some reason or the other Indians dislike each other.Now Telangana pls look at it how they are fighting among themselves. Hope they are not China agents…China wants to see us twenty to thirty small states thats not united India!

      • Gandhi is great and knew Indian weakness thats why he opted for non-voilence.If he opted for war,his own people would have back stabbed him. History of thousands of maharajas who were fighting each other lead to mughal and british rule thats the truth. Godse was a misguided emotional reckage. Its very clear in this article.His talk about Hindhu unity is an eye wash.Even today its very clear. Where the money collected for Ram Temple is gone. There were no muslims or Cristians in India before. Why so many people got converted from a very easy way of life. Its atrocity and back stabing of our own Hindhus lead to all this.With one babri we have to spend lakhs of crores for the security related issues. The greed of coming to power has done this.Even today its thousand of casts,regions streets….for some reason or the other Indians dislike each other.Now Telangana pls look at it how they are fighting among themselves. Hope they are not China agents…China wants to see us twenty to thirty small states thats not united India!

        • ranjansh…your english is as shitty as your logic and reasoning…infact you come across as a frustrated individual who has scant understanding of indian culture and hindus…your style of writing and sentence formation is atrocious…first learn how to communicate properly, then write on such forums…
          you fool, every nation has its share of rotten apples…godse was a true patriot who was disillusioned by gandhi and his hypocritic behaviour…same as shaheed bhagat singh, who gave up his life so that retards like you could enjoy your precious freedom !!!

    • Saurya and others, you all are are ass holes and should by hanged like Nathuram for treason. I am a supporter of Bose, but at the same time do realize that without Gandi we would still be slaves of your master the Britishers. Gandhi was a man, and by that definition he may have been wrong sometimes but without him we would have been slaves of your masters.

      • rana u are a brainless ape and a moron…an ignoramus if u feel that without gandhi we should be still under british raj…in fact thousands of satyagrahis were routinely beaten up & killed by british cause they embraced ahimsa as promoted by gandhi…instead if we had more revolutionaries like bhagat singh, kartar singh sarabha & udham singh, english would have left our nation and run away in terror much earlier…if ur theory about india not getting independence without gandhi & his non-violent agitation is true, that would mean that even great people like shivaji, rana pratap & tipu sultan who fought bravely against foreign invaders were fools…instead they should have resorted to satyagraha !!!

    • dear friends,
      ek hindu hone k nate main ye manta hu k jo Nathu ram godse ne kia wo sahi tha.bilkul shi tha….balkiye sab agr pehle ho gya hota to India kab ka aazad ho gya hota….inki wazah se india azzad ni h balki abi bi wo British Empire ka ek Dominion State h yani ek slave country.commonweath me India ki jo entry h wo independent ni balki ek slave country ki hasiyat se h.Bhut log ye mante h k India gandhi k andolano ki wajah se free hua…..ye bilkul galat h.balki British empire second world war ki wajah se bhut weak ho gya tha.isliye unko jana pada.pr jate jate unhone desh ki satta gandhi or nehru k haatho me sop di.or nehru k bare main to sabhi jante h k uski sharir hindustani tha pr aatma angrez thi….chahe koi jo bi kahe Gandhi must be treated as a”father of pakistan” na ki “father of our nation”…or nehru jaisa kamina aadmi na hi aaj tk paida hua h na hi hoga.

  78. I regard Shaheed Nathuram Godse as a true & dutiful Indian.May his soul rest in peace!!!
    Gandhi & Nehru were two very shrewd & cunning politicians who had created such a massive & largescale disaster that the whole of the Hindu race is still suffering & will continue to suffer…
    Majority of the present day Indians blindly believe in Gandhi & even brain wash their kids to worship Gandhi. A large population of people still call him “mahatma” rather than calling him “duratma” . Kids learn his title “mahatma” first before they learn his real first name.
    95% of Idians do not know that it was he who led to the downfall of great freedom fighters like Bhagat Singh & Subhash Chandra Bose who had given up everything to free India.Gandhi just kept on appeasing the British Government & the Muslims at the cost of the lives & honour of the normal, ordinary Hindus who r still suffering till this date throughout the entire subcontinent!!!
    It was he & J. Nehru who made the Punjab Lion Bhagat Singh die. It was he who led to the disappearance of the Royal Bengal Tiger , Subhash Chandra Bose. These men could have got unified India independence long back. During WW II when England was initially being thrashed by Germany Bose wanted to take complete charge of the oppurtunity to strengthen freedom movement , but he prevented him becoz he never wanted India to thrive at the expense of England,s loss . Instead he encouraged more Indians to go & fight for Britain!!! He never supported industrialization in India. Whenever non schedule caste Hindus where in danger he never stood by them.He purposly tried to upheld the schedule caste & Muslims for fame. It was he who further seperated sheduled caste people & divided Hindus. thus he has done much more harm than good!!! Today sheduled caste have reservation in every field. This has resulted in further division of the Hindus & more hatred is generated between these two divisions of the Hindus ,thanks to Gandhi!!!!!

    • You are a Complete Idiot. You are fool of the highest degree imaginable. Try and do one thing, just ONE thing that makes YOU a revolutionary today. Stand up to the White Man who has still got you in chains for just ONE DAY. You will FAIL. Because you are a Complete Idiot.

    • It would not do to completely disregard Gandhiji’s achievements. After all, he was the one who converted the freedom struggle into a nationwide movement. While he had many faults, we cannot completely disregard his strengths. For this reason I think that calling Gandhiji a ‘Duratma’ is not right.

    • Whenever we talk about the past, a few principles need to be kept in mind. Just because different people ahve different methods does not mean one is good and other one bad. Methods of Gandhiji, Nehruji, Gokhaleji were different from Bhagat Sinhji or Netaji. But no one can deny they were all great people with trmendous love for the country. They are all worth worshipping. No need to force a choice. As for present day, I think the whole world is a village. We cannot afford to be divided on basis of race, religiion, colour or language etc. There is place for everyone and we need to live togther. Look what happened in Japan…all of us need to take care of them now. The world is shrinking. Remember, it is people in our country who said thousands of years ago….vasudhaiva kutumbakam. Facebook is making it possible now !!

    • britishers used gandhi as to safely rule india…and gandhi with his stupid followers…allowed and supported..the britishers..no one knows why gandhi starts a movement and suddenly he stops it…when it is very high….
      I think he is the chamcha of britishers…who indirectly supported britishers to rule.

  79. I reALLY need ur opinions on this topic
    Do you really think that Netaji Subhash Chandra Bose was killed in a plane crash or there were some other Reason
    If he survived in that crash where did he go and what happened to his ashes???? What do u all think
    Do reply soon

    • Hi Rakshita, Still its a mystry about Netajis death,but its a hidden truth Netaji not died in plane crash but one question arise here why he cannot back to his mother land still india goverment hidden the file between india and british goverment.what Gandhi commited to britishers thats the main resons he not back to his mother land .britisher wanted Netaji Subash Chandra Bose jinda ya murda hum ko chaiye….you just think Gandhian policy ye subject jab padh ta hoon to mera khoon garam hota hai.. Rakshita ABOUT Netaji mystrious life padho research karo to Gandhi giri ke bare main pata chalega……JAI HIND.

      • shivaji. Ur statement gv me clue dat u r deep beliver of netaji.but u hv lack of knowledge.netaji was accused by international court.that is the reason he never came in lime lyt

        • Dear Aditya,please tell me what is international court at that time and why he was acused.Only cause is he war agnaist britisher by the help of Germany,Japan and Italy.Aditya is desh main angrejo ko nikal kar BURMA main pehla janda lahraya Subash Chanra Bose ne ajj tak ye kis ne kiya aur ek bat indepedence ke bat Nehur ne prime minister of england ETLY ko Subash KE BARE MAIN KYA LETTER LIKH KE DIYA THA.AT THAT TIME INTERNATIONAL COURT INKI HAT MAIN THA TO INHO NE HAMARE LEDAR KE SAMNE CONDITION RAKHE HUM RAJI HO GAYE ITS A SHAME.SACHAI KYA HAI SWARAJ HUM KO KIS NE DI GANDHI NE IS KE SAM NE SAB BALI PADE IS NAM SE KOI BADA NAHI HO SAKTA YE KARAN THA…….JAI HIND

    • it is one of the great unsolved mysteries and i suspect that it will remain unsolved…like all conspiracy theories, there is a humongous amount of speculation involved…do not worry your pretty head so much…if netaji expired in the plane crash, he is a true martyr…if he somehow survived, cheers to him…

  80. gandhi is back now u indians get ready to be f**ked again.now i have taken viagra to increase my f**king power.this time i will fuck congress also because i alone want to f**k all indians

  81. gandhi is back now u indians get ready to be f**ked again.now i have taken viagra to increase my f**king power.this time i will f**k congress also because i alone want to f**k all indians

  82. wow! you people are accusing Gandhi..please do some deep research..what you guys have done for your country? A man stood up for his country and fought for his people. He is not the reason for the condition of India now. he is not the reason of partition between India and Pakistan occurred. Problem between Hindu and Muslim were there long before Independent and he worked hard and tried to educate his people. name one great person born in India after Gandhi died. with the name of religion, people do shitty stuff forreal..

    • you are the one who need to do “deep research”…most indians know that it was because of gandhi’s pandering to muslims that pakistan was created…and still continues to pester us like a canker sore…gandhi was a politician and not a patriot…he sought power & influence…unlike shahid bhagat singh who only wished to be martyred in the name of his nation, so that his sacrifice would serve as inspiration for thousands of indians…gandhi played in the hands of the british who used divide & rule policy to undermine india…

    • what deep research are you talking about??? if u read india’s history properly, u will understand that nehru, gandhi & congress were responsible for partition and loss of thousands of lives…true patriots are people like udham singh, bhagat singh & kartar singh…bhagat & kartar singh embraced martyrdom willingly in the full bloom of their youth (bhagat 23 yrs & kartar 18 yrs), unlike gandhi who was killed by a fellow indian…opportunists like gandhi use religion to forward their own political influence & power…gandhi went on a fast unto death so that indian government should give 55 crores to pakistan…he also demanded that hindu refugees occupying mosques at time of partition should leave…he never protested the killing of thousands of hindus in pakistan…only shed tears for muslims killed in india !!!

    • the muslim appeasement has been started from the day we got independence and still it is continuing..gr8 mera bharath mahaan….congress…..ruining india….

    • To Tenzin,
      I agree with your thoughts that a man stood up for his country and fought for the people. But, similarly many people like Bhagat Singh, Netaji and many other great people stood to fight up for the country. And to your answer name one GREAT person who was born after Gandhi died, it would be SRI SRI RAVISHANKAR. Gandhiji tried to bring the whole country together. He is bringing the whole humanity together:D…cheers..

      • Lol, you must be joking, Ravi shankar is only making money by selling his expensive courses and his fake products,, he has opend up sri sri university also,, just try to get your son addmission there and u will realize how costly it is,,

  83. nathuram godase was a man believe on caste system and suprimacy of his priesty caste.gandhiji give messages for equal rights to all.they opposed the supremacy of any caste or religion.this is because jatiwadi nathuram and his friends are planned to kill gandhi.

    • Nathuram Godse did not believe in the supremacy of the bramhin class. He believed that it was not necessary to divide the Indian Subcontinent. He was also opposed to the 55 crore donation given by India to Pakistan after the partition. Gandhiji was behind both of these actions. This forced Nathuram Godse to assassinate Gandhiji, with a view of preserving what was left of India.
      It is also important to note that Pakistan refused to allow Gandhiji’s ashes to be poured into the Indus river as was his will.
      Nathuram Godse was a patriot in a true sense, he knew that there was a limit to one’s endurance and peaceful aitations will only take you so far.

  84. No doubt NATHURAM’S act was CRIMINAL…but his THOUGHT was..REVOLUTIONARY….he should also be rightly called as KARNTIKARI GODSE…as was BHAGAT SINGH as was..NETAJI…!!!!!! JAY HIND!!

    • Hi Adi,
      still we are misguided plz azadi kis ne di hum ne kis adhar par ajadi mila condition kya tha plz batao about mahatma gandhi.

  85. I stronlgy supported nathu ram godse at what he did.
    Gandhi had an opportunity to stop bhagat Singh ,rajguru and sukhdev execution but he did not.
    He said to the britishers that we felt guilty due to their voilence act and we are not with them.
    With his wordings they get encouraged and executed them.
    Because they killed british officer jp saundans who killed lala lajpat rai by beating with sticks.
    Killing thousands of innocent unarmed indians in jalliawala bagh amritsar was a voilence act or non-voilence act by the britishers.
    After 21 years of jalliawala baghs killing shaheed udham singh took avenged of india by killing dwyers responsible for the killings.
    “At a public meeting in Kanpur, a speaker stated that “at last an insult and humiliation of the nation had been avenged” by udham singh.
    Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose was the only public leader of great importance who approved of Udham Singh’s action”
    While pt nehru and gandhi had condemned the Caxton Hall shooting by udham singh and So called MAHATMA said that “the outrage has caused me deep pain. I regard it as an act of insanity…
    I ask one question to all MAHATMAS fan’s today do you all feel guilty on VOILENCE act of bhagat and udham singh.? But gandhi felt guilty.
    We got independence due to these violent heroes. NOT DUE TO GANDHI AND NEHRU.
    Others violent herores were jansi ki rani, tipu sultan, shiva ji rao, neta ji subhas chandra boss, kartar singh sharaba and many many more.
    Ram chander ji , krishan ji , guru gobind singh ji they fought againt voilence. Voilence of killing innocent peoples. They all did voilence against voilence ,the voilence which kills innocent poeples, their independence, their peace.
    All the three were also good politicians.
    If there actions were not considered voilent then why bhagat singh’s and udham singhs action was voilent for gandhi.?
    Gandhi did nothing he played a very safe game. He was coward He enjoyed every momnent even when he was in prison.
    Bhagat singh was tourched in jails, put on ice slabs ,britishers put salt .on his wounds etc etc
    But gandhi lived relaxed life even in the jails. Because brithishers were not scared off gandhi but they were scared from bhagat singh’s and such other voilent heros
    So shanti ki baat bi waha hoti ha jaha dusra bi santi banaye rakhna chahta hoi.

    • All the people you mentioned had a common thing in them, love for their country, my I bow my head to them. However, I hope you will agree that Turth and Non Violence is what this world needs today so very badly. Look what has happened sicne he has gone. Sourth Africa and latest example Egypt…they succeeded on basis of his principle. Nathu did not fully understand that Gandhiji’s methods take longer time, but those are much stronger. Is it not true that Indian Muslims are doing better than those in Pakistan. Are we not a better country because of all of us live togther? Clearly Gandhiji, Nehruji and the like were correct, else why only India stands so much tall compared to other countries which also gained independence. Think, you need to evaluate the performance over a period of time.

    • hi RS Singh I appritiate your thinkiking,
      but I want to ask one question to you
      apne kabhi jhoot bola hai?
      aisi konsi galati ki hai jo kisi ko pata chal jaye to
      apki jindigi kharab ho sakati hai
      agar ha
      to kya aap me himmat hai use us insan ke samne kabul kar sakte ho jis ko ye galati pata chale to wo kabhi bhi aapse baat karna nahi chayenge
      sach bol ne ke liye himmat lagati hai

      • Haan mujhe pata hai sach bolnay ke liye himmat chahiyea. Kya tumhay pata hai ki sach bolne pe aur sacch ka saath denay pe jaan bi ja sakti hai.
        Magar chetan mujhe aap ki baat ki samjah nahi aaye.
        Kaya aap yeh kah rahe ho ki gandhi ek saacha aadami tha.
        chetan mujhe yeh bataoo ki gandhi ke agendo mein kyun sara hindustan uss ke saath chalta tha. ? Aur bhagat singh aur uss ki party “gadar ” ke saath kyun ginti ke log hote thay.
        Kyuki sab ko pata tha ki gandhi ke saath chalne mein unki zindgiaa ko koi khatra nahi hai woh sab save hai. “Due TO NON-VOILENCE” funda
        magar my dear chetan bhagat singh ke saach ke saath wohi hindustani tha jin ko pata tha shir(head) dey kar aazadi milti hai. Aur woh sab aazadi ke liye marne ke liye tiaar thay.
        toh yaha do saach hai ek gandhi ka saach jo bolta hai aur karta utna hay jis se zindagi ko koee problem na ho.
        Aur bhagat singh and such voilent freedom fighters ka saach jaha pe mout (death)hai.
        Gandhi aur bhagat singh dono ne hunger strike ki par chetan tumhay pata hai
        ghandhi ki hunger strike ek childlish hunger strike hoti thi kyuki usse pata tha ki mujhe manane wale.bohut hai.
        Magar bhagat singh aur uss ki saathioo ko manane wala koi.nahi tha.
        chetan aagar tum hungar strike ghar ke logo main karogay aur jaha tume manane wale ho to kya uss hunger strike ki koi value rahi gi kya?
        So gandhi ne utna hi kiya jis.se zindgi ko koi khatra na ho es liye sare log uss ke saath thay.
        Tum mere saache hone ki baat kar rahe ho.
        Chetan aagar tumare samnay koi tumare papa ko chanta mare to kya tum gandhi ke non- voilnece principle pe chalogay aur kya tum apne papa ko bolo gay papa dusra bhi gal aagay kar do?
        So just think what you have said. Aur meri kisi baat ka mind mat karna.

  86. In reallity gandhi was not in favour of non-violence, from the inner core of his heart he was a born coward who always wanted to be the one man standing for our country’s freedom . he was coward in his thoughts so does his followers ,who can’t even resist brutallity there is no still found evidence about what happened to bose but if he had took control over our country ,india would have been a far better place to live in….

    • Gandhi ji some time right, but what happen when tagor give him the surname mahatma hi try to become mahatma, but reality is that he was a ordinary man. but he think in himself that watch ever he think that is right and start taking unpractical decision like Hindi language ,NO need to go all Muslim to Pakistan,chose Nehru as PM,sardar patal can be good PM,
      I understand Gandhi philosophy but how can you say that those how not follow Gandhi they are not freedom fighter ,when 23 year Yong boy(Bagat singh) sacrifice her life and you not respect her any one can ask about you mahatmanees.
      but this is all history now time come to create new Hindustan where every one can get justice ,freedom.
      pls cast your vote to new party not that party who rule 55 year and nothing did special for our country.

  87. If Gandhiji would not have existed, we would have got freedom. But we would have ended up like Afghanistan. Where each person gets votes by power, not by democracy. People not to realize this should review books of history and philosophy.
    Ps. I salute Veer bhagat singh and all freedom fighters, who had the courage to stand up for india
    Ps. My great grand father used to fund the above movements which Bapu hated.

  88. why gandhi step back from “asahkar andolan” when it was in full swing?
    it made shri.bhagatsingh to take the path of violence.
    why he didn’t stopped death sentence of shahid bhagatsingh, rajguru, sukhdev even though he could hav?
    he once praised hitler saying “he is a great man. he made Germany prosperous. (referring to agricultural and industrialization)”. didn’t he knew the foundation of that progress covered with Jew’s blood?
    he was no one but the dirty hearted politicians…….

  89. hi all friends for your kind information,
    Jawaharlal neharu know the facts gadhiji has been assassinated by nathuram godse before 2-3 weeks.
    and neharu wants become a PM after indipendiace indaia.neharu also killed Netaji subhash Chandra bose

  90. TO CHETAN
    Haan mujhe pata hai sach bolnay ke liye himmat chahiyea. Kya tumhay pata hai ki sach bolne pe aur sacch ka saath denay pe jaan bi ja sakti hai.
    Magar chetan mujhe aap ki baat ki samjah nahi aaye.
    Kaya aap yeh kah rahe ho ki gandhi ek saacha aadami tha.
    chetan mujhe yeh bataoo ki gandhi ke agendo mein kyun sara hindustan uss ke saath chalta tha. ? Aur bhagat singh aur uss ki party “gadar ” ke saath kyun ginti ke log hote thay.
    Kyuki sab ko pata tha ki gandhi ke saath chalne mein unki zindgiaa ko koi khatra nahi hai woh sab save hai. “Due TO NON-VOILENCE” funda
    magar my dear chetan bhagat singh ke saach ke saath wohi hindustani tha jin ko pata tha shir(head) dey kar aazadi milti hai. Aur woh sab aazadi ke liye marne ke liye tiaar thay.
    toh yaha do saach hai ek gandhi ka saach jo bolta hai aur karta utna hay jis se zindagi ko koee problem na ho.
    Aur bhagat singh and such voilent freedom fighters ka saach jaha pe mout (death)hai.
    Gandhi aur bhagat singh dono ne hunger strike ki par chetan tumhay pata hai
    ghandhi ki hunger strike ek childlish hunger strike hoti thi kyuki usse pata tha ki mujhe manane wale.bohut hai.
    Magar bhagat singh aur uss ki saathioo ko manane wala koi.nahi tha.
    chetan aagar tum hungar strike ghar ke logo main karogay aur jaha tume manane wale ho to kya uss hunger strike ki koi value rahi gi kya?
    So gandhi ne utna hi kiya jis.se zindgi ko koi khatra na ho es liye sare log uss ke saath thay.
    Tum mere saache hone ki baat kar rahe ho.
    Chetan aagar tumare samnay koi tumare papa ko chanta mare to kya tum gandhi ke non- voilnece principle pe chalogay aur kya tum apne papa ko bolo gay papa dusra bhi gal aagay kar do?
    So just think what you have said. Aur meri kisi baat ka mind mat karna.

    • hi every one i m agreed with R S Singh . coz Gandhi ji might be wrong in some of his descisions but truth iz that his Gandhigiri only did a tremendous job to get freedom 4 India .If we would have fought according 2 Bhagat singh Subhash Chandra Bose. our country would ve got independence in 1960 or later on . It was the fact in terms of weapons we were nothing in front of British Empire. Ghandhi ji’s unique movements n heart touching techniques were awesome even we can use it even now as well ya Pakistan was a great mistake. Gandhi ji could have stopped Jinnah in a better way. nevertheless kuch pane ke liya kuch khona padta hai N 4 all my viewers i would urge u 2 buy n watch Lage Raho Munnabhi to understand Ghandi ji in a better way.

    • me tumse agree nahi hu…mera manana he k gandhi was a gr8 man…and he lead us to freedom….aur jab sab log unke saath isliye the k unhe pata k unhe jaan ka koi khatara nahi hoga to isme buri baat kya he….

  91. bhaiyo, jai shri nathuram godse!
    jo bhi shri Nathuram godse ko bura kahata hai aur gandhi ko achha kahta hai wo bilkull agyani hai, agyani ka matlab wh kewl srkari kitabo ka hi gyata hai na ki anya kuchh nish-paksh kitabo ka,
    bhaiyo mai aap logo ko “FREEDOM AT MID NIGHT” padane ka sujhav dunga jo ki bahut hi achhi pustak hai, kripya agar sambhav ho to ise jroor pade!
    bhaiyo, mai ek chij aap logo ko kahana chahonga ki Brahmano ne hindutva tatha desh ke liye marane me sabse jyada aage rhe hai, chahe wo Shri Mangal Pandey rahe ho ya shri Nathuram godse ji lekin desh un brahmano ke sath kaisa vyawhar kr raha hai, secondary citezenship, reservation aadi
    how bad resrvation is!!!
    Jai Bharat! Jai shri Nathuram Godse Ji!!
    mera smprk sutra 8750981762

  92. Gandhiji killed by Nathuram Godse, may it is right in sight of the people against Him. But it unright in sight of GOD, no body has authority against life and God Alone has authority to take life and give life. It is always 50% agreeable and 50% dissagreeable in any matter, “this dsn’t mean that Man to take Chargeable against Man” Each and every Man is accountable to God Alone. As per me, if Nathuram Godse worked in one diognal for the Indian Democracy, Gandhiji too worked in different diognal for the democracy of our country.Any religions blood is red, so All are one” all are created by one God. Let’s join together for the gain for other indians.

    • I think Mr.Godse as an avatar as god who killed an adement man like Ghandhi.Actually at first Mr.Godse is also a follower of Ghandi, being irritated from the activities of ghandhi he killed him and said the GREAT work of ghandi like eliminating BOSE from congress for trying to ask help from Japan for the army to help India to get freedom from british.

    • Then why Law and why Punishment? Nobody has the right to kill other. There should be no ‘Hang till Death’.
      Isn’t it, Mr Indian?

    • teri jath ka faida marooo. u had seen whether nathuram has taken money fo that job (gandu gandhi assasin). don’t talk like a country fool.

  93. It is with great sadness that I write this comment as many of you condone such terrorism. Gandhi did try to prevent partition of India. the parts of India whihc are not Pakistan and Bangladesh had 20% hindus at that time. Today it is less than 2% in Pakistan. There were over 300 temples in Pakistan. No one including Gandhi would toady say that everything went perfectly. It was not an internet era and they did not send emails. Documents have shown that pressure for a separate state was not just from Jinnah but also from Siks who wanted a separate state of Kalistan and most of the princely states did not want to join India at all. British asked Cyrill Radcliff to divide India and he drew lines through streets of Punjab separating families. None of the congress memebers agreeded to the separation. However when the govt in UK changed and they did not have much money due to world war 2 they they were put under lot of pressure by the US to decolonize and all that Mount Batten wanted was to give India independence and get out. How could Godse be part of all these higher level discussions and political documents. These documents have all been published now by Indian government and british government. Godse was so misguided that he decided that by killing Gandhi he would solve the issues. Gandhi had to ask for 55 million rupees to be given to Pakistan so that they would not die of famine and hunger. Many Hindus would die too. He did not anticipate that Hindus and muslims would clash and die as they had lived as neighbours for centuries. Congress believed that Jinnah would see that light and come back to India. Jinnah died with a year due to cancer. Hindus killed muslims and muslims did the same. The situation was inflamed further by Siks but today they take no responsibility for the massacre. Look at what is happening in Afghanistan and Palestine today. Do you think India could have fought against the mighty British? Do you think Netaji Subahshchandra Boses intention of taking Japanese and hitlers help would have worked. Both Japanese and Hitler did such acts of genocide against Jews, polish people and Aussies that British look like puppies. Please read history. Donot blame the current state of corrupt Indian political system on Gandhi. He would not have tolerated it in any way. Gandhi saw himself at a figurative head to lead a group of people but he never wanted any statues or photos of him in any way. His job would be done after the independence so that he could persue Ashram living. How many of you can sacrifice everything in life for India? How many of of you have paid money to charity to educate atleast one child in India? How many please write up. It is easy to say these things reading propaganda by political parties etc. Truth is out there if you want to find it. But dont believe in false propaganda and falseness of lies sperad by people like Godse. These people did not want to live with Muslims which could not have been possible. Muslims have been a part of India since 725AD. This carzy notion that Godse did the right thing is sad and misguided. All dociuments are published on the web and books. read it and find out the truth.

    • I would like to recall the Godse last desire before death, he wanted to keep his Asthis undissolved until & unless Pakistan comes into the Akhand Bharat. He also desired to keep Akhand Bharat Map & Bhagawa Zenda in his hand it proves that he was also a great patriot & wanted Pakistan in India & against Partition means he was ready to live with Muslims. He also clearly mentioned that he would not mind if Jinnah becomes Prime Minister but he was against the partition. I think my friend hasn’t got much information about Godse before commenting. Off course Gandhiji was a great man, he made a huge contribution to make India free, but its history that he unknowindly costed the nation so much for the fullfillment of his principles & will. It is said that no individual is great than a nation that thing was unknowingly going to happen.

    • your kind of thinking is only responsible for today India’s plight, if you have any idea of real history, it is fact that ghandhiji, failed miserably against the iron will and intelligence of jinnah, and he did failed to see the history of muslims. it is fact that he was loved by hindus only , a community which he unknowingly hurt most. we fully agree with martyr Godse.

    • nyaya, i believe ur way of thinking is totaly correct. godse was fired up by some thoughts n did NONSENSE.he did such a stupidity that our nation sufferred from big loss

    • Godse was inspired by Veer Savarkar… Savarkar wrote that he had no issues with Muslims but had issues with minority politiks… his point of view was that no minority can dictate terms for the majority. You cannot appease minority at the cost of the majority, no offense to any religion plz. Godse mentioned how Gandhi declared civil disobedience movements and how he called ’em off at will… many pple disobeyed civil service during British times by not working for the municipality or government and then suddenly found themselves w/o jobs when the civil disobedience was called off… while the INC seemed to have patched up with the government temporarily. more than 50 martys were sentenced on death row for misconduct. Of course Gandhi was a great man, no one ordinary and no one can deny that. And Savarkar or Godse didn’t mean to fight a military war with Britain. People who had to move to India or Pakistan lost watever they had. Most affluent Lahore families came down to India and lived in refugee camps for many yrs after. Most pple were left w/o a livelihood even longer. You would never know wat it feels to lose watever you have, would you?. Living in another part of the country won’t make you understand the hardships pple had to go thru to start afresh.

  94. I agree with Godse 100%. British were civilized people so they understood Gandhiji’s non-violence but the muslims are a curse to earth. Muslim don’t understand non-violence. If you show them your head for Laathi, they will cut your head with sword. So at the time of partition, we should have continued to let the riot happen. As there is muslim minority, they can’t sustain. But now due to partion, till now we are still fighting and the ugly minded, mosquitoes of filthy sewage pakis still in the darkness of hatredness. Actually they need slavery. By the way the present condition of pakistan shows Ginnah’s filthy mind. I respect gandhiji as he is a hindu. I respect for him for his intelligence but I strongly disagree for not taking responsibility for the country and the decision for partition. A true indian…

  95. Before posting any comment here, should we think whether we are at the right position to comment against our freedom fighter like Bhagat singh, Netaji Subhash as well as Mahatma Gandhi. We are independent for them. An independent India is not gifted by any single person. We got it, due to the sacrifice of all our freedom fighters including Gandhiji. There might be different way of movements, but, all the movements were against British Government.
    They tried their best to give us a chance to live in independent India. But, we also have some duties to make our country beautiful. If, we only think or comment what was the dealing done during the independence, I think it will not help our country
    to grow.
    Our freedom fighters tried their best to give us independence and they had to sacrifice their happiness, wealth, relatives, career, and lives for that. Do we think about those kind of sacrifices to make our country beautiful? If not, then why we are commenting here to dishonour our freedom fighters? At least, they were not corrupted like today’s politicians.

  96. The timing was not perfect. Gandhi as well as Nehru should be killed right after the freedom. Both was criminal in other aspect of freedom. Nehru did the blunder and Gandhi supported him.

  97. shut you mouth for all of you.don’t discuss about past.gandhi may or may not be good man,it is the past.. and gadhi also past.
    Think about today and plan for tomorrow to devolp india
    please don’t hand over the india to 100 % useless party.
    kindly do some think for india. don’t waste your good times

    • u knw dear hamari yahi soch hame devlop nahi karane deti
      hame apane past ke bare me sochana chahiye bcoz future depend karata hai hamare passd pe ,,hum hamesa apane bare me sochate hai .realy u r slfsh agar bhagat singh ajad ji aur sabhi logo ne apane gd time ke liye socha hota to tum nahi hum log bhi srvnt hote angrejo or pakistani ke ghar pe.

  98. Are bhai,
    aap log past ki piche mat bhagiye. Kisne galti ki, kisne nahi ki. We have not seen with our eyes. We can’t trust on print media of that time. Because they were under britishers. What i think we shouldn’t waste our time. Because i think that history is not written by those who died. What was reality of situation?

    • y i agreed but ye fair bhi to nahi hai ki jasane(nathuram godse) apne country ki liye sab kuchh kiya use hum badanam kare aur fansi ki saja de aur jo galat kiya use hum good man le

  99. WHAT YOU GAINED BY FREEDOM? YOUR CORRUPTED LEADERS ARE BECOMING RICH? ATLEAST YOU PEOPLE ARE SPEAKING ENGISH & GOT EDUCATION BECAUSE OF BRITISH.
    INDIANS TALK TOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO MUCH BUT DO VERY LITTLE.

  100. i would like to appreciate all the comments writer for the valuable information provided to the reader on this site.i came to this site through a link when i was reading wiki about Gandhi.and my mind itching to see about Nathu Ram godse, and i started to read this page and comments.
    i think whatever is written here is correct because he is true in one way or the other.Always keep in mind “NO ONE IS PERFECT”.Gandhiji and Nathuram both were human and we know “TO err is human”.Everyone makes mistakes in his life,so there’s nothing wrong in anyone,if we will take our responsibilities and try our best to do something for India. we can live in peace and harmorny.
    NO HINDU NO MUSLIMS NO SIKHS NO CHRISTIANS NO PHARSIS NOTHING ……………TYR UR BEST TO BE A “HUMAN”.AND THEN AN INDIAN
    Jai Hind
    regard
    Harish , Ajit

  101. Hi All,
    Please stop arguing on our History,concenterate on your developement and Country’s Development.
    It will be a better way to prove yourself rather than proving your arguements right.
    Do Great and Be Great
    Regards
    Hitesh

    • DEAR ALL
      ITS VERY EASY TO COMMENT ON ANYBODY. BUT CAN ANY ONE THINK THAT WHAT KIND OF TROUBLES TAKEN BY GANDHIJI. HE DONE ONLY FOR PEOPLES NOT FOR HIMSELF OR HIS FAMILY. NOW A DAYS OUR LEADERS DOING WRONG AND INCREASE THE BANK BALANC AND PROPERTY.
      ABHI KOI NATHURAM GODSE BANKAR IN LEADERS KO MAAR SAKTA HAI.

      • Mahatma Gandhi is the main reason y we got freedom so late. if Bose and all where there we would have got the freedom long back. See there were less number of english men stayed in our country if the ppl over that period joined together that and raise against the english we would have got the freedom long time back.But wen Mahatma Gandhi came into the scene he made the ppl coward. bec of that only we got the freedom so late and also Nehru’s family stil ruling the country is a big draw back for us.

      • Jaswant, what do u know about gandhi…i feel ashamed to even write the first letter of his name in upper caps…he is a disgrace to us Indians…
        Nathuram Godse is a legend…gandhi was fasting for fukin pakis…to get them money…
        what Nathuram did, should have been done long back…
        please dont advocate gandhi the scumbag…”Thu” on gandhi and nehru

  102. nearly after 800 yrs invation india has got atleast
    one vandalised temple in each village/town/tehsil,any place hindus live as a symbol of secularism,ahimsa
    non-viloence,RELOGIOUS-TOLARENCE, anybody with simple
    general knowledge, can understand the above fact,but
    NO-BODY is there to atleast tell that it is SO and who is the CAUSE for it?, TOLERANCE? BROAD -MINDED?
    AFRAID TO TELL? at what cost? ESCAPISM? from the TRUTH?

    • Hi, do you know the truth? what about partition?who has escaped from partition from past 60 years?who were lost their land and lives?……..think about this truth.

  103. i think that mr godse was very right . gandhi was a pure dictator,he wanted everything in his own ways.
    todays conflicts between hindu muslim is because of him. if godse hadn’t killed him we might have seen even more complications.i think godse is the real son of mother india.

  104. because of gandhi only, this country is still developing country….. if Subhash chandra bose, Bhagath sing, Azaad were alive then we could have got our freedom before 1947 ….
    if we jus look into Gandhi’s life history, he was not treating his wife with respect…he s the reason for not only hindu muslims fight, also for difference in intercasts…. india’s partition was because of Gandhi and Nehru… Nehru wanted to become prime minister of the country… From that time our politics got currupted..

    • Go through the history with good observation dear then only you can understand that neither it was Nehruji nor Mahatma Gandhi behind the partition. Its easy to blame because you just have to point your fingur on others watch inside your heart. It was the dispute of thoughts between the Hindus and the Muslims that caused partition. Godse was an extremist Hindu which is clear from his last wordings too. You should know that in 1937 5 attemts were made to kill Bapu which failed and Godse was part of two attemts. Same was the problem with Muslims. I can’t describe it all in just one comment better go through the Facts yourself believe me you’ll be glad to know and will feel better….God Bless you…:)

    • Gaurav – tu kya bahut bada itihaskar he kya ? Tune puri history padhi he kya ? Aur agar sirf padhe hue par hi vishwas karta he to teri galti nahi he kyonki history bhi congress ne hi likhee he. Tumhare jaise gadhon ki wajah se hi aaj desh ki ye halat he.
      Ek sawal aur, agar kissi kitab mein kahin ye miljaye ki Gandhi ko kabhi police ki lathi padi thi to mujhe pls us kitab ka naam bata dena.

  105. Read all the comments and am surprised to see that though some are against and some are in favour of Godse….but no one knows what are the facts my dear….go through books, Biographies and all such things written at that time you will come closer to the fact as the common in all is always the fact. “Bapu ko aur chacha Nehru ko aaj k liye dosh dena samajhdari nahi, unka maksad azadi dilana tha wo unhone kia, unke baad jo bhi ae unhone kuch nahi kia…ab tum ho tumhare jajbaat hain , please inhe dusron ko kosne aur bhala bura kehne mein gawane k bajae sahi jagah use karo…ek word deta hun isey sath lekar history mein jao lautoge to sabko sahi aoge…..”EXTRIMIST”……….aur haan hindu ya muslim, industani ya akistani banke mat padhna…insaan banke observe karna……..:)

  106. Many Indian politicians, journalists & Generals admits that Jinnah was an intelligent person who teared India into two parts. Jinnah did it without weapons what he use was only his brain & pen.
    Now stupid Pakistani give vote to corrupt Zardari just because he is son in law of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto who was second genius leader of Pak. & Indians doing same giving vote to Sonia, Rahel Gandhi who are playing with India for their personal interests.
    China world super power is with Pakistan. soon they will finish terrorists from their land & shift terrorism in Indian state. No doubt sooner or later there will be Khalistan for Sikhs & new independent state for naxalites.

  107. Gandhi was stupid & Jinnah was genius…
    Jinnah said we dont want hindu raj. & gandhi said please stay with us, for god sake.. baharat mahan ke jae.. but Jinnah said shutup, Democracy in India means Hindu Raj that’s all, Gandhi’s stupid policies was exposed on 14 august 1947. India was teared apart into 2 pieces… now if ISI start funding money & weapons Naxalites then there will be a new Naxal State, because still India giving votes to stupid Gandhi Family…!

  108. MAINE AAP SAB K COMMENTS PADHE AAP SAB NE APNE COMMENTS DIYE PAR ENGLISH ME DESH PREM KI BATE HINDI ME KARO ENGLISH ME NAHI PAHLE BHARTIYA BANO AUR HA MUJHE NAHI MALOOM AAJ MUSLIMS IS DESH ME KYA KYA KARTE HAI PAR AGAR HUM DHYAN DE TO SHAYAD HAMARI ROOH KANP JAYE.HUME APNI BHARAT MATA KO BHRASHTACHARIYO AUR GADDARO SE RAKSHA KARNI CHAHIYE BHARAT MATA KI JAI.MUSLIMS KABHI HUMARE NAHI HO SAKTE MERA KAHNA HAI APNE DESH ME SABHI MUSLIM PAHLE HINDU THE PAR MUGALO NE UNHE MUSLIM BANA DIYA HUME IN SAB K BARE ME SOCHNA HOGA.HINDI HAMARI MATRUBHASHA HAI USE APNE AAP SE HI BACHANE ME SAHYOG DE.JAI [email protected] MAIN NATHURAM GODASE JI KO SAHI MANTA HU GANDHI JI NE NEHRU PREM ME NA JANE HUMARE KITNE HINDU BHAIYO KO MARVAYA HAI…VO ISK LIYE DOSHI HAI

  109. i have strongly belief that gandhiji was a god or a man of god becaze of dis nathu harami he was been killed and den insulted… aur hamare indians to 3 person se bhi gaye gosre aggarmahatma nahi hote to aaj bhi angrejo k home me toilet aur vessels saaf kar rahe hote …. last me bhi woh apne murderrer ko blessings dete gaye aur god ko yaad kiya aggar unke jaggah ye sare leader eccept sardar ,nehru mar gaye hote to aaj hamara india kuch aur hota yarrrr dont blame gandhi blame and abuse nathu harami…….yarrrrrrr

    • sahi itihas pado beta gandhi aur uske gandhi gharane ne hi desh ki vat lagayi hai woh god nahi gaandu tha.agar detail me janna hai to muje contact karo.

    • vishruti ! waise bhi ladkiyon ke deeemag nai hota .jao jaa ke make up karo.agar tumhein itni akal bhi nai aayi jab tumne statement padha. kis history ki baat kar rai ho tum.tumne wahi history padhi jo padhayi gayi aapko .agar sach mein sab kuch janna haitoh woh bi padho jo publish nai ki gay. u know what u r shame for Hindu religion. aur mujhe lagta hai u r mother was fucked by some muslim and then u were born.

      • at Navin, sahi mein ladkiyon mein dimag nahi hota,isliye shayad,teri maa mein bi dimag nahi tha….tabhi tu paida ho gaya.ladkiyon mein dimag nahi hai,toh jaakar kisi ladke se shaadi kar le and fir dono apna dimaag use kar ke bache paida bhi kar lena.

    • Bacche, Angrej is liye nahi gaye ki gandhi ka jor tha, unhe har waqt yeh dar rahne laga tha kab kidhar se goli aa kar unhe khatm kar degi. agar krantikari nahi hote to hum aaj bhi angrejo ke gulam hote

  110. After reading most comments by Gandhi supporters here, i realize India is really a place of ignorant illiterates. who have no hold on history and reality. there are congressmen who are either in power or supporters of gandhiwad. not even knowing India got freedom at a time when Britain was weak, militarily, economically and politically. from world war 2. hence freedom was granted to most british colonies, Palestine, Africa, India. because contrary to popular belief, better read by economists, maintaining a colony cannot be run by loot of princely states alone. India had to get freedom. it wasn’t gandhi alone who fought for it. it was more than 500 people who have laid their lives fighting the british in armed rebellion. call it Bhagat Singh or NSA. gandhi did catch the heart of the people bcoz his ways were more associable. now even eunuchs could join the bandwagon. after all who wud want to give their life to the country. there are pple who were jailed for more than 10 yrs by the british. gandhi went for 2 yrs at his worst. now who sacrificed for the country?. gandhi had bcome the self-appointed moral chief of the country who misguided idiots, illiterates and eunuchs and gave them a sense of belonging to this country. i think one can also blame the education system. after run by congress for more than 50 yrs, history is manipulated to play impressionistic politiks. good luck to the eunuchs. next time when our enemy attacks, you would be the first ones to satyagraha in your homes.

      • Dear Supporters of godse ,I wish to saybehind criminial that Every criminal has a motive and reason and according to me Nathuram godse is a criminal.And before anyone Comments about my Father of the Nation Should think about this ,He got this freedom To freedom ,the very freedom which is Used to abuse him. And for the fools who think we could have got the freedom by armed struggle ,consider this Even the Germans with their superior power with Luftwaffe and U-boats could not defeat the british ,how could you guys Imagine that we could have defeated British,Bullshit .we would be still under The british ,licking their shoes !!
        Never insult my father of Nation ,Mahatma Gandhiji !!.Next time this website And people who had insulted gandhiji would be Taken would be taken to court
        JAI HIND!!!

        • F**k u and ur m******f*****g Father of nation…suck shit
          he is not the father of this nation i.e. India
          politicians didnt had any other option
          otherwise father of Nation should have been Subash Chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh, Vallab Bhai Patel, Lala Lajpat Rai…!!!!
          But not this prick or nehru!!!
          Shame on u for respecting him…a person who was fasting till death to get Pakistan Rs. 55 Crore
          He was a failure as a politician, as a human, as a man! He was a spineless insect!!!

        • I do apologize for the tough language which was definitely uncalled for. After all Gandhi supporters have a point of view just like we do, and I am sorry to have hurt ’em. Deeply regret! But i believe constitution in its current form gives me the right to state my point of view which needn’t be in-line with yours or the majority in general. This clearly is not a forum to defame a particular person and hence cannot be a case of defamation either. Also about Germany and Britain then unlike Germany, Britain was not at war with India. It is called freedom struggle. Hence Britain would not have gone all out defending its occupation. Germany would have annihilated Britain in the battle of london if not for Hitler’s misjudgment and his haste to break into Soviet Union. Also that hitler held Britishers in high regards and had nothing against Britain. Germany was forced into the war with Britian after the poland episode. British RAF were infact fighting down to the last 300 aircrafts in cases even piloted by 14-yr olds. However an armed conflict with Britain was not wat Savarkar or Godse envisioned. It was merely a struggle like all others who took to arms. From district to district, they wanted to make it as difficult for British to operate on Indian soil. After all most soldiers in the Indian army during British were Indians. The point was to create mutiny, civil rebellion to uphold law and occupation from district to district. Of course armed conflict with Britain was not practical, feasible or sensible. But i feel let down by history writers, who don’t hold Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad and others in equivalent high regards. And give all credit to Gandhi and his followers alone. They sacrificed just as much. Do you think India would have gained freedom if there hadn’t been a world war 2? And on satyagraha alone? The british tortured unyielding farmers to death, and you think they would have bent down to non-violence alone. I definitely have high regards for Gandhi, for wat he did in SA, to the manner in which he galvanized the freedom movement, from city to city and home to home, no one came close to touching the hearts of a million pple. And Godse felt the same. And he knew killing Gandhi won’t solve many issues inherent in the Indian social structure.

        • 1) we didnt “win” independence!! British didnt have enough resources to maintain a colony (manpower, morale, soldiers) and they had taken away most of the wealth, so it wasnt very beneficial to retain a colony.
          2) after United Nation (League of Nations) was built it wouldnt have been easy to justify a colony. Guess why all the colonies were liberated within 10 years after WWII?
          3) He is Father of Nation because Congress named him so and you read it in your books. He is also Father of Pakistan because it was him who gave them 55 crore of indian currency which they used to attack Kashmir.
          4) if not for Nathuram Godse, we would have defintely been licking the boots.. of pakistan.. because Gandhi wud have fasted to death to dissolve the army, and do a peace march to convince the attacking Pakistani army to withdraw..

        • i think…u belong to the same series of bastards,who had brought this country into a peril….first stop telling M.K gandhi a’FATHER’.he has not slept with ur mother & brought you in the world. believe in ur biological father & almighty god,if u r believer of god.we are great country,no doubt but we are most victims of backstbbing by our own people like u.
          bloody congressmen.

        • really!!! ….wjo the hell r u to put the ppl behind bars who is oppsing b******d gandhi…. its their voice of freedom….i must say that u r no less than british as u r stopping ppl expressing their freedom….get lost with as*******e father of the nation …f******* nation of the father….woh tho gaya…ab teri baari….and time for people who blindly supports that mother f******* gandhi ….dumb a***

        • Guna, i hope you are not the Guna character from Kamalhasan’s movie GUNA. FYI british did not defeat germans but soviet. know history first.

  111. I don’t know who do what !! but i know only one thing “History is Bald” means we all put our wigs on it and make it a style. If i ask from you what’s your grand grand grand grand grand grand’s father name ?? what he do ? what is his religion ? what is his caste ? you have no answer (may be some have) ,,but is it really your grand father,, any gurantee ?? no … so please whatever done earlier we can’t change it but we can make a good future. So unite and make a change..!!!
    when you all are so Intelligent then what are you doing for Your COUNTRY .. be mature man.. do for society and the path of Peace..!!!
    PAST IS PAINFULL (whether it’s your own or your Country)

  112. 15 अगस्त आजादी नहीं धोखा है, देश का समझौता है , शासन नहीं शासक बदला है, गोरा नहीं अब काला है 15 अगस्त 1947 को देश आजाद नहीं हुआ तो हर वर्ष क्यों ख़ुशी मनाई जाती है ?
    क्यों भारतवासियों के साथ भद्दा मजाक …किया जा रहा है l
    इस सन्दर्भ में निम्नलिखित तथ्यों को जानें …. :
    1. भारत को सत्ता हस्तांतरण 14…-15 अगस्त 1947 को गुप्त दस्तावेज के तहत, जो की 1999 तक प्रकाश में नहीं आने थे (50 वर्षों तक ) l
    2. भारत सरकार का संविधान के महत्वपूर्ण अनुच्छेदों में संशोधन करने का अधिकार नहीं है l
    3. संविधान के अनुच्छेद 348 के अंतर्गत उच्चतम न्यायलय, उच्च न्यायलय तथा संसद की कार्यवाही अपनी राष्ट्रभाषा हिंदी में होने के बजाय अंग्रेजी भाषा में होगी l
    4. अप्रैल 1947 में लन्दन में उपनिवेश देश के प्रधानमंत्री अथवा अधिकारी उपस्थित हुए, यहाँ के घोषणा पात्र के खंड 3 में भारत वर्ष की इस इच्छा को निश्चयात्मक रूप में बताया है की वह …
    क ) ज्यों का त्यों ब्रिटिश का राज समूह सदस्य बना रहेगा तथा
    ख ) ब्रिटिश राष्ट्र समूह के देशों के स्वेच्छापूर्ण मिलाप का ब्रिटिश सम्राट को चिन्ह (प्रतीक) समझेगा, जिनमे शामिल हैं ….. (इंग्लैंड, कनाडा, ऑस्ट्रेलिया, न्यूज़ीलैण्ड, दक्षिण अफ्रीका, पाकिस्तान, श्री लंका) … तथा
    ग ) सम्राट को ब्रिटिश समूह का अध्यक्ष स्वीकार करेगा l
    5. भारत की विदेश नीति तथा अर्थ नीति, भारत के ब्रिटिश का उपनिवेश होने के कारण स्वतंत्र नहीं है अर्थात उन्हीं के अधीन है l
    6. नौ-सेना के जहाज़ों पर आज भी तथाकथित भारतीय राष्ट्रीय ध्वज नहीं है l
    7. जन गन मन अधिनायक जय हे … हमारा राष्ट्र-गान नहीं है, अपितु जार्ज पंचम के भारत आगमन पर उसके स्वागत में गाया गया गान है, उपनिवेशिक प्रथाओं के कारण दबाव में इसी गीत को राष्ट्र-गान बना दिया गया … जो की हमारी गुलामी का प्रतीक है l
    8. सन 1948 में बने बर्तानिया कानून के अंतर्गत भाग 1 (1) 1948 के बर्तानिया के कानून के अनुसार हर भारतवासी बर्तानिया की रियाया है और यह कानून भारत के गणराज्य प्राप्त कर लेने के पश्चात भी लागू है l
    9. यदि 15 अगस्त 1947 को भारत स्वतंत्र हुआ तो प्रथम गवर्नर जनरल माउन्ट-बेटन को क्यों बनाया गया ??
    10. 22 जून 1948 को भारत के दुसरे गवर्नर के रूप में चक्रवर्ती राजगोपालचारी ने निम्न शपथ ली l “मैं चक्रवर्ती राजगोपालचारी यथाविधि यह शपथ लेता हूँ की मैं सम्राट जार्ज षष्ठ और उनके वंशधर और उत्तराधिकारी के प्रति कानून के मुताबिक विश्वास के साथ वफादारी निभाऊंगा, एवं मैं चक्रवर्ती राजगोपालचारी यह शपथ लेता हूँ की मैं गवर्नर जनरल के पद पर होते हुए सम्राट जार्ज षष्ठ और उनके वंशधर और उत्तराधिकारी की यथावत सव्वा करूँगा l ”
    11. 14 अगस्त 1947 को भारतीय स्वतन्त्रता विधि से भारत के दो उपनिवेश बनाए गए जिन्हें ब्रिटिश Common-Wealth की … धारा नं. 9 (1) – (2) – (3) तथा धारा नं. 8 (1) – (2) धारा नं. 339 (1) धारा नं. 362 (1) – (3) – (5) G – 18 के अनुच्छेद 576 और 7 के अंतर्गत …. इन उपरोक्त कानूनों को तोडना या भंग करना भारत सरकार की सीमाशक्ति से बाहर की बात है तथा प्रत्येक भारतीय नागरिक इन धाराओं के अनुसार ब्रिटिश नागरिक अर्थात गोरी सन्तान है l
    12. भारतीय संविधान की व्याख्या अनुच्छेद 147 के अनुसार गवर्नमेंट ऑफ़ इंडिया एक्ट 1935 तथा indian independence act 1947 के अधीन ही की जा सकती है … यह एक्ट ब्रिटिश सरकार ने लागू किये l
    13. भारत सरकार के संविधान के अनुच्छेद नं. 366, 371, 372 एवं 392 को बदलने या रद्द करने की क्षमता भारत सरकार को नहीं है l
    14. भारत सरकार के पास ऐसे ठोस प्रमाण अभी तक नहीं हैं, जिनसे नेताजी की वायुयान दुर्घटना में मृत्यु साबित होती है l इसके उपरान्त मोहनदास गांधी, जवाहरलाल नेहरू, मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना और मौलाना अबुल कलाम आजाद ने ब्रिटिश न्यायाधीश के साथ यह समझौता किया कि अगर नेताजी ने भारत में प्रवेश किया, तो वह गिरफ्तार ककर ब्रिटिश हुकूमत को सौंप दिया जाएगाl बाद में ब्रिटिश सरकार के कार्यकाल के दौरान उन सभी राष्ट्रभक्तों की गिरफ्तारी और सुपुर्दगी पर मुहर लगाईं गई जिनको ब्रिटिश सरकार पकड़ नहीं पाई थी l
    15. डंकल व् गैट, साम्राज्यवाद को भारत में पीछे के दरवाजों से लाने का सुलभ रास्ता बनाया है ताकि भारत की सत्ता फिर से इनके हाथों में आसानी से सौंपी जा सके l
    उपरोक्त तथ्यों से यह स्पष्ट होता है की सम्पूर्ण भारतीय जनमानस को आज तक एक धोखे में ही रखा गया है, तथाकथित नेहरु गाँधी परिवार इस सच्चाई से पूर्ण रूप से अवगत थे परन्तु सत्तालोलुभ पृवृत्ति के चलते आज तक उन्होंने भारत की जनता को अँधेरे में रखा और विश्वासघात करने में पूर्ण रूप से सफल हुए l
    सवाल उठता है कि … यह भारतीय थे या …. काले अंग्रेज ?
    नहीं स्वतंत्र अब तक हम, हमे स्वतंत्र होना है कुछ झूठे देशभक्तों ने, किये जो पाप, धोना है सरदार भगत सिंह कि मृत्यु के पीछे अंग्रेजों के कानूनों के बहाने गुंडागर्दी एवं क्रूरता के राज्य का पर्दाफाश करना एवं भारत के नौजवानों को भारत कि पीड़ा के प्रति जागृत करना उद्देश था l राजीव दीक्षित कि शहादत भी षड्यंत्रकारी प्रतीत होती है, SEZ , परमाणु संधि, विदेशी बाजारों के षड्यंत्र … आदि योजनाओं एवं कानूनी मकडजाल में फंसे भारत को जागृत करने तथा नवयुवकों को इन कार्यों के लिए आगे लाने के कारण l यदि भगत सिंह और राजीव दीक्षित और समय तक जीवित रहते तो परिवर्तन और रहस्यों कि परत और खुल सकती थी l भारत इतना गरीब देश है कि 100000,0000000 (1 लाख करोड़) के रोज रोज नए नए घोटाले होते हैं…. ? क्या गरीब देश भारत से साड़ी दुनिया के लुटेरे व्यापार के नाम पर 20 लाख करोड़ रूपये प्रतिवर्ष ले जा सकते हैं ?
    विदेशी बेंकों में जमा धन कितना हो सकता है ? एक अनुमान के तहत 280 लाख करोड़ कहा जाता है ? पर यह सिर्फ SWISS बेंकों के कुछ बेंकों कि ही report है … समस्त बेंकों कि नहीं, इसके अलावा दुनिया भर के और भी देशों में काला धन जमा करके रखा हुआ है ?
    भारत के युवकों, अपनी संस्कृति को पहचानो, जिसमे शास्त्र और शस्त्र दोनों कि शिक्षा दी जाती थी l आज तुम्हारे पास न शास्त्र हैं न शस्त्र हैं .. क्यों ?? क्या कारण हो सकते हैं ?? भारत गरीब नहीं है … भारत सोने कि चिड़िया था … है … और सदैव रहेगा l
    तुम्हें तुम्हारे नेता, पत्रकार और प्रशासक झूठ पढ़ाते रहे हैं l वो इतिहास पढ़ा है तुमने जो नेहरु के प्रधानमंत्री निवास में 75 दिनों तक अलीगढ मुस्लिम विश्वविद्यालय और अंग्रेजों के निर्देशों पर बनाया गया l जिसमे प्राचीन शिव मन्दिर तेजो महालय को ताज महल, ध्रुव स्तम्भ को क़ुतुब मीनार और शिव मन्दिर को जामा मस्जिद ही पढ़ाया जाता है l
    सारे यूरोप – अमेरिका के लिए लूट का केंद्र बने भारत को गुलामी कि जंजीरों से मुक्त करवाने हेतु आगे आओ l उठो…. सत्य और धर्म की संस्थापना कि हुंकार तो भरो एक बार, विश्व के सभी देशों कि बोद्धिक संपदा बने भारत l जय जय भारत जय हो

    • mahatma gandhi ek bahut bade khud garj admi the jo apne sowath ke liye juth bola or aaj tak usse raast pita ke naam se jante hai log khahte gandhi ji baht hinsa wadi the magar ye janne ki kabhi kosish nahi ki ke nathu ram bhi ek bahut bade hinsa wadi the magar unhone kun unhe goli mar di aap sabhi se gujarish hai ke inhe pure duina bhar me failaye or bataye ki kya sach hai or kya dhut hai hai hind jai bharat

    • @Chandrabhan…. aap ne bahut hi acha and sachi baate likhi hai… aap se vinti hai ki aise lekh aur public forum per daale taki naye yuva pidhi ko sach ka pata chale… Jai Hind

  113. Totally support to what Nathuram Godse Ji did. Everyone know that Gandhi was the one who wanted masses behind him. Less educated people thought he was the messiah and blindly followed his every word. He did all for the appeasement of the Moslems. Never did he support his Hindu brothers or sisters. I only wish Godse Ji got rid of him earlier.

  114. Guys mene aap sabhi ke comments padhe lekin mujhe nahi lagta hum mai se koi bhi ek insan aisa hoga jo sirf comment hi nahi kuch kaam bhi karta ho jo desh ke liye faydemand ho. Aap logo ne bina kuch soche samjhe ek International site par is tarah ke comment diye agar inhe koi gora padhe to vo kya samjhega?
    Aap sabhi logo ko apne comments se pehle hazar baar sochna chahiye kyon ke ho sakta hai hum jise gaddar keh rahe ho haqiqat mai vo hi hamara hero ho aur ya phir hamara hero hi hamara gaddar ho chunki hum us samey the to nahi lekin jaankari ke abhaav mai is tarah ki batein. I don’t think so!

  115. Hi All
    Well more than the article itself, the comments are interesting, some abusing, some enlightening….
    1) Freedom is gift that we cherish today and are able to post comment like these freely, only because of our freedom fighters including M. K. Gandhi(Among all freedom fighters I am mentioning his name, as he is the point of discussion here). If for nothing else, we should respect him for this. I wonder what did Nathuram Godse for Indian Freedom Struggle, if he was such a firebrand, why didn’t he attempted to kill Queen Elizabeth or joined INA. My history is bad and I apologize, but if anyone else here knows about contribution of Mr. Godse in freedom struggle of India, please do enlighten me, apart from publishing a newspaper called ‘Agrani’ for Hindu Mahasabha, which was more of a Hindu fanaticism, rather than Indian Independence.
    2) M. K. Gandhi was a suit clad, attorney in his youth. He could have lead an affluent life, but he chose self spun, dhoti, I wonder how many of us are capable of doing this. Not me, that makes Mr Gandhi a more willed person than me. And in my personal opinion, it needs more will power to sacrifice personal comfort than to kill someone… Killing is short lived will, while his sacrifice for personal comfort lasted for more than 40 years.
    3) Mr Godse had his own viewpoint, but he chose to kill a fellow human being, which is crime punishable by law. To many who commented that what will you do in case of an act of personal violence committed on your loved ones, well we will act, and in law its called self defense. This raises an important question around Mr gandhi’s policy of ‘Non violence’. Well he travelled India far and wide, into rural parts, and tried to understand India before participating in Indian struggle. He realized that Indians were poor and divided. An armed would have caused more loss or property, and could not unite India. He chose non violence, as this was the weapon every Indian could afford, and this indeed united India, like never before, which ‘Garam dal’ had failed in doing so. We criticize Hitler for his extremism, but then Netaji (who indeed is a super hero to me) went to same Hitler to ask for his support, which was a desperate act. Japanese supported him initially as they saw their own benefit, but retracted later which led to INA losing the war. Gandhiji chose a form of ‘self-reliant war’, where we should not be dependent on any external country or ruler, but ourselves. This might seem wrong or foolish today, but we are talking about India of 1915-1947, which was hunger and poverty struck.
    3) Lets also try and understand his theory of not reacting, when someone slaps you. He understood that life is very important. and most of gram dal leaders, and past warriors lost their lives before seeing their mission to an end. And no one carried the torch forward. after 1857’s revolt, it was a silence for long. Few people can call it cowardice, but he choose a way, to get Independence with minimum bloodshed and larger involvement of masses. He used International media as his aid, so much so, that a normal citizen of England turned against their own government, criticizing their action in India. He belittled and embarrassed them.
    4) Mr Gandhi was the one who asked for complete independence. it was his advent that India as a nation was thinking of freedom. And all the gram dal leaders were born and rose out of it. It was his defiance, which gave birth to feeling of nationality all over India. And I think thats why the term Father of Nation was given to him. He made Independence an household idea, even for those who were struggling for food and water and were living on streets. Free India was no more a fascination of rich and powerful, because of him, it became an aspiration of every common Indian at that time, which was initiated at Champaran.
    5) I am in no way supporting partition of India. But Mr Zinnah had threatened of a civil war if Pakistan was not formed, either he was power hungry or was worried for Muslim community. but whatever be the intentions of Mr. Zinnah, Mr. Gandhi had to make a choice along with other leaders of that time. A civil war would have meant more deaths and their continuance till even today, putting us on par with Israel, Palestine, Afghanistan etc; living in a continuous state of civil war… An India was not self sufficient Military or police wise to handle that. And maybe Today Indian would have been further divided into more countries than just Pakistan and Bangladesh; and we would have never been able to unite other provinces into India as we know of Today. I wonder what any of us would have done in that situation, to save a country whose Independence was in a nascent stage?
    6) I wonder if some of us would be criticising Mr Gandhi, as we are today, if he would have died a martyr, at hands of a britisher. So he lived through the freedom struggle, seems to be his major flaw.
    7) We are wrong to blame today’s corruption solely on one man, Mr. Gandhi, when at the same time we fail to credit him for Indian independence. Its just a comforting hypocricy. He was the man who gave up all luxuries of life for more than 35 years (1915-1948). So how can we in our right senses blame him for corruption that is prevalent today. And lets not blame actions of Indira Gandhi, Sanjay Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi, Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi; or congress party on him. Corruption is not a personal legacy, but a personal choice.
    8) We call politics dirty. Lets understand politics is necessary, Good and bad are just two sides of it, like science. You can use it for upliftment of society and nation OR personal gain. I wonder what personal gain Mr. Gandhi had in our freedom struggle. And if he was ambitious or selfish, why he didn’t keep any post. Who would have objected to him being the first PM of India??
    9) So many people here supporting the action of ‘killing’ of one man by another. I wonder how many of those supporters who also called Mr Gandhi coward; and using abusive language to show their fiery nature; are today picking up arms against corrupt politicians. I haven’t read any politicians murder in newspaper, so are all these patriots supporting violence as a medium, only restricted to their keypads on computers. Then you are no different than a politician making speeches. Atleast right or wrong, Mr Gandhi acted on what he believed, unlike any of us, who believe in something but do not act.
    10) coming back to favorite and dear, Mr Godse. his last court statement clearly states that he was more hinduism driven than being a nation driver person. their is nothing wrong in living for one’s religion, but that might have clouded his vision, and what he saw as an act to support Muslim community, was actually saving India as a nation. Which would have been raged with a civil war of Hindu-Muslim for generations to come. since Mr Gandhi could see through the so called ‘Iron Will’ of Mr. Zinnah. We are well aware of Pakistan’s, today’s detriorating economic, social as well as political condition. Wonder what condition India would be living in if it was part of India. and moreover its easy to fight an enemy across the border, than one living and breeding inside. But then we should also understand that India-Pakistan war today, is politically than a religious driven one. this war to cause instability in Asia, is what helps them keep getting fund and running their economy. I had been to Lahore and Karachi, in 1997, for theater performances. We Indians were welcomed into homes of a normal Pakistani muslim. I have been to Kabul recently for shooting ad films and music videos, and they love Indians. Terrorism is an organized crime syndicate, run by men of money, and using religion as the medium. Just as some of us use, hinduism as a medium, for our economic or political benefits.
    11) I would give a simple example of perception, which indeed affected Mr Godse and many others. Supposse if on roadside i stop to feed a poor animal, which in itself is a sheer act of kindness, many would comment against it, saying so many humans are hungry and this man here is feeding animals. he cares more about animals than human, he is a blot on our species, lets kill him to teach him a lesson. and I would be dead for my kindness. But I am just wondering how many of those killers of mine, would have fed any poor human soul. they failed to see, if didn’t fed him, he might end up hurting someone to feed himself. But then, was killed and not asked the reason. and even i was asked, i would have been advised to kill the animal rather than feed it, and they would call the cause ‘humanity’. (Pls note that above example is a metaphor, I am not comparing one religion to human and another to animal).
    I hope sensible ones will get the point, and insensible ones will comment back in abuses. My suggestion, if you like Mr Gandhi, then join cause of Anna Hazare or start your own cause; and if you like and patronize Mr Godse, please act like him and do your nation a service.
    God Bless India and Humanity.

    • Thank you for your unbiased and comprehensive post! The nation definitely would benefit more from people who use sensibility and reasoning rather than those who are biased by being too ‘opinionated’ (unfortunately often without even having the complete knowledge of situation)

    • mr anshuman i like you wrote your point openly but with respect i sugest u to read history of gandhi era.u will find entry of gandhi in india is bebeficial to british.when subhashbabu meet hitler in berlin he ask one simple quscn “how british who are not more than 4 percent rule 96 percent people” i think u got the answer.read history of india but not reffers gov books read open mindedlyand also when jinnah rioting not more than 100 people were killed but at time of partion more than 1 lakh hindus were killed in pakistan

    • Dear Anshuman,
      1. We do not know about Godse as he was demonised and even stupid acts of Gandhi were made heroic. As far as Gandhi is concerned I would like to quote PM of England at the time of freedom. When asked the role of Gandhi in India’s freedom, he simply said “MINIMAL”. India’s freedom was more of economic and military considerations than Gandhi’s non violence.
      2. Sarojani Naidu pointed out that “Gandhi is a poor whose poverty cost a fortune to India.” Everyone says Gandhi traveled third class, but that third class was always emptied for Gandhi. No fellow travellor in his coaches.
      3. Non violence has never won a war, nor will it ever. History stands testimony to it. While Godse’s act was criminal in nature, greater good must also be taken into account. What Netaji did did makes Gandhi’s deeds any less evil. In politics, there is no good or evil, only interests.
      4. If there be bloodshed, at least it must be bilateral. I see no point in seeing fellow men fall just for sake of non violence. And only answer to violence is counter violence.
      5. Of course he succeeded in uniting India, but failed to get optimal mileage out of it.
      6. What made Jinnah capable of blackmailing? Gandhi’s tendency to appease muslims. Even if partition was inevitable, it could b carried out with minimal blood shed just be means of counter violence, not by asking Hindus to surrender.
      7. Hypothetical question.
      8. Only thing I agree with you. We can not call him corrupt, at least not in material sense.
      9. Killing politicians is not a feasible solution just because we live in a free nation where we do have right to vote and avoid corruption. To this we are rsponsible ourselves. In his ime, power was in foreign hands which never heard our justified demands.
      10. Being a Hindu and supporting it should not be a crime as it seems to be in India. It might have clouded the judgement of a stupid, not that of a person capable of logical reasoning, that Godse definitely exhibited. Further when you go out to pakistan or somewhere else on a theatrical tour things are much different than ground realities. Terrorism is not a crime syndicate, it is a mentality.
      11. Again a hypothetical situation. No one is going to kill you just for feeding an animal. But the killing would be worth if you snatch food from human to feed animals.
      Finally only those people switch to abuses who have no capability of sensible argument. Regarding acting like Godse, we do not have a definite enemy.
      Regards
      Rajeev

    • Freedom…came at point after the world war when Britain had exhausted its resources, and could not AFFORD to sustai its colonies. Had Gandhi not been in picture…instead of 1948…with division, a revolution with likes of Bhagat Singh would have yielded unified India, in 1930s

    • What Nathuram Godse did was wrong I agree but there are N number of people like Nathuram Godse who did N number of things for Indian Freedom Struggle,without selfish intention so why only Gandhi should be Praised every time matter of fact there might be some Freedom Fighter who have given their life for their country and no one known them

  116. I would just want to tell a story of ghandhi nd nehru in 1930. But in history there no written proof.when they were on a way of creating cumminal issue in my home town deoghar jharkhnd famous for its shiv temple 12 jorterlin.as a result of ghandhi.’s communial issue ghandhi was almost killed by the local peple he was bruttly bitten up just as kutta ki tarah mar khaya tha wha nd nehru bhag khra hua tha.hope that day ghandhi died than just emagine what would be country. They would be no roits no religious issue .undivided indid from krachi -delhi-dhakha world superpower developed nd free frm terrerist .nathu ji would be with us. With more nd more good works by him.why my fourfather didnt betten him till his death.

    • This is all part of a web of evil, some realise it but don’t know what it is. It is the evil the remains whether you have a king, queen, prime minister or other…
      The real evil is the illuminati, freemasons are continue their new world agenda today just like they have done before they stepped foot on what is today considered ‘indian/pakistani’ soil.
      WHAT DO YOU CONSIDER FREEDOM? FREE TO BE WATCHED LIKE A HAWK ON POLICE CAMERA’S ON EVERY CORNER OF THE STREET? FREEDOM TO BE TOLD WHAT IS GOOD FOR MY SAFETY? FREEDOM TO FEED THE LAZY GOVERNMENT MONEY AND WATCH THEM DO NOTHING? FREEDOM TO SIT BACK AND WATCH SONY OR ZEE WHILE SOMEONE SOMEWHERE IS BEING BOMBED?
      SO LONG AS YOU AND YOURS ARE OKAY, YOU WILL NEVER GIVE A FUCK ABOUT WHAT THE REAL WORLD IS LIKE, YOUR BLIND IF YOUR NOT SLEEPING, YOUR DEAF IF YOU DONT HEAR IT. AND YOUR FUCKING NUMB IF YOU DONT FEEL IT AROUND YOU.
      THE WHOLE FUCKING WORLD IS INVOLVED, NOT JUST INDIA OR PAKISTAN. ALMOST EVERYTHING IN THIS WORLD IS UNDER THE TRANCE OF THE ILLUMINATI, THEY CONTROL EVERYTHING.. FROM THE COMPUTER IM TYPING ON TO THE T.V. I WATCH THE NEWS ON TO GIVE ME MY DAILY UPDATES ON THE WORLD….
      AND FOR MANY OTHERS YOUR PREPACKAGED FOOD, YOUR JOBS, YOUR INTERESTS, YOUR MUSIC, YOUR MOVIES.. GAMES… CLOTHING LABELS.. THE FUCKING LOT ! THE NEXT STAGE IS TO CREATE A DISASTER OF SOME KIND THAT GOES ACROSS THE EASTERN COUNTRIES.. WHICH WILL!! RESULT IN NEW UNIFIED CURRENCIES.. EITHER THAT OR SOMEONE NEAR YOU IS GOING INTO A WAR PRETTY FUCKING SOON IF THEY ALREADY HAVENT!
      KEEP YOUR EYES PEALED AND YA EARS TO THE GROUND PEOPLE..
      STOP CHATTING SHIT ABOUT GANDHI, NEHRU & GODSE… EVEN IF THEIR INTENTIONS WE’RE TO HELP THE NATION BRING ABOUT INDEPENDANCE, THEY FAILED – ALL OF THEM & MORE IMPORTANTLY THEY CANNOT SAVE YOU WHEN A CRISIS EMERGES IN YOUR NEIGHBOURHOOD TOMORROW. SIMPLE. RESEARCH THE FOLLOWING :
      NEW WORLD ORDER, FREEMASONRY, ILLUMINATI, GEORGIA GUIDESTONES, MASONIC SYMBOLS IN EVERYTHING, YOU NAME IT I WILL GIVE YOU THE EVIDENCE WHILE I CAN STILL BE CONTACTED. PLEASE NO STUPID RESPONSE.

      • I do agree with your view.. there so many day to day activity we do without giving a thought for the sake of system which has been desinged to benefit set of people.. fact is whole world is being ruled by Europeans who control most of the planet virtually now.. brits nvr left they just changed the way of controlling us.. the new form of colonism is in form of religion, culture and economic for which we all the slowing surrendering our resources to these parasites

  117. FRIENDS ALL THOSE WHO HAVE COMMENTED I FEEL MOST OF THEM ARE VERY MUCH AWARE OF HISTORY,BUT PLEASE BE PATIENCE ENOUGH WHEN YOU SEE COMMENTS WRITTEN BY OTHER’S AND FEEL ITS STUPIDITY,AND WHAT IF SOME FOREIGNER IS WATCHING THIS SITE,WE HAVE SO MANY INTERNAL PROBLEMS LIKE SCAMS,RESERVATIONS,DIRTY POLITICS , MOISTS,NAXALISM,TERRORISTS WHO HAVE BEEN ATTACKING AGAIN AND AGAIN TO POINT OUT OUR SYSTEM FAILURE,AND ADDING TO THESE ARE FRAUD BABA’S WHO ARE FILLED WITH WEALTH,HINDU,MUSLIMS,CHRISTIAN OR SIKH BEFORE RELIGION WE ARE HUMAN BEINGS FRIENDS,IM NOT COMMENTING HERE NOT TO DISCUSS THE PAST BUT LETS SEE THE DISCUSSION IS A HEALTY DISCUSSION, WHY R V FIGHTING AMONG OURSELVES FRIENDS,KEEP THE DISCUSSION OPEN IN A GOOD MANNER, I SALUTE ALL THE FREEDOM FIGHTERS WHO GOT OUR NATION FREE AND INDEPENDENT FOR US.

  118. Read it carefully.This is invented by me. First a rhetoric Question. Why Ghandhi is called Father of Nation?
    The reason behind this is because Britishers wanted him to be called as father of nation. They knew that this bald half naked person will ruin the country. It was evident that India will flourish like any thing and the man who can stop all this will be Ghandi. He was the sole reason for delay in our freedom movement who always insisted on dominion status which was later guided by HRS along with BHAGAT SINGH for complete Independence, well Bhagat Singh was not killed by Angrez hukumat actually he was killed by that ambitious gandhi. Well infact this has always been our fault that we trust any1 and every1 so we did with that Porn star always flanked with women.
    I wont be surprize if we see him in the cover page of some magazine called uptitled bastard of India. Now Please stop calling that guy as Father of nation. I have stopped so do i expect from every1.

    • I AM FULLY AGREE WITH YOU. I WILL DO MY BEST TO CIRCULATE YOUR MESSAGE TO EVERYONE IN MY CONTACT. THANK YOU! THANK YOU!! VERY MUCH !!!

    • I do agree with you… GANDHI was an idiot and I wish I had killed him.
      This gandhi family gave nothing to India but corruption, dishonor, poverty…
      I will request everyone to not vote for CONGRESS..

  119. That was a great thing that Godse did! I am full of respect for him! Hardly anyone today ever doubts what Gandhi did yo India! They just dont know what happened! Gandhi was indeed just a stubborn who worked totally in interests of muslims! Its a shame that the history textbooks have chapters n chapters on him but hardly anything on the real fighters like Bhagat Singh or Sardar Patel!

    • Yes I am also agree with you nathuram was correct.But As we knows Gandhi ji had played a great roal in India freedom but he has done a great mistake for that people payed by lossing their life at that time and till now we are paying,but not only Gandhi ji Nehru ji also a guilty for Jan Gadh man to Kashmir.
      Jai Hind.Jago india ke Naujawano.Jai Anna HAzare

    • No wonder!! you must be a RSS i d i o t!! RSS is the divisive factor in India, they were intimidating the minorities then and continue to do so today.

      • yes yes yes! Everyone is from RSS,they are conspiring against you!! Do such morons still exist in 2012…whose entire existence revolves around what RSS is doing??

    • So true..I feel so sorry today fr him..he did everythg fr us ..he killed gandhi coz he thought abt our future..history has been misinterpreted coz d ppl who printed history was dey only..i dnt want my childrens to learn d false history..i want dem to kw who were real freedom fighters..bcoz of whom v r free…I watched nathuram godse play and it has opened my eyes…d man who ditched india is called as father of nation and ppl who did so much v hardly celebrate deir jayantis…

  120. hao, bhaisaab aur bahino jiyo,
    khoob ho gayi yeki burai oo ki burai….koi itihaas ki book mat pado apne ghar aaj aur pucho ghar balo se ki pariwar se kitne log swatantrata ke liye lade the….tab pta chalegi Mahatma aur Nathuram ki kimat…… aur suno kuch krna chahte ho to khud karo doosro ke kiye pe judge mat bano…..pta hai India me paida hokar ANGREZI galiyan khoob sikh gaye ho…..unke….barabar buddhiman bhi ban jao vo itne chutiya nahi the kon angrez ki saab pka pkaya de jate…aur na to Mahatma bure the na Nathuram bura to koi aur hi th samjho….jisko ghar,jamin,daulat ya prime minister ki gaddi nahi balki poora ka poora MULK chahiye the………… 100% sahi baat hai uss Ek AADAMI ne hi saab matiya met kiya tha !!!! ab jo ho gya so achcha hua ab khud se kuch karo …SONIYA pr nirbhar mat raho!!!!

  121. It was my long back desire to read the statement of Sri Nathuram Godse or to read the book written by Sri Gopal Godse but through this site I fulfilled my desire upto some extent. I am not ashamed to accept it that it has impressed me towards Godse. Ghandhiji may be great but Godse was not inferior to him. Our forefathers(living in undivided India) told that they could not migrate to India in time as Gandhiji has said Pakistan will be formed on my dead body. Later on Pakistan was declared and they had to rush to India leaving all their belongings their and had to live in India in miserable conditions for years. Who was responsible for the bloodshed and migration of Hindus from Pakistan, now I think none other than Gandhi.

    • manohar ji
      1-what was the contribution by godse for the freedom of india,
      2-why godse killed gandhiji after independent ,why not before
      3-godse femus only after killed gandhi ji
      4-u know what was the situation why pakistan made
      5-gandhi ji was never thinking to be priminister of post independent inda

      • banoj… why dont u read the article properly and then comment…
        it is clearly written that godse killed gandhi as he proved incompetent in saving INDIA and his comment on partitioning of INDIA wud be over his dead body was proved wrong.
        since, he did not die after partition, godse kild him..
        FIRST READ..THEN COMMENT… DUMBO

  122. Supporters of Godse……..RSS pracharaks, the dimwits of human society.Imagine India being led by seperatists like RSS … (though Vajpayee was thanks to the coalition govt their ideas were never near implementation) .. the facist would have divided and multiplied India numerous times like the princely states which existed prior to and after the Brits ( though Sardar Patel takes credit of unifying be thankful he was in the national congress). Please stop even giving the murderer / terrorist Godse any importance at all.. he needs to be treated like any other terrorist of 9/11 and his thaughts massacred like the martyrs of Jalian wala Bagh.

  123. Sahid Bhagat Sing first arrest hue the sirf Against British leaflet batney kelea. Shahid Khudiram Bose ko 16 years old mey hi Fasi dey diya gaya. Netaji subhas bose ko gum karwa diya gaya taki desh ki bagdor apne hath me ley sakey congress. Leken so calling Gandhi ko kuch bhi nehi kiya gaya. Is admi ney 30 core Hindustani ko sirf 10 lakh British ke same Hizra banake rakh diya. Taki British humey loot tey rahey. Or janey ki baad desh unko dey kar jaye. Agar MG ne ek bar bhi kaha ke british ko maro, to uske dusre din India independent ho jata. EH EK ESA BANDA HAY JO HUM HINDUSTANI KO BRITISH KE SAMNE AGINGSA CHUDAKAR HIZRA BANAKAR RAKHA. ME AS A BENGALI CAN'T LOVE GANDHI. HUM PAYR DABAR INDEPENDENT KE KILAF HAY. HUM SAR KATKAR INDEPENDENT LENA CHATE THEY. ISNE CASMA PAHENA THA BANDHKAR, LEKEN ESA KAR DIYA ISKA PURA FAMILIY (GANDHI PARIWAR) KO FULL SETTELE KAR DIYA, JO HUMKO ABHI BHI LOOT RAHEY HAY. ORR HUM HINDUSTANI BEBAKUF INKO DESH KEY FATHER BOLTE HAY. SHAME ON US.. I SALUTE TO NATHURAM GODSE.

    • U r ryt Mr.Bapi……Congress HINDU and SIKH Dharam ki dushman hai…..Jo sarkar GANGA ko National River ghoshit nhi kr skti…….?….Ramayan or Geeta ko National Granth ghoshit nhi kar skti…?…..Gau hatya ko nhi seal kr skti…?…..Amarnath….or kailash mansarovar….or Hemkunt sahib ki yarta par sabsidi nhi de skati…..?…….Aisi Sarkar ka takhta palat kar dena chahiye……

    • Sorav Gogna sir we are a secular nation. if we declared ganga to be our national river mainly on religious grounds it would cause an uproar among the other religions. india houses many other religions and wouldn't they demand that their religious places and books be given national importance too? if for you your religion is important then for them their religion is. and you can't judge a government merely on the basis of its inability to declare ganga a national river or ramayan a national book.

    • setudagli You are not in a secular nation. ITS A SICK – ULAR NATIONS. AND WE ARE SICK. IF WE ARE STAY LIKE SICK. IN ABOUT NEXT 30 YEARS, IT WILL BE AN ISLAMIC COUNTRY. BECAUSE THEY ARE NOT SICK – ULAR LIKE US.
      On that time you will be in a zoo. Or ek bacha uske papa ko bolega ke " Abbu eh kon hay?" Uske abbu bolega " Eh dekho beta, eh Hindu hay. jo ki secular they." Tab oo bacha bhi jor jor se hasega….

    • Mr. Agar koi govt kisi religion ko national symbol nhi bna sakti to usko protect to kar hi sakti hai……Jab govt ke employee RAM CHANDER ji ko sirf kahaani hi mante hain….ram setu ko break karne ki koshish krte hai….den we dont need this type of govt………

    • DONT READ THIS AS A HINDU, MUSLIM, SIKH OR OF ANY RELIGION BUT AS A HUMAN BEING AND ASSUME IF IT WERE YOU. COMMENTING AND CRITICIZING OTHERS IS VERY EASY IT TAKES GUTS TO DO SO AND SURRENDER URSELF INSTEAD OF RUNNING LIKE A COWARD.
      BELOW LINK SPECIFIES AN ARTICLE WRITTEN BY BROTHER OF NATHURAM GODSE WHO WAS INVOLVED IN THE ACT I BET AS A HUMAN BEING ATLEAST YOU WOULD UNDERSTAND HIS MOTIVE
      http://www.imrajeev.com/2009/01/why-godse-killed-gandhi/

      • thank you nathuram godse agar ap na hote to ajke yuva pidi bhi ganghi ji ko bhagwan manti par kya gandi ji hi akele galat the kisi ne to unka sath diya honga
        shayad gandhi ne hi bhrashatchar shuru kiya jo gandi parivar aj b chala raha
        par logko kyu nahi samjta ki gandhi parivar me hi problem hai ek mohandas gandhi ne desh ka partition kiya aur jinda hote to aur karte aur ab ye gandi ki congress jab se ayi to janta ko loot hi rahi hai sab milke inhe ikkalo plz save india and indian
        hum sab bharatiya hai aur bharat humara adhikar hai

    • setudagli ji, just go one comment upward and see Sorav Gogna's comment. When Haj pilgrims are getting subsidy, why not those who travel to Amarnath or Kailash. This is what you call secular, right? Days are gone when people were talking about secularism on behalf of the Muslims of India. People like you are growing number and now the time has come for people like us to talk about secularism on behalf of Hindus of India. If it goes like this a day will come when our Hindu grand children and Hindu great grand children will be driven out of our home land. Ramayan, Mahabharath happened in this country. If you still think that we are wrong, then this is our answer. "Why not we claim it a national book. Incidents narrated in Holy Qurran or Holy Bible are did not happened in India".

    • Mr.setudagli ……Can u tell any river name or hill name which is belongs to any other religion in India………. So "Why not we claim a national river as Ganga"….

    • Bapi Dey, During freedom fight, Subhas Chandra Bose had, formed and Army, to fight for freedom, there were many other freedom fighters throughout India who were fighting their own way, some thru media, like dramas, cinemas,pros,poetry,News Papers etc. Mahatma Gandhi had adopted what he thought was right. During that time what your forefathers were doing , had anybody stopped them from freedom fights, did any of your forefathers assasinated any British Governors,Officers,Soldiers, were they HIZDAS, or NAMARD, "abey besharam' now your father and your self are enjoying the freedom of India, now you are talking against Mahatma Gandhi. Shame on you, bloody illetterate bengali, read good books. Do not read this RSS rubbish writings. They themselves are HIZDAS.

    • Jab Bhagat sing ko fasi se rokne kelea sare punjab tatha pure india me andolan chir chuke they, signatures collects ho raha tha, tab FASI DENE KELEA PATA HAY KON FIRST SIGN KIYA THA IN FAVOR OF BRITISH ? ITS YOUR M GANDHI. SALIM NA MARD TUM JASE LOG HO. TUM LOGO NE BAHOT KHUN DIYA JAB JINNA NE DIRECT ACTION DAY MENTION KIYA. TUM LOG APNE RELEGION KELEA JITNA MARE, USKA 1% BHI SAYED ESA HO JO DESH KELEA APNA JAAN DIYE HO.. HUM FREED HUE HAY NOT FOR GANDHI. 2ND WORLD WAR KE BAD EH DECIDE HO GAYA THA KE AB KOI MULK KO KOI GULAM NEHI KAR SAKTA. MG GANDHI NE BRITISH KE DECLARATION PE SIGN KIYA KE " BHAGAT SING NE HINGSA KE RASTA CHUNA OR AGAR USEY FASI DIYA TO MUJE KOI PROBLEM NEHI". IS DECLARATION KE BA BRITISH NE FASI KE COURT ORDER KE 1 DIN PAHLEHI FASI DEY DI. USKE PAHELE TINO KO BURI TARAH MARA. FASI DENE KE BAD UNKE BODY KO GHASLET (KEROSIN) SE JALAKAR PANI ME FEK DIYA. INKO GANDHI ARAMSE BACHA SAKTE THE.
      2. AP EH JANLE KE 15 TH AUGUST JIS DIN KO HUM CELEBRETE KARTE HAY WO DIN HUMNE NEHI CHUNA THA. WO BRITISH NE CHUNA THA. WO DIN BRITISH KELEA APNA GLORIOUS DAY THA. KIYNKI 15 AUGUST, 1945 KO JAPAN NE UK KE ARMY KE SAMNE SURRENDER KIYA THA JUST AFTER THE USA NUCLEAR BLAST IN JAPAN. BRITISH KE KUTTE CONGRESS NE BRITSH KE ORDER PER USI DIN DESH KO AJAAD DECLARE KIYA.
      3. APKO EH BHII JAN LENA CHAIYE, KEY INDIA HI EK ESA DESH HAY JISKI AZADI KELEA BRITISH PARLIAMENT ME BILL PAS HUE (HA HA HA HA ) . KEY ABHI INDIA KO FREED KARNA HOGA. WO BILL PASS HONE KE BAD HUMKO AZADI MILE. KOI M GANDHI KELEA NEHI.
      4. AGAR KOI NAYA GOVT OF UK, IS BILL KO WITHDRAW KARTA HAY, (IT WILL MAY BE NEVER HAPPEN) TO HUMARA DESH INDIA, LEGALLY FIRSE GULAM HO JAYEGA. EH SAB APKI CONGRESS KA DEN HAY.

    • setudagli but ramayana n geeta has been written in India but other religious books are written at thier own places…and Ganges should be a national river not because of only religious point of view but because of its scientific, geographic n historical point of view..got it….yup i mean it dat equality must be there but not like dat…taking rights of Hinduism…n giving so much percentage of quota to lower castes, it doesnt show equality it still shows dat our nation has no feeling of equality. and it still creates feeling of rudeness towards lower class people dat they r getting everything bcoz of their quota fascilities not bcoz of there abilities…actually the competitions have became a challenge only for general category…..if u all want equality den u all must indulge all these lower castes in general category….it would solve many probs in India…

    • setudagli
      while you are right that we are secular nation and neither Geeta can be declared national book, nor Ganga national river, what is the logic in giving subsidy to hajj. is this secular. how do we allow bangladeshi's in India. knidly reply.

    • well mister secular, ganga should be declared national river not on religious basis , but if u read about indian geography and the population which depends on this great river n its tributeries, the point wil be clear to u. And about geeta, this is the grantha whose words swami vivekananda quote while delivering his very famous lectures in shicago, counsil of religion and all the religions appriciate that, geeta in itself is secular like any other religious book . if u think that swami vivekananda was not secular, u are free to think whatever u want,for me u seems to be pseudo-secular, but most people wont agree with u.

    • setudagli in dat case hindustan is for hindus… as decided during partition by ur lovable leaders.. unhone hi us smay kha tha ki india is for hindus nd pakistan for muslims toh ab hum kyun na ganga ko national river bnaye.. agar congress ki sarkar rhi toh vo din dur nhi jb hyderabad ko owaisi jese kayar log dusra pakistan bna denge.. tym to wake up nd support hinduism

    • Because Nathu Ram Godse (according to him) realized that Gandhi was doing harm to the nation and to Hindu's (or Sikhs as well) by favoring only the Muslim community…
      Gandhi somehow was not sane enough to make the correct decisions at the right time, and he actually did not allow people like Subhash Chandra Bose to grow and take command of the struggle for independence…
      Come again if you still can't understand the reason

    • क्या अप जानते है कि—
      ३० जनवरी को यदि गांधी वध रुक जाता तो ३ फरवरी १९४८ को
      देश का एक और विभाजन पक्का था
      जिन्ना की मांग थी कि पश्चिमी पाकिस्तान से पूर्वी पाकिस्तान जाने में बहुत समय लगता है और हवाई जहाज से जाने की सभी की औकात नहीं, तो हमको बिलकुल बीच भारत से एक कोरिडोर बना कर दिया जाए जो :-
      १. लाहौर से ढाका जाता हो
      २. दिल्ली के पास से जाता हो
      ३. जिसकी चौड़ाई कम से कम १० मील यानि १६ किलोमीटर हो
      ४. १० मील के दोनों और सिर्फ मुस्लिम बस्तियां ही बनेगी
      तत्कालीन परिस्थितियों में सभी भारतीय और पाकिस्तानी इस सत्य से परिचित थे कि एक और विभाजन निश्चिंत है, उसके बाद नाथूराम गोडसे ने जो किया वो इतिहास है, अगर गाँधी वध का संकल्प पूरा ना होता……….. .तो आप ही बताइये क्या आज भारत कितना होता ?
      गोडसे जी भागे नहीं, और इस पुन्य कार्य को न्यायलय के सभी ३५ सुनवाइयों पर स्वीकार किया……….. …..
      पर क्या हम इस देवतुल्य वीर पुरुष के त्याग और बलिदान को सार्थक कर पा रहे है या फिर अनेको जिन्ना और अनेको गाँधी के स्वार्थ में सनातन की बलि दी जा रही है
      जय हिन्दू राष्ट्र !!!!!
      जय सनातन !!!!!!!!

  124. नाथूराम इससे पहले भी बापू के हत्या की तीन बार (1934, मई और सितम्बर 1944 में ) कोशिश कर चुका था,

  125. hi all When my teacher told me to read the speech delivered by nathuram godse I studied it thoroughly then I came to about the reason why nathu ram godse killed mahatma gandhi.

  126. there is a nice support you got @abhishek mishra…
    with all due respect I would lilke to remind that we indians can be easily influence….
    i agree with the fact that nathu wasn not wrong at all..
    but also not agree with the conclusion that he vs the culprit..
    remember the english story that gandhi was a lawyer n hardly won a case..:-)
    i never found gandhi as a politician or as a mastermind of nything..
    even I found him passionate but influensive..
    vo nehru n party k lye matr ek kathputli tha jiska congress jee bhar k istemal karti thi…
    i never doubted is theories..even at home you too have to follow his theories like sacrificing for your loved ones nd trying to be honest towards your family…don't you?
    just like that gandhi treated the nation ads his family..nt only nation but the world…as family…
    but the fact behind oll his theories was lacking a main law of nature…dats goodness affects only the good people.. bad people don't bother about good and bad… so goodness never work on them…
    godse was an erotically minded man… but even he couldn't recognize the main culprit… n dat was not gandhi ofcourse..
    nehru party and jinnah group saw a dream to lead the country…but none of them coudnt sacrifice their dream… hence find a solution by dividing the beautiful golden bird n a curse to all indians and pakistanies..
    an endless trauma n pain which our soldiers n common man suffers evry upcoming day…
    kashmiries are bound to live as refugees in their own country…
    its so miserable……

  127. Hardly makes any sense both ways…
    One was a moronic pervert… other was a religious Fanatic…
    Subhash Chandra Bose was a real Hero… but he too lived a miserable life in India… thanks to the stupid politics and the deciders of policies and everything…
    Its true that Gandhi wasn't a strong man, and being honest, he was so weak that he couldn't much retaliat against either the Britishers or whatever…
    Gandhi is hyped and over rated… It wasn't India alone who got freedom during 1945 – 1955… many other countries owned by the Britishers also got free during this time, the reason being that the Britishers have become real weak after the WWII.
    It was stupid, in face very stupid on Gandhi's part to ask the Indian Army to fight for Britishers in WWII… Bose brought back those PoW's back to India by making the Azad Hind Fauj.
    Adding more to it… though V B Patel dreamed or tried to make one united nation > India. The trick failed miserably and is still backfiring…
    Its like tying the north pole of a magnet with another north pole just because u feel that its the right thing to do… whether it works or it doesn't.

    • Information is only as good as it's source. Let's not get agitated by simply reading one article. Be critical and THINK. This should be a platform for discussion and (hopefully) pave the way to solve the underlying problems in India now. If people just start going on a shooting rampage simply because he/she does not agree with a certain political statement/view/policy, then it's just plain silly.

    • That was not Just Another Shooting Rampage (Like the one took place at Jaliyan Wala Bagh, Amritsar Thanks to Mr O'Dyer (or what ever the spelling of his name was…), Gandhi was influencing the nation in a very major way… and his ideology was harming the nation…
      Anyways, nothing lasts Forever… Gandhi did enough harm to the nation, he made it sure that the most deserving and elected Congress President S C Bose had to resign from the post and had to make a separate party and movement… He made sure that they had the control over the nation, and all the decisions came through between his legs…
      Country suffered more because of his policies, and If he was so accepted and correct, then why we dun have a single true Gandhian here??

    • agar gandhi kuch samay aur jinda rehta to nischit hi bharat ke kum se kum char Tukre aur karwa deta lanat hai un logo par jo usey apney baap ko chor kar usey bapu aur rashtrapita kehte hein ,rahi kasar uske chamche nehru ne puri kar di ,galti kari in dono ne aur bhugat raha hai sara desh .

  128. Bapi Ji……
    Mein sirf itna kehna chaunga ki sirf gandhi hi akele nahi hain jinhone humein loota hai…..
    Aaj congress bhi vahi kar rahi hai. Chahe vah indira gandhi ho , rajiv gandhi ho ya sonia gandhi ho sab log milkar humein loot rahe hain..
    Gandhi ki dhaarnaa shuru se hi hindu virodhi thi or aaj bhi congress hindu virodhi neetion par chal rahi hai.
    Sonia gandhi ek aisi aurat hai jise apne baap (biological father) ka naam bhi malum nahi or yes bade afsos ki bat hai ki aaj hindustan ki sarkar aisi aurat ke hath me ha..
    I don't know whether u knows it or not but Nehru dynasty ke ancestor Muslim the jo apna naam change kar hindu ban gaye or gandhi ne congress ke in muslim se hindu ka chola pehne logon ki or is desh ko baatne mein koi kasar nahi chodi..

  129. madhar chod assish purohit sale chutiya, gandu tumhe gandhi ji ke bare me kya pata hai? tumhe apn? e baap ke bare me pata hai ki tu rastra pita par aarop lagaaraha hai.band kar yes galat comennt.nai to gand phad dunga.

    • Ye to us dhongi ka dikhawa tha……." RAGHUPTI RAGHAV RAJA RAM, PATIT PAWAN SITA RAM…ISHWAR ALLA TERO NAAM…SABKO SAMMTI DE BHAGWAN.." Ye sare GANDHI HINDU virodhi the or abhi bhi hain……Saala kamina BHAGWAN SHREE RAM CHANDER MAHARAJ ka naam badnam krta rha…

    • saale haram khor wo tumhare dil pe kaise raj karte hai be
      chullu bhar pani me doob kr mar q nahi jate gaddar kahi k

    • BIRBAHADUR SINGH GANDHI CHUTIYA DHA HAI RAHEGA AUR E DIN AAYEGA JAB ISS BAAT KO SAARA DESH SAMAJH JAYEGA USS DIN HAMARE RUPAYE MAI GANDHI NAHI BHAGAT SINGH KA PHOTO HOGA AUR USS DIN INDIA FIR AAJAD HO JAYEGA GANDHIYO SE …………COMING SOON

    • you are right Bibahadur ji….ye log kuch bhi bole….koi gandhi ji jaisa achhha insaan nahi ban sakta…mujhe koi ek question ka ans.de sakta hai kya?? unhone desh se apne liye kya liya..aur unke naati pote..koi hai politics me kya???mahan logo ke bachhe bhi mahan hote hai…hum chah kar bhi unke kadmo ki dhool ..nahi ban sakte…

      • Are bhai in logon ki baatein jo Jinnah kehta tha usko justify karti hai
        Dukh ki baat hai ki Gandhiji ki ideology haar gayi, aur aise logon ki jeet gayi, isliye hum bat gaye.

  130. If we thing according to new generation then GODSE was right. He was 3-4 genrations back, that their was no person to lead country.People want freedom but to whom to follow no much cummnication infrastur, literacy like today. that time top leaders (Congress Alone Party) influneced by Gandhi and move forward step to step of Gandhiji. That's sure if gandhi ji was not in india might we got freedom earlier, b'caz we have Bhagat Singh, chander Shekar Azad, Udam Singh and many more freedom fighters to whom we don't know or never written in history books. today is Bhangat Singh, Raj guru and Sukhdev death Ceramony. Hats off to them and Jai Hind.

  131. Puri Azadi ki Ladai me Gandhi ne ek Lathi / goli khai kya? nahi, to fir father of Nation kaise ban gaya? Dil se sachha Hero to Godase Hai……..jin hone.
    Hindu ke liye Ram Bankar ek Ravan ko Mara jai hind.

    • Hemant Sabhani, Sharam ana chahiye, you must feel shame for this statement, Gandhiji had sacrificed his life for the cause of India's feeedom. Are you so illetterate, have you read about Gandhis public life. One RSS pervert had murderede Gandhi and you are prising that murderer. Shame on people like you.

    • salim karup : You are a real illiterate BRO. It seems 'My experiments with truth' has begotten a 'follow the leader' crap as you. Come on, be a pro, donn clown to be a knowledgeable mess relying on mere factoids. Google out some simple topics that will clear out the shit from your junk head. Let me help you and every one else here………..Google out-'Gandhi's support for khilafat movement;Moplah Rebellion 1921;Naokhali Genocide, Clauses of the Gandhi-Irwin Pact(this will highlight his intentions in slaying Bhagat Singh);Gandhi's alleged role in the making of Pakistan……………the list continues.
      Its time to accept the truth of Gandhi's tyrrany. We live in the age of internet. We can have any information at our finger tips lest some idiots as you, who still rely on autobiographies of bloody anti-nationals. Auto biography mein sab apni taarif hi karenge. Gandhi has never repented in any of his self portrayal works. On the other hand, Nathuram was a real nationalist, who brought harmony to the nation by eradicating a cancer named GANDI(GANDHI)

    • salim karup jai nathuram gode ,,,,,,,, aaapka bapu hoga mohan das gandi ,,,o hamareliye pagal kutha hai,,,,hamareliye suchhe mahathma log nathuram godse,subhas chandra bos,chandrashekar ajad,bhagath sing ,lala lajapath rai,o sab deshkeliye apny bhalidhan diya hai,,,,,,apka pagal gandine kay kurban kardiya bharath aur pakisthanko alag kardiya au kusthe musalmanko firbe industhan me bachadiya ,,,sale kuthe gandi

    • गाँधी एक अंधविश्वास
      अब रंगरूट भर्ती का काम शुरू हुआ । गाँधी ने एक महान ब्रिटिश राज्यभक्त की तरह यह काम बडे मनोयोग से शुरू किया । गाँधी ने खुद लिखा है – “मेरी दूसरी जिम्मेदारी रंगरूट भर्ती करने की थी ।” अब उसने अपने अहिंषा के शिद्धान्त को ताक पर रखकर तर्क वितर्क करके लोगो को शस्त्र धारण करने का उपदेश देना शुरु किया। यह तो बस एक झलक थी गाँधी के अंग्रेज प्रेम की।

    • All this thinking and reading led me to believe that it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (three hundred million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and well-being of all India, one fifth of the human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghatanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the National Independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well. Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokmanya Tilak, Gandhi's influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to these slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a dream if you imagine the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scruplous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day. In fact, honour, duty and love of one's own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggressionis unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. (In the Ramayana) Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. (In the Mahabharata) Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed the a total ignorance of the springs of human action. In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essential for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history's towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Govind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhi has merely exposed as self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever for the freedom they brought to them. The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good work in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India, he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on in his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the judge of everyone and everything; he was the master brain guiding the Civil Disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin it and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, but that could make no difference to the Mahatma's infallibility. 'A Satyagrahi can never fail' was his formula for his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.

    • Salim Karup: Sacrificed tb bolo jbb usne khud ki ho, usko to sare aam maaraa thaa, shaayad pichle janm me me hi Nathu Ram Godse thaa, jisne uss Gandhi ko maaraa thaa, I shapth now I came to know how Gandhi, Nehru and all get the power in just one day after Independence without any Vote/poll…….

    • Salim Karup: Sacrificed tb bolo jbb usne khud ki ho, usko to sare aam maaraa thaa, shaayad pichle janm me me hi Nathu Ram Godse thaa, jisne uss Gandhi ko maaraa thaa, I shapth now I came to know how Gandhi, Nehru and all get the power in just one day after Independence without any Vote/poll…….

  132. what I believe is this tale of Godse was how he saw everything.. maybe at some places he is right BUT if Gandhiji stood alone for a cause on his own maybe the reason behind this is becauce Congress couldn't come up with the ideas that could shake the very foundations of British govt. and believe you me the othe leaders were not so stupid or losers that they blindly follow him maybe few of them had same intentions as Godse has described but do you find all of them so stupid? ask yourself? You all may find that division of muslims and hindus was a good step but trust the nation would have been a better place to live if the nation was not India but Hindustan. Actually what Godse did was of his will.. Other than this did he do anything else? anything.. and further going on the topic that innocent blood spilled by Muslims of Hindus.. for that I find Jinnah more influential than Gandhiji and tell me one thing what change do the division brought? Didn't Kargil brought any blood loss? Didn't day to day violence due to Indo-pak cold war bring any blood loss.. We all don't know anything we read and we trust… we read this article and we are moved by it, when we read another we are after that.. He did it in less than 40 years what wasn't done for 400 years trust the father of the nation..

    • Pradeep Tiwari on second thoughts did your great grandfather bought you independence.. be thankful for what he did for us and use it rather than just playing with yourself all day long…

    • Rahul pradhan: i really feel pity on your judging of things. its really a shame that nonsense as you still exist in this age of information, when u can know the real colors of gandhi from amples of logical sources. You are really the 'see no evil,hear no evil,say no evil' type of monkey. Be a MAN, u moron

      • on a post abt four months old you comment and talk about age of information.. first of all pace up dude.. i am a predecessor of a freedom fighter are you?? or your grandfathers were busy clapping when our ancestors were fighting for the nation and you talk abt me being a man.. losers like you are hard to find.. And what sources do you prefer, the stories from who actually saw it all happen or from the souces idiots like you recommend.. i mean seriously??
        so plz shut up.. and stop commenting its your ideas and these are mine.. i’ll stick to mine and you stick to yours.. and this goes for people about to comment on this…

    • Rahul Bhai, ek baat suno, 1947-1955, lots of british ruled country got independence bkz Britisher defeated and had huge loss in WW-II and opposition party of England demand ruling party to focus on their own country rather than ruling one… and that is the only reason India got independence not bkz of Gandhi/Shubhash/Bhagat Singh every one tried by their Ideas but If WW-II hadn't fought britishers never ever give independence to India or any other Country, Samjhe munna…… Dubaara Gandhi k gungaan mtt krnaa

  133. It is very sad that because of Godse’s actions, Gandhi was not given a chance to deliver his final address. Violence, let alone murder, is never the answer.

    • agar nathu ram or late kar deta gandhi ko marne mein….to wo to INDIA ka or bhi bura haal kar deta…..Pakistan mein jo lakho hindu or sikh maare gye the….wo sab is kamine gandi or jinnah ki badolat hua tha………….JAI SHREE RAM

  134. nathuram godse had no right to kill anyone, but he must resist gandhi's thinking and make his picture out of indian "notes".

    • @lalitha: no one has the rgt to kill anyone but still ppl do dat…….nathuram godse got the punishment for killing a person as he was hanged………..hundreds of inocent ppl are murdered daily and they dnt get justice…so can u stp dat??? den why jst debate on gandhi's assasin……….a human is a human……..so if u so much care for that kindly do smthng to stop all the assasin's then talk abt rights to kill n all

    • dear mr. Sharma
      for sure, no one has the right to kill, but you must understand the one simple fact. gandhi did enormous harm to the nation. his elimination had become need of the time. India has a tendency to worship people. we generally have crowd mentality. resisting him was not an option. he would have caused more havoc.

    • Rajeev, yeah sure using force against Pakistan from separating would have made things rosy. Seriously, do you think with all that agitation and hatred on both sides it was wise to not let Pakistan have their way? Enormous harm? please. Gandhi achieved something for the greater good of humanity. Not simply for nationalistic goals.

      • dear Madhu,
        again I have the same point. when it comes between humanity and nation, my choice would always be the nation. it can not be called wise to sacrifice one side for the sake of humanity. every action must be bilateral either non violence or violence. if you believe that anything like humanity exist I can only say that you might be very good at heart but you are not observant of some basic principles of nature. doing good unilaterally has proved disastrous, not only in India but worldwide.
        your opinion is welcome.
        regards
        Rajeev

      • Dear Madhu
        I appreciate the concept of humanity but it must be bilateral. on sided humanity has always resulted in disaster.
        regards
        Rajeev

    • ur rgt mr. choudhary…..but did mr. gandhi follow these principles himself??? There are lot of things written about him and his own letters that goes against him and anger and terror is not a solution was also apllicable to britishers then why did gandhi let sacrifice our Indian ppl that consisted of so many Hindu, Muslim, Sikh brothers and not teach the same to britishers.

    • mr. chaudhary,
      although the principle of non-violence is supremely noble and highly romantic, it does not stand good when it comes to real life. no matter how many praises are sung, no one can deny that violence and terror can only be won by counter violence and terror. imagine if nazis were not suppressed by use of superior force, pakistani attacks were not repelled. history would have been much different.

  135. Gandhi was just a magician, who worked in League with British to keep India for ever under them. He could have conceded to Subhas Chandra Bose, and started an armed resistance to the foreign rule. The INA, Indian National Army, contained Hindus, Muslims and Sikhs who would any time fight for the motherland against the British, but that could not be despite the Netaji once being the president of INCongress. Only Gandhi's sway held supreme and the sentiments of a 400 million Indians didn't count, or meant nothing for Gandhi. He was just a madman being used and pampered by the wily British. I would say: Long Live Netaji, Subhas Chandra Bose and his INA!

  136. VERY GOOD JOB WORK…BY NATHURAM, AGAR MAIN HOTA TO MAIN BHI US GANDHI KO MAAR DETA…SHAHID BAHGAT SINGH KO CHAHTA TO YE GANDHI BACHA SAKTA THA…BUT YE TO SAALA ANGREJO KE TALWE CHATNE WALA THA… I THINK HE MUST BE A MUSLIM…

    • Hashim Khan : Donn blame Dhirender, its the misdeed of Gandhi and his fallacious acumen of appeasing all najayaz demands of Muslim that has led to this hatred. Sayad jiss din Pakistani Mussalman Hindustani Hinduon se pyaar karenge, toh ye nafrat mit paye. But, for this, India has to take a strong diplomatic stand against Pakistan to efface it of the jehadi mindset and its corrupted rulers.
      Now donn tell that it wont be possible. I hope as an Indian you too want the same thing.

    • brother avinash and brother hashim …. its not about a hindu or a muslim …. we have lived together in this very great land , a great nation, our motherland which every child of it has an equal right to call it by any name he likes to call his dear mother india,bharat, hindustan!! …. and u cannot relate a political situation of any land or any country to a totally different topic of following a particular religion …. and let us not judge the policies of india and pakistan based on the religious beliefs …. in that case we will just be assisting dis rage of upcoming anger and hatred between fellow human beings following various religions and closing our eyes towards making da world a better place for our generations to come …. rememberer dat we r facin dese problems tode cuz our ancestors in power din play thier roles in da right manner in da past …. so do u want our cmin generations to suffer da same way like us?? …. and brothers i duno if a person in pakistan loves a person in india or not …. bt i ofcourse know dat a muslim in this country ofcourse loves a hindu like his own brother and da oder way round is also very true but we all r just hesitant to show it wich is very wrong !! We shud love n respect each other cuz we r born to da same mother OUR MOTHERLAND!! And this mother of ours equally belongs to all of us as much it belonged to any one else like nehru,jinnah or gandhi!! and we have a right to make our decisions !! NOW THE QUESTION IS R WE GOING TO MAKE A DECISION TOWARDS MAKIN THE FUTURE OF OUR COUNTRY BEAUTIFUL WHERE ALL OF US LIVE HAPPILY TOGETHER AS ONE or R WE GOIN TO CONTINUE TO FIGHT IN DA SAME WAY LIKE WE HAVE DONE TILL NOW ?? da choice is ours!!

    • YA LET US LIVE HAPPILY BUT TO BE FRANK SOME IGNORANTS OF MUSLIM COMMUNITY ARE SPOILING THE NAME OF THE COMMUNITY TO SING VANDE MATARAM IT WILL HURT US BRO PLEASE DO THINK ON AND RAISE UR VOICE SUCH MISCREANTS OR ELSE IT WILL LET DOWN THE MORALE OF OUR MOHTERLAND AS A NATION IN FRONT OF THE WHOLE WORLD WHEN THE SONS OF COUNTRY REFUSE TO SING HER NATIONAL SONG (NOT ANTHEM SONG) @Musheer Lahori

    • Raise our voice because some of us won't sing the national song? Do you think that really lets down our morale in front of the world? How about showing compassion to fellow human being? There are much more issues and problems we should raise our voice for. If we need up keep the morale of OUR MOTHERLAND then one need to treat her like mother, last I looked at our streets and how they are kept it is such a disgrace that our brothers and sisters would treat her with filth. This will be the first the world would notice of a nation.

    • Dhirender Singh ppl like u are real IDIOTS In Our Country Who spread violence by this hatred words
      The Topic here is goin on of Nathuram Godse
      so from where the Hell religion came ?
      Educated people never talk like this
      @ Avinash mohapatra : U dont say what Govt needs to do . What u can do for the counrty that matters

  137. GANDHI NE TO ASLIYAT MAI AAJADI DILWAI…..SIRF PAKISTAN KO….
    GANDHI EK MUSLIM DESH CHAHTA THA…NAAKI EK HINDU RASTRA….. LOKMANYA TILAK JI THE JO HINDUSTAN KO AAZAD KRWANA CHAHTE THE…BHAGAT SINGH, RAJGURU, SUKHDEV…YE SABHI HINDUSTAN KI AAZADI CHAHTE THE…NAAKI GANDHI KI TARAH PAKISTAN KI..AAZADI…

  138. huma to etna patta nahi tha thanks g app ka agar appa ko patta ho ke batbara sman land or baki bastuio ka kasa hoia plz batna ek bar phir thanks

  139. hey people…u seem to misunderstand mr ghodse’s address….the reason simply being da way history is taught to us in India…it is completely biased and state-run… if u try to place ur self in da 50’s… when freedom of india was emminent(after the two world wars) …gandhi n nehru could hav avoided partition… v would be in a strong united nation… no issues of kashmir no issues of terrorism… gandhi proclaed he was secular than why this unsecular approach of appeasement towards muslims… partition resulted in unneeded chaos damage destruction, moreover who gave gandhi o for that matter anyone in this world to make the hindus sindhis n sikhs from pakistan n muslims from india leave there homeland.. yes gandhi was arrogant, godse is right, gandhi is lyk that ignorant man who thinks wateva he dord is right…all others r foolish! he had to be assassinated! imagine a scenario where our country wud be governed by an impractical ignorant man worshipping non violence! the very existance of the union of india would be in danger! indian people are brainwashed by the way history is taught here! look up any internation book on the history of india 1900-1950! you would realise the biased way of us being taught

    • You people sitting here, singing your praises to this cowardly murderer ought to be ashamed of yourselves! Ghandi was a compassionate, forward-thinking teacher. He set out to end tyranny and build bridges between people of all races and cultures. Who gives a shit what his politics were?! If not for him, your first language would be the queen’s english because Britian would still be occupying India. Ghandi was one of the few genuine heros the world has ever seen. He had strong and simple convictions of bringing people together and possessed the strength of mind, body,soul and character to see them thru. Those who praise barbarism and the people who murdered him, are a part of the very same thinking that keeps all humanity divided.

      • Very well said .British kept Indians slaves and among the poorest , by stealing away all the resources for 2 centuries. If Indians have not learned a lesson , that the enemy rules by dividing up the Indian nation. then once again it can go back to that status. Even now the only way India can throw itself to dogs is by creating social or religious divide. Staying United is the safest and best way to live honorably. Thanks.

      • HEY Rashid just stop your bullsheet thinking ok..Nathuram ji is not a coward,he was a great hindu leader & who fougt for hinduism & every true hindu salutes him..

  140. "Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. " — Best Line , I would say!

    • The whole text what you read was not of the murderer Godse's. These posted text was well carved out by the RSS heads.They are working overtime for long years to villify Gandhi and make Pervert Godse as hero. The whole statement was ridiculous. As Brahmin he and his RSS was worried that Dalits,and other backward class Indian are being liberated from the hegemony, chauvinism, of Brahmins who had enslaved 99% of backward Indians. Reasonably they had bitter enmity with Christians and Muslims who had welcomed all willing backward Indians in their fold, and assured them that they are not lesser human beings.

    • salim karup : donn give biased statements as a fool. Read history and analyze the truth for yourself. It seems, you are a muslim….from the statement whr u highlight 'they had bitter enmity with Christians and Muslims who had welcomed all willing backward Indians in their fold'.
      Why donn u highlight the Moplah Rebellion of 1921, when the bastard Muslims swords slayed so many Hindus irrespective of Caste, only in the name of baseless jehad. Your motto was 'meet death or embrace Islam'.What about the Naokhali Genocide during Partition, that led to creation of Bangladesh.
      History is evident that whenever Muslims rise in majority…..they have demanded a separate land of theirs and bastards as Gandhi and Nehru easily conceded to their inane pursuits. It is rational that opportunists as you will sing his praise while on the other hand you will behold him as a kafir.

    • A real story doesn't exist. It is all fabricated versions. The truth remains that Godse killed Gandhi. Simply justifying the assassination using righteousness of religious texts doesn't make it just. As much as Godse accusses Gandhi's infallibility, he asserts the characters in our epics killing others as the right thing to do. Ramayana and Mahabharata was written by mere mortals like us. They aren't bound to be infallible as Godse asserts. By his definition, he wants to eradicate muslims from India altogether. Using force would have cost more human lives be it Hindu or Muslim. And it wouldn't have stopped until each party obliterated one another from this planet.

    • salim karup who said that they treat them equally ..its a myth….on the basis of this myth muslims and christians converted many many hindus. in reality they are worst…no religion in the world attack their own worship place execpt muslims, who blow each others masjids of the divisions of shias/sunnis every now and then…. chiritians are divided in to 10-12 castes or creed & colour codes of their skin… they sometime kill each other for not worshiping mother marry…how ridiculess…..yes..there were brahmins thousands of years ago who supressed some dalits but nobody does that today ..but in other religions its happening everyday……..first they should be human beings then teach others…

    • salim karup who said that they treat them equally ..its a myth….on the basis of this myth muslims and christians converted many many hindus. in reality they are worst…no religion in the world attack their own worship place execpt muslims, who blow each others masjids of the divisions of shias/sunnis every now and then…. chiritians are divided in to 10-12 castes or creed & colour codes of their skin… they sometime kill each other for not worshiping mother marry…how ridiculess…..yes..there were brahmins thousands of years ago who supressed some dalits but nobody does that today ..but in other religions its happening everyday……..first they should be human beings then teach others…

  141. Gandhi Ji was so great and so powerful .It is the story of David and Goliath . He as a David brought down the British Empire ( The Goliath) . With his teachings of justice , love for all Human beings.He thus removed the slavery of 2 centuries . Which the other greats tried to do but were unsuccessful(Tippu Sultan,Bahadur Shah Zafar) ) in the past. It was the educated Brahmin youth and others who brought the Mutiny to expel the British . Even after spilling of rivers of Indian blood (of Hindus and Muslims and Sikhs)still India could not get rid of the British.
    After 1857 failed attempt to India’s Independence , It was this great Brahmim Mahatma Gandhi got the Hindu Muslim Unity first and then victory later. It was this Humanitarian , intellectual , organizer , winner that won the independence along with the efforts of Millions and millions of other great Indians.The world recognizes the power of this Great Man . but a few Indians do not .These are only those who truly dont understand the message of Hinduism itself . The true message of Hinduism is love of all Human beings. To be able to see God’s reflection in every Human being. To serve the people with justice and truthfulness and compassion.Which is also the same with all other religions of the World. Greed and Anger makes Humans behave otherwise.

  142. Obviously this man is biased towords the side of the Hindus. It doesn't bring any sort of surprise to me to see that not everyone would have liked Gandhi and his influence on India. However, I think that this Godse blew what he thought Gandhi was in control of out of proportion. But it was interesting hearing both sides of the story, most definitely.

    • I feel it is wrong to say that Nathuram was biased towards Hinduism.In fact Gandhi took the Hindus for granted and tried to sacrifice their interests for the sake of Muslims.Creation of Pakistan was not the demand of Muslim majority but only of Jinnah where Gandhi surrendered.

    • In the name of non-violence, we kept quite and watched the Britishers loot our country. In the name of secularism, not only during the days before independence, even today Hindus are forced to sacrifice a lot. Your name suggests that you are not an Indian. Lots of things like these are not known to the world outside India is still happening. If you are a foreigner please pay a visit to India, stay here for sometime and do a research on this topic. You will understand. Sorry, if I had written anything harsh.

    • you should have gone through a deep study then but GODSE'S feelings should not be termed as hatred it we form the majority of our MOTHERLAND and the ruthless oppression of muslims had been suffered by us for about 1000 years and again if the decisions go on behalf of them then it would hurt us too and mr.mohandas did it for his own interest first he DIVIDED OUR MOTHERLAND WHICH WE CONSIDER AS OUR MOTHER AND ITS A PRIMARY DEITY FOR EVERYBODY IT STARTED CREATING THE ANGER WITHIN US (INDIAN'S TO BE EXACT RATHER ONLY HINDUS) AND HE COULD HAVE BEEN SILENT AFTER ALL THIS BUT INSTEAD IF HE GOES ON A FAST TILL DEATH AND BLACKMAILS OUR GOVERNMENT TO DONATE A SUM OF RS.55 CRORES SURPRISINGLY WHEN PAKISTAN HAD ALREADY ATTACKED AND CREPT INSIDE KASHMIR AND IT ENTERED SRINAGAR WHICH IS THE PRESENT STATE CAPITAL AND THE pakistani INFILTRATORS WERE KICKED OUT FROM SRINAGAR ONLY AFTER HIS (MOHANDAS'S ASSASSINATION) TILL THEN HANDS OF OUR ARMED FORCES WERE WERE TIED BECAUSE OF HIS STAND ON PAKISTAN TELL ME ONE THING IF U WERE IN THIS SITUATION WHAT WOULD U HAVE DONE H E KILLED HIM BEFORE GANDHI WOULD RUIN THE SOVEREINGNITY OF OUR MOTHERLAND I ADVICE U TO GO THROUGH LIFE HISTORY OF SARDAR SHRI.VALLABH BHAI PATELJI HE IS THE TRUE FATHER OF THE NATION AND IF U WNAT TO REALLY KNOW WHAT HINDUISM MEANS PLEASE DO STUDY SWAMI VIVEKANANDA HE NOT JUST A SAINT BUT HE IS THE SYMBOL OF TRUE INDIA AND HINDUISM AND HE THE GODFATHER OF OUR NATION

    • Annabelle Marie : its mohandas not mohanda.. all we can say is that you can love Gandhi or you can hate Gandhi but you can not ignore his contribution for the fight for freedom of S. Africa and India..

    • Annabelle Marie his full name was MOHANDAS KARAMCHAND GANDHI but all india called him BAPU GANDHI and MAHATMA GANDHI also

  143. It's true and sad to see that the person who is known as "Father of nation" is even not at all deserve the citizen of India, because he did more for Pakistan than for India.He should be killed much before time.If it would have been happened before time we can not see Partition of India and as well as the problem which we are facing right now with Pakistan.

    • It is really pathetic that this father of nation did not try for stopping the hanging stood the great son of the nation Sri bhagAt Singh telling that he would not support revolutioneries thus indirectly supported British violence of hanging though he claimed himself nonviolence preacher

  144. British could have got Gandhi killed any time when he was at his peak.They did not do so because they knew that Gandhi was the only one who would take care of their interests in India,forcing the people to surrender
    before his fasts.He weakened the efforts of others who had similar targets of independence.
    The fate of a secular state seen by Gandhi is well before all of us.

  145. I – India
    N – Never
    D – Develops
    I – In
    A – Anything
    Yes – don’t look at IT parks and say India has developed. We Indians are self centred fools and 65 years of useless Independence – We still piss on streets and adore reservation – I dont see light for generations to come…

  146. JAI HIND GODSE.GOD SE AMAR RAHE. SUBHASH CHANDRABOSE , NATHURAM GODSE , BAGATH SINGH , AZAD THESE ARE THE PEOPLE WHO BROUGHT INDEPENDENCE TO OUR COUNTRY.lET US SALUTE THESE PEOPLE FOR WHAT THEY HAVE CONTRIBUTED.

    • Gandhi was busy outside India. Who fool brought him back to India. It was J.L.Nehru and the britishers who did it.. In any case had gandhi not come to India, the country would have been really independent. Are we really independent even today. We are still slave to Italian Sonia and the off-spring of Feroz Gandi. Remove them from the country to save the country from disaster.

  147. Gandhi was more a saint than a political leader. His works towards upliftment of Harijans and idea of non-violence is much appreciated. But he forgot that Hindu ithihas always preached saama-dhaana-bedha-danda. When every ways to drive out British failed, it had to be Dand. Gandhi who regarded Bhagavadgita so much, could not understand the heart of Krishna. I would like to tell Gandhi Philiosophy is NOT Hindu Philosophy. Its his own, taking non-violenece as solution for all the problems.
    Gandhi was pampered by British, since they knew he cannot do any harm and probably they wanted more and more Indians (Hindus) to beleive only in Non-Violenece, so that they could disgress Hindus on efforts of Savarkar, Bhagat Singh..etc
    And what a legacy he left for his future generations. Nehru, Indira, Sonia, Rahul ..etc. If India has lost more than 60 thousand people to terorrism today, its because of Gandhi and his legacy, the Congress. THe fradaulent Pancha Sheela by Nehru and Shimla agreement and Accord by Indira, could not define a proper border for India. All they required was self glorification and were least interested in building a strong Hindu nation or Hindustan.

    • Gandhi was very weak… his idealogy was a lot like weak person’s who cannot save his own pride and who can depend and wait for others behaviour towards him.For properly running any organisation company or country we definetly need a strict punishment and strict enforcement of law.
      Nathuram godse was a right man in his deeds a true patriot a true indian. .salutations to him

  148. जितना की ये चित्र बनावटी है उतनिही यहां की बाते.अगर नथुराम इतने देशभक्त थे तो वो दो,चार अंग्रेजो को गोली मार देते.दुसरी बात ५५ करोड की तो आप सब इस बारे मे अधिक जानकारी ले.गांधीजिने पार्टिशन के लिये विरोध किया था पर नेहरु और जिना जिदपर अडे बैठे थे.और जब यह करना तय हो गया तब पाकिस्तान को ६५ करोड देना तय हुआ जो की उनका अधिकार था.क्यु की जब दो राष्ट्र होते है तो जमिन की तरह रुपयोंका भि बटवारा होगा.
    रहि बात भगतसिंघ की माफ़ि की तो अगर आपन खुद एक राह चुन लेते है तो उसके नतिजे भि आप स्वयं को भुगतने होंगे,अगर गांधी की एक दस्तखज से उनकी जान बाच जाते है ऐसा आपका कहना मान लिया जाये तो फ़िर ये तो गांधी की हि जित हुयि.
    संसार मे ऐसा कोइ इंसान नही जो गलतिया ना करे पर जो गलतिया कबुल करें वो हमेशा महान होता है.
    नथुराम एक सायको किलर था इसमे कोई सम्देह नही.क्यु की हत्या करते समय उसने मुस्लिम वेषभुषा अपनायी और सुन्नत तक की,इसके पिछे मुस्लिम समाज की बहुसंख्या मे हत्या हो यही प्लान था.पर वो उलटा पड गया और निरपराध ब्राम्हनो दुख भुगतना पडा.
    यहि बात जब सिख हत्याकांड मे हुयि तो आप लोग कॉंग्रेस को दोषी मान लेते है ना कि उन हत्यारों को,ये दोगलापन क्यु?

    • tushar
      tum bhi gadaar hoo jassa woo gandi aur naharu tah.
      pakistan banat hi muslmanno na hindu ko maran uru kar dia aur hamari women and girls ka rape kia uska badla agar hindu na maar to kay galat kai tumhara matlab hai ki woo hamari maa bahan ki rape karan hama mara aur hum uss salaa gandi ki tarah chup baatt.ajj bhi tum jassa logo ki soch ki wajah saa dest mai terrorist muslim parati hai.tum jassa logo ki soch ki wajah saa hi ajj pakistan jassa desh jinda hi nahi hai balki fulfool raha hai.kassa tum jassa log india koo apan desh mant to sayad hum is jaagh nahi hota.kon tah gandi kay kai ussna partition ussni na karwaya nehru ka saath.agar uss smaay woo saarr muslim ko bhi pakistn bajj deta to hum ajj g8 mai hoat.lakin kssa app jassa log jab tak desh mai hai kass ahoag.
      jai hindi jai godssaa jai bagaht singh jai chandre saker azad

    • @tushar
      agar tumhare jaise logon ko mauka diya jaye to hum sirf gandhi aur congress ki batein ko hi sach aur sarvmaya manna padega… balki tum doshi ho kyuki tumhe pura gyan na hi h aur naa tum pura gyan rakhna chahte ho, kyuki itihas vijeta likhte h to aapko sirf unki drishtikon ka gyan hota h, par doosre paksh ka nai, jab tak aapki samajh adhoori h aap sahi aur galat ka faisla kar hi nai sakte.
      Mujhe lagta h aap nasamjh ho aur chote bacche ho apko abhi bada hona jaruri h insab cheezon pe bolne se pehle.

      • @tushar
        Tumhe agar gandhi ke charitra ko ache se janana h to unki autobiography
        An Autobiography: The Story of My Experiments With Truth
        se shuruat karo. .
        aur fir use khatam karke jo usme likha h usi ko sab sach mat manana gandhi ko uske samay k log kya samajhte the wo b janana jaruri hoga. .
        Jahatak mera vishwas h uske bad hi tum samajh paoge ki kya sach me sahi h kya sach me galat.
        sikke ke do pehlu hote h dono pe vichar karna jaruri h

    • gandhi ne kya kia subhash chandra bose ,bhagat singh in logo ne itni mehnat se ajadi ki ladi aur neta ji ne to ajad hind fauj banaya aur gandhi ne goro ke dar se bhagat singh ke death certificate par sign kiya gandhi ji ne to do -char andolan chalya desh ajad tab hua jab goro ne pure india ko lut liya ‘kab wo sone ki chidiya hua karta tha aj itni garibi kyo hai.jise dekho whi ghotale pe ghotala karta ja rha hai ‘.ye mai sochta hun na ke main ksi ke bare me kuch kah rha hun.

  149. Muslims were such a pain in the arse, now wat if christians,punjabis,sikhs too demanded a different country?? wud Gandhi give in?? pak should hav been only a seperate state, not country.

  150. if godse was that much hurt with then he should have killed jinnah, lord mountbatton, other firangis rather than gandhi its all just bullshit on the name of hindusm bcoz of him many innocent bramhin suffered get killed who is responsible.

  151. if godse was that much hurt with then he should have killed jinnah, lord mountbatton, other firangis rather than gandhi its all just bullshit on the name of hindusm bcoz of him many innocent bramhin suffered get killed who is responsible.

  152. u all are absolutely right nathuram godse was a real hero gandhiji ne hamare desh ki itni buri dasha ki thi ki british ne bhi itni buri dasha nahi ki.aur yes gandhiji ki hi karamat hai ki aaj muslim hamare desh me rehkar bhi hamare samne sar uthakar rehte hai.

  153. doston achi baat hai ki kuch sachai jo chipa kar rakhi gai thi bahar aai aazadi ke pehle se hi media mix kam karta tha koi bhi kam niswarth nahi hota par swarth utna hi sidh karo ki samaj par galat asar na pade.bhagat singh 23 sal ke the jab unhone jan de di us mukaam tak unke jajbaton ko pacuchne ke lia kam se kam 10-12 sal lage honge aur ek bacha apna swarth nahi dekhta is lia unki izzat hamesha upar rahegi jante hain hum sab is baat par charcha ab kyon kar rahe hain kyonki yes pure congress ki chal thi ki wo desh ko ghulam hi rakhna chahti thi.Nehru ek aisa pariwar hai jiski tulna main ek vaisya se bhi nahi kar sakta kyonki meri nazar me unki(vaisyayon) bhi ek izzat hai.uske alawa yes Nehru(or so called gandhi family) ne jan mujh kar desh ke sabhi mahtwa rakhne wale sthano par ya to gandhi ka nam de dia ya nehru lagbhag har sehar me ek MG road ya mahatma gandhi road ya phir jawahar lal nehru univ. ya indira gandhi univ. par kya kabhi vallabh bhai patel lala lajpat rai bhagat singh udham singh aur wo tamam saheed me koi aur nahi tha jisne in se jyada kam kia tha ya importance rakhte hain aaj bhi baki deshon ne apne swiss bank ke account holders aur unke paise nikal lie par bharat me bheji gai list bahar nahi aa rahi aur koi kuch nahi kar sakta kya yes sabse badi gulami nahi hai, agar galti se aap kisi sarkari varisht adhikari ya mantri ke sath kisi case me ulajh gaye kya aapko nyay milega.bharat ka adhiktar hissa naksalwad se ghira hai jahan roj hamare CRPF POLICE aur anya log mare jate hain 75 jawan ek sath mar diye gaye aur na jane kitne roz mar diye jate hai par uspe sarkar kuch nahi karegi par ek din parliament pe attack ho jaye aur in kamino ki jaan musibat me ho to border par army khadi ho jati hai.agar america ya kisi bji izzatdar mulk ka insaan dusre mulk me phas jaye to ek insaan ke liye wo jamin aasman ek kar dete hain par hamre desh ke na jane kitne jawan POK ke jailon me hai kabhi australia me mar khate hain kabhi kahin ek bhartiya ki kya izzat hai? to doston niskarsh yeh hai ki ladai abhi khatam nahi hui hum ab bhi aazad nahi hue hain to main appeal karta hun un sabhi rastra bhakton se is rastra ke bete betion se ki ek forum banate hain jahan hum sirf baat nahi karenge balki is aazadi ki ladai ke khilaf pukhta kadam uthayenge hum jahan kahi bhi jis rajya me honge us rajya me sikshit yuvan tazurbekaron ki team banakar janta se judkar ek aisa sunami layenge ki is desh ki zameen se sare daag dho denge aur phir se is ganga ki dharti ko pavitra kar denge.for those who think we can do and we can contribute can write to me and we all can work together my mail id is [email protected].

    • I really salute to Mr. Nathu Ram godse. His belives, his ideology and his thinking really meaningful. In the fact Gandhi was a Saint than a patriot. But every country need patriot than Saints as sama as every Revolution needs blood.
      They are more patriot whose dies in the age of only 23 like Bhagat Singh, Udam Singh, Rajguru, Sukhdev, Kartar Singh Saraba and many of etc whose families are now in the darkness.
      I really dont know that Gandhi was absolutly right or wrong but one thing I can dam surely say that i
      his ideology was not so good for the any nation of the world. and India became a free country not for Gandi’s Satyagrah and non-violence movement. Even I personally feel that Britishes have always taken the advantages from the Gandhi’s movements and the flow of the revolution bacame weaker and in the result Independence came very late atleast 20 years.
      Rupay K upar kisi Saint ki nhi Patriot ki snap honi chahiye thi……
      JAI HIND

  154. Many of us don't know that there were 9 persons arrested by the police Nathuram Godse, Nan Apte, Karkare, Madanlal, Shankar Kistaiya, Gopal Godse, Vinayak Damodar Sawarkar, Dr. Parchure, And Badge, Nathuram And Nana Apte was got death punishment Sawwarkar and Dr. Pachure acquitted by the Hon'ble High court of Punjab and Badge was excused due to government witness and other got life imprisonment, But all know that only Nathuram Godse hanged , Nana Apte was also hanged. But he was not present at that time in incident place then why he is guilty and got death sentence even though is accused for conspiracy, Nathuram was great freedom fighter, he never run away from his punishment, after shoot he was still there in the spot. And when the trial court has punished him death sentence he has not tried for appeal in his death sentence, he had filed an appeal just for conspiracy because he told there is no conspiracy for Gandhi 's death. Why the other accused will get sentence. He had argued for him self, he had never hire any lawyer for himself. Even after pronouncement of judgement in High Court of Shimla the Honb'le Jus. Khosla Judge of High Court appreciate the behavior of Nathuram when he was in jail during trial. It is also spectacular that the bullets which has been found in Gandhi's body that was not from the pistol shoot by Nathuram godse, There are five injuries in his body and only 3 bullets were shot by Nathuram. Ther are many things in this case to know, why Gandhi was shot by Nathuram. Gandhism Ahinsa was only for Hindu. After bifurcation of country he wants that government give 55 Crore Rs/- to Pakistan but Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel and other leader don't want to give a single pie to them because it was Indians property, but Gandhi has decided to fast and pressurize to give them rupees.

  155. But it is also wonder that many Indians think that Present future Gandhi Family is connected with Mahatma Gandhi. But it is not true present Gandhi Family is Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru's Family and he is the one of the most butterer of Gandhi, Gandhi Has two sons Ram Das and Deodas Gandhi and there is no relation between both families except adulation.

      • Dear Sushil
        Stop living in fools’ paradise.
        Always remember – Muslims will be an oppressive majority and a turbulent minority.
        Look at what they did to Hindus in Kashmir where they were majority and in rest of India they have special demands for themselves.
        They owe their allegiance not to the country but to their religion. For them its Islam first and Bharat next
        So wake up. Though we cannot do anything about the ones who are now born in this country but we must face them properly and not give in to their absurd demands
        Muslims did not join 1857 independence struggle to free Bharat, but they wanted to get Bahadur Shah Zafar re-appointed as King of this country to continue Mughal rule
        Wake up
        Regards

      • Mr Sushil. On which world are you living? Wake up bro. There was an incident happened with me, I work for a BPO. Our is a multinational company works from 6pm to 5pm IST as it is a USA & Canadian process. One day there was a technical problem & we closed the office by 4 in the morning, cabs were not available at that time as they start operating from 5am. One of my colleague , she is a muslim girl. She asked me for a lift as she stays in a hostel near by to my apartment, I offered her life & on the way two guys chased us they saw Lord Ganesha’s sticker on bike & they hit me saying that where are you taking a muslim girl. They abused me & my colleague like anything. More over she was not sitting two sides, she was sitting to one side. They asked this girl one thing that “Office Musalman bandhe koi nahi hai kya? Hindu k sath aane k kya zaroori hai?” This hurted me very badly. He also said “Hindu log sab chinal k auladh hai” Which made me to cry. Then I hit both the guys & they registered a case against me. Now tell me kis nazar se aap ko Hindu – muslim bhai bahi lagra?

  156. @ALL who r against gandhi
    agar gandhi ji nai hote toh aaj bhi hum kisi angrez ke ghar toilet clean kar rahe hote.
    what type of independence u wanted.
    a man who sacrificed whole of his lyf for ths country ,doesn’t deserves this kind of comments!
    the only motive of ths nathuram was to get enlighted by killing mr.gandhi .
    a man has travelled and fought but still he is culprit ? buzzz off

    • @shikhar
      the thing he was really successfull to do was to fool people very nicely and and that can be read from your comment. Angrej kisi gandhi k karan nai chhode bharat kyuki wo is halat mai nai the ki wo desh chala payein to unhone bharat k sath usi time pe kai saare deshon k sath “Transfer of power” agreement kiya. Aur aaj bhi hum ghulam h!!!

      • boss transfer of power has to be signed bcoz jinnah has asked for it otherwise he would hav announced a civil war and on wht basis r u tellin tht we r not independent,for e.g whn u sell ur car u sign a transfer of authority tht doesn’t means tht u own tht car anymore.
        sowith due respect go n check ur knowledge first sir.

    • Mr. Shikhar main tumhare se agree nahi hu agar gandhi ji aaj hote to …..
      aaj jis kashmir ko tum bade shaan se kehte ho na ki hmare yahan hai woh aj pakistan ki shaan hota ? isme PUNJAB,RAJSTHAN, & gujrat ka name bhi aata hai
      kya aapko pta hai ki independence ke time pakistan ko 55 crore dena tha india ne jabki india ne diya 75 crore diya gandhi ji vjah se ……………
      kya aap ab bhi mante ho nathu ram godse ne galat kiya and jo aap keh rahe ho ki kisi angrej ke ghar ki oilet saff kar rhe hote to bahi aaj hum log jo foreign jate hain vahan par bhi yahi kam kar rhe hain
      to apne desh mein karne se kya hota hai aapko ya hme……….?

      • i agree wid u sir. but for that man life of the people was more important than money or land. don’t forget tht at that time pakistan was also included in india and they were our people.
        think!

    • Popularity in india is cheap sometimes. See the examples of Lalu, mulayam,mayawati etc…So the same to Gandhi and nehru.
      After world war II made britishers to leave india and not only india even thier other occupants.
      Nothing great Gandhi has done other than teaching lessons of cowardness …

    • abe o shikhar
      sale shikhar ki aulad tuje kya pata aazadi ka
      kisi ke dande khane se yan phir chup chap khade rahne se aazdi nahi milti
      without violation aazadi is not possible

  157. Jai Hind, I want to say every personality has some negative and some positive features. And same was with Gandhi ji and Mr. Godse. I never denied that Gandhi ji did so many mistakes. But if we see from an outsider point of view and consider the partition was a disaster. If it was like that and we should consider that country was not partitioned then where did Muslim go? Should hindus shoot them in India? Even it was not partitioned them I think Godse ji also must not think of revenging from muslim. There is no doubt that hunduism the best living style teller religion. But it also tells that we should kill the person who is wrong not to the relatives. Second Godse ji’s thoughts were amazing for the country and he saved the country at one level. But I think it could have been better if these kind of freedom fighters stood against congress at that time. Because at that time more than 90% population were hindu in the country. Today people become more materialistic and difficult to make them understand about these facts and effects. I remember one of the gandhi quotes – A nation’s culture resides in the hearts and in the soul of its people. And if once the people and youth would get awake there would be again a great revolotion in India.

  158. Stop Writing about the persons who are no more here.
    Now its time for all of us to do something for our nation.
    Hum bhi to sirf internet par likhne mei apna time barbaad karte hai..sochne ki baat hai hammse kitne log apne desh ke future ke liye contribute kar rahe hai
    ye tume hai jaagne ka or kuchh kar dikhane ka

  159. I am an army officer’s daughter and patriotism has rushed through my veins from childhood. Today I speak, not just being an Indian, but above all a Human. All you people, defending Godse don’t know anything about Gandhi’s sacrifice. If Godse was a real patriot, he could have done a lot more other than brutally killing Gandhi and then defending himself with his long, well thought,cunning speech. He was weak and scared and that is what led to such a shameful act. Not once did he make an attempt to meet Gandhi although even after his unsuccessful attacks , Gandhi called to meet him. His ashram was open to everyone. But he refused. And if you get your facts straight, Godse attacked Gandhi around 10 times and more than half of these attacks were done long before partition was even being discussed. Shame on all of you to insult a simple man whose entire life revolved around love and peace. If violence is the answer to everything, kill everyone and kill yourself too. Let all mankind suffer death for none is perfect and everyone has sinned. None of you are even capable of dreaming of what Gandhi has achieved for our nation. So, keep rambling about whatever you want, I know it, the world knows it, Truth alone triumph. Godse never got the place he demanded in the history. And Gandhi became immortal.
    “Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth.” – Albert Einstein on Gandhi’s funeral.

    • we indians need to maintain our thinking like sneha singh and priya.and people like surjit are evil minded , need to beware of such guys.

    • Nice to see your comments.I am going through this
      web page very cauciously but most of the guys till now making heroic statement against Gandhi and making hero the person Nathu even though they have not even moved an ant in their whole life. Their are very few people who thinks like u. Nathu’s Ideologies are based on division of Hindu and Muslims and Gandhi’s are on unity. only this ideology make Nathu the killer of Great person Gandhi. Think about the people who have so much hate in their heart will do with their brothers. though many person should have experience hate from others community but still we should not hate each other. as Gandhi says, An eye for an Eye Makes the whole world Blind.
      Jai Hind

  160. I agree what nathuram godse did at that time was right, even today the congress party is doing the same thing ,u people might have seen
    during utter Pradesh election how they tried to flirt Muslim by incresing their quata,BEWARE OF CONGRESS PARTY

    • all the people who think nathuram godse is a patriot are from his family and in mere future they will follow his legacy and create disturbance in hindu muslim unity. beaware and stay united. coz fight leads to nothin…….

    • i think u r a SC or ST..darr lagaya hoga ki tere quota musalman ko mil jaayega bolke aur tere haath me lota aajayega…ye kya kare musalman tum log ko..musalman sirf 5% se 10% govt jobs me hai baaki aur log kyu musaman bhi insan hai unko bhi arman aur unko bhi bhuk lagti…yaar utna kyu agar private jobs me bhi lo musalman ka to sirf resume dekhkar bhej dete..chalo tumhari baat lo sc st kam caste ke bolte but unke pas hi sabse zyada properties aur unko hi govt jobs hai aisa kyu…oc bc bhi to hai…sirf caste bade rahene se kuch nahi..jeb me bhi to hona chahiye..sab sc st leliye aur oc bc ko kya hai..reddy’s oc ke hai meri comp me office boy reddy hai..ye kahaka insaaf hai…quota kisi ko nahi sirf widows aur handicap jaise logo dena chahiye bakhi ka jaise army selections karte waise kare jobs selections me..

      • Abbe, Tu Hindu ho ya Musalman. Jisse bole usse abuse kar raha hai. Kya samaj k rakha hai tu apne aap ko, Behan chodh. Teri Maa chodh dhunga. Tu Musalman reh kar Hindu k naam se sab ko abuse kar raha hai ya tera biwi musalman hogi. Behan chod. Hindus ka takaath nahi pata hai tujhe, Maa chodhoonga behna chodh kaha rehta re tu? Clear hai ki Hyderbad ka he hai, Hyd mein kaha rehta re behan k lode tu? Teri maa chodh dhoonga, cut bulli saale.

  161. the day when people of india will start exploring and analysing rather just believing, ram will get a place he deserve….. jai hind

  162. these debates do not provide any solution to the current problems of india , we have many problems to disscus about. for example ruppe is trying to commit suiside , a person who gets 9 percent marks , becomes second grade maths teacher in a govt school , now system requires changes and our constitution needs some amendments.

    • And the problem never gets solved… Problem is the brain, the humans, the people, we… You can train the present, not the future… it never fully gets solved… its like energy, can't be created, can't be destroyed… only changes form…

    • Never, Why would You stop Trying ?? Trying is a good thing, makes You learn many more things, the actuals and the overheads… gives You immense knowledge about the on screen and off screen scenarios, helps you become more practical and humble… makes You…

    • @laltitha thyagraj: sitting in england and commenting on indian affairs is very easy. Talented ppl lke u prefer to spend ur whole lfe in other country use ur knowlege for the benifit of other country and then talk abt development of India lol.

    • Hmm…interesting comment. Would you have said the same f I had agreed with your comments about Nathuram? Am I less entitled to expressing my thoughts and opinions simply because I'm in a different geographical location? Isn't it fantastic that we now have a tool which allows people from different parts of the world to get connected for a common goal? Could this not be a platform for positive discussions and exchange of ideas? Perspective Swapnil…it's all about perspective. Stay calm and focused 🙂

    • no it doesn't help too mch……..as there are too mch of so called scholars who cme with brilliant and innovative ideas in our country but practically no one implements it himself or herself……….so instead of ppl exchanging ideas, ppl actually implementing those ideas are truly required. So sitting there in other country really doesnt contribute to the countries progress unless n untill ur network is really strong with ppl those who work on ur advice in india inspite u being there.

      • gandhi was a bustard and congress too. some selfish leaders of congress like nehru had ambition to rule india for the sake of anything and our people were like cow they were fooled. congress has done only destruction in the country right from partition to till now. playing divide and rule game. when thousands of people were dying in jalia wala bagh where was gandhi when lala lajpat rai was killed were was gandhi when bhagat singh was hanged were was he?? he was totally bullshit and then he used to sleep with other ladies. he was a bustard and intentionally he killed bhagat singh. when bhagat singh succeeded to get equal rights for all prisoners by the method of non violence then where was the gandhi? is this nonviolence is only made for gandhi. as he criticized bhagat singh and his friends. gandhi was bullshit spit on his face.

        • Yes..i am agree with Harsha Ranjan..
          Most of the modern people unaware about gandhi tricks.That fellow is a british agent ,who put indian in sin.Other wise India should be freed before 1920’s…

    • Hahaha! I suppose nothing is going stop you and I from commenting further on topics that interest us. I hope your network is strong enough to contribute substantially toward the country's development (growth?). Personally, I believe everyone can make a difference. No matter how small his/her contribution is. Every little thing matters. And in order for change to happen,the mindset of the people has to change. You have to start from the grassroots. Gradual change. After all, Rome wasn't built in a day. Question is if India is ready for change?

  163. Gandhi was a great leader. He shouldn't have been killed like this. His murder is not justified. He probably wanted to win the hearts. If you win the hearts, that is the biggest victory. To agree to partition was a big mistake (end of the day, he was human being). Please confirm, if Gandhi wouldn't have agreed, India wouldn't have partitioned? Together we would be stronger and best country. All we need to do is to just eliminate hate and hopefully will be united again in future.

    • bhai mere wo dil kisika nahi jeeta sirf uske umar lehaz karke usko izzat diye warna uski koi aukat nahi..lekin wo ek real politician hai aur jo jaanta tha politics…jo kranthi kaari sirf 22,25 aur kamse kam umar me anpi jaan azaadi me kurban kare unki koi izzat nahi..ye aap jo bolre gandhi wo 78 me mar diya gaya warna shayad 100 saal pure karta tha…bhai apke ghar par koi agar buri nazar dala aur hum kahete satyagraha aur bhook hartal me usse ye kaha tu nazar hata aiseto mahine aur saalo guzar jaate aur apke haathon aur aagan me bhool bhool rahete gair mulk ke agar wahi dat ke ladoo jaise(Krathi kaari)to saale ki aankhon se khoon bahe..baat ku samjho..agar nahi samaj me aae to bola khulke sajhaonga..

    • You are ri8 Imraan bhai.In the sepoy mutiny of 1857, both Hindus and Muslims fought valiantly against the Goras. They slit throats of 3 lakh 64 thousand britishers. Inspite of the treacherous mughal rule, Hindu and muslim common ppl were never opposed to each other. Britishers tried to exploit their unity and brought 'cow slaughter' as the issue. Muslims(Qureshi) though reluctant were forced under british torture and mayhem to resort to this ugly job of 'Qatl khanas'. Among upper caste muslims, britishers bred hatred against innocent and helpless Qureshis. But the hatred bred among Hindus against Muslims was the craftmanship of bastard Britishers. The contempt grew so far that the fist ever hindu-muslim riot happened in 1897(40 yrs after sepoy mutiny).
      The second blow to Hindu-Muslim unity was in 1905 when the britishers divided Bengal, to curb the rising agitation of east Indians against the british raj. Even Gandhi fell prey to these ugly tactics when he promised self-rule(swaraj) to muslims after the non-cooperation movement. The muslims took part in khilafat movement against the british dominion of sunni caliphate in Turkey. Self-rule for muslims meant restoring the sunni caliphate all over the world. When they dicovered the true essence of Swaraj meaning a democratic govt, their aspirations broke apart and once again HIndus and Muslims drew swords against each other when Stupid Gandhi withdrew the Non-cooperation movement after the chauri-chaura massacre. The rift kept growing and the mahatma was utterly useless with his non-violence tantrums against the bloody britishers. Britishers saw no danger with this toothless aging bastards and kept carrying on their 'divide and rule' policy. Finally the brunt came in 1947 when the country got divided in the name of religion.
      To this day, CONGRESS as a faithful agent of britishers and US keeps continuing its agenda of breaking India. Pakistan is in ruins today bcoz of dirty tactics of US in giving birth to taliban. Divided we are weak. forgetting the differences and embracing the true history of our past we should strive for unity against the western hegemony. But the history-makers in your and our country keep preaching false history that keeps breeding discontent and bitterness. Ideology of we hindustanis should change. it can start from ppl as u and me.

    • Thanks brother.. we all need to understand that we are the country which was cut into pieces… we need an original/ genuine, united India. the poverty in the region will evaporate quickly once we unite… and the NRIs will return to the homeland and people for other countries will come here for jobs. i hope, the public will break "berlin wall" one day (in near future).

    • we cannot say he is a great leader imran there are thousands of people who lost their life because of gandhi they were never been known to many of us he is always spared soul n pain r common to all. further he deserves to b dead for the hatred he showed on nethaji (he never opposed nethaji's deporting) all he did is for fame just like politicians who knows if he is left to live he could hav been PM one fine day.we have more than 100s of great leaders dating back from 1700s ok

    • Sir, He was a human being, end of the day and probably had make few mistakes. There is no doubts that almost a million people lost their lives due to the mistakes/ crimes/ corruption of our leaders in 20th century. That is the past which we can't change, but we can try to change our future. Thanks

    • No but if Gandhi was great then Jinnah was atleast great if not greater … gandhi was too much wraped in his fatasy ideal world ….but rightly alll leaders of independence movement were not of great calibre or the results for india and pakistan would been better ….. we s asians are paradoxically marooned with chains ???? no hope .. eternal poverty , chaos and confusion is our fate ………….

  164. ya we know gandhi is a good leader but he is a selfish person and he give a more preference to muslims…..NATHURAM think has a hindhu so he did do it……NATHURAM also a good person

  165. There are two sides of every story , and if the actual story is as emotionally charged as this one, i could not blaim my own judgments, which inevitably compare the present scenarios concerning our nation, past and post independence. I see that there are quite a few young participant in the comments which follows Godse’s address to court after his assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. To a young man like me who does not suffered any personal loss to Independence, the creation of Pakistan becomes major issue and possible justification for throwing abuses to Mahatma Gandhi, one reason could be my lack of genuine pre- independence history. But i somehow try to visualize things differently and then see if i could have such firm views.
    What if….
    1) Even after large amount of exodus and atrocities committed by both sides, Pakistan had survived like India after partition as a stable nation.
    2) Pakistan had accepted democracy then the military dictatorship it eventually fell into.
    3) Pakistan had not created the issue of Kashmir and never fought preposterous wars with India.
    4) It never have harbored fundamental ideologies and sent terrorists in India to support it.
    I wonder if i could have sticked to my firms views if such things might not have happened. It never justify the two nation theory which Muslim league and Jinnah propagated and which Gandhi always rejected, possibly the fundamental reason why the Muslims in India had full freedom if they chose to migrate to Pakistan or remain in India. Now for a leader of the stature of Gandhi or Nehru, the margin for any mistake is unacceptable when it affects the people and the future of the newly independent nation.And creation of Pakistan has proved to be a blunder rather then a mere mistake. Some people might argue that we are better off Pakistan as that country is slowly descending into chaos and anarchy, possibly a civil war. But given the thought that if there was no Pakistan, than there could not have been any Afghan war, creation of mujahedin and AL-quida by US to fight with Russian invasion, possibly no fundamental Muslim terrorism throughout the world. I wonder many sensible Pakistanis must be regretting the partition. But since all of this not transpired and Pakistan today is not only headache for India but the entire world,i dread that it exists and that to only as my closest neighbor. I am not taking sides but i feel that a leader must be a person who aim for a long term goals rather than succumbing to short lived solutions.I do not know if Gandhi was great leader but i think all of us should agree that he was a great man. Great for uniting India and accepting democracy when Pakistan chose the easiest but destructive way to dependance on forgine powers and military ruling,great for advocating one the most original ideas as Satyagraha and Ahinmsa for successful protests against oppressing British empire which was far superior militarily and technologically than pre- independent India, because India was just one of the British colonies, they piratically ruled half of the world. So when someone suggest that we should have fought with British empire, it becomes as laughable as when an economically broken Pakistan wants to invade India and win Delhi.And the ways Gandhi has adopted half a century ago are still quite effective when a powerless man like Anna Hzare use them to tame government. So i think it was a point of view which played important part in Gandhi’s assassination, and even today there are more Muslims residing in India than in Pakistan, who have suffered as we Hindus in communal riots perpetrated by power hungry politicians.

  166. Are jeene do yaaro,koun mara,koun maara,bahot puraani baat ho gayee,hindustaan ko lutna thaa,lootero ki to ab tak mout bhi ho gayee,gadhe murdo ukhaadne me ab koi samajhdaari nahy hai,jindagy se kadam milaao….kya rakkha hai ladne me kabhi to sudhar jaao…..koun sach loun jhut iska faisla waqt k sivaa koi nahy karsakta,kiyaa na aap sabne yaad puraane jakhmo ko …kuch huva???? kuch nahy bas kadvi meethi yaade reh gayee – Nishan

  167. Hum Us Desh ke Wasi Hain Jis Desh Me Ganga Behti Hain , Are Bhai AZADi Ki Liye Hum Sub milke Lade , kithnone jan diye fir ye kyoun hamare sat aisa hota hain Hindu Muslims kehke hum hum kyoun ladthe hain ye jivan boht chota hain kush raho aur dusroonko kush rahne do

  168. I AM ASHAMED A ALL OF YOU WHO ARE VILIFYING GANDHI AND MAKING GODSE A HERO. There is dearth in history of leaders like Gandhiji , who bring about revolution with peace.It is very easy to take up a gun and kill a tyrant, but it is very difficult to bring about a change in a tyrant through your action. And that is what Gandhiji achieved he brought about a revolution with peace, something which had never been done before. As for you saying he was an agent of muslims.Gandhiji was a firm believer in Hindu Muslim unity. He wanted a country where we were all Indians and not Hindu , Muslims, Rajputs, Chamars. That is why he was against discrimination on all grounds.He belived that all men are created equal and defended that ideology to his last, our partition was inevitable.It occurred because all the lesser people like Godse, Savarkar, Jinnah could not grasp the depth of the Gandhian ideology. Both Nehru and Patel said yes to the partition only after the massive riots of 1946, led by the Muslim league’s Direct Action Day. Gandhi then asked Jinnah to be the first PM , but Jinnah, Nehru and Patel refused this offer citing this would hurt the hindu sentiments and this will only increase the riots. It was common folk like you and me who were rioting at that time, who made this partition inevitable.Had we been all like Gandhi ther would have been no problem like this.

    • I do think that Non Violence is great thing it is not easy to follow. You have good knowledge so I want to ask some question to you. Gandhij had recruited 15 lack army for Britisher’s during 1st world war So Gandhiji awarded as Kesre Hind & Recruitment Sergeant(read in Wikipedia or type Indian soldier in 1st world war in google).He said, fight for Britishers fight for Emperor . He give Rs 300 crore to Britishers. Gandhiji’s opinion is we were not able to fight 45000 Britishers So he could not support Subhash Chandra Bose but he had recruited 15lacs Indian soldier for Britishers in 1st world war. He withdraw Non Cooperation movement which was very good movement. The same Gandhi continue during 2nd world. Recently 1 ship found on Atlantick Mahasagar which was full of 225 ton Silver. Which was carried by Britishers from Kolkata to London during 1942. How it was possible when our leader was fighting against Britishers.

    • Sorry abhishek to hear this but just answer one question what will you do when some bloody outsiders came into your house and starts ruling on you and your family member? Will you be gentle or you will hit them and force them to leave your home. And if you still belive in gandhism then turn the pages of american history, i hope you’ll surely get the answer if you are willing to get the correct one

  169. yaar sab chodo bus ye bata do ke us gandhi ne desh k liye kiya hi kya hai
    aur uski so called freedom fight mai aaj tak use kitne dande pade aur kitne torcher sahe jaise logo ne us k chakkar ma sahe saala jaha bhi dande padne ki naubat aati khud jail mai jaa kar baith jata aur logo ko pitwa deta
    saale ne non coperation movement wapas lene se pehle ye bhi nahi soocha k jin logo ne is madarc**d k chaakar mai apni naukri school chod diye hai unka kya hoga
    aur agar ye buddha itna bada ahinsa ka pujaari tha to world war 2 mai apni sena kyo bejhi aur bejhi to bejhi saale ne vijayi bhav ka aashorwaad diya ab us saale se poocho kya sena bine lade apna loda dikha k jeet jaati
    saala aur to aur apni beti ki umar ki ladkiyo k saath sota tha aur ye bat to usne khud kahi thi k use apni kaamvasna apne kaabu mai nahi rakhi jaati saala randi baaz

  170. See the real history of partition, Stop fighting on such useless topic which start from word and end at word.No body is going to do any thing except bullshit discussion. So please improve your gk.
    Story of indian partition
    Apart from revisionist historians, it was none other than Lord Clement Atlee himself, the British Prime Minster responsible for conceding independence to India, who gave a shattering blow to the myth sought to be perpetuated by court historians, that Gandhi and his movement had led the country to freedom. Chief justice P.B. Chakrabarty of Calcutta High Court, who had also served as the acting Governor of West Bengal in India, disclosed the following in a letter addressed to the publisher of Dr. R.C. Majumdar’s book A History of Bengal. The Chief Justice wrote:
    You have fulfilled a noble task by persuading Dr. Majumdar to write this history of Bengal and publishing it … In the preface of the book Dr. Majumdar has written that he could not accept the thesis that Indian independence was brought about solely, or predominantly by the non-violent civil disobedience movement of Gandhi. When I was the acting Governor, Lord Atlee, who had given us independence by withdrawing the British rule from India, spent two days in the Governor’s palace at Calcutta during his tour of India. At that time I had a prolonged discussion with him regarding the real factors that had led the British to quit India. My direct question to him was that since Gandhi’s “Quit India” movement had tapered off quite some time ago and in 1947 no such new compelling situation had arisen that would necessitate a hasty British departure, why did they have to leave? In his reply Atlee cited several reasons, the principal among them being the erosion of loyalty to the British Crown among the Indian army and navy personnel as a result of the military activities of Netaji. Toward the end of our discussion I asked Atlee what was the extent of Gandhi’s influence upon the British decision to quit India. Hearing this question, Atlee’s lips became twisted in a sarcastic smile as he slowly chewed out the word, “m-i-n-i-m-a-l!”[46]

  171. I accept Gandhi is a great leader, But he has no right to divide country into two parts. Don’t for get that Muslims came like British people. India belongs to Hindus
    When country is divided we have made deal and we have stand on the deal, I accept that Muslims from India has to Pakistan might be pain for them, think about the Hindus who came from Pakistan, for Hindus there is no pain that we leaving our house and childhood memories.
    If Godse’s would have not been killed Gandhi, might be there is only one country (i.e Pakistan)

  172. I accept Gandhi is a great leader, But he has no right to divide country into two parts. Don’t for get that Muslims came like British people. India belongs to Hindus
    When country is divided we have made a deal and we have to stand on the deal, I accept that Muslims from India has to move to Pakistan might be pain for them, think about the Hindus who came from Pakistan, for Hindus there is no pain that they are leaving house’s and childhood memories ( in Pakistan).
    If Godse’s wouldn’t killed Gandhi, might be there is only one country (i.e Pakistan)

  173. ಅಪ್ರತಿಮ ದೇಶ ಭಕ್ತಿಯ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಒಂದು ಕಹಿ ಕೃತ್ಯ ದೇಶವನ್ನು ಮತ್ತೊಮ್ಮೆ ತುಂಡರಿಸುವುದನ್ನು ತಪ್ಪಿಸೆತ್ತೆಂದು ಇತಿಹಾಸ ಓದಿದಾಗ ನನಗರಿವಾಗಿದೆ.
    ನಿಮ್ಮನ್ನು ಹಂತಕನೆನ್ನಬಹುದು. ಕೊಲೆಗಾರನೆನ್ನಬಹುದು. ಆದರೆ ಇಡೀ ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರವೇ ನಂಬಿದ್ದ ಹಾಗೂ ಅನುಸರಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯೋರ್ವ ಸತತ ತಪ್ಪು ಹೆಜ್ಜೆಗಳನಿಟ್ಟು ದೇಶವಾಸಿಗಳನ್ನು ಸಂಕಷ್ಠಕ್ಕೆ ಒಳಪಡಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾಗ ನೀವು ಗೈದ ಕಾರ್ಯ ತಾಯಿ ಭಾರತಾಂಬೆಯ ರಕ್ಷಣೆಯ ಕೃತ್ಯವೆಂದೇ ನನ್ನ ಅನಿಸಿಕೆ. ಜೈ ಭಾರತಾಂಬೆ….

    • ramesh ji apka baap koi musalman hoga isliye ap isi batha karr raha hai, nathuram gode mahan hai ,gandiji yek lafang hai,gandi ka family kuthe ka family hai isme teli ka yek kuthiya be hai ,sale gandi vamsh, jai nathuram godse aap bharath mahan hai

    • That is wat i fail to understand !!! Even after watching & living such disastrous state today people dont act to correct it… even if not like HEROES yet can choose the right!!!! Wait … watch … crib … and continue is wat is understood to all i guess 🙁

    • No one is fool man , if they fool ask all Indian leaders about there account will they tell you ?
      They are exposing innocency to help Pakistan . Pakistan is going to do defence agreement
      with once Indian friend Russia but no agitation among Indian government . They broke all
      friendship to help Pakistan . I am not telling that they are funded by Saudi like rich musalim
      country but you can't deny that they are more wise then us then why they are not understanding that we can understand ??

  174. Muslims hindus can never unite, today not but tommorow we will again face muslim extremism, i want all hindu and sikhs to unite against evil muslim powers and save ourselves and our loving sanatan dharma and hindustan. EVERY MUSLIM IS NOT TERRORIST BUT EVERY TERRORIST IS MUSLIM. Wake up my young brothers and fight for every drop of blood of our hindu sikh buddhists jains brothers killed by muslims without any reason. If anybody wants to talk me then call on 7737757032. JAI HIND

    • kya baat karte re terejaise chutiye se..insan hai baadme hindu muslim..tere maa se puch uske baap ka par dada kaun hai..

    • mere khayal me tera baap muslim tha aur teri maa choth ke sry chod ke chala gaya isliye badi dushmani hai musalman se..ya phir shayad teri biwi ya bahen ka koi muslim lover hoga aur unhe choth choth ke chod ra bhi nahi hoga musalman chothne me hai chodne me nahi…to tu bada paresha hora hoga ki kaise peecha chudao isse…par ha apni bahen aur biwi ku uske chothne ka mazaa puch shayad unhe bada mazaa aara hoga aur wo continue karna chahre..prostitue ka business karta kya apna number publicity karra..rates bhi to patade..per hour ya 1shot ka..kissi teri bahen aur biwi ku..tere jaise madarchodu ke liye jo muslim aur hindu ya sikh isai bolte..shayad tu OLD CITY ka OLD MINDED hoga..new city me aa bataenge tujhe hindu musalam kaun hai..sirf ghar aur religion alag hoga par dil sabka ek hi hai…aise baatein old city ke muslim bhi karte wo bhi hindus badi nafrat karte..mai ye nahi bolra ki tu hi hai jo ye bolra..grew up man..dil se bol kabhi kisi musalam ke haath ki koi koi bhi cheeze abhi tak nahi liya..bhuka mar jayega..new city ke hindu bhai musalamo par apni jaan chitakte….i hate old city old minded people like u…chahe wo hindu ho ya phir musalman..number del kar yaar nahito koi na koi amma bahen ginke choth ke call cut kardeta..tu sirf sunne me rahega aur wo choth ke jale jaata.

    • oops JAI HIND isliye daala…par wo pura nahi hoga wo sirf words hai…HINDUSTAN bol sahi aur solid hoga…chutiye…rates to mention kar per hour kitna hoga ya phir call karne par hi bataega…tere msg koi oldcity musalman dekhega to teri to band bajaadega…tu old minded wo old minded..isi baatpe ek shayari arz hai…gaadi gaadi raasukunte boodi ralutadi…ghate

    • what????????how can u tell that every terrorist is a muslim???? arent there any hindu terrorists at all in the country?????

    • Chootia comments likhay hain tun nay. RSS is the biggest terrorist organization. A ban should be imposed on this terrorist third class organization to save india.

  175. koi batao yaar SAMBHAV ko ki ab baatein kis baareme chalre lagta hai ki M…. B…… aur B…..ku koi musalam utah legaya usliye bechara freedom ki baaton me hindu muslim bolra… gadhi(South African) ke waise baat mai nahi karta INDIAN hoon indian jaise bolunga…num del kar udhar nahi to sab log tere ghar guss baith karinge..bacha ghar ke aurato ko..

  176. Dharma sukshma aur paristhithi janya hota hai
    Jaise Mahabharat me Bhisma,Arjun aur Karna teeno
    hi mahan the kyonki be apne apne raste per sahi the.
    Hum aaj system par baithkar aasani se tay kar sakte hai koun galat tha aur koun sahi parantu sahi ye hai ki samay nirnay leta hai, byakti nahi
    Ghabraiye nahi ek din sara vishwa ek rastra hoga
    aur hum sab ek hi des ke basi.
    Hindi kaha mohi ram pyara, turak kaha rahmana.
    Apas me doe lad lad mare, maram na konau jana.
    So at last I must say I respect Gandhi as a great man
    and also honour the feelings of Nathuram Godse.
    So the assasinasion of gandhi and execution of Godse both were the wrong dicision of indian history.

  177. History is written by them who wins. I would suggest you all to read NCERT class 8th book’s second last chapter. It bears all fact’s and figures supporting good’s about gandhi. And it depicts all Violent indians as “not respected INA”. Decide yourself!! No one is best judge when we have all facts and figures in hand.

  178. Dont call gandhi as father of our nation,he is father of Muslims.He shotted him late thats why he became the master piece in india. whenever i see is statue in roads i will feel bad. No one knows about Godes goodness.

    • How can you say someone who advocates peace and freedom deserves death? What gandhi taught, that peaceful protest can overcome oppression, is true today. Good luck trying to get free using guns because you’ll only die. peaceful resistance or bust.

  179. agar gandhi kuch samay aur jinda rehta to nischit hi bharat ke kum se kum char Tukre aur karwa deta lanat hai un logo par jo usey apney baap ko chor kar usey bapu aur rashtrapita kehte hein ,rahi kasar uske chamche nehru ne puri kar di ,galti kari in dono ne aur bhugat raha hai sara desh .

  180. Before freedom, there were no two countries like india and pakistan… those people who are living in present pakistan were called Indians.. and today many people who are living there migrated from this part of India.. So, if u say gandhi did wrong by giving 55crore for those people, it is wrong as they were also indians.. they also fought against the Britishers.. there were many national leaders who were muslims and were not supporters of division.. the problem is with us people, when british torchered us for a long time, we didn't retaliate.. but when it comes to hindu-muslim religion, we fought like anything.. godse killed a man who devoted his whole life for the freedom of india, freedom of the poor and unouchables..Its not patrotism on the part of Godse, it was fanatism… Either you can love Gandhi or you can hate Gandhi but you cant ignore his contribution for freedom struggle of India…

    • Dear Yogesh, Ghandi did not love India, he loved himself. He was no freedom fighter, he was a coward. The Paks got freedom without fighting the British they fought the Indians. They were the chamchas of the British. Read about the Muslim league. Gandhi contributed nothing to the freedon of India. He sacrificed millions of Indians (Hindus and Sikhs). Read whay Mr Dey has writted above. That will open your eyes

  181. गाँधी एक अंधविश्वास
    अब रंगरूट भर्ती का काम शुरू हुआ । गाँधी ने एक महान ब्रिटिश राज्यभक्त की तरह यह काम बडे मनोयोग से शुरू किया । गाँधी ने खुद लिखा है – “मेरी दूसरी जिम्मेदारी रंगरूट भर्ती करने की थी ।” अब उसने अपने अहिंषा के शिद्धान्त को ताक पर रखकर तर्क वितर्क करके लोगो को शस्त्र धारण करने का उपदेश देना शुरु किया। यह तो बस एक झलक थी गाँधी के अंग्रेज प्रेम की।

    • MAI SNEHA, ENGLISH PATA HAI AUR HINDI TYPE KARNI NI AATI, MAI MOBILE ME KIYE HUYE MSG KI TARAH LIKHUNGI HINDI…..
      GANDHI EK AISA NAAM JO LOG MAHATMA LAGA KR LETE HAI AUR RAASTRA PITA BHI KAHTE HAI, MANTE HAI WO RAASTRA PITA HAI KYO KI USKO BHI NI PATA HOGA KI USKE KITNE BACCHE HAI, EK GHATIYA INSAN JO HAMARE HINDUSTAN K BATWARE AUR ISKI BARBADI KA KARAN HAI USKO IZZAT DETE HAI BUT USE YAD BHI NI KARTE JO SACH ME IZZAT KE LAYAK HAI, MAI SAT -SAT NAMAN KARTI HU NATHURAN GODSE JI KO JINHONE ISH GHATIYA INSAAN KO GOLI MARA, LEKIN YE SHIKAYAT HAI UNSE MERI KI DER SE KYO MARA AUR PAHLE MARTE TO SHAAYAD KUCH ACCHE LOG HAMARE ISH DESH KI BHALAI KR PATE,AUR SIRF KUTTA GANDHI KO KYO MARA SATH ME UNKE CHAMCHO KO BHI MARNA THA FIR AATMA SAMARPAN KRTE,KYO KI MOHAN DAS KARAMCHAND GANDHI AUR USKE KUTTE (AP LOG TO JAANTE HE HO KAUN THEY)AISE JANWAR THE JO APNI SARJAMEE AUR APNI MAA, BAHEN , AUR BETIYO KO BECHNE ME YAKEEN RAKHTE THE AUR AJ BHI UNKI NAJAYAS AULAADE ISH KAAM KO ANZAAM DE RAHI HAI,GANDHI KABHI DESH KI AZAADI NI CHAAHTA THA, WO DESH KE SACCHE KRANTIKARIYO KO KHATM KARNA CHAHTA THA AUR WO YE KRNE ME SAFAL BHI RAHA JISME BALI CHADHE- SHRI SHARDAR BHAGAT SINGH, SHRI LALA LAJPAT RAI, SHRI SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSH, SHRI CHANDRA SEKHAR AZAAD,SHRI RAM PRASAD BISMIL, SHRI RAJ GURU, SHRI SUKHDEV AUR NA JAANE KITNE KRANTI KARI JINKO IS KUTTE GANDHI NI APNE NAAM KO UPPER KARNE K LIYE SHAHID KARWA DIYA,KYA KISI KO LAGTA HAI KI GANDHI K LIYE ISH DUNIYA ME KOI GAALI BANI HAI???? GANDHI SALA CHAPA BHI AISE KAAGAJ PER JISKE LIYE LOG APNA IMMAN BECH DETE HAI, AURTE APNI IZZAT BECH DETI HAI SALA GANDHI,KYA BOLU ISH SITE PE KABHI DEVA NE MAUKA DIYA TO ISH BHADHUYE KI ACCHE SE UTAARENGE PURI DUNIYA K SAMNE, MUJHE SHAARM AATI HAI KI MAI 2nd OCT KO PAIDA HUI HU,KASH MAI 31 JAN KO PAIDA HOTI.DEAR PRASHANTH SIR UPPER WALA HAME USH LAYAK BANAYE KI ISKI HAR ACCHI JAGAH SE KALMUHI PHOTO TO UTARWA HE DE AUR ISKI ASI KAM TAISI KAR DE. ‘I HATE GANDHI’.
      VANDE MATRAM.

  182. GANDHI & GODSE. 5 FACTS YOU NEEDED TO KNOW …
    1. Yeah … so this Gandhi bloke. Know the name. Heard of the film …
    So, who has he?
    Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on 2nd October 1869 in Porbandar, Gujarat. He was married at age thirteen to Kasturbai. At age eighteen, he set sail for England to study Law. After passing his exams, he practiced Law in Pretoria, South Africa.
    There, he was involved in a famous incident on a train, where a white man wanted him out of a particular carriage, but Gandhi stood his ground. He was forcibly thrown out. After that incident, he became a champion of Human Rights for Indians – and returned to a hero’s welcome in his Native India.
    2. The whole Indian Independence thing … what happened then?
    Gandhi became a household name, and a thorn in the side of the British. He was jailed on numerous occasions as the British feared his popularity could spark nationwide anti-British protests/riots.
    Gandhi’s core doctrines were:
    1. “ahimsa” or non-violence
    2. the ‘brotherhood’ of Hindus and Muslims, who according to him were one and them same(?!).
    Most famously, in 1930, Gandhi marched 240 miles upto the coastal shores of Gujarat in Dandi to protest against the British for not allowing Indians to make their own salt. Again, he was arrested for this and gained much iconic popularity.
    3. Godse … never heard of him.
    So who has he?
    NathuRam Godse was born on 19th May 1910 in Poona, Maharashtra. Godse was born into a pious family of Brahmin caste. NathuRam was known for his social work with (so-called) ‘untouchable’ castes, and during the tragic times of the partition in 1947, he aided many Hindu and Sikh refugees who had been victims of horrific injuries and rapes etc.
    4. So what did Godse do then?
    Godse will go down in history as the man who assassinated Gandhi at point blank rage on 30th January, 1948.
    5. Why did he do it?
    Gandhi, despite all the love and attention heaped on him by many, remained a power-hungry, extreme left-ist who was happy to put the needs of Hindus second to the appeasing of the Muslim minorities.
    In the late 1930’s, Gandhi was defeated by one Subhash Chander Bose in a Congress leadership election. Bose was renowned for his hatred of the British and his willingness to take up arms in the endeavour of Indian Independence. This conflicted with Gandhi’s doctrine of non-violence. So, Gandhi went on a hunger strike against Bose’s legitimate victory, and caused a rift in the Indian National Congress forcing other senior leaders like Nehru to not back Bose.
    In 1940, a Sikh by the name of Udham Singh travelled to England and assassinated Sir Michael O Dwyer. O Dwyer was the man who gave the go-ahead for the firing of innocents in the massacre of Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar, Punjab back in 1919. This brutal attack took place on Vasakhi – a religious day for the Sikhs, and a state-wide holiday for all Punjabis. Upto a thousand men, women and children were gunned down in cold blood.
    Udham Singh waited twenty years to exact revenge for this terrible scar. After having assassinated O Dwyer, what did Gandhi do?
    Gandhi wrote a letter of apology to the British!!!
    And finally, during the tragic times of Partition, Gandhi went on a hunger strike because of the violence inflicted on Muslims by Hindus and Sikhs in the Punjab. The fact that brutalities had been meted out to Hindus in other states like Bengal at the behest of his Muslim League cronies was of little or no significance.
    Gandhi went on a hunger-strike and proposed that FIFTY-FIVE CRORE RUPEES (that’s £68million in today’s value – imagine how much it would have been 56 years ago) BE GIVEN TO PAKISTAN AS “GOODWILL” MONEY.
    This was the final insult, and Godse felt that Gandhi’s life had to be ended as this man who was so warped in his extreme left-ist ideals, would be the death of hindu pride or the concept of a hindu nation.

  183. Nathu Ram Godse’s Speech At The Trial
    NATHU RAM GODSE’S SPEECH AT THE TRIAL
    Nathuram Godse’s speech at trial .. DO read it fully
    Full text of Godse’s speech at his trial…..
    ” On January 13, 1948, I learnt that Gandhiji had decided to go on fast unto
    death. The reason given was that he wanted an assurance of Hindu-Muslim
    Unity… But I and many others could easily see that the real motive…
    [was] to compel the Dominion Government to pay the sum of Rs 55 crores to
    Pakistan, the payment of which was emphatically refused by the
    Government…. But this decision of the people’s Government was reversed to
    suit the tune of Gandhiji’s fast. It was evident to my mind that the force
    of public opinion was nothing but a trifle when compared with the leanings
    of Gandhiji favourable to Pakistan.
    ….In 1946 or thereabout, Muslim atrocities perpetrated on Hindus under the
    Government patronage of Surhawardy in Noakhali made our blood boil. Our
    shame and indignation knew no bounds when we saw that Gandhiji had come
    forward to shield that very Surhawardy and began to style him as ‘Shaheed
    Saheb’ – a martyr – even in his prayer meetings…
    ….Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became
    supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their
    intensity and were reinforced by the slogans of truth and non-violence which
    he ostentatiously paraded before the country… I could never conceive that
    an armed resistance to the aggressor is unjust… Ram killed Ravan in a
    tumultuous fight… Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness… In
    condemning Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Govind as ‘misguided patriots,’
    Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit… Gandhiji was, paradoxically,
    a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name
    of truth and nonviolence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will
    remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever…
    ….By 1919, Gandhiji had become desperate in his endeavours to get the
    Muslims to trust him and went from one absurd promise to another… He
    backed the Khilafat movement in this country and was able to enlist the full
    support of the National Congress in that policy… very soon the Moplah
    Rebellion showed that the Muslims had not the slightest idea of national
    unity… There followed a huge slaughter of Hindus… The British
    Government, entirely unmoved by the rebellion, suppressed it in a few months
    and left to Gandhiji the joy of his Hindu-Muslim Unity… British
    Imperialism emerged stronger, the Muslims became more fanatical, and the
    consequences were visited on the Hindus…
    The accumulating provocation of 32 years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim
    fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhiji
    should be brought to an end immediately… he developed a subjective
    mentality under which he alone was the final judge of what was right or
    wrong… Either Congress had to surrender its will to him and play second
    fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality… or it had to carry on
    without him… He was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience
    movement… The movement may succeed or fail; it may bring untold disasters
    and political reverses, but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s
    infallibility… These childish inanities and obstinacies, coupled with a
    most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character, made
    Gandhiji formidable and irresistible… In a position of such absolute
    irresponsibility, Gandhiji was guilty of blunder after blunder…
    ….The Mahatma even supported the separation of Sindh from the Bombay
    Presidency and threw the Hindus of Sindh to the communal wolves. Numerous
    riots took place in Karachi, Sukkur, Shikarpur and other places in which the
    Hindus were the only sufferers…
    ….From August 1946 onwards, the private armies of the Muslim League began
    a massacre of the Hindus… Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi
    with mild reactions in the Deccan… The Interim government formed in
    September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members, but the more they
    became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part,
    the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them…
    ….The Congress, which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism,
    secretly accepted Pakistan and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was
    vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to
    us… This is what Gandhiji had achieved after 30 years of undisputed
    dictatorship, and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’…
    ….One of the conditions imposed by Gandhiji for his breaking of the fast
    unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by Hindu refugees. But
    when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much
    as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan government…
    Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so,
    he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously
    to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it… The people of
    this country were eager and vehement in their opposition to Pakistan. But
    Gandhiji played false with the people…
    ….I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the
    people would be nothing but hatred… if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the
    same time, I felt that Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would
    surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and be powerful with armed
    forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation
    would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan…
    ….I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action
    had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus… There was
    no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book, and
    for this reason I fired those fatal shots…
    ….I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me… I did fire shots at
    Gandhiji in open daylight. I did not make any attempt to run away; in fact I
    never entertained any idea of running away. I did not try to shoot myself…
    for, it was my ardent desire to give vent to my thoughts in an open Court.
    My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by
    the criticism levelled of against it on all sides. I have no doubt, honest
    writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some
    day in future. “

  184. All this thinking and reading led me to believe that it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (three hundred million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and well-being of all India, one fifth of the human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghatanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the National Independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well. Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokmanya Tilak, Gandhi’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to these slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a dream if you imagine the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scruplous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day. In fact, honour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggressionis unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. (In the Ramayana) Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. (In the Mahabharata) Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed the a total ignorance of the springs of human action. In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essential for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Govind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhi has merely exposed as self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever for the freedom they brought to them. The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good work in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India, he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on in his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the judge of everyone and everything; he was the master brain guiding the Civil Disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin it and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.

  185. if godse was wrong then why congress did not allow his last statements in courts to come out in public till 50+ yrs of independence. Obviously they know if public will read the nathu ram views , then public will accept gandhi was not a gud man he was having a psycological disorder to become a celebrity. that's y he did not save shaheed bhagat singh and all other revolutionaries even then he signed some pact with britishers….. shame on gandhi and nehru and I love godse he did right.

  186. Just as Krishna had to kill Kansa and the Arjuna had to kill Bhishma in the same way Ghandhi had to be killed by Godses. To bring the green shoots out nature has to start a fire and burn the old grass away. India needs to do the same, India needs to cleanse it self from the rot that is set by the so called Ghandhi family who really should be called ‘Khans’.

  187. If it was not Marathas, Rajputs, and Sikhs, Mughals would have converted everyone into muslims like they did to your ancestors….if anyone think i m wrong, go to the states which were ruled by these three rulers, u will know what i mean and why there are not many muslims. if muslim ruler’s intention was right then why did they built mosques in all hindu sacred places??? go ..look at mathura…the mosque is very next to krishan birth place temple.., why masque was built at Ram janam bhoomi?? why mosque at kaashi ?? when is see them my heart fills with anger …but we r not criminals like mughals….. so i request my muslim brothers to leave all this aside and come back to your own hindu brothers….. be a hindu, which you really are ..hinduism is the only religion which says that in this world every life is born as hindu,even the creators were hindus (followers of Sanatan Dharm) thats why we dont do khatna and baptize any child …bcoz its a process to convert them into other religion…. you are born as a hindu …be a hindu…

  188. If it was not Marathas, Rajputs, and Sikhs, Mughals would have converted everyone into muslims like they did to your ancestors….if anyone think i m wrong, go to the states which were ruled by these three rulers, u will know what i mean and why there are not many muslims. if muslim ruler’s intention was right then why did they built mosques in all hindu sacred places??? go ..look at mathura…the mosque is very next to krishan birth place temple.., why masque was built at Ram janam bhoomi?? why mosque at kaashi ?? when is see them my heart fills with anger …but we r not criminals like mughals….. so i request my muslim brothers to leave all this aside and come back to your own hindu brothers….. be a hindu, which you really are ..hinduism is the only religion which says that in this world every life is born as hindu,even the creators were hindus (followers of Sanatan Dharm) thats why we dont do khatna and baptize any child …bcoz its a process to convert them into other religion…. you are born as a hindu …be a hindu…

  189. So friends don't be like the gandhi be like the common man with humanity don't follow the ganhi's trend you should only have set the your own new trend.

  190. Mahatama Gandhi was a great man but now a day so many shameless Indian leader are.
    there who gives cheque to terrorist family after batala house encounter , who saves Kasab.
    and afzal Guru by taking money from Saudi Arabiya. May God save them from Any patriotic.
    Nathuram Gotse

  191. who say’s we get independence,we didn’t earn it they gave it,we beg them as a beggar,a strong government will be formed form revolution only, but not from begging ,Gandhi is a stupid what gads e was right, did really non violence helped India ,it will never help our country ,god help my country from this corruption and slavery

  192. The great man has said “Be the change that you wish to see in the world.” He preached it only after practicing.
    The thing is that Godse thought if Gandhiji is not there, the others will be 'practical'. He had nothing to do with the problem, except killing the dictator, who happened to lose so called hindu values.Why did'nt he kill other leaders who 'surrendered' their will to Gandhiji too? Then it would be more easy to be 'practical'.
    What did he think of HINDU VALUES? Oh God! this is a shame on the eternal SANATHANA DHARMA. The essence of hindu is universal tolerance.
    I would like to share the meaning of the mantra GAYATHRI here.
    "BY THE GRACE OF GOD , THE WHOLE MANKIND, EXCEPT ME, MAY BE PROTECTED".
    Not hindus, but the mankind as a whole have to be protected. Naturally, he might have thought that, the HINDU know it well.The wrong done by Gandhiji is that, he failed to understant that the hindu had lost its values very earlier itself.
    Yes, we Indians do not deserve to be lead by such a great soul.
    The wrongs done by british to us may be forgotten, but what we hindus done to the mother india, by killing her child, can't be erased. As a hindu I feel ashame.

  193. A common criminal, who killed an unarmed person because he disagreed with his policies. He deserved the penalty and got it. Even pick pocket will have a reason to justify why he steals.

  194. The Muslim league under jinnah divided India on religious ground. When Hindus were fighting for freedom, the muslims instead of joining hands with the congress, supported the Britishers and were more concerned about a seperate muslim nation. What Nathuram anticipated was right, since most of the communal riots take place in muslim majority areas and the majority of victims are always the Hindus. This is because of the gandhi based mindset of Hindus. Recent example is the opposition of MIM party in Hyderabad for temple renovation and opposition of the kashmiris towards temporary land transfer to amarnath yatra. these same people go on Haj on subsidies from the tax payed by the Hindus The minorities are pampered at the cost of Hindus. Is this the secularism we are proud of.

    • Yes, everyone knew about it. All these are true facts.
      Only the congress and its policies are responsible for bringing havoc to this country.
      For this rampant corruption, poverty, lawlessness only this congress govt is responsible

  195. the fact remains that every country is going through one challenge or the other……. i was actually disapointed on what was written about ghandi….. he did a great job in india. when you checked most countries that are having religious fight, they also wish they can all go thr seperate ways and form their own cuntries…. the fact remains that staying together as one or not thr is probability that india will still be going through what they are going through because ple have not learnt their lessons. we cant keep on complaining and not doing anything and be expecting result. history is of the past and we are the one to set the change for the future

    • Agreed he has done a great job!!!
      but what that job served in favour of india .. we still question that.
      what many Gandhi followers would say voilence, that may be just an act of self defence.
      Had Gandhi not signed the pact with british government, and before signing, had he insisted on release of bhagat singh, rajguru and sukhdev, we could have seen independence quite early.
      There were barely any attempts made for those three heros’, and the article by gandhi on 29 March 1931 issue of Young India, states :-
      “Bhagat Singh did not wish to live. ”
      “These heroes had conquered the fear of death. Let us bow to them a thousand times for their heroism.
      But we should not imitate their act.”
      “Our dharma is to swallow our anger, abide by the discipline of non-violence and carry out our duty.”
      When congress was pleading for dominian status, it was Bhagat singh who asked for COMPLETE INDEPENDENCE.
      Every one has their own methodology to deal with a situation! Gandhi had his own, and Rest all had their own. But the act of gandhi in which he justified more than billion times, that only his methodology is correct, can be seen as an act of misleading people.
      It was almost 50 % contribution from Germany, who broke the back of British in 2nd world war, that lead India’s independence in 1947.
      Points are countless, and pages will fall sort for any one to write upon supporting Gandhi or not.
      This is completly my opinion, and i have no intentions to hurt anyones sentiments.
      thanks

  196. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  197. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  198. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  199. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  200. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  201. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  202. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  203. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  204. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  205. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  206. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  207. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  208. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  209. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  210. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  211. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  212. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  213. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  214. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  215. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  216. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

      • gandhi was not a nation lover he always tries to be a hero. SO only b’coz of his stupidity partition is possible and mostly when there was a vote for the president of congress to be the 1st prime minister neheru was voted just 1 out of 15 where Sardar patel was voted 14. so just think how he became the prime minister of independent India .it’s possible only B’coz of one stupid person. you know that,not necessary to mention his name .. i am telling just for your knowledge , neheru went to Gandhi and told if i will not be the primeminister of inidia then i will destroy the congress , thats why gandhi told that if neheru would be the prime minister else i will go for fasting
        ok
        this is the fact
        if u don’t know abt the history then go and read carefully
        then say godse was wrong
        he didn’t do for his own he did it for the betterment of country

      • You really did not read the full article and do not understand Godse’s actions. You are just a blind believer. Open your eyes and accept the truth.

  217. Why is it criminal in this country to proclaim a hindu identity ? If one says I am a Hindu one is automatically branded as an extremist. The same people who do this branding will vociferously support a Muslim doing the same. I do not think godse was a hero. Neither do I agree that gandhi got us independence. It was a England weakened by two world wars which gave India indepdence. Gandhi and the Congress were present to take the final prize with leaders like tilak and bose lost in the struggle. It has been the pacifist ideology of the Hindu which allowed both the mughals and then British to rule this country. The same ideology has allowed the corrupt nehru dynasty to rule us for 60 years. Hinduism is inclusive and not an exclusive religion. India needs nationalists and not religionists.

  218. I agree with godse. He seems to b a pro muslim leader. He pretended to b a secularist bt during khilafat aandolan he proved himself a pro muslim. By supporting Muslims he hurt the sentiments of many hindus.
    Another thing wen he supported non violence for his whole life why did he send indian troops in world war to fight that bloody battle? Where was his non violence? Nd dat also without signing any agreement with dem.

  219. I support Nathuram Godse atleast he had the guts to kill a person who was only interested to appease a few muslims. My question is what has the nehru family given to the country in the 60 years of rule. Atleast in the good hold days kings had to fight to keep their dynasty now this family gets it for free and wmajority still vote for these agents of west wake up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    May a maillion Nathuram godse be born to kill these gandhis.

  220. Nanthram Godse to be called as Mahatma Nanthuram Godse and the father of indian nation insted to call Ghandhi Mahatma, Ghandhi did nothing only split the nation.

  221. I can’t understand this one…if Muslims and Hindus wanted to be brothers and sisters, why they partitioned India into three(India , pakistan and Bangladesh).Also if they needed separate Muslim country, why India didn’t made as seperate Hindu country

  222. Assasinating MK Gandhi is not acceptable because under Mahatma Gandhi’s leadership, we secured country’s freedom. Nathuram Godse will remain the villain in the history of India.

    • India was saved by Bhagat Singh not Gandhi………………….it was saved by freedom fighters who sacrificed their lives for country …………………..non violence was carried out since 150 years but no result ……….we had had to attack the British to get freedom .

    • India didn’t get independence because of Gandhi. Gandhi also asked for giving right to kill and rape non-muslims. Then why Hindus have not done so till now.

    • I am truly impressed by this true fireball N. Godse. Hail Him !!!
      Like me millions of minds in India has been regularly brainwashed to worship Gandhi and Nehru right from the initial days of childhood of each Indian through school text books. !!! And believe me it has worked beyond question !!!.
      But now I feel why should we succumb to the brainwashing formula of Congress to glorify these 2 culprit of my past india. Just by being half naked or by being called chacha , truth cannot be hidden.

  223. Its very sad that Nathuram Godse & his so called followers (Swayam Sevaks) are “deeply” misunderstanding what Gandhiji has said and preached throughout his life.. And to pass “such” misunderstanding and evil in the younger generations is even more sad and stupid….
    Feeling pity and ashamed of you people…

    • shame on you for not understanding true history and believing in twisted history created by the congress raj. Gandhi has no right to be called father of the nation . Instead he and Nehru should be labeled as dividers of the nation and traitors.

  224. We can not say
    Godse is right of wrong.The partition of India is not done in a proper way. Because of this the hate between the Hindu and Muslim started increasing. Still our political leaders using this the means of vote bank. The new generations should understand this game and not became a prey in this. We have to develop good leaders.. Better to forget both Gandhi and Godse

    • Have u seen any leader in bharat working for the development of the country except NarendraModi ji and many other bjp leaders
      Every party except bjp try it’s best to secure it’s vote bank like:
      Tmc,Sp,Sp,congress,jdu,ddu,etc
      The bjp’s development report card is best in the country,and the crime graf is so thinner,and the women are much safer than any other state of India ruling by any other party
      Have u any other choice except bjp

  225. Its proved already who is right and wrong, ghandi is respecting by not only indians but whole world and his views are more valueble todays. Godsya no one considering as a great person except some extreamists

  226. I have been reading everyone’s comments on this article. It shocks me to see how easy people change their views by merely reading a person’s point of view. Godse would not have/could not have united India and he could not have gotten us freedom. Godse can’t be compared to Gandhi.
    2ndly and more importantly.If Gandhi had not agreed to the partition, what do you think India would be like today? We can all speculate but the fact is that India would have been 50% Hindu and 50% Muslim. Now, You can all take a guess on what the condition of our society would be if that were the case. What if Gandhi knew that the only was for Hindus and muslims to survive would be to separate them, otherwise a massive massacare would ensue.
    I hate who say this but people who think Gandhi was a failure are simply dumb. Gandhi influenced the whole nation, I bet these critics can’t influence even one. And still these critics feel that they have all the politics figured out by simply reading a few articles.

    • Gandhi also has not given us freedom. Gandhi was against partition. After partition Gandhi stopped many Muslims from leaving India. Gandhi supported Muslims Ummah, Muslim right to kill and rape non-muslims. The main reason Gandhi made Nehru as first PM against the wished of Indian people to stop Indian Muslims from leaving India. Patition credit should go to Jinnah and to some extend Patel. Ambedkar also supported partition. Except Nehru, Gandhi and Abdul Kalam Azad, everyone supported partition. Gandhi was a failure because India got partitioned in Gandhi own words. Gandhi was a failure because his Muslims appeasement didn’t work.

    • You mean that there was not any other way to stop them
      No it’s not the fact,when the Muslim leaders were planning riots and encouraging their community to kill the Hindus for the partition what was Nehru doing could he not dare to do the same
      And why did they created the conditions in Muslims favour,godse killed Gandhi after one year of partition because he had a telescopic vision,if the law book of our country was wwritten according to him,in result the conditions of Hindus would not had to be like this

    • Uhh…….India still houses Muslims. No offense but if MK Gandhi was such a “omnipotent” satyagrahi then shouldn’t India be Hindustan that is, a uni-religious State? No. The Muslims got to have their own nation and were even allowed to stay in OUR India. Gandhi was not a Martin Luther King Jr., a man who fought peacefully for the rights of his people and then took to the shadows(forget the pun please), but he was more of a Kwame Nkrumah, seeker of fame by just leading the people of his country on vain hopes which he shattered himself on his path to glory.

  227. Talking about two G’s , Great,Giant,Gentle,Guts, God and even Ghost has the same , values and views differs , for me both of them were genuine with their attitudes,
    I wish all of us to be genius of all these things with great attitude to leave a better world for our followers,
    Generate a spark for our Guys and Girls to become Glossy with Genes.
    NSK

  228. How stupid of people to actually change their views just by reading a single point of view ?? Think yourself that on one hand he (Godse) accepts the role of Gandhi in freedom struggle & on the other hand he calls him a politician whose actions were based on Muslim-appeasement policies ? Moreover its a book on How Personal Grudges lead to the Cold-Blooded murder of Gandhi ! It certainly never resonated the mindset of a million Indians who worshipped Gandhi and right now we are able to see the state of Indian Politics without Gandhi . Had Gandhi Ji lead us the story would have been different. Stupid as well shameful of RSS people to actually consider this piece if lame fiction & personal grudges as their Bible .
    PS: I am not a Congi !

    • It is your illusion and Nehruvian education system that said that Gandhi brought us freedom. Please read Prime Minister Attlee’s interaction with the Bar council of Calcutta in 1948. The man Gandhi exiled from India gave the jitters to the British who had no choice but to leave. It is an illusion that the British left because of Gandhi.
      Great men are never spoken of as heroes and many are never given the credit of their accomplishments. But I think that that is the true testament of their heroism. There cannot be a Ram rajya, as Gandhi wanted, without Ram having to fight when the people need it. Please read about the support of the Kilafat movement Gandhi endorsed. You will realize his fool hardy attitude. No one is opposed to his principles of harmony. But there has to be a sense of reality and practicality when you are a leader of a nation.
      Have you read about his forcing a democratically elected president of INC, Netaji, in the Tripura congress elections? or have you read about how he over ruled the congress election of Sardar Patel as the first PM of India?
      there are many things that are not talked about in the country about its history and the blunders some so called heroes.
      But the real heroes are the ones we seldom hear about and are the ones we need to dig to find. Once we take that trouble, we realize that there are great men and women who have helped us to be here but seldom did they get their appreciation nor did they want it. They truly and relentlessly worked, fought and died for their nation and some people tore the country and are called heroes now!
      Awaken and study beyond the text books that were approved by the government. You will realize that Ghodse was a patriot. I wouldnt call him a hero but his act was brave and completely selfless and in the interest of the Nation that was left after Nehru-Gandhi incompetency

  229. “An eye for an eye will leave everyone blind?” word’s of MK GANDHI. Godse used violence as a way of achieving racial justice which is immoral, that’s a story from one side.He was executed by hanging inside the bars for killing a man who spared all his life for non-violence, sathyagrah that’s other side. If gandhi was right, hanging godse was definitely wrong.

  230. gandhi is a advertising fool……………………………but godse was real and powerstar……………………..hero…………………………………………………………….of indian………..proud to be godse’s india………………………..gandhi’s india…………………….from now godse is our father of nation………………………..

  231. sab bakwas kar rahe ho, us samay desh ki halat kya thi wo to wahi log jante the. tum is naye yug me kewal comment & criticize karna jante ho aur kuch nahi, kahana assan hai.

  232. This is the true power of India, our forefathers once thought of a nation where every one is free to express his views and we are living theirs dreams , please consider that PERCEPTION is what we all are applying here please do read my experiments with truth and Sir Godse’s whole trials writeups before commenting AND fighting

      • with all these facts its very unfortunate the gandi family is still controlling the nation for its own purpose. Still doing wrongs behind the scene, the whole system became paralyzed and oiling parts for their nefarious purpose.

  233. I do not think Gandhiji played any part in division. He was never the part of negotiations.He was left out.He never wanted division on a religious ground.

    • Gandhiji comments are well known that that Hindustan can only be devided over his body and one will have to accept that he did not do any thing to prevent the partition.

  234. I respect Gandiji as pitamaha bishma in Mahabarat in the same way I agree Godse act as Arjun in same yug. Personnaly Godse did not get any bebefits after killing Gandiji knowingly he done it for nation.

    • Godse did it for the nation. He put his family happiness on the line for the nation. Godse is also my hero as Gandhi is for his principles and leadership. We need to build a smarak for Godse, who sacrificed so much for the love of his country.

      • Your logic is flawed. There are hundreds of Islamic suicide bombers who are sacrificing their lives everyday for Islam. Hitler also committed suicide for the cause he believed. I have no doubt that Nathuram Godse was an honest righteous man. But that does not mean that we will have to support him as his logic was based on a narrow band of thinking.

        • Rather, it is your logic which is flawed, for it’s always advised the rotten apple to be taken out of the basket to save other fresh apples. Gandhi was not only an insane person but also a sexually perverted being. He used to sleep naked with young girls of around 16 to 24 years saying he is practicing self regulation(LOL). Basically Gandhi had a very soft corner for Nehru and had promised him supreme post in the Govt. of the Independent India. Jinnah was much much senior to Nehru as was Netaji and several others. The partition of India could have been easily avoided had Gandhi accepted Jinnah’s claim of becoming the first Prime Minister of Independent India specially keeping in view of Jinnah’s health (as he was suffering from Cancer/TB and was in the last stage of his ailment) for he had hardly 6 months to a year’s life left. But Gandhi was blinded by his love for Nehru and didn’t agree to Jinnah’s claim. Hence the inevitable happened. Keeping Gandhi alive would have or may have had disintegrated India to further fractions and this was the very reason why Godse took the extreme step of eliminating him(Gandhi).Had Godse been a religious fanatic he would have been involved in many Hindu/Muslim riots that happened in pre-independent India, but he was never involved in any such episode. So, you should now know that your understanding of Godse’s act was totally flawed….

  235. If you have to understand Gandhiji and his views regarding Pakistan you will need to know what was the feeling of thousands of migrants from Pakistan who had to leave behind every thing and they came here in anticipation that Govt or Gandhiji would help them. After more than 67 years after independence most of theses issues remain unresolved.

    • I agree and disagree. I agree that as a muslim, you are brought up to despise any other religion and call names. I disagree that there is not a thing called ‘Hindu Fanatic’ or else your religion would not have remained in Hindustan. Of course we frequently get to hear ‘Islamic terror, jihad’ etc. all over the world. A recent murders of journalists in Paris again establishes that fact.

    • for your information: it speaks volumes about the peculiar mindset you still carry on in. The yesteryear’s forefathers and their progeny didn’t see the future,its their karma or deeds that when one pull out the rose you have to take the throne too, come out of your dream see the facts past history and decide the future course of existence & stop loose comments,grow-up ! introspect the existence on which land we all are………advice for u & others like u ! talk about A P J Abdul kalam and how he lead his life try to emulate that.

  236. Hmm.. After reading all those points highlighted by Godse, any emotional fool can easily be brought to tears and may probably hail him( as it happened with that stupid judge) But people who are blessed with adequate sanity and intelligence along with good grip on general knowledge can cleary debunk godse’s flawed philosophy of nationalism and sacrifice.
    The big problem with godse was his lack of bigger vision. Although he claims to have read many renowned books and voluntarily broken many Brahmanical ethos and rituals, he still ended up stuck neck deep in local hindu vs muslim fights, and kept his eyes wide shut over british’s larger evil designs of devide-n-conquer, loot-n-boot.
    Its the britishers alone who started first hindu muslim riots in late 1800AD over cow slaughter. Till that time muslims didnt ate cow nor do they crave to eat it even now in these times outside this subcontinent. Westerners ate beef all along and they still continue do so. After getting a big blow from revolt of 1857 by mangal pandey and bahadur zafar combined, britishers realized the potential of hindu-muslim unity and immediately started working on ideas to break it. One such idea was of opening slaughter houses and appointing muslims quresh tribes as butchers, so that they can get steady supply of beef, and also to blame up the muslims as-n-when needed to start a riot. Alas! We still fight over it even to this day.
    And no saffron party accuse a finger at british.
    Similarly about allegation of muslim appeasement by gandhi to extreme levels so much propagandized by saffron forces that have completely forgetten who has already looted us completely lock-stock-n-barrel. In India, just before british rule, there were 560 kingdoms with load of gold and silver, with thier own bullion as currency. All this wealth was systematically looted and shipped to Britain and a worthless paper currency was imposed by british by establishing a reserve bank in bengal now called as RBI. This is the biggest shame to a such a richest India to accept worthles paper as its currency. This is also the biggest calamity which has befallen on humanity as a whole as this can be printed and manipulated overnight by our controllers. Now no country in world out of 203 is free from this cheating. BUT THE SAFFRON BRIGADE TILL KEEP ON CURSING MULIM RULERS FOR LOOTING… WHILE 99% OF THEM INVADED INDIA AND SETLLED DOWN IN INDIA ONLY WITH ALL MONEY, UNLIKE BRITISH WHO CAME ONLY TO LOOT AND ENSLAVE. ALTHOUGH LOOTING IS OVER, THEY STILL CONTINUE TO ENSLAVE US BY LOANING U THEIR PAPER DOLLARS N POUNDS as DEBT MONEY, AND WE ARE KEEPING ON PAYING THEM INTEREST AFTER INTEREST FROM EVERY BUDGET. OMG!
    India was divided by british only to keep larger population of muslims and their rich king Nizam fully busy and preoccupied so that they can create a nation of ISRAEL inbetween palastine land. With this strategy they can keep balance of power both in sub-continent and middle east. Bcoz, just compare how the process of pakistan and israel creation went simultaneouly since ww1 and both got created back-to-back in 1947 & 1948. Arabs went into arms race purchasing all weapons with their petrol money, and we too went later with our man power earned money in arms race with pakistan. Both wars of 1967 and 1972 are did by pakis only at the behest of usa and uk.
    I can keep writing many more facts, but seems of no big use. Bcoz everybody want sensation and not common sense. Thats why i say any feeling of nationalism, or religious fundamentalism is not at all praiseworthy unless it has done encompassing all the knowledge of their contemporary times. This way both Gandhi N Godse are mere mortals and not mahatmas

    • @Abdul Azeem (AzeemAZM) It couldnt have been explained more simply than this..Hope such writings do bring in common sense to some fanatics. common sense which is so uncommon. Really appreciate what u highlited.

      • Mr Nilhat Shaikh, your appreciation does not prove that what Mr Abdul Azeem wrote is correct or you all are pure and dhuli hui tulsi too does not fit; and fact remains the fact that at the end Hindustan was divided,

    • Abdul Azzez..Ok British did all this and that and we fools of pre-parition India did not have the sense not to fight amonts ourselves over small things. If we accept everything you say, how is Godse’s elimination of Gandhi a problem? Did not Gandhi delay India’s independence by using non-violence that was so convenient for the British because now it became easier for them to control a nation of Gandhian followers by controlling/managing one person Gandhi. They indulged him when they found fit and when got out of control, they jailed him. This on and off satyagraha struggle was leading to freedom. Gandhi did commit many blunders..many innocents went to jail because Gandhi did not support them; Bose was booted out of Congress, Jinnah and Muslims unfair appeasement was ongoing. Can you not accept that he was trying to appease Muslims?

  237. We cannot totally disagree with godse’s reasoning behind his bold step. Jinnah was the traitor,who was dancing to the tunes of britishers. Who wanted to create seperate state to secure army bases to keep russians at bay. They approached sardar patel first but upon being refused they shook their hands with jinnah. Jinnah was getting Rs600000 p.m from britishers through nizam of hyderabad. Jinnah had no regard for gandhi’s philosophy and gandhi made it easy for jinnah to have his way, which would have been difficult for him to get away. Pakistan shouldnt have been created with 1/3 of india’s prime and fertile land. India should have been united like before.

  238. Account by a person who was all lost by over analysing the books he read and came to believe that he was the saviour of all …. the same way Hitler thought his thoughts were just right !
    These people are just afraid to speak to others to influence thier belief and rather think it is ok to kill and solve the problem. How stupid !!
    He would have done good to the mankind if he had rather killed a hundred rapists to make a point that this is not acceptable in India/ Hindu / Muslim / or whoever else,,
    One should reason with a person who reasons for societal changes and punish persons who tarnish the fabric of society by stealing public money, smuggling, raping women, etc.

  239. How India got its Independence – The Real Story
    • View
    • RelatedContent
    • Track
    Submitted by Desh on Tue, 10/13/2009 – 20:20
    Utpal Dutt, the actor who played comedian in one of most memorable role in Hindi Cinema in Golmaal, was arrested on December 27, 1965 by the Government of West Bengal under the Preventive Detention Act. The Government of Bengal and India feared he was “subversive”. Why? Because he wrote a play called “Kallol” (Sound of Waves) on an important chapter of Indian Freedom that is never mentioned in any official History book. The Royal Indian Navy Mutiny (or Naval Uprising) of 1946.
    The Beginning
    British were in trouble in 1946. Indians in the Armed forces were no longer trust worthy. The mutiny, that no one in our generation has ever heard of, did to the British colonization, what no other action could have done in the long struggle of 250 years.
    Said Sir Stafford Cripps, intervening in the debate on the motion to grant Indian Indepence in the British House of Commons in 1947 (‘The Freedom Struggle and the Dravidian Movement’ by P.Ramamurti, Orient Longman, 1987)
    …The Indian Army in India is not obeying the British officers. We have recruited our workers for the war; they have been demobilized after the war. They are required to repair the factories damaged by Hitler’s bombers. Moreover, they want to join their kith and kin after five and a half years of separation. Their kith and kin also want to join them. In these conditions if we have to rule India for a long time, we have to keep a permanent British army for a long time in a vast country of four hundred millions. We have no such army….”
    In August 1945, Subhash Bose had reportedly died, while he collaborated with the Japanese and Hitler to fight the British. After the Second World War was over, three of the top officers of the Indian National Army (INA) – General Shah Nawaz Khan (Muslim), Colonel Prem Sehgal (Hindu) and Colonel Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon (Sikh) were put on trial at the Red Fort in Delhi. Their crime: “waging war against the King Emperor”
    While Nehru was busy “defending” the three; he (Nehru), Gandhi, Mohd. Ali Jinnah, and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad had come to a secret pact that if Subhash Bose was to enter India (as many knew he hadn’t died in 1945), he would be handed over and charged.
    Unprecedentedly, these trials were very public. Due to the sympathy toward Netaji and the INA in general, there was an instant and large outpouring of passion and patriotism in Indians. These stories were being shared via wireless sets and through media in general on the ships, where the sailors who were being given bad treatment (lack of proper service facilities), got inspired to go out and join together in a strike and rebel against the government.
    The Spread
    The mutiny started on 18 February 1946 and by next evening a Naval Central Strike Committee was formed where Leading Signalman M.S Khan and Petty Officer Telegraphist Madan Singh were unanimously elected President and Vice-President respectively.
    The spread of the Naval mutiny, which started in Bombay was complete – Karachi, Calcutta, Cochin and Vizag. 78 ships, 20 shore establishments and 20,000 sailors had been involved in the strike.
    Seeing this Naval strike, the Bombay-ites did a one day general strike. Even the Royal Indian Air Force and local police forces joined in the other cities. The NCOs in the British Indian army openly ignored and defied the orders of the British superiors. In Madras and Pune, the Indian Army revolted in the British Garrisons.
    Riots broke out all over the country. The mutineers were hoisting 3 flags – Indian National Congress, Muslim League and CPI. British people in cars were made to get off and shout “Jai Hind” by the mutineers. The Indian Tricolor was hoisted on many ships and establishments, by just the second day.
    Such was the crisis that destroyers were gotten and stationed at the Gateway of India in Bombay to deal with the mutineers. Navies of Australia and Canada were also summoned.
    The third day into this – the Royal Air Force flew an entire squadron of Bombers over Bombay Harbor to show support. Meanwhile the sailors had taken over HMIS Bahadur, Chamak and Himalaya and from the Royal Naval Anti-Aircraft School .
    It was by that time that the decision to confront the Navy ratings was taken by the British and the sailors aboard the destroyer Hindustan were challenged. The sailors lost many lives and could not fight back much and in the process the ship Hindustan was destroyed.
    Betrayal by Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah and Azad
    Despite the extensive public support and support from all the wings of the Armed forces – Army, Navy, Air force, and even police – apart from unanimous coming together of people across religious groups at a time when the religious situation had been made really bad due to Partition debate and passion, ALL the National Leaders not only did NOT support the Navy Mutineers and their supporters but instead condemned them.
    They were leaderless, surely, but they had achieved what NO OTHER generation and group of Indians had achieved in 250 years – turn the Indian Armed forces personnel against their Masters. Subhash Bose had imagined this kind of situation. Little did he know that from the failure of his own Army, would arise a rebellion and a will to fight amongst the rank and file of Indian soldiers hitherto fighting dutifully for the British, often against their own countrymen, to strike back.
    The Mainstream politicians – from Jinnah to Gandhi, to Nehru to Maulana Azad – ALL let these final Freedom fighters down. They just abandoned them and except for preaching they did nothing to help them.
    In midst of one of most unprecedented religious tension in the sub-continent, this rebellion and its genesis was a Godsend to reinforce religious and class harmony, which was forged instantly WITHOUT any machination. Yet, it was squandered…. probably deliberately by all those who promised us peace and harmony.
    These people – the so-called Mainstream politicians spearheaded by Gandhi were interested in only their hold of their masses.. to see themselves being upstaged by a bunch of young upstarts with romantic patriotism in their eyes was unnerving. (James L. Raj; Making and unmaking of British India. Abacus. 1997. p598) Show of fake “constitutional process” and “principles” was a good way to brush them aside despite all they had been able to do.
    Real Reason for Independence
    So what were the three things which convinced the British that India could not be governed by force anymore?
    Subhash Bose, Indian National Army and the Royal Navy Uprising..
    When Justice P.B. Chakraborty, the Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court once asked the British PM Lord Clement Atlee – responsible for conceding India’s Independence, the all important question –
    “what was the extent of Gandhi’s influence upon the British decision to quit India”
    His response, with a smirk: “m-i-n-i-m-a-l!“
    So, then why did they have to leave if the Quit India movement of 1942 had subsided and nothing major happened in the mainstream politics – then why did the British have to leave so suddenly in 1947??
    Clement Atlee’s response:
    Erosion of loyalty to the British Crown among the Indian army and navy personnel as a result of the military activities of Netaji
    Such was the Congress party scared of the truth coming out that as late as 1965, a Marxist theater actor and writer Utpal Dutt was arrested for writing a passionate play on the VERY event that ensured India its Independence – the Royal Navy Uprising!
    But as the story goes in our History books…….
    Reference Links:
    1. Royal Indian Navy Mutiny
    2. Subhas Chandra Bose, the Indian National Army, and the War of India’s Liberation – Ranjan Borra, Journal of Historical Review, no. 3, 4 (Winter 1982)
    3. Inside the actor’s mind

  240. http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/aug/13india.htm
    Francois Gautier
    ‘Gandhi was a misfit in India’
    ‘Nationalism is not a mere political programme; nationalism is a religion’
    Nehru, writes French historian Alain Danielou, “was the perfect replica of a certain type of Englishman. He often used the expression ‘continental people’, with an amused and sarcastic manner, to designate French or Italians. He despised non-anglicised Indians and had a very superficial and partial knowledge of India. His ideal was the romantic socialism of 19th century Britain. But this type of socialism was totally unfit to India, where there was no class struggle and where the conditions were totally different from 19th century Europe.”
    It should be added that Nehru was not a fiery leader, maybe because of his innate “gentlemanship” and often succumbed not only to Gandhi’s views, with which he sometimes disagreed, not only to the blackmailing of Jinnah and the fanatical Indian Muslim minority, but also to the British, particularly Lord Mountbatten, whom history has portrayed as the benevolent last viceroy of India, but who actually was most instrumental in the Partition of India, whatever Freedom at Midnight a very romanticised book, says. (Remember Churchill’s words on learning about Partition: “At last we had the last word”!).
    It may be added that the British had a habit of leaving a total mess when they had to surrender a colony, witness Ireland, Palestine, or India-Pakistan.
    Mahatma Gandhi was indeed a great soul, an extraordinary human being, a man with a tremendous appeal to the people. But, unfortunately, he was a misfit in India. Karma or fate, or God, or whatever you want to call it, made a mistake when they sent him down to the land of Bharat. For at heart, Gandhi was a European, his ideals were a blend of Christianity raised to an exalted moral standard and a dose of liberalism ‘à la Tolstoy.’ The patterns and goals he put forward for India, not only came to naught, but sometimes did great harm to a country, which unquestionably he loved immensely.
    Furthermore, even after his death, Gandhism, although it does not really have any relevance to Modern India, is still used shamelessly by all politicians and intellectuals, particularly Congressmen, ‘secular’ Muslims and pseudo-Marxists, to smoke-screen their ineffectiveness and to perpetuate their power. To understand Gandhi properly, one has to put in perspective his aims, his goals, and the results today.
    One has to start at the beginning. There is no doubt that after his bitter experiences with racism in South Africa, he took to heart the plight of fellow Indians there. But what did he achieve for them? Second class citizenship! Worse, he dissociated them from their black Africans brothers, who share the same colour and are the majority. And today the Indians in South Africa are in a difficult position, sandwiched between the Whites who prefer them to the Blacks but do not accept them fully as their own, and the Blacks who often despise them for their superior attitudes.
    Ultimately, they sided with the Moderate Whites led by de Klerk and this was a mistake as Mandela was elected and the Blacks wrested total power in South Africa — and once more we might have an exodus of Indians from a place where they have lived and which they have loved for generations.
    The Mahatma did a lot for India. But the question again is: What remains today in India of Gandhi’s heritage? Spinning was a joke. “He made Charkha a religious article of faith and excluded all people from Congress membership who would not spin. How many, even among his own followers believe in the gospel of Charkha? Such a tremendous waste of energy, just for the sake of a few annas is most unreasonable,” wrote Sri Aurobindo in 1938 (India’s Rebirth, page 207). Does any Congress leader today still weave cotton? And has Gandhi’s Khadi policy of village handicrafts for India survived him? Nehru was the first to embark upon a massive “Soviet type” heavy industrialisation, resolutely turning his back on Gandhi’s policy, although handicrafts in India do have their place.
    Then, nowhere does Gandhi’s great Christian morality find more expression than in his attitude towards sex. All his life he felt guilty about having made love to his wife while his father was dying. But guilt is truly a Western prerogative. In India, sex has (was at least) always been put in its proper place, neither suppressed, as in Victorian times, nor brought to its extreme perversion, like in the West today. Gandhi’s attitude towards sex was to remain ambivalent all his life, sleeping with his beautiful nieces “to test his brahmacharya,” while advocating abstinence for India’s population control. But why impose on others what he practised for himself?
    Again, this is a very Christian attitude: John Paul II, or Mother Teresa, fifty years later, enjoined all Christians to do the same. But did Gandhi think for a minute how millions of Indian women would be able to persuade their husbands to abstain from sex when they are fertile? And who will suffer abortions, pregnancy and other ignominies? And again, India has totally turned its back on Gandhi’s policy: today its birth control programme must be the most elaborate in the world — and does not even utilise force (except for a short period during the Emergency), as the Chinese have done.
    For all the world, Gandhi is synonymous with non-violence. But once more, a very Christian notion. Gandhi loved the Mahabharata. But did he understand that sometimes non-violence does more harm than violence itself? That violence can also be “Dharma,” if it is done for defending one’s country, or oneself, or one’s mother, or sisters? Take the Cripps proposals for instance.
    In 1942, the Japanese were at the doors of India. England was weakened, vulnerable and desperately needed support. Churchill sent Sir Stafford Cripps to India to propose that if India participated in the war effort, Great Britain would grant her Dominion status (as in Australia or Canada) at the end of the war. Sri Aurobindo sent a personal letter to the Congress, urging it to accept. Nehru wavered, but ultimately, Gandhi in the name of non-violence put his foot down and the Cripps proposal was rejected. Had it been accepted, history might have been changed, Partition and its terrible bloodshed would have been avoided.
    Gandhi also never seemed to have realised the great danger that Nazism represented for humanity. A great Asuric wave had risen in Europe and threatened to engulf the world and it had to be fought — with violence. Calling Hitler “my beloved brother,” a man who murdered 6 million Jews in cold blood just to prove the purity of his own race, is more than just innocence, it borders on criminal credulity. And did not Gandhi also advise the Jews to let themselves be butchered?
    Ultimately, it must be said that whatever his saintliness, his extreme and somehow rigid asceticism, Gandhi did enormous harm to India and this harm has two names: Muslims and Untouchables.
    The British must have rubbed their hands in glee: here was a man who was perfecting their policy of rule-and-divide, for ultimately nobody more than Gandhi contributed to the Partition of India, by his obsession to always give in to the Muslims, by his obstinate refusal to see that the Muslims always started rioting, Hindus only retaliated. By his indulgence of Jinnah, going as far as proposing to make him the prime minister of India.
    Sri Aurobindo was very clear about Hindu-Muslim unity: “I am sorry they are making a fetish of Hindu-Muslim unity. It is no use ignoring facts; some day the Hindus may have to fight the Muslims and they must prepare for it. Hindu-Muslim unity should not mean the subjection of the Hindus. Every time the mildness of the Hindu has given way. The best solution would be to allow the Hindus to organise themselves and the Hindu-Muslim unity would take care of itself, it would automatically solve the problem. Otherwise we are lulled into a false sense of satisfaction that we have solved a difficult problem, when in fact we have only shelved it.” (India’s Rebirth, page 159)
    Gandhi’s love of the Harijans, as he called them, was certainly very touching and sprang from the highest motivations, but it had also as its base a Christian notion that would have found a truer meaning in Europe, where there are no castes, only classes. Glorifying the scavenger as a man of God makes good poetry, but little social meaning. In the words of Sri Aurobindo: “The idea that it needs a special ‘punya’ to be born a Bhangi is, of course one of these forceful exaggerations which are common to the Mahatma and impress greatly the mind of his hearers. The idea behind is that his function is an indispensable service to society, quite as much as the Brahmin’s, but that being disagreeable, it would need a special moral heroism to choose it voluntarily and he thinks as if the soul freely chose it as such a heroic service to the society and as reward of righteous acts, but that is hardly likely.
    “In any case, it is not true that the Bhangi life is superior to the Brahmin life and the reward of special righteousness, no more that it is true that a man is superior because he is born a Brahmin. A spiritual man of pariah birth is superior in the divine values to an unspiritual and worldly-minded Brahmin. Birth counts but the basic value is in the soul behind the man and the degree to which it manifests itself in nature”. (India’s Rebirth, page 201)
    Once more Gandhi took the European element in the decrying of the caste system, forgetting the divine element behind. And unfortunately he sowed the seeds of future disorders and of a caste war in India, of which we see the effects only today.
    Non-violence, you say? But Gandhi did the greatest violence to his body, in true Christian fashion, punishing it, to blackmail others in doing his will, even if he thought it was for the greater good. And ultimately, it may be asked, what remains of Gandhi’s non-violence today? India has fought three wars with Pakistan (four, if you count Kargil), had to combat the Chinese, has the second biggest army in the world and has to fight counter-insurgency movements in Punjab, Assam and Kashmir. Gandhi must have died a broken man indeed. He saw India partitioned, Hindus and Muslims fighting each other and his ideals of Charkha, non-violence and Brahmacharya being flouted by the very men he brought up as his disciples.
    However, his heritage is not dead, for it survives where it should have been in the first instance: in the West. His ideals have inspired countless great figures, from Martin Luther King, to Albert Einstein, to Nelson Mandela, the Dalaï Lama or Attenborough and continue to inspire many others. Gandhi’s birth in India was an accident, for here, there is nothing left of him, except million of statues and streets and saintly mouthings by politicians, who don’t apply the least bit what Gandhi had taught so ardently.
    History will judge. But with Nehru on one side and his Westernised concept of India and Gandhi on the other, who tried to impose upon India a non-violence which was not hers, India was destined to be partitioned. Thus when the time came, India was bled into two, in three even, and Muslims took their pound of flesh while leaving. India never recovered from that trauma and today she is still suffering from its consequences. Yet has anybody really understood the lessons of history?
    Francois Gautier

  241. Excuse me…….Jinnah was a supporter of congress from 1904-1930………..It was all due to Gandhi he started opposing congress…It was gandhi who did not plead for bhagat singh’s death sentence….it is actually true that gandhi actually never saw Bhagat Singh….and he was against him….Actually gandhi just wanted to gain TRP…and nothing else….he was against every good leader be it Bose ..and Sardar Patel also.. For me Godse was absolutely right

    • You have totally missed my point. What I wanted to convey is that believing in ones faith does not entail anybody to kill somebody else. Then everybody will be killing everybody else. Godse was free to confront Gandhi politically.By choosing to kill Gandhi he has taken the extremist path. And Mr Roy, you have just called me mad and have not given any reason for the same. I suggest that you get out of your small world and start thinking logically and with reason. I have nothing for or against Godse or Gandhi. I have commented on Godse,s speech.

      • Kroy have rightly called mad and you are not only mad but parasite like gandi, you call your self human who doesnot even able to gauge between Godse or Gandi or rather trying to be apolitical, we are surviving on this land which we called MA Dharti or MOTHER LAND, our forefathers and all the coming generation too will live here in peace only when Gandi like people needs to be stoned in public, Jinnha,osama will come and go but before the world kills Jinnha or osama first I will kill Gandi and their supporters at my own land then the others can be justified on the international court.

  242. The mistery of Subhashchandra Bose death also needs to solved. There was no plane crash or anything. The British ordered defeated Japanese to execute Subhash Bose. There was no plane in the control of Japanese. Japanese were already defeated..

    • Killing Subhashchandra Bose was also a plan of gandhi n the british goverment.. it was necessary to do so for the uprising of the congress goverment.. that’s why gandhi n british planned this fatal act..

  243. Nathuram Godse has done a fabulous job by killing gandhi …cause he was just not worth of all that!!!! I completely agree with Prakash Bedekar.

  244. Godse killed Gandhi because in his view there was no other alternative to stop him from harming a complete generation of hindus politically & socially. If one studies about those times, one may also agree with Godse. In fact that was the very reason the Nehru Government did not make his last speech public and all successive Congress Governments followed the same. Not only his speech was banned but also were his books. The successive Congress Governments allowed only one side of the story & the Godse story was completely banned. Many termed Godse as a terrorist or a mathefiru but actually he was a very intellectual person. His courtroom speech was so impressive that the judge himself remarked that if India had a Jury system, Godse would have walked free. He gave various reasons behind his act but asked for no mercy. The day he killed Gandhi, he went to see him earlier when Gandhi was alone sitting in the verhanda of Birla house alongwith a relative of Sardar patel. Godse had his Beretta in his pocket and could have killed him & ran away. But he deposed before the court that he did not want to do that and did want to kill Gandhi in a full public view of at least 300 to 400 people. So he came back at the prayer time. He said he wanted to kill Gandhi to show the world the assassination as a defeat of Ahinsa.

    • I agree with your argument in full! Had Gandhi lived on, Indian would have been in a worse situation even 60 years back.

  245. Everyone knows that the partition was effected due to power struggle of Nehru and Jinnah and nothing else. In fact, history makes it clear that Gandhi tried his best to strike a negotiation between the two but the ‘horned bulls’ didn’t budge. N for the record, Jinnah did not believe in Islam for an ounce, he never even practiced it. He only revered himself as the face of Islam only for the sake of his own political career. Religion has always been an evil when it seaps into the political structure of the country. Even now, look at us, we justify the deeds of godse on the basis of religious sentiments not the law of our land. As per the speech, yes, we can say that godse was ‘provoked’ into committing a murder (even though its a far fetched argument) but how can we even think of justifying his deeds. You see, our society has suffered since ages coz we are not ready to eliminate the divides, we are not ready to understand and be apprised of the laws of our own land let alone honour them n this sentiment stands as such irrespective of our caste, creed, religion or gender. How many of us can think rationally, logically without being moved by the religious sentiments. Religion was always a tool in the hands of politicians since the independence and continues to be till date. We have evolved as a race, as individuals. People talk abt jury, but are they even competent to institute a system of jury when they can’t even form a mature opinion free from extraneous considerations, when they still identify people as hindus, Muslims, Scheduled caste n so on. I think not…..we need to grow as a democracy, as Indians, n we need to form strong democratic opinions independent of extraneous considerations. Unless we do that, I do not think we can ever be competent to form legal opinions abt cases such as these.
    N as for Gandhi, please give him some respect. The man had his faults, made lots of mistakes, yet he did got us our independence. Instead of the contempt u guys express for his satyagraha n non violence movement, please understand the cunning politics he played n the amount of bloodshed he avoided. Of course, we the Indians were foolish enough to forego that advantage by fighting in the partition yet, why do u guys forget that we had already been fighting numerous battles with the british since 200 years before gandhi came along. The Punjabi’s, the Marathas, the mughals, the Mysore dynasty all fought with the British but were subjugated. Further, our hopes for violent removal of the Brits was thwarted when Japan fell in the hands of the allies. Hence, all political considerations of independence era should be carefully analysed before denying the credibility of gandhi.

    • well said….. I was feeling sad seeing the comments which praises a fascist propogator who killed gandhi. That too believing a bunch of lies and half truths.

    • Tanisha We had found another Vivekananda in you and it seems Geeta is born out of you, but unfortunately we the humanity race have very early on accepted the Chicago congregation which happened before your this comments.HINDUISM is the way of life so what’s wrong if it been raked upon. Hindu religion is without doubt the supreme fact on the face of Earth, the sooner we merge into it peace will prevail sooner otherwise every deeds have its fruits that has to be swallow like what’s happening around the world.

  246. Extremists or hardliners do more harm to any country or religion they belong to than others. It can be argued if Godse wanted to kill he should have tried his hands on Jinnah, the crusader of separate state or Mountbatten who sped up the partition process.. Killing Gandhi did not serve any purpose but only highlighted the antics and rhetorics of extremists. Nationalism is definitely required but not based or related to any majority religion but as an Indian. Bcoz India is basically secular country and our politican know how to exploit it to fulfill their ulterior motives. Want to implement something sensible bring in law and implement it aggressively, but just playing the cards of majority-minority will definitely will create more misguided youths in this country.

    • You needn’t worry about creation of misguided youths ‘coz there are enough Jinnahs in the country ie. Mulayam Singh Yadav, Laloo Yadav, Nithish Kumar, Karunanidhi, Mamta & all congressmen. India soon will become Pakistan with the support of present day politicians.

    • for clarity of thought, the gandi, the gandi family, and the Congress makes us or the youths of this country fall into such trap what they did to Godsay, subhas chandra bose, you just name them and Numerous of other such freedom fighters, Surprisingly still Congress is doing the same thing since independence and with the present generation too.

  247. i have read the statement of nathu ramji godse, given by him in the court- i have also read the biography of godse ji and gandhi ji- and on that basis i can say that in patriotism character and courage godse ji stands above ganghi ji–so if any body asks me that to whom i will like between godse ji nd gandhi ji–i will without any hesitation say that i like godse ji and not gandhi ji—t.d.chandna

    • He just wanted to satisfy his evil mentality… Had he been really courageous… He should have assassinated Jinnah… Shooting an unarmed man who was already a role model of peace loving people, is the sign of a PURE COWARD WHO ONLY WANTED HIS NAME TO BE REMEMBERED… Godse is no better than Osama or other stupids like him…

      • You are right about Godse but kiling Jinnah would not helped anyway. Jinnah was not the alone leader, Indian Muslims in majority demanded, voted and fought for Pakistan.

      • THe reason why Godse chose to kill gandhi was his continued minority appeasement. if had decided to kill jinnah first(and obviously, the people there, would have beat him to death), gandhi would still have been alive and would have continued his appeasement policy. i personally feel,all 3(gandhi,jinnah as well as nehru )
        should have been killed

      • Parasite mentality aasim! u are not associating GODSAY but youself with osama? will you allow your own property to be partitioned between the thieves(stepbrothers/neighbor) who just broken into your ancestral home/property………..the same applies to our country too.

  248. Everyone in this era only thinks of a persons bad quality….. Why? Hose was a patriot? How? No he was never. Indians itself are against the person who gave them independance . everything is not free. Yes india was partitioned. But think if india was not partitioned how terrorists would have emerged in our country… Now atleast there is a boder where india can fight against it. If partition didn’t happen the great malla would not have been recognised. Mahatma ghandi beleived that the unity of Muslims and Hindu was the only way of freedom. If godse wanted to kill the main people who was the reason of the partition kill all those rapists and all those lords who came to our country and the other exploited it. Modi Saab, instead of putting a statue of a killer, pls make india clean, pollution free, rapist free. Make it a country where women can walk without scare and fear instead of wasting the time for killers. Modse was brave but he didn’t need to show it by killing he had to know that without Gandhi ji we are wouldn’t have got freedom and the whole india can would have been perished. And there wouldn’t be india….. Long live INDIA.

    • looks like you are fool we did not get freedom because of Gandhi… there were hundreds of freedom fighters.. like Netaji, Tilak and meny more. Gandhi was responsible for killings of thousands of Hindus because of his stupid policy of Ahimsa… Godse was great he should have finished Gandhi much before.

    • Gandhi didnt gave India Independence. Partition was not bad but a great idea, but then why then the Muslims who created didnt move? What do you mean by rapist free, India is having lowest rape rate in the world?

    • I am ashamed of myself varsha, you and whole of India was/is been raped by the same traitors with whom you are colluding with.
      Is distortion of history not amount to crime? What an unfortunate tragedy and irony?

  249. Seriously?
    21st century, where we have people giving it up for unity and growth of India, and people respect a man who murdered a man with decent ideology and what for? RELIGION? Just tell me how different it is than terrorists doing the same for their religion. How in any world religion can be so dependable and act as a jury?
    For god’s sake, for some shame read something about gandhiji, please. Atleast 3 books or one documentary.
    A murderer being called as a hero is like yourselves being a part of that ungrateful act.
    Anyway,
    Still doing hindus and muslims ? Like Who is better? Still doing that?
    Ha! You learnt nothing from the history then. Neither from gandhiji or godse or any other being. We are equal. Like brothers.
    If you think India cannot change, then it’s because you are not changing.
    Peace.

    • if gandhi would had atleast emphasized on the releasing of bhagat singh, sukhdev, and rajguru today we people would had more effective and patriotic men. gandhi was never keen to talk erwin over their execution. so please brush up your memory sir .. today we lack those effective and courageous people like subhash chandra bose and lala lajpat rai who could had also been saved had only gandhi tried to protect them…..

    • Absolutely brother. There is absolutely no need to eulogize a killer like Godse. Rather than killing a saint like Mahatma Gandhi, that mindless should have killed Jinnah and those who were butchering Hindus. Gandhiji tried hard to save Indians in pakistan, but Muslims there did not hear him. Poor soul.. and this idiot killed him for that. Actually Godse was trying to kill Gandhi since 1946 itself. He was nothing but a militant. And Hindus, or even Marathis should not associate with him. There are other great Marathis like Lokmanya Tilak, Gopalkrishna Gokhle, and off course Shivaji, who are the real pride of Great Maharashtra. Godse the killer has been a tainting blot ….

  250. There were lot of great freedom fighters than gandhi off course gandhi was one of them. But i feel proud of godse who was a great patriotic. His ideology was true and acceptable.

  251. One bullet shoot is meant for the loast of not only what gandhiji has sacrifice thr own life but brutish role to the sentiments of billion not only from India, abroad as well

  252. Godse was great…Bose was strong…gandhi was weak…he could hav joined with bose..together they could hav beaten Britain to their knees…but gandhi was concerned abt the lives of indian ppl. Well, if he was truly concerned then he would’nt hav called for stupid meetings such as “jalian walah bagh”..I dont think more ppl could hav been killed in a war!…Without considering hindu-muslim problem…we can say that gandhi is the reason for the death of millions of “True freedom fighters”!••

  253. I think this was all about communism ….everything created by the britishers……we should talk about humanity not about hindu muslim …before bengal seperation everybody was working for the nation not for community.but this has gobe into the roots of minds of people to talk about religon.this should not bedone

  254. Dear Fools….don’t you have any other duty rather than thinking about who is right – Godse or Gandhi.I say,don’t believe anyone just because of his words.When someone make a speech he has the complete consideration that a group of people are there to judge him.We never know whether Gandhiji was selfish or not(there can be a chance I must say).Similarly simply because Godse killed Gandhiji doesn’t mean than he is courageous.He may be actually a person who pee through his pants on gunpoint.Who knows…?
    So dear friends,please use your brain.There is no hard and fast rule for right and wrong.There is no need to believe in a person whom you don’t know personally.Believe in yourself

    • What godse did was right…had he not killed gandhi den…half of india wud hav been captured by china(just like tibet) and half by pakistan. #bullshitnonvoilence #longlivegodse #respect.

      • Dear friend plz tell me where was this RSS during the whole movement of freedom struggle….. wat was its methods …. were they popular among masses…..
        Today it may claim that India should be on its line BUT where were they, when Gandhi was working 1920-1945…. It is easy for somebody to come in last and claim BUT the whole process was not so easy…
        ONE MORE QUESTION….wat was the self interest of Gandhiji? He was a son of rich person with high social status. He could enjoy much better life than he did in struggle……wat was the self interst pl tell…..

        • He was a selfish man who wanted the credit for others’ hard work. He played dirty politics when his candidate Pattabhi Sitaramayya lost against Shri Subhash Chandra Bose. The British left India because of their own reasons and not because of that rascal. Had we risen up in arms earlier and not listened to him, we would have been independet 50 years earlier. Today is also the birthday of Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri, he was twice the man Gandhi could ever dream of being. We should commemorate his memory not Gandhis. People like you should be ashamed of themselves. Read the reasons Nathuram Godse gave for killing Gandhi. They define logic and reason.
          Atakodeyenne.

      • I would say that,If gandhi ji existed,China would have become india If china were to ever attack & there would have been cordial relations between pakistan and india…See,these issues cant be solved with violence,They are to be solved through talks.Godse,instead of killing gandhi,could have discussed exchanged opinions at the time when gandhi was decisive.Probably this would have led to a better situation.I understand it is a f****d up situation but godse could at least see both sides of the situation.See its easy to be biased but it is hard to break the small bubble we are living in.But if he seriously wanted to release his pent up anger he could have killed nehru.gandhi according to me was not a conspirator but a real time strategist,He made such long term goals that many people could not percieve the long term positive impact…By the way if you see the jalianwalla bagh massacre those victims were not killed by general dyer but were killed by our own indian people under the orders of dyer.it is extremely shameful for them to backstab the country they were born in.

      • And to add the only fault of gandhi was that he was not killed or he did not sacrifice his life during the freedom struggle.But if he had sacrificed himself india would not have existed as we know today.It would either have been a part of Britain where the British guys would have treated us lie blacks in america or india would have broken down into smaller provinces.There would have been no unity or integrity among india.All the systems would have gone haywire .There would have been a lot of bloodshed.There would have been a lot of entropy…And dont forget Even the muslims took part in our sufferings…I cannot find any fault with gandhi i am sorry

    • Certain things you have to believe. because there is no alternate for the same. Am not arguing, who is correct, whether Gandhi Ji or Godse ??? But some certain things attract the acuteness of rights of the people of India. Still our country called as INDIA (Independent Nation Declared In August). Who has replaced the Bharat or Hindustan by India? So many questions are yet to be answered. If you advising that only to believe in a person whom you know personally. History is History. We cannot interact with everybody at every time and age. Certain things have to believe without interaction.

  255. Gandhiji deserve killing
    when all indians was with Sardar Patel to make him P.M , gandhiji made nehru as it and due to nehru our india was suffering from paying more taxes and due that we are much back -economically , in education , financially in compare to other countries.

  256. Peace to Godse and peace to Gandhi
    Im not in a position to tell anyone weather Gandhi or Godse was right…..
    Actually both of them were better than us(or maybe me) because we all give our comments and our views but when it actually comes to do something, more than 50%[which includes me] just sit there and watch.
    I think that they were great…just because they actually did something…they stood for their beliefs and their morals which they believed in.
    From their perspective they did what they could do to bring this nation up.

  257. Half of this is bullshit. Its written and exaggerated by some hindu Author. In every line there is hinduism and not Indian patriotism.
    Whoever has written this is brain washing all people.

    • Give proper proof in favor of your comment or just shut up you shameless (I don’t know whether you are guy or girl)

    • Truth hurts. Know all facts, think critically with an open mind. Independence was sacrifice of not just Gandhiji, but many others. Mr. Godse gives credit to Gandhiji’s leadership. However at a certain point every leader faces a situation where he creates a very greedy, powerful and influential heir or next level. I think Nehru was such a person of greed and power. Did Pakistan exist before 1947? Did India not have many religious entities before that? So we need to know what went wrong in 1945-47. Greed for power and succession overtook the cause for freedom.

    • Its not written by any HINDU, its been spoken by GODSAY himself in the Court of this land, also called by the name of HINDUSTAN ! Where Ram,Krishna,Gutam Buddha,King Ashoka,Subhas Chandra Bose,Indra had toiled on this soil.I am Proud to be in India and its citizen @ HINDU.

  258. Before partition india was secular still then muslim was in need to have a seperate land then why didnot Gandhi & Neheru as a gurdian of the nation allow all the muslim to leave this land to settle in Pakistan as who knows one day may be 100 yrs from now they need another seperate land as their fertility rate is much higher than any other religion.Hopeless as a father. Was he not a selfish to be a greatman only by sacrificing the interest of india belongs to.If British can go why not muslims to leave also.

  259. Gandhiji is Father of Pakistan , for me Bhagat singh , Bose and savarkar are the real Heroes not this Bloody Old Man who forced the britishers to hang Bhagat singh

    • Seriously! Even Lokmanya Tilak had done great work! But all this Gandhi could to was to stand against real Patriots! :/ i wish Nathuram Godse get born again n kill all those remaining Gandhi’s that are against our national!

    • hey aditya..i hope u must b indian ryt..so u shud definetly hv respect towards gandhiji for sure..i dnt say dat hz true but hz d main rsns of independence for sure..n bhagath singh is sooper hero forvr

    • aditya, dont forget what gandhiji has done for us , the dandi march and so many things. and if you r so confident then go and ask bhagat singh now that does he still have respect for bapu or not. people like u are stupid and worst. if u were in the time of gandhiji would u have faught for independence . u should respect gandhiji people r mad and u r right is ti then die u have no right to live bluudy fool

    • That is not true! I believe they are the heroes but so is Ghandhi. But actually he could be called both “father of nation” and father of Pakistan because in the Pakistan the people of are only living. They were a part of us and so are now. Ghandi is was a super person

  260. This was really interesting article to read. History is something that has already happened and it cannot be changed. Our beliefs are influenced by the knowledge we gather and most schools make sure that we do not learn to think critically. We were taught that Mr. Godse was part of RSS. But, no one taught us he was also part of Indian National Congress. I have tremendous respect for Gandhiji and until recently I used to think that he was calm and at peace even when the bullet hit him, so much so that the phrase “Hey Ram” are taught as Gandhiji’s last words. But, that was a lie and who taught this lie to us? Distorting the facts is the game politicians play for self benefit. In this day and age, when facts can be found through many sources, why not study further from sources other than school textbooks or Internet. Let’s dig some archives and find the truth for ourselves and for the benefit of generations to come. My only regret is not knowing Nehru’s cunning nature. No longer call him Chacha Nehru or Pandit Nehru. Still have respect for Gandhiji and good to know the ideology of Mr Godse.

  261. If it were all for Indian freedom then Gandhi had achieved all.
    Gandhiji would have lived on (not for a greater cause but) for a direction. If he would have got a break from the fighting men in his life…
    Looking for the “Ahimsa” evermore are the whole world generation. Gandhiji would have taken the world there.
    If his countryman (Godse the maniac?!) had not defeated his purpose!
    🙂

  262. every one has thinking but all the thoughts are not correct, who knows that what godse did for his country, who knows that gandiji did for this country,, i am proud to say that bagat sigh is correct, but not the godse

  263. After reading many thoughts and conclusion therein with an repetetive attempt to malign Gandhi ji and associating his conduct with a favourism to muslims only to satisfy their own sentiments, I think now the time has come to reassess Godse and Gandhi case by today’s historians with a formal government order. Since a patriotic and Popular govt had sworned in after 5-6 decades after independent India first time, they should take up the issue seriously to make clear for coming generations whether Gandhi deserves to be called Father of Nation, Or Godse should be awarded Bharat Ratna.

    • Adding to your thought, get back the land that been partitioned, and for your information, those above topic for which we all are here had happened in the court in-front of the then judges, so question does not take birth to assess it now, Award must be bestowed upon GODSAY, Make changes in the primary School History.

  264. I say that bhagat Singh ws da real hero of hero’s……bt mahatma Gandhi could save him …n bhagat Singh by his own didn’t want to live…his dream ws to die for us….coz he wanted us to b real hero’s of da future

    • No you are wrong! He should not kill Ghandhi nor Nehru. He was a stupid man and so are you. Read textbooks to know more and gain knowledge.

      • Huma Tameem Khan: It is very suitable for you to say all this. You are living in a country where Hindus are in majority and you are safe here. Safer than many of the Islamic countries even the land which was created specially for Muslims by dismembering the great nation which I would call Bharat ( not India). It is very suitable for you not to speak of the atrocities committed on Hindus of Pakistan and Bangladesh where they have practically disappeared and your community is thriving here in Bharat with special pampering from all the “Secular” parties. Whether Nathuram Godse was right or wrong it will be judged by the history itself but Gandhi and Nehru failed this nation and Gandhi deserved what he got finally.

      • See. It’s not about killing,, anger,, hatred.When you are very deep and you can understand the situation and have the most righteous reason perhaps that step would be right but even then we should not be the person who believes in noone but himself like Gandhi was.perhaps godse wanted to have a discussion with others but can’t because of the time but anyway thinking about that may result in manipulating our minds and developing a hatred.

    • Nathuram Godse may have given many explanations for killing Gandhiji . After reading it I came to the conclusion that it was only the thought of a sick upper caste people’s mentality. They couldn’t tolerate a lower caste thought or concept of non-violence and non-co-operation which lead India to freedom with lower casualties and loss of property. He , Nathuram Godse , along with people behind him had to prove that all the upper caste ruler, starting from Ramayana, Mahabharata and others have resorted to violence to win their war, were right. Gandhiji was very practical as our poor illiterate and divided people couldn’t have afforded the high cost of violence. Also British were very clever in dealing violence but they had no answer to non-violence and non-co-operation concept of Gandhiji. What ever the people say but I appreciate that Gandhiji brought freedom to Indian in cheapest and affordable effort. Gandhiji was not greedy of any post so any body, should be held responsible for division of India and Pakistan , are those who desired for top political position after partition.

      • Mr Rajeev .I think due to Hindu like you whole political parties are targeting that community in India who are called minorities .Because they know, they can easily divide Hindus on basis of upper caste and lower caste.This cast ism exists in other religion also but they unite when any body talk about their Religion. And you guys just sought on your own religion.In today Politics what lower cast is not getting–>”RESERVATION”.Ha Ha you will get number of examples where meritorious student did not reach better institute and lower caste people go.but we are not shouting. So instead of shouting try to improve your thinking ,because it is direct fight of one religion to other ,they are not going to see you are lower or upper cast.

        • A assassin of father of Nation can’t be celebrated in a civilized society . One( after assassinating somebody) can’t prove himself right quoting religious books. Illegal assassination is always done to settle personal or communal scores (killer of innocent person is killer nothing else). Either Godse or the person who poisoned his mind settled theirs personal scores.
          Many people blames reservation system in India. Do anybody give time to think Who is responsible? And what should be done to eliminate the root cause? Are the responsible person belong to benefited castes and religion. I think the few greedy and corrupt people are responsible for the same. They characterized and classified different castes. They started mis-utilising their position to give the chance to their near and relative in various sectors of countries ignoring the deserving candidate. They created tussle between the different castes. All this just to make people busy in useless things and they can continue their corrupt practices. When things started getting out of control they passed the reservation bill in haste without giving the thoughts of unprivileged millions. Those who controls the system never made the system transparent and fair till now. No body want to talk of fair and transparent legal and administration in our country. All those who are at topmost postions still passing big tenders worth crores to their near and relative. But the lower people are busy in useless reservation issues. We want the best and competent teacher – doctor for our family but we never select the similar competent person for parliament. How can we expect good outcome. In the era of Science and Spirituality still there are many followers of plenty of blind faith. If reservations kept on continuing for few years it will turn out blind faith for our politicians similar to our religious books. Disease and body structures are same between different castes and religion. Drugs used for treatment are same. Even organ transplant between two individuals can be done regardless of castes and religion. We have progressed from dictatorship to democracy but still we have to learn a lot why God created us. But if anybody suppresses talent and opportunities to a deserving candidate our nation and systems get spoiled. It is just like adulterating milk – feeding a child and then expecting normal humane outcome.
          And about faith A water molecule travels through many mouth and urinary tracks of many organisms ( different species, castes, religion) but the molecule of water is always considered pure if collected from Ganges river. There are many castes and religion in India. Some educated individual can comment a whole caste community as dogs but no action taken, even it is mentioned in some so called pious book, but people consumes the food produced in the fields of THE caste community ( compared with dogs), with the help of their hand and sweat and probably their excreta also. How can a civilized individual compares a community with animals.

      • Rajeev plz read some more to know the reality. You are saying cheapest and affordable way !! plz read read and read some more before spreading this superficial propaganda by Nehru and Co.

      • Hinduism has evolved over time as a religion of reservation(based on caste). It is good to respect the religion and religious faith but it is sickness to get obsessed of it. We learnt to wear undergarments to coats-tie and eat with forks- spoon from western people. But still plenty about civilization has to be learnt from them. I want to add Who classified castes and then started reservations it was the Brahmins who demanded nearly 100%reservation in temples with free food and residence with no required qualifications / competitions. The pandits of temple enjoys the benefit of mostly tax free income plus reasonable to lavish lifestyle with lots of respect . They can capture any property with least effort/money and convert it into temple . All at the cost of just a mere birth in families of Brahmin caste . But till now no revolution done to eradicate this reservation. If India is projected as Hindu nation, it will be a nation of reservations based on castes. What a religion that don’t consider all individual same. How fake is the religious faith can be judged by the fact that An orthodox Brahmin will not eat from hand of a scheduled caste individual but he will eat grains raised in their farm with help of excreta and the same Brahmin will be ready to accept kidney from a street beggar without knowing his/her caste or religion in case of terminal chronic renal failure. It well known many great people have created different religion after knowing the incompleteness and unjustified rituals in their parent religion. People keeps talking of present social problems but don’t analyze that many social problems are deep rooted from past.

  265. मुझे लगता है की गांधी जी और नेहरू दोनों ही भारत के विभाजन के लिए जिम्मेदार थे। ज्यादा तो नेहरू थे क्योंकि उन्हे प्रधानमंत्री बनने की बहुत जल्दी थी इसीलिए उन्होंने देश को तोड़ दिया। मैं मानता हूँ गांधी का योगदान बहत बड़ा है हमारे देश के लिए लेकिन जब मुस्लिमो के लिए अलग देश बन गया था तब क्या जरूत थी की भारत को हिन्दू और मुस्लिम दोनों के लिए। भारत सिर्फ हिन्दुओ के लिए होना चाहिए था क्योंकि बटवारा तो इसलिए हुआ था की मुसलमानो को एक अलग देश मिलेगा और हिन्दुओ को एक अलग देश। जब भारत हिन्दुओ के लिए बना था फिर इस में मुस्लिम की क्या जररूत थी। दंगा रोकने के लिए हिन्दू मुस्लिमो को अलग किया गया था। पाकिस्तन तो मुस्लिमो की लिए बन गया पर भारत हिन्दुओ का नहीं हुआ। secularism के नाम पर गांधी और नेहरू ने मुसलमानो का साथ दिया और हिन्दू का उसका हक़ नहीं दिया ।और वही आज हो रहा secularism के नाम पर आज के कांग्रेस वाले मुसलमानो का साथ देते पर हिन्दुओ के सैज गैरो जैसा व्यवाहर करते है। कितना दिख की बात है। गांधी महान थे इस कोई दोराय नहीं लेकिन गोडसे भी आतंकवादी नहीं वो गांधी जितन महान् तो नहीं पर पर वो एक सच्चा देश भक्त था भगत सिंह चन्द्र शेखर आज़ाद जैसा हमें अपना गोडसे के प्रति नजरिया बदलना होगा

    • इतिहास के बारे में पता क्या है तुम लोगो को |
      जब भारत के लोगो को साऊथ अफ्रीका ले जाया गया, और वहा उनसे जानवरों की तरह
      व्यवहार किया गया, तो कौन था जिसने उनके हक़ में आवाज उठाई | महात्मा गाँधी @
      जब भारत के बिहार के गाव चंपारण में किसानो से जबरदस्ती नील की खेती कराइ
      गई | और उसे खुद अंग्रेजो द्वारा ही कौड़ियो के भाव ख़रीदा गया, तो कौन था जो
      आगे आकर बोला, “किसान के खेत पर किसान का हक है, और ये उसकी मर्जी होना
      चाहिए की वो अपने खेत में क्या बोये |” वो कौन था जिसने किसानो पर हो रहे
      इस अत्याचार के खिलाफ आवाज उठाई | और अंग्रेजो को झुकाया और किसानो को सुखी
      बनाया | महात्मा गाँधी @
      गुजरात के खेडा गाव में जब अकाल की वजह से फसल बर्बाद हो गई थी तब कौन आया
      उनका कर माफ़ करवाने | किसने कह दिया की इस बार किसानो की फसल बर्बाद हो गई
      है इस बार कोई लगान नहीं दिया जाएगा | महात्मा गाँधी @
      जब अहमदाबाद के बारडोली में किसानो पर अन्यत्र 30% कर का भार जबरदस्ती डाला
      गया, तब कौन आया बारडोली सत्याग्रह लेकर किसानो को खुशहाल बनाने, अंग्रेजो
      को फिर से झुकाने | महात्मा गाँधी @
      जब नमक कानून आया और अंग्रेजो ने भारतीयों के नमक बनाने पर रोक लगा दी,
      अंग्रेजो ने भारतीयों के नमक बेचने पर भी रोक लगा दी | और नमक सिर्फ
      अंग्रेजो द्वारा, वो भी दुगुनी कीमत पर बेचा जाने लगा, तो कौन आया जिसने
      निर्भय होकर दांडी यात्रा की | महात्मा गाँधी @ इस यात्रा ने पूरी दुनिया
      का ध्यान भारत की और खीचा, और जिस तरह से अंग्रेजो ने भारतीयों का दमन किया
      उसकी पुरे विश्व में निंदा हुई और अंग्रेजो/इंग्लेंड वासियों पर एक
      अन्तराष्ट्रीय दबाव बनने लगा की वो भारत को आजाद करे |
      किसने असहयोग आन्दोलन चलाकर अंग्रेजो की सिट्टी पिट्टी गुम कर दी | महात्मा
      गाँधी @
      और जो लोग कहते की भारत का विभाजन गाँधी में किया वो सुन ले, भारत का
      विभाजन मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना, जो की मुस्लिम लीग का नेता था, उसने किया |
      जब गाँधी जी और बाकी लोगो ने जिन्ना के पाकिस्तान की बात नहीं मानी, तो
      जिन्ना ने डाइरेक्ट एक्शन डे का एलान कर दिया | जिसके चलते सारे मुस्लिम
      हाथो में हथियार लिए गैर मुस्लिमो को मारने लगे, और देखते ही देखते दंगे
      भड़क उठे | महात्मा गाँधी को सिविल वार की चिंता सताने लगी, और इस हिंसा के
      माहौल को देखते हुए वो विभाजन के लिए तैयार हो गए | जिन्ना ने तो विभाजन न
      मानने पर एक और डाइरेक्ट एक्शन डे के एलान की धमकी दे दी थी | सरदार वल्लभ
      भाई पटेल भी कहने लगे थे की यदि शरीर का कोई हिस्सा बीमार हो जाए, और
      बीमारी पुरे शरीर में फ़ैलाने का खतरा हो, तो अच्छा यही होगा की हम उस बीमार
      हिस्से को शरीर से काट कर फेंक दे | अलग कर दे उसे |
      जब देश में विभाजन के समय दंगे भड़के थे और लोग एक दुसरे को मारने के लिए
      हाथो में नंगे हथियार लिए घूम रहे थे, तब केवल एक ही महात्मा में वो जिगरा
      था की वो लोगो के बिच पहुच जाए और उन्हें खून खराबे से रोके | महात्मा
      गाँधी @
      परेशानी तो यह थी की उस वक्त दो पाकिस्तान बने थे, एक पश्चिम पाकिस्तान और
      एक पूर्वी पाकिस्तान | महात्मा गाँधी ने पूर्वी पाकिस्तान जाकर हिंसा रोकने
      का मन बनाया और इतिहास गवाह है की पूर्वी पाकिस्तान के विभाजन में बहुत कम
      हिंसा हुई, जो हिंसा हुई वो पश्चिम पाकिस्तान में हुई |
      जो लोग कहते है के गांधीजी पाकिस्तान को करोडो रुपये देना चाहते थे, उन्हें
      बता दू की विभाजन के समय जिन्ना ने होस्पिटल, शैक्षणिक संस्थानों, सैन्य
      तथा ख़ुफ़िया एजेंसी के बटवारे की बात की थी, जिसे नेहरू और सरदार पटेल ने
      नामंजूर कर दिया था, उन्होंने कह दिया था की, अब जो करना है अपने इलाके में
      करो हमारे इलाके की कोई चीज अब तुम्हारी नहीं रही | जिन्ना ने अंग्रेजो से
      मदद मांगी और कहा की इन सारी सुविधाओ के बिना पाकिस्तान देश तो अधुरा है |
      तब नेहरू और पटेल ने सुविधाओ के बदले 75 करोड़ रुपये पाकिस्तान को देने की
      बात कही | जिसे जिन्ना ने मान लिया |
      जब गाँधी की हत्या हुई उससे पहले वह पाकिस्तान यात्रा का मन बना चुके थे,
      और चाहते थे की पाकिस्तान में शांति व्यवस्था बनी रहे, वहा हमारे हिन्दू
      भाई सुरक्षित रहे | अगर गाँधी जी जिन्दा होते, तो आज पाकिस्तान इतना पगला
      नहीं होता, और वहा जो हिन्दुओ पर अत्याचार हुए है, शायद वो नहीं होते |
      क्या आप लोगो को पता है, की गाँधी जी ने अपनी जिंदगी के 2338 दिन जेल में
      बिताये | सिर्फ हमारे लिए |
      विश्व में महात्मा गाँधी सिर्फ़ एक नाम नहीं अपितु शान्ति और अहिंसा का
      प्रतीक है। महात्मा गाँधी के पूर्व भी शान्ति और अहिंसा की अवधारणा थी,
      लेकिन उन्होंने
      जिस प्रकार सत्याग्रह, शान्ति व अहिंसा के रास्तों पर चलते हुये अंग्रेजों
      को भारत छोड़ने पर मजबूर कर दिया, उसका कोई दूसरा उदाहरण विश्व इतिहास में
      देखने को नहीं मिलता। तभी तो दुनिया के सबसे बड़े और बुद्धिमान वैज्ञानिक
      आइंस्टीन ने कहा था कि
      -‘‘हज़ार साल बाद आने वाली नस्लें इस बात पर मुश्किल से विश्वास करेंगी कि
      हाड़-मांस से बना ऐसा कोई इन्सान धरती पर कभी आया था।’’
      संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ ने भी वर्ष 2007 से गाँधी जयन्ती को ‘विश्व अहिंसा
      दिवस’ के रूप में
      मनाये जाने की घोषणा की।
      मार्टिन लूथर किंग जूनियर किससे प्रभावित थे | नेल्सन मंडेला किसकी फोटो
      अपने पास रखते थे | किसने विश्व के इन दिग्गज नेताओ को राह दिखाई | किसने
      भारत को विश्व में एक अलग ही पहचान दिलाई | The One And Only महात्मा गाँधी
      @

    • Well Nishant.. i agree you at some points bt if you remember that ki india ko indipend karne ke liye muslims ne bhi sath diya tha so how can you say that jo ppl khud ko indian mante hai unko aap pakistan jjane ke liye kaise bol sakte ho..????

  266. I am a Pakistani.I was born in Pakistan.Never been to India.Met nearly all people belonging to every part of India who had migrated to Pakistan after partition.Read history in school , college and through books plus verbal stories related by the then elders.After reading Nathuram’s statement I have only one thought…What a brilliant mind killed such a super Soul…tragic on both counts.Everybody has a right to their views but the difference between normal and abnormal is going with the flow , leading a life based upon universal values of coexistence and decency while going alone the complex road of life without any regard for the collective good of humanity or comrades is considered ‘abnormal’.Gandhiji having had a bigger canvas had greater influence on the majority of the then Indians plus great respect among all the people of Indo-Pak while Nathruram’s individual observations based upon his personal judgement and solo action resulted in the wate of not only a MAHATMA but maybe a great future Indian Leader …but one finds oneself helpless when it comes to Destiny.

  267. As a hindu and also as an Indian I really agree with some of the things Godse gave in his final speech but having read so much about Gandhi from different sects and different authors I seriously think that the kind of independence Gandhi wanted for this nation was highly impractical, although it sounds noble but I don’t think India was ready for Gandhi kind of independence and for that matter even now and even in a distant future India would have never accepted that as a whole, it was simply impractical and probably that’s why the called him a soul that was not ordinary…now if he is a mahatma or a duratma that is for people to decide, everyone will have his/her own viewpoint, but even this impractical ideology made such a big impact on 20th century India, makes me solely believe that with sheer belief aap bulk mein ek desh k bht bade section ka bhi CHUTIYA KAAT SAKTE HO…in others word nothing is impossible…Take a Bow! Gandhiji. Well Done! And ofcourse don’t forget the mass support or rather I should say ‘selfish’ mass support he got from India.

  268. What Godseji did was his own perception. To me he punished Gandhiji without telling his crime which went really wrong on his part. He took his step in haste. He should have protested against Gandhiji. He should open discussion with him. But perhaps he was not confident to discuss this matter in open. Anyways Gandhiji passed away and Godseji got punishment.
    Now comes reservation. This is purely political term. Killing the interest of deserved candidates and giving chances to undeserved is a way to weakening country. You know human being respect the job only when he earned by putting his effort into it and hardly care the job which he get the job without putting his sweet. This is happening actually.For instance, A candidate securing 10% is getting job of teacher is really worrying. No matter whichever caste he belongs to. He is got to teach all. Can he really teach ? No…where is quality. At least minimum qualification should be there. Some arrangements should be made to provide financial help so that they can complete their education. Make them competent first then let them earn them job. Make them self dependent and not beggars. Modi ji asked capable ones to sacrifice lpg subsidy. Good, many has done that also. But can he dare to ask capable families to surrender reservation benefit . It would be interesting to find that numbers also because mostly jobs were not earned but were given to them.

  269. An Individual thinks and acts according to his/her environment, the way he lived, what he learnt, history of their ancestors.. Everyone has the mentality to stabilize their livelihood. For that stability, they destroy others peace.
    But what I have now is knowledge and information..everyone of my age is aware of mankinds fury, Right there from Alexander,Babar, Ashoka, Aurangzeb, British and finally Godse through series of Epics, scripts, Books and documentary.
    But these fury still prevails and exists even now,previously in the form of Al-qaeda and now Boko Haram and ISIS.
    Everybody is actually stable, but greed has poisioned men’s soul..
    GREED results HATRED which finally results into REVENGE,its natural and everybody knows that.
    Above all Im a mangoloid face Indian, from Arunachal recently under President rule, people call us chinkies and chinese even if Im ready to die for my country India..but those minds wont effect me, becoz I also have the knowledge of discrimination as done to Blacks in America few years back.
    And above all, Im also one of those angry young men who would have done what sir Godse had done..Becoz I too believe that true Historians will definitely scale the weight of action mankind has performed.But here I have a different theory-
    Why Mankind exist?
    Is their a task for them?
    Some kind of Game is being played with us?
    Yes..I believe something very fishy is going on with mankind.
    Mankind will definitely be judged according to their action..and we shall overcome someday..We will define God as mankind..Men will be God. There will be peace, there wont be any place for greed.We will live together as children of God, we will be Gods, we will pray to Mankind according to their deeds.
    Deeds like messi plays football, deeds like sachin Bats, deeds like Lataji sings deeds like ussain bolt runs, like sun shines to give life, nature’s way of fulfilling everyones need. ..which is only possible through true historians, providing right amount of information revealing what mankind has done.
    And thats why I believe in mankind.
    We will win against ourselves
    We will fight against ourselves till the end of time.

    • Bhagvan Krishna encouraged Arjuna to kill cousins, relatives and not to spare even his own teacher and grandfather, to gain kingdom or to save dharma, my lord Mr.Parikh.

  270. I just want to say that ..gandhiji done a vry good job n had a great role in our indepndnc..
    But he was not as that great as we have read in our bks …there would be diff situation if gandhij took ryt step..

  271. I think Nathuram Godse miscalculated the situation and performed the act which created a black spot forever in the history. Post the assassination too, the communal violence did not stop. In fact, it went rampant. Regarding the use of force against the Britishers was not a good choice as they were the might one at that time. The history even witnessed the force used in the First independence revolt in 1857, where India got thoroughly suppressed by the Britishers.Hence, in my point of view resorting to the killing of someone, don’t yield the good result, but, creates vacuum in the of mature democracy of any country..

  272. The RSS ideology that Godse embraced clearly influenced him to assassinate Gandhiji. The RSS is the agency responsible for the death of India’s greatest hero. Gandhi was right to embrace nonviolence. The British wouldn’t have feared violence- they were the Empire that had the most powerful weapons. Godse wanted the massacre of millions of Muslims to appease the wrath and expectations of the Hindu majority. Godse is no different from a jihadi terrorist of today, because he chose to end someone’s life. This is why the saffron terror outfits ought to be banned and unmasked for what they really are- terrorist agencies. RSS, VHP, Sangh Parivar, Banrang Dal, Shiv Sena. They now have political power to do what they please- to cleanse India of Islam and Christianity and make Hinduism the single religion. That’s what the Modi government is doing.

  273. Nehru jante the ki Jinnah ko cancer Hai phir bhi kehte the ki Jinnah ko apna chaprasi bhi nahi banaunga. Unki bhool ne lakho ko maut ke anjam tak pahunchaya. Vo bhale hi desh ke pradhanmantri the par fir bhi mere liye wo ek aasakt aur kaamuk vyakti se jyada kuch nahi the.

  274. history can be manipulated differently , faith manipulates opinion , but truth is only truth. Friends, let the history in the past and think about solution for today’s corruption in India .

  275. I am sure even kasab and burhan wani would also have some justification for what they did. Godse is no better than kasab and wani, stop this hero worshipping of a terrorist otherwise u loose the moral ground to protest against any other form of terrorism. Rss has divided this country always. That is what they do. Propaganda and only propaganda. They believe in the laws of Manu.

    • My friend, Godse in his times did not have support to fight against thoughts of Nehru and Gandhi like Vemula and kanaiyakumar get at present. Nehru and Gandhi always impose their thoughts on the people of the country irrespective of what people of the country want. They never thought about sentiments of the people of the country regarding Akhand Bharat and partitioned Akhand Bharat for their own publicity. Today we knew only positive history of Gandhi and Nehru because very few had daring / courage to oppose these two at that time. I am not supporter of the RSS but I strongly dislike Nehru and Gandhi for partition of Akhand Bharat. You are comparing Lion Pandit Nathuram with the mosquitoes,Kasab and Burhan but he was the true son of the Akhand Bharat Mata.अखंड भारत अमर रहे वंदे मातरम्।

  276. Pandey ji… You are right… It was Nathuram godse bcoz of whom we are independent. Other wise India would also have become islamic state…

    • Are you mad! Ghandhi
      Was taken the most loved, respected man and patience man of India. Please I suggest you to read history textbooks and books written by Ghandhi. Nathuram Godse was a fool. A stupid man. He did not had love and happiness in his heart. It is not about religion fool. Religion can never build a country, love can build a country. Which Ghandhi had. Because of him you are free if he would not there to help us, you would have been cleaning British slippers. Fool!

  277. The killing of mahatma gandhi was one of the greatest blunder which resulted in ten times more damage to its purpose than what it gained,by bolstering the agenda of pseudo secularism of Congress and shaming of the right wing RSS . This one event changed the entire course of INDIAN history. Every movement needs a hero and a villian, and by killing Gandhi, Godse presented one good example of that. See the result of his stupidity which led to open pasture for the congress and censuring of the RSS. The congress used the opportunity to decimate the opposition and till the shah bano and the babri masjid case, the right wing parties were languishing on the periphery on the national scene.
    If Gandhi was not assasinated, the congress would have lasted only 02 term. The congress in the meantime used all this time to strengthen their position by naming all the nations resources and it acts like adverisement.
    Whatever hard Modi govt tries improve the nation it will be difficult for them to get a second term and they have to thank Godse for that.

  278. Can any body claim himself to be infallible. Godse has a view he lived for that. Killing of Gandhi ofcourse is not justifiable at any cost but at the same time one has to think and find out whether Godse was completely wrong?. Gandhi could not be always right , Godse was not completely wrong.

  279. Godse cheated to the court. He planned to kill Gandhi much before the the proposal of partition but couldn’t materialize it. A group of conspirators kill Gandhi by making Godse a weapon only.

    • Gandhi betrayed our people and country.. He should have been sentenced to death for this crime. He doesn’t even deserve to be called Gandhi.

      • I think You don’t know anything. The person who had given all his life in the independence of India is treated like this. Shame on you to think these stupid things. Read Ghandhi books and read history textbook too. To understand the history of India.

  280. well in Hindu religion killing is more like a duty if it means establishing stability and peace. so cheers to that naz

  281. Gandhi n Nehru were disasters for India. The subsequent congress rule for the next 60+ years were also disastrous. In the next 50 years or so people will gradually forget about these two founding fathers of Pakistan. People will slowly but surely start realising that whatever they have been reading in history books till date were partially correct and biased. Truth can never remain hidden … It will come out someday.

  282. It is a misdemeanor that the non cooperation movement of Gandhi got us freedom. Yes the complete nation was mobilized by Mahatma and the then Congress. British wanted to give us freedom in any way; may be little later. Mountbaton & Nehru were responsible for speeding up by accepting the division of India? Nehru was in hurry to become the first PM of the country even at the division of the sub continent. Another reason for faster independence is that the British were incapable of handling the huge well trained British Indian demobilized Armed Forces.At that time Mutiny was already showing up in the Naval dock yard of Bombay. Whatever the individual ideology Nathuram Godse had no business to kill Mahatma.

    • Gandhi was a Mahatma? In what sense? For murdering democracy and nominating Nehru for PM even though the overwhelming congress majority voted for Vallabhbhai Patel? For cowering under the iron-will of Jinnah? For doing nothing for hindus who were being butchered by muslims on the call for ‘direct action day’? For making us laugh with the joke ‘if you are slapped on one cheek, offer the other’?

  283. Shri Nathuram Godse is the greatest patriot of the Indian nation then Gandhi. He done right thing but late decision he has killed only Gandhi for united India another two Muslim persons were escaped same treatment could have been given to Nehru and Jinnah these two persons cheated to the entire Indian people for PM posts with the help of Britishers.

  284. Ghandi was a selfish man that he wanted the whole nation to follow and glorify him and nothing to speak about Nehru who was neither a nationalist nor a religious person who was a sensualist and so on and so forth. In total congress ruined this nation as much as possible, then why Ghandhi himself wanted that to be dissolved after independence, he did foersee and .knew the culprits.

    • You honestly don’t really know about Indian history. For supporting Hinduism you are critiquing Gandhi. Where did all his hard work go in freeing the nation? Wasn’t he the ONE WHO FOUGHT THROUGH NON VIOLENT WAYS TO FREE HIS COUNTRY? If he wanted, he could have stayed in Africa since that’s where he spent his work time. Honestly hope could’ve been wrong BUT TO SUCH AN EXTEMT OF KILLING HIM MUST NOT BE OKAY.

  285. Godse killed gandhi dosnt make him great but today we remember gandhi that he was killed by bullets fired by godse history made gandhi Amar but I feel if godse had to fire y when gandhi was old as he couldn’t walk killing an old person or kids in any releigion is hinsa if he had to kill gandhi he shld have done when gandhi came to India and fought for rights of everyone he can’t justify killing an old person even though he is gandhi fight with them who r strong not weak
    So I feel what godse did is an act of shame and he has no right to give justification

    • He did not kill him when he came to india as he has said that he liked him in the beginning but as time passed by gandi became the dictator ,a inacaple dictator who must be dealt with to prosper the country

  286. it’s a bloody thing that we are made to believe, we got independence cause of non violence.
    There are many unsung hero’s behind the curtain.
    can u guys plz tell me who really gave freedom to INDIA.
    it was the Labour party of England who PASSED the independence ACT to INDIA in 1946. British stayed there after just to transfer there power peacefully and sold there properties. They fled with our Resource.
    AS we says sorrow comes in BOUNCES
    OUR LAND WAS DIVIDED . TO BE FRANK
    ONLY Educated Indians where in FRUSTRATION.
    Well I Would like to say HINDUS AND MUSLIMS LIVED IN PEACE
    even when we paid tax just to REMAIN AS hindus it is called JAQURIEE.
    cause to those bas******** divide and rule policy we are facing problem till date .
    HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW ?
    That Nethaji had convinced the PRIME MINISTER Candidate OF England to ADD FREEDOM OF INDIA IN HIS ELECTIONS PROPAGANDA.
    WHY Britishes targeted and killed Exermist not the moderates
    for the simple reason being moderates helped Britishes to carry on smooth Administration by keeping Indians as slaves in the name of PEACE
    Exermist knew that they would never leave us until we fight them.
    WHY AMERICA got FREEDOM SO EASILY ? FROM British
    Did they follow non violence ?
    AS per my knowledge The answer is NO.
    IF WWII had not happened British would have led a happy life here BY MAKING US SLAVES FOR GENERATIONS
    THANK GOD FOR WWII
    I know it took lots of life but some how it is a main reason for our todays freedom
    STOP FIGHTING
    START THINKING

  287. As a common man, we don’t know the reality. but what Nehru & Gandhi did for division of Pakistan from India is totally wrong. i think they don’t did it, in favour of nation, only for their own benefits.

    • hindus have to be more conscious about our religion.nowadays also the argument for separatism is enduring.yashim malik need kashmir to be forked.in tamil nadu there is also someone named simon(catholic christian) try to separate tamil nadu from India.for all malice the single word secularism is the cause.so as to deter such bifurcation again india have to be emancipated as Hindu nation.

  288. No one has the right to kill another person, regardless of that person”s ideology or what he has advocated, unless the killing is in self defence. From what is written above, Godse was indeed a learned person and wholly supported the Hindu religion and culture. Based on Godse’s speech at the end of his trial, which was in a closed court without a jury, the judge commented that a jury might have acquitted him. However, the fact remains that Godse did shoot Gandhi, basically for his appeasement to the Muslim, and this resulted in the immediate death of Gandhi. Therefore, he was sentenced to death according to the law of the land. Dr Nat Khublall, email: [email protected]

  289. We Indians are born slaves.
    At first these mongol rulers.. then the delhi sultanate period.. these mughals.. and Rajputs.
    Later the British, then this self absorbed human gandhi and his fanatics.. nehru and his hereditary claim over the throne. Slave to whatever happened. Slave because of the going with the flow attitude.
    Slave because they tried to dominate us and we let them.
    Now a slave to idea that Hinduism is diminishing.
    When the evolution of such a great ideology has not been recorded how can it’s extinction be a threat.
    Do any one of us know where has the ideology of Hinduism started from?
    No.
    Rest all religions have a history of being evolved and preached.
    But Hinduism doesnt.
    So, I don’t think we need to fall trap to such baseless ideas of centring Hinduism to cow and ram and Krishna.
    They might be a part of Hinduism, but the religion is so big and great that it is beyond anybody’s absorption.
    Nobody can understand hinduism and it’s true meaning.
    These people using the name of RSS and spreading hatred for Hinduism amongst Muslims need to be checked upon.
    Nobody has ever had hatred for Hinduism.
    Only because people misusing the popularity and name of a Sangh.
    Is not good..at all.
    We are all again becoming slaves to such fanatics.

  290. What gandhi and nehru had done during partition with support of Mt. Betton, we all know. Nehru was in too hurry to become PM of india and Jinnah was for undivided part of India that time. Gandhi was opposing INA made by Subhash ji but consequently supporting to send Indians in British troops during world war, where was Ahinsa gone that time?? He was asking indians to welcome pakistani coming from panjab provinence but was silent over thousands of murder done in Mapilla and Noakhali. Gandhi’s thought had made all hindus fool and secular.

  291. No doubt ki gandhi ne ye sab kiya,or sahi bhi kiya,pr jo usne desh k batware ke liye kiya wo bearable nhi tha,jo usne hindu’on ko nazarandaz krke muslims k liye kiya wo bearable nhi tha,jo usne bharat k liye na krke pakistan k liye kiya wo bearable nhi

  292. I bow my head in respect for u. If some spirited youth like u had got rid of not just Gandhi but Nehru and Jinna as well much earler before their machinations bear fruit, the history of this subcontinent would have changed for the better.

  293. Nathuram Godse was a true patriot. He sacrificed his own life to save Hindus from this fanatic maniac Gandhi. This title of Father of nation should be given to Sardar Patel who put India together. Gandhi should be given the title Villain of India.

    • Whatever is your opinion, please do not disrespect Mr. Gandhi. I myself feel that the action of Godse was justified but we have no right to defame a national figure. Thank you

  294. NATHURAM Godse can be called mahatma and Gandhi Nehru can be called DURATMA. True DESHBHAKTA was NATHURAM Godse Evan today motherland India cry for NATHURAM Godse Godse was not selfish.

  295. I believe that what he did was right. I mostly agree with him but there are few things I don’t he was right at, eg he just wanted the well-being of Hindus alone but as a country, it should treat every person equally irrespective of their religion.
    Gandhi was completely unfair as he just wanted Hindus to practice non-violence, but when Muslims were performing a violent act against Hindu, he was fine with that. He was very biased.
    I believe Gandhi was being unbiased because as he wanted to become the leader of Muslims too, just like he was the leader of Hindu, but as Godse said Muslims didn’t care about whether Gandhi lived or die.
    To the whole non-violence thing, it seems great on paper but in practicality is not very good. It only works when both sides are being non-violent, even then the problem can only be solved if they are reasonable.

  296. Nathuram Godse was the biggest fool Ever Good he was hanged. We all should respect both Hindus and Muslims. We should have love and friendship. Ghandi took equal parts of both the religions. Which is exelent. Never be fool like him. Love, dignity and happiness will always remain in our heart for Ghandhi

    • Sorry not agree Gandhi was father of hypocracy a dictator he was neither pro hindu nor Muslim he was opportunist

    • Lolz. Dont u think Muslims more inclined towards other Muslims and Pakistan? Moreover how do u know that Gandhi was not biased. These were his statements. How many Indian Muslims think of kashmiri pandits? and how many support separatists? Azar ko century maarna hai Pakistan ko jeetna hai this is the mentality of most of the Muslims. Tum logonka niyath main khot hai

    • khan sahab …..mulk batne se pehle kabhi hindu aur muslim nahi lade …..fir baad me itni nafrat kahan se aagyi ….both were used for personel benefits and godse was real patriot if he would have not killed Gandhi then India must havebeen divided into many parts.

  297. These few historical people who spent entire their life to unite India.
    Adishankarachary
    Chatrapati shivaji
    Nathuram Godse
    Sardar Patel.
    Below people who encourage or silent to divide country based on religions, and india still suffering to their mistake and betray.
    Raja Jaychand
    Nehru
    Gandhi

    • Thank you Amit Agrawal. Those commending Nathuram Godse with all due respect, do not know what they say. Nobody has the right to take another’s life except perhaps, in self-defence. I am surprised these supporters did not see that Nathuram eventually became what he accused Gandhi of- the judge and jury.

      • When a cat is cornered and knows that there is no escape from the coming enemy, it attacks. Gandhi destroyed Congress. He craftily eliminated every opposition against his heavy handed approach. Godse on the other hand believed use of violence for a just cause to be justified which is why he chose to eliminate Gandhi. A legend and a patriot like Godse are rare. He loved nothing but the country.

  298. What an Irony. A nationalist who eliminated a person who had parochial mind set against Hindus for the larger good of Nation was sent to Gallows. Because of MK Gandhi’s misplaced ideology and idol worship by others of that time resulted in present day misery of the Nation.

  299. I’m an Amrerican and black till the day I die. If what he have written is true, then I too, would have found his actions justified and worthy of impeccable honor for his heroism.

  300. At that time major religion [ Hindus and Muslims ] were fought not just because of partition, hatred behaviour towards each other [BECAUSE OF POLITICAL SPLIT] was also a reason. Jinnah’s policy was only for Muslims not for Hindus this played a key role in riots also. if at that time, many ‘Godse’ were there, many ‘Abul kalam azad’ also served this country !

  301. Nathu ram sahib did a great job I would if possible will give him bharat ratan or father of nation instead of a man who was not able to walk and support himself and had shoulders of two women instead of stick or men…. A man. Who confess raped his neice a man who cheated society when Indira got. Pregnant before marriage by feroz shah Gandhi changed named to Feroz shah Gandhi…. And a biggest supporter of Muslim despite their rejection…
    LIST is big for more references read freedom. In midnight…

    • I just wonder, why did this fool not consider killing Jinna, who was the root cause of the demand for partition and the aftermath of partition of India !!.
      His last statement reveals, how much he was biased already against Gandhiji from beginning and not at all against Jinna?

      • Baba Ganteshwar Traitors are dangerours than enemies please understand ( I am now 57 years if you have asked my comments some thirty to forty years back just by reading my history book my comment will be different)

    • Hopefully Muslims around the world would learn that soon, my best wishes are with them, also it is much easier to preach than to practice, unfortunately those who don’t practice are the ones preaching most of the times these days, no I am not talking about Muslims only, others as well. I hope my comments would be taken positively and just to clarify I am not condoning what Godse did and I am not from the RSS.

  302. The Nobel committee did the right thing not to award Gandhi with the peace prise. All hè did was in favour of moslims.

  303. Godse killed Gandhi wrongly & irrationally , but he did for the love of his country !
    He was a Patriot like Shahid Bhagat Singh .
    In retrospect , they both sacrificed their lives for the UNGRATEFUL , HIGHLY FRAGMENTED NATION – INDIA !
    Ironically , Sanjay Dutt , the convicted terrorist killed many people for communal hatred but has many defenders & sympathisers in Bollywood Crazed Celebrities & Crowd !
    Ultimately , the Greatness of a leader must be measured by the Legacy and Long Trem Results !

  304. Gandhi just ruined Hindustan …he along with Nehru created 2 seperate countries which now are continously fighting with each other.
    Same countries which was home for all religion & keeping our history in mind …none of the religion ever fought with each other before the partition.
    As per my views Godse did the right thing otherwise Nehru & Gandhi would have eaten whole of our country. Gandhi would have saved Shaeed Bhagat Singh but due to his ego he didn’t saved him.
    Also I read one book named “Rangeela Gandhi” in which they have mentioned that Gandhi used to sleep with girls now what kind of Mahatama was he?
    On the other hand Nehru was very busy with his own family. We can find no. of pics in which he is busy with girls. ….Maze me the wo bhi …..
    It’s my personel view.

  305. Left wing anti Hindu historians and Congress party which now has illegitimate children of Gandhi have demonized a patriot like Godse. I wish to die in a country where Godse is treated with honour and the respect that he deserves.

    • Yes, of course.. India is a land of diversity in religion, caste, region etc.. but All of the above is that Humanity.. do you think your religion people showered humanity to Our Hindus??
      Sarbe bhabantu sukhinah, sarbe santu niramaya,
      Sarbe Bhadrani pasyantu, Maa kaschit dukh ba bhabet.. –Hinduon ki yehi reet hai to iss lie bache ho..
      Show some humanity and you will get the same..
      #Jay_Hind

  306. I agree with everything he said except his ideas on our ancient Varna Vyavastha. This vyavastha was created by our poorvajas for our benefit and we are nobody to defile this system. Infact caste system should be strengthened.

  307. I always salute to Nathu Ram Godse ji,because he was real patriot and Gandhi was real opportunist
    I think that the other who think Godse a terrorist they r big fool

  308. I wish someone did Nehru too. This nation would’ve been free in the truest sense.

    Gandhi was an anti-national who would’ve succeeded in doing what Babar or Aurungzeb or any of those invaders couldn’t.

Leave a Reply to Aloysious Kraj Cancel reply

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here
Captcha verification failed!
CAPTCHA user score failed. Please contact us!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Popular Articles