Friday, February 21, 2020

WHY I KILLED GANDHI – Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

Must Read

Celebrities Utilizing Psychics In All Aspects Of Their Lives

22% of Americans have consulted a psychic or medium, according to You Gov. While they might not be overly popular with the general public, there’s one group of individuals that turn to psychics in their droves: celebrities. George Clooney, Khloe Kardashian, Brad Pitt and Jenny McCarthy are just a few famous faces who have confessed to seeing a psychic. But just how do celebrities benefit from psychics in a way that others don’t?

Meditation vs Panic Attacks: Guess Which One Wins?

Photo by Mitchell Griest on Unsplash By Lucy Yardley

A train journey and two names to remember

A train journey and two names to remember By Leena Sarma

Gandhiji’s assassin, Nathuram Godse’s Final Address to the Court.

WHY I KILLED GANDHI - Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.
WHY I KILLED GANDHI - Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

Nathuram Godse was arrested immediately after he assassinated Gandhiji, based on a F. I. R. filed by Nandlal Mehta at the Tughlak Road Police staton at Delhi . The trial, which was held in camera, began on May 27, 1948 and concluded on February 10, 1949. He was sentenced to death.

An appeal to the Punjab High Court, then in session at Simla, did not find favour and the sentence was upheld. The statement that you are about to read is the last made by Godse before the Court on the May 5, 1949.

Such was the power and eloquence of this statement that one of the judges, G. D. Khosla, later wrote, “I have, however, no doubt that had the audience of that day been constituted into a jury and entrusted with the task of deciding Godse’s appeal, they would have brought a verdict of ‘not Guilty’ by an overwhelming majority”

WHY I KILLED GANDHI

Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined RSS wing of anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession.

I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other. I have read the speeches and writings of Ravana, Chanakiya, Dadabhai Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England , France , America and Russia . Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.

All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well-being of all India , one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan , my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.

Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them.. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day.

In fact, honour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita.. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.
In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India . It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to them.

The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way.

Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every thing; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible.

Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster. Gandhi’s pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India . It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India , Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani.. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect, it is spoken, but not written. It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma’s sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India . His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.

From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork. The Congress which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947.

Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’ and ‘peaceful transfer of power’. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called ‘freedom won by them with sacrifice’ – whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country – which we consider a deity of worship – my mind was filled with direful anger.

One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan , there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.

Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless. Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan . People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building.

After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House. I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi.

I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims. I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.

- Advertisement -

1204 COMMENTS

  1. I always salute to Nathu Ram Godse ji,because he was real patriot and Gandhi was real opportunist
    I think that the other who think Godse a terrorist they r big fool

  2. I agree with everything he said except his ideas on our ancient Varna Vyavastha. This vyavastha was created by our poorvajas for our benefit and we are nobody to defile this system. Infact caste system should be strengthened.

    • Yes, of course.. India is a land of diversity in religion, caste, region etc.. but All of the above is that Humanity.. do you think your religion people showered humanity to Our Hindus??

      Sarbe bhabantu sukhinah, sarbe santu niramaya,
      Sarbe Bhadrani pasyantu, Maa kaschit dukh ba bhabet.. –Hinduon ki yehi reet hai to iss lie bache ho..
      Show some humanity and you will get the same..
      #Jay_Hind

  3. Left wing anti Hindu historians and Congress party which now has illegitimate children of Gandhi have demonized a patriot like Godse. I wish to die in a country where Godse is treated with honour and the respect that he deserves.

  4. Gandhi just ruined Hindustan …he along with Nehru created 2 seperate countries which now are continously fighting with each other.
    Same countries which was home for all religion & keeping our history in mind …none of the religion ever fought with each other before the partition.
    As per my views Godse did the right thing otherwise Nehru & Gandhi would have eaten whole of our country. Gandhi would have saved Shaeed Bhagat Singh but due to his ego he didn’t saved him.
    Also I read one book named “Rangeela Gandhi” in which they have mentioned that Gandhi used to sleep with girls now what kind of Mahatama was he?
    On the other hand Nehru was very busy with his own family. We can find no. of pics in which he is busy with girls. ….Maze me the wo bhi …..
    It’s my personel view.

  5. Godse killed Gandhi wrongly & irrationally , but he did for the love of his country !
    He was a Patriot like Shahid Bhagat Singh .
    In retrospect , they both sacrificed their lives for the UNGRATEFUL , HIGHLY FRAGMENTED NATION – INDIA !
    Ironically , Sanjay Dutt , the convicted terrorist killed many people for communal hatred but has many defenders & sympathisers in Bollywood Crazed Celebrities & Crowd !
    Ultimately , the Greatness of a leader must be measured by the Legacy and Long Trem Results !

  6. The Nobel committee did the right thing not to award Gandhi with the peace prise. All hè did was in favour of moslims.

    • Hopefully Muslims around the world would learn that soon, my best wishes are with them, also it is much easier to preach than to practice, unfortunately those who don’t practice are the ones preaching most of the times these days, no I am not talking about Muslims only, others as well. I hope my comments would be taken positively and just to clarify I am not condoning what Godse did and I am not from the RSS.

  7. Nathu ram sahib did a great job I would if possible will give him bharat ratan or father of nation instead of a man who was not able to walk and support himself and had shoulders of two women instead of stick or men…. A man. Who confess raped his neice a man who cheated society when Indira got. Pregnant before marriage by feroz shah Gandhi changed named to Feroz shah Gandhi…. And a biggest supporter of Muslim despite their rejection…
    LIST is big for more references read freedom. In midnight…

    • I just wonder, why did this fool not consider killing Jinna, who was the root cause of the demand for partition and the aftermath of partition of India !!.
      His last statement reveals, how much he was biased already against Gandhiji from beginning and not at all against Jinna?

      • Baba Ganteshwar Traitors are dangerours than enemies please understand ( I am now 57 years if you have asked my comments some thirty to forty years back just by reading my history book my comment will be different)

  8. At that time major religion [ Hindus and Muslims ] were fought not just because of partition, hatred behaviour towards each other [BECAUSE OF POLITICAL SPLIT] was also a reason. Jinnah’s policy was only for Muslims not for Hindus this played a key role in riots also. if at that time, many ‘Godse’ were there, many ‘Abul kalam azad’ also served this country !

  9. I’m an Amrerican and black till the day I die. If what he have written is true, then I too, would have found his actions justified and worthy of impeccable honor for his heroism.

  10. What an Irony. A nationalist who eliminated a person who had parochial mind set against Hindus for the larger good of Nation was sent to Gallows. Because of MK Gandhi’s misplaced ideology and idol worship by others of that time resulted in present day misery of the Nation.

    • Thank you Amit Agrawal. Those commending Nathuram Godse with all due respect, do not know what they say. Nobody has the right to take another’s life except perhaps, in self-defence. I am surprised these supporters did not see that Nathuram eventually became what he accused Gandhi of- the judge and jury.

      • When a cat is cornered and knows that there is no escape from the coming enemy, it attacks. Gandhi destroyed Congress. He craftily eliminated every opposition against his heavy handed approach. Godse on the other hand believed use of violence for a just cause to be justified which is why he chose to eliminate Gandhi. A legend and a patriot like Godse are rare. He loved nothing but the country.

  11. These few historical people who spent entire their life to unite India.
    Adishankarachary
    Chatrapati shivaji
    Nathuram Godse
    Sardar Patel.

    Below people who encourage or silent to divide country based on religions, and india still suffering to their mistake and betray.
    Raja Jaychand
    Nehru
    Gandhi

  12. Nathuram Godse was the biggest fool Ever Good he was hanged. We all should respect both Hindus and Muslims. We should have love and friendship. Ghandi took equal parts of both the religions. Which is exelent. Never be fool like him. Love, dignity and happiness will always remain in our heart for Ghandhi

    • Sorry not agree Gandhi was father of hypocracy a dictator he was neither pro hindu nor Muslim he was opportunist

    • Lolz. Dont u think Muslims more inclined towards other Muslims and Pakistan? Moreover how do u know that Gandhi was not biased. These were his statements. How many Indian Muslims think of kashmiri pandits? and how many support separatists? Azar ko century maarna hai Pakistan ko jeetna hai this is the mentality of most of the Muslims. Tum logonka niyath main khot hai

    • khan sahab …..mulk batne se pehle kabhi hindu aur muslim nahi lade …..fir baad me itni nafrat kahan se aagyi ….both were used for personel benefits and godse was real patriot if he would have not killed Gandhi then India must havebeen divided into many parts.

  13. I believe that what he did was right. I mostly agree with him but there are few things I don’t he was right at, eg he just wanted the well-being of Hindus alone but as a country, it should treat every person equally irrespective of their religion.
    Gandhi was completely unfair as he just wanted Hindus to practice non-violence, but when Muslims were performing a violent act against Hindu, he was fine with that. He was very biased.
    I believe Gandhi was being unbiased because as he wanted to become the leader of Muslims too, just like he was the leader of Hindu, but as Godse said Muslims didn’t care about whether Gandhi lived or die.
    To the whole non-violence thing, it seems great on paper but in practicality is not very good. It only works when both sides are being non-violent, even then the problem can only be solved if they are reasonable.

  14. NATHURAM Godse can be called mahatma and Gandhi Nehru can be called DURATMA. True DESHBHAKTA was NATHURAM Godse Evan today motherland India cry for NATHURAM Godse Godse was not selfish.

  15. Nathuram Godse was a true patriot. He sacrificed his own life to save Hindus from this fanatic maniac Gandhi. This title of Father of nation should be given to Sardar Patel who put India together. Gandhi should be given the title Villain of India.

    • Whatever is your opinion, please do not disrespect Mr. Gandhi. I myself feel that the action of Godse was justified but we have no right to defame a national figure. Thank you

  16. I bow my head in respect for u. If some spirited youth like u had got rid of not just Gandhi but Nehru and Jinna as well much earler before their machinations bear fruit, the history of this subcontinent would have changed for the better.

  17. No doubt ki gandhi ne ye sab kiya,or sahi bhi kiya,pr jo usne desh k batware ke liye kiya wo bearable nhi tha,jo usne hindu’on ko nazarandaz krke muslims k liye kiya wo bearable nhi tha,jo usne bharat k liye na krke pakistan k liye kiya wo bearable nhi

  18. What gandhi and nehru had done during partition with support of Mt. Betton, we all know. Nehru was in too hurry to become PM of india and Jinnah was for undivided part of India that time. Gandhi was opposing INA made by Subhash ji but consequently supporting to send Indians in British troops during world war, where was Ahinsa gone that time?? He was asking indians to welcome pakistani coming from panjab provinence but was silent over thousands of murder done in Mapilla and Noakhali. Gandhi’s thought had made all hindus fool and secular.

  19. We Indians are born slaves.
    At first these mongol rulers.. then the delhi sultanate period.. these mughals.. and Rajputs.
    Later the British, then this self absorbed human gandhi and his fanatics.. nehru and his hereditary claim over the throne. Slave to whatever happened. Slave because of the going with the flow attitude.
    Slave because they tried to dominate us and we let them.
    Now a slave to idea that Hinduism is diminishing.
    When the evolution of such a great ideology has not been recorded how can it’s extinction be a threat.
    Do any one of us know where has the ideology of Hinduism started from?
    No.
    Rest all religions have a history of being evolved and preached.
    But Hinduism doesnt.
    So, I don’t think we need to fall trap to such baseless ideas of centring Hinduism to cow and ram and Krishna.
    They might be a part of Hinduism, but the religion is so big and great that it is beyond anybody’s absorption.
    Nobody can understand hinduism and it’s true meaning.
    These people using the name of RSS and spreading hatred for Hinduism amongst Muslims need to be checked upon.
    Nobody has ever had hatred for Hinduism.
    Only because people misusing the popularity and name of a Sangh.
    Is not good..at all.
    We are all again becoming slaves to such fanatics.

  20. No one has the right to kill another person, regardless of that person”s ideology or what he has advocated, unless the killing is in self defence. From what is written above, Godse was indeed a learned person and wholly supported the Hindu religion and culture. Based on Godse’s speech at the end of his trial, which was in a closed court without a jury, the judge commented that a jury might have acquitted him. However, the fact remains that Godse did shoot Gandhi, basically for his appeasement to the Muslim, and this resulted in the immediate death of Gandhi. Therefore, he was sentenced to death according to the law of the land. Dr Nat Khublall, email: [email protected]

  21. As a common man, we don’t know the reality. but what Nehru & Gandhi did for division of Pakistan from India is totally wrong. i think they don’t did it, in favour of nation, only for their own benefits.

    • hindus have to be more conscious about our religion.nowadays also the argument for separatism is enduring.yashim malik need kashmir to be forked.in tamil nadu there is also someone named simon(catholic christian) try to separate tamil nadu from India.for all malice the single word secularism is the cause.so as to deter such bifurcation again india have to be emancipated as Hindu nation.

  22. it’s a bloody thing that we are made to believe, we got independence cause of non violence.
    There are many unsung hero’s behind the curtain.
    can u guys plz tell me who really gave freedom to INDIA.
    it was the Labour party of England who PASSED the independence ACT to INDIA in 1946. British stayed there after just to transfer there power peacefully and sold there properties. They fled with our Resource.

    AS we says sorrow comes in BOUNCES

    OUR LAND WAS DIVIDED . TO BE FRANK

    ONLY Educated Indians where in FRUSTRATION.

    Well I Would like to say HINDUS AND MUSLIMS LIVED IN PEACE
    even when we paid tax just to REMAIN AS hindus it is called JAQURIEE.

    cause to those bas******** divide and rule policy we are facing problem till date .

    HOW MANY OF YOU KNOW ?
    That Nethaji had convinced the PRIME MINISTER Candidate OF England to ADD FREEDOM OF INDIA IN HIS ELECTIONS PROPAGANDA.

    WHY Britishes targeted and killed Exermist not the moderates
    for the simple reason being moderates helped Britishes to carry on smooth Administration by keeping Indians as slaves in the name of PEACE

    Exermist knew that they would never leave us until we fight them.

    WHY AMERICA got FREEDOM SO EASILY ? FROM British
    Did they follow non violence ?
    AS per my knowledge The answer is NO.

    IF WWII had not happened British would have led a happy life here BY MAKING US SLAVES FOR GENERATIONS

    THANK GOD FOR WWII

    I know it took lots of life but some how it is a main reason for our todays freedom

    STOP FIGHTING

    START THINKING

  23. Godse killed gandhi dosnt make him great but today we remember gandhi that he was killed by bullets fired by godse history made gandhi Amar but I feel if godse had to fire y when gandhi was old as he couldn’t walk killing an old person or kids in any releigion is hinsa if he had to kill gandhi he shld have done when gandhi came to India and fought for rights of everyone he can’t justify killing an old person even though he is gandhi fight with them who r strong not weak
    So I feel what godse did is an act of shame and he has no right to give justification

    • He did not kill him when he came to india as he has said that he liked him in the beginning but as time passed by gandi became the dictator ,a inacaple dictator who must be dealt with to prosper the country

  24. Ghandi was a selfish man that he wanted the whole nation to follow and glorify him and nothing to speak about Nehru who was neither a nationalist nor a religious person who was a sensualist and so on and so forth. In total congress ruined this nation as much as possible, then why Ghandhi himself wanted that to be dissolved after independence, he did foersee and .knew the culprits.

    • You honestly don’t really know about Indian history. For supporting Hinduism you are critiquing Gandhi. Where did all his hard work go in freeing the nation? Wasn’t he the ONE WHO FOUGHT THROUGH NON VIOLENT WAYS TO FREE HIS COUNTRY? If he wanted, he could have stayed in Africa since that’s where he spent his work time. Honestly hope could’ve been wrong BUT TO SUCH AN EXTEMT OF KILLING HIM MUST NOT BE OKAY.

  25. Shri Nathuram Godse is the greatest patriot of the Indian nation then Gandhi. He done right thing but late decision he has killed only Gandhi for united India another two Muslim persons were escaped same treatment could have been given to Nehru and Jinnah these two persons cheated to the entire Indian people for PM posts with the help of Britishers.

  26. It is a misdemeanor that the non cooperation movement of Gandhi got us freedom. Yes the complete nation was mobilized by Mahatma and the then Congress. British wanted to give us freedom in any way; may be little later. Mountbaton & Nehru were responsible for speeding up by accepting the division of India? Nehru was in hurry to become the first PM of the country even at the division of the sub continent. Another reason for faster independence is that the British were incapable of handling the huge well trained British Indian demobilized Armed Forces.At that time Mutiny was already showing up in the Naval dock yard of Bombay. Whatever the individual ideology Nathuram Godse had no business to kill Mahatma.

    • Gandhi was a Mahatma? In what sense? For murdering democracy and nominating Nehru for PM even though the overwhelming congress majority voted for Vallabhbhai Patel? For cowering under the iron-will of Jinnah? For doing nothing for hindus who were being butchered by muslims on the call for ‘direct action day’? For making us laugh with the joke ‘if you are slapped on one cheek, offer the other’?

  27. Gandhi n Nehru were disasters for India. The subsequent congress rule for the next 60+ years were also disastrous. In the next 50 years or so people will gradually forget about these two founding fathers of Pakistan. People will slowly but surely start realising that whatever they have been reading in history books till date were partially correct and biased. Truth can never remain hidden … It will come out someday.

  28. well in Hindu religion killing is more like a duty if it means establishing stability and peace. so cheers to that naz

    • Gandhi betrayed our people and country.. He should have been sentenced to death for this crime. He doesn’t even deserve to be called Gandhi.

      • I think You don’t know anything. The person who had given all his life in the independence of India is treated like this. Shame on you to think these stupid things. Read Ghandhi books and read history textbook too. To understand the history of India.

  29. Godse cheated to the court. He planned to kill Gandhi much before the the proposal of partition but couldn’t materialize it. A group of conspirators kill Gandhi by making Godse a weapon only.

  30. Can any body claim himself to be infallible. Godse has a view he lived for that. Killing of Gandhi ofcourse is not justifiable at any cost but at the same time one has to think and find out whether Godse was completely wrong?. Gandhi could not be always right , Godse was not completely wrong.

  31. The killing of mahatma gandhi was one of the greatest blunder which resulted in ten times more damage to its purpose than what it gained,by bolstering the agenda of pseudo secularism of Congress and shaming of the right wing RSS . This one event changed the entire course of INDIAN history. Every movement needs a hero and a villian, and by killing Gandhi, Godse presented one good example of that. See the result of his stupidity which led to open pasture for the congress and censuring of the RSS. The congress used the opportunity to decimate the opposition and till the shah bano and the babri masjid case, the right wing parties were languishing on the periphery on the national scene.
    If Gandhi was not assasinated, the congress would have lasted only 02 term. The congress in the meantime used all this time to strengthen their position by naming all the nations resources and it acts like adverisement.
    Whatever hard Modi govt tries improve the nation it will be difficult for them to get a second term and they have to thank Godse for that.

  32. Pandey ji… You are right… It was Nathuram godse bcoz of whom we are independent. Other wise India would also have become islamic state…

    • Are you mad! Ghandhi
      Was taken the most loved, respected man and patience man of India. Please I suggest you to read history textbooks and books written by Ghandhi. Nathuram Godse was a fool. A stupid man. He did not had love and happiness in his heart. It is not about religion fool. Religion can never build a country, love can build a country. Which Ghandhi had. Because of him you are free if he would not there to help us, you would have been cleaning British slippers. Fool!

  33. I am sure even kasab and burhan wani would also have some justification for what they did. Godse is no better than kasab and wani, stop this hero worshipping of a terrorist otherwise u loose the moral ground to protest against any other form of terrorism. Rss has divided this country always. That is what they do. Propaganda and only propaganda. They believe in the laws of Manu.

    • My friend, Godse in his times did not have support to fight against thoughts of Nehru and Gandhi like Vemula and kanaiyakumar get at present. Nehru and Gandhi always impose their thoughts on the people of the country irrespective of what people of the country want. They never thought about sentiments of the people of the country regarding Akhand Bharat and partitioned Akhand Bharat for their own publicity. Today we knew only positive history of Gandhi and Nehru because very few had daring / courage to oppose these two at that time. I am not supporter of the RSS but I strongly dislike Nehru and Gandhi for partition of Akhand Bharat. You are comparing Lion Pandit Nathuram with the mosquitoes,Kasab and Burhan but he was the true son of the Akhand Bharat Mata.अखंड भारत अमर रहे वंदे मातरम्।

  34. history can be manipulated differently , faith manipulates opinion , but truth is only truth. Friends, let the history in the past and think about solution for today’s corruption in India .

  35. Nehru jante the ki Jinnah ko cancer Hai phir bhi kehte the ki Jinnah ko apna chaprasi bhi nahi banaunga. Unki bhool ne lakho ko maut ke anjam tak pahunchaya. Vo bhale hi desh ke pradhanmantri the par fir bhi mere liye wo ek aasakt aur kaamuk vyakti se jyada kuch nahi the.

  36. The RSS ideology that Godse embraced clearly influenced him to assassinate Gandhiji. The RSS is the agency responsible for the death of India’s greatest hero. Gandhi was right to embrace nonviolence. The British wouldn’t have feared violence- they were the Empire that had the most powerful weapons. Godse wanted the massacre of millions of Muslims to appease the wrath and expectations of the Hindu majority. Godse is no different from a jihadi terrorist of today, because he chose to end someone’s life. This is why the saffron terror outfits ought to be banned and unmasked for what they really are- terrorist agencies. RSS, VHP, Sangh Parivar, Banrang Dal, Shiv Sena. They now have political power to do what they please- to cleanse India of Islam and Christianity and make Hinduism the single religion. That’s what the Modi government is doing.

  37. I think Nathuram Godse miscalculated the situation and performed the act which created a black spot forever in the history. Post the assassination too, the communal violence did not stop. In fact, it went rampant. Regarding the use of force against the Britishers was not a good choice as they were the might one at that time. The history even witnessed the force used in the First independence revolt in 1857, where India got thoroughly suppressed by the Britishers.Hence, in my point of view resorting to the killing of someone, don’t yield the good result, but, creates vacuum in the of mature democracy of any country..

  38. I just want to say that ..gandhiji done a vry good job n had a great role in our indepndnc..
    But he was not as that great as we have read in our bks …there would be diff situation if gandhij took ryt step..

    • Bhagvan Krishna encouraged Arjuna to kill cousins, relatives and not to spare even his own teacher and grandfather, to gain kingdom or to save dharma, my lord Mr.Parikh.

  39. An Individual thinks and acts according to his/her environment, the way he lived, what he learnt, history of their ancestors.. Everyone has the mentality to stabilize their livelihood. For that stability, they destroy others peace.
    But what I have now is knowledge and information..everyone of my age is aware of mankinds fury, Right there from Alexander,Babar, Ashoka, Aurangzeb, British and finally Godse through series of Epics, scripts, Books and documentary.
    But these fury still prevails and exists even now,previously in the form of Al-qaeda and now Boko Haram and ISIS.
    Everybody is actually stable, but greed has poisioned men’s soul..
    GREED results HATRED which finally results into REVENGE,its natural and everybody knows that.
    Above all Im a mangoloid face Indian, from Arunachal recently under President rule, people call us chinkies and chinese even if Im ready to die for my country India..but those minds wont effect me, becoz I also have the knowledge of discrimination as done to Blacks in America few years back.
    And above all, Im also one of those angry young men who would have done what sir Godse had done..Becoz I too believe that true Historians will definitely scale the weight of action mankind has performed.But here I have a different theory-
    Why Mankind exist?
    Is their a task for them?
    Some kind of Game is being played with us?
    Yes..I believe something very fishy is going on with mankind.
    Mankind will definitely be judged according to their action..and we shall overcome someday..We will define God as mankind..Men will be God. There will be peace, there wont be any place for greed.We will live together as children of God, we will be Gods, we will pray to Mankind according to their deeds.
    Deeds like messi plays football, deeds like sachin Bats, deeds like Lataji sings deeds like ussain bolt runs, like sun shines to give life, nature’s way of fulfilling everyones need. ..which is only possible through true historians, providing right amount of information revealing what mankind has done.
    And thats why I believe in mankind.
    We will win against ourselves
    We will fight against ourselves till the end of time.

  40. What Godseji did was his own perception. To me he punished Gandhiji without telling his crime which went really wrong on his part. He took his step in haste. He should have protested against Gandhiji. He should open discussion with him. But perhaps he was not confident to discuss this matter in open. Anyways Gandhiji passed away and Godseji got punishment.
    Now comes reservation. This is purely political term. Killing the interest of deserved candidates and giving chances to undeserved is a way to weakening country. You know human being respect the job only when he earned by putting his effort into it and hardly care the job which he get the job without putting his sweet. This is happening actually.For instance, A candidate securing 10% is getting job of teacher is really worrying. No matter whichever caste he belongs to. He is got to teach all. Can he really teach ? No…where is quality. At least minimum qualification should be there. Some arrangements should be made to provide financial help so that they can complete their education. Make them competent first then let them earn them job. Make them self dependent and not beggars. Modi ji asked capable ones to sacrifice lpg subsidy. Good, many has done that also. But can he dare to ask capable families to surrender reservation benefit . It would be interesting to find that numbers also because mostly jobs were not earned but were given to them.

  41. As a hindu and also as an Indian I really agree with some of the things Godse gave in his final speech but having read so much about Gandhi from different sects and different authors I seriously think that the kind of independence Gandhi wanted for this nation was highly impractical, although it sounds noble but I don’t think India was ready for Gandhi kind of independence and for that matter even now and even in a distant future India would have never accepted that as a whole, it was simply impractical and probably that’s why the called him a soul that was not ordinary…now if he is a mahatma or a duratma that is for people to decide, everyone will have his/her own viewpoint, but even this impractical ideology made such a big impact on 20th century India, makes me solely believe that with sheer belief aap bulk mein ek desh k bht bade section ka bhi CHUTIYA KAAT SAKTE HO…in others word nothing is impossible…Take a Bow! Gandhiji. Well Done! And ofcourse don’t forget the mass support or rather I should say ‘selfish’ mass support he got from India.

  42. I am a Pakistani.I was born in Pakistan.Never been to India.Met nearly all people belonging to every part of India who had migrated to Pakistan after partition.Read history in school , college and through books plus verbal stories related by the then elders.After reading Nathuram’s statement I have only one thought…What a brilliant mind killed such a super Soul…tragic on both counts.Everybody has a right to their views but the difference between normal and abnormal is going with the flow , leading a life based upon universal values of coexistence and decency while going alone the complex road of life without any regard for the collective good of humanity or comrades is considered ‘abnormal’.Gandhiji having had a bigger canvas had greater influence on the majority of the then Indians plus great respect among all the people of Indo-Pak while Nathruram’s individual observations based upon his personal judgement and solo action resulted in the wate of not only a MAHATMA but maybe a great future Indian Leader …but one finds oneself helpless when it comes to Destiny.

  43. मुझे लगता है की गांधी जी और नेहरू दोनों ही भारत के विभाजन के लिए जिम्मेदार थे। ज्यादा तो नेहरू थे क्योंकि उन्हे प्रधानमंत्री बनने की बहुत जल्दी थी इसीलिए उन्होंने देश को तोड़ दिया। मैं मानता हूँ गांधी का योगदान बहत बड़ा है हमारे देश के लिए लेकिन जब मुस्लिमो के लिए अलग देश बन गया था तब क्या जरूत थी की भारत को हिन्दू और मुस्लिम दोनों के लिए। भारत सिर्फ हिन्दुओ के लिए होना चाहिए था क्योंकि बटवारा तो इसलिए हुआ था की मुसलमानो को एक अलग देश मिलेगा और हिन्दुओ को एक अलग देश। जब भारत हिन्दुओ के लिए बना था फिर इस में मुस्लिम की क्या जररूत थी। दंगा रोकने के लिए हिन्दू मुस्लिमो को अलग किया गया था। पाकिस्तन तो मुस्लिमो की लिए बन गया पर भारत हिन्दुओ का नहीं हुआ। secularism के नाम पर गांधी और नेहरू ने मुसलमानो का साथ दिया और हिन्दू का उसका हक़ नहीं दिया ।और वही आज हो रहा secularism के नाम पर आज के कांग्रेस वाले मुसलमानो का साथ देते पर हिन्दुओ के सैज गैरो जैसा व्यवाहर करते है। कितना दिख की बात है। गांधी महान थे इस कोई दोराय नहीं लेकिन गोडसे भी आतंकवादी नहीं वो गांधी जितन महान् तो नहीं पर पर वो एक सच्चा देश भक्त था भगत सिंह चन्द्र शेखर आज़ाद जैसा हमें अपना गोडसे के प्रति नजरिया बदलना होगा

    • इतिहास के बारे में पता क्या है तुम लोगो को |
      जब भारत के लोगो को साऊथ अफ्रीका ले जाया गया, और वहा उनसे जानवरों की तरह
      व्यवहार किया गया, तो कौन था जिसने उनके हक़ में आवाज उठाई | महात्मा गाँधी @

      जब भारत के बिहार के गाव चंपारण में किसानो से जबरदस्ती नील की खेती कराइ
      गई | और उसे खुद अंग्रेजो द्वारा ही कौड़ियो के भाव ख़रीदा गया, तो कौन था जो
      आगे आकर बोला, “किसान के खेत पर किसान का हक है, और ये उसकी मर्जी होना
      चाहिए की वो अपने खेत में क्या बोये |” वो कौन था जिसने किसानो पर हो रहे
      इस अत्याचार के खिलाफ आवाज उठाई | और अंग्रेजो को झुकाया और किसानो को सुखी
      बनाया | महात्मा गाँधी @

      गुजरात के खेडा गाव में जब अकाल की वजह से फसल बर्बाद हो गई थी तब कौन आया
      उनका कर माफ़ करवाने | किसने कह दिया की इस बार किसानो की फसल बर्बाद हो गई
      है इस बार कोई लगान नहीं दिया जाएगा | महात्मा गाँधी @

      जब अहमदाबाद के बारडोली में किसानो पर अन्यत्र 30% कर का भार जबरदस्ती डाला
      गया, तब कौन आया बारडोली सत्याग्रह लेकर किसानो को खुशहाल बनाने, अंग्रेजो
      को फिर से झुकाने | महात्मा गाँधी @

      जब नमक कानून आया और अंग्रेजो ने भारतीयों के नमक बनाने पर रोक लगा दी,
      अंग्रेजो ने भारतीयों के नमक बेचने पर भी रोक लगा दी | और नमक सिर्फ
      अंग्रेजो द्वारा, वो भी दुगुनी कीमत पर बेचा जाने लगा, तो कौन आया जिसने
      निर्भय होकर दांडी यात्रा की | महात्मा गाँधी @ इस यात्रा ने पूरी दुनिया
      का ध्यान भारत की और खीचा, और जिस तरह से अंग्रेजो ने भारतीयों का दमन किया
      उसकी पुरे विश्व में निंदा हुई और अंग्रेजो/इंग्लेंड वासियों पर एक
      अन्तराष्ट्रीय दबाव बनने लगा की वो भारत को आजाद करे |

      किसने असहयोग आन्दोलन चलाकर अंग्रेजो की सिट्टी पिट्टी गुम कर दी | महात्मा
      गाँधी @

      और जो लोग कहते की भारत का विभाजन गाँधी में किया वो सुन ले, भारत का
      विभाजन मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना, जो की मुस्लिम लीग का नेता था, उसने किया |
      जब गाँधी जी और बाकी लोगो ने जिन्ना के पाकिस्तान की बात नहीं मानी, तो
      जिन्ना ने डाइरेक्ट एक्शन डे का एलान कर दिया | जिसके चलते सारे मुस्लिम
      हाथो में हथियार लिए गैर मुस्लिमो को मारने लगे, और देखते ही देखते दंगे
      भड़क उठे | महात्मा गाँधी को सिविल वार की चिंता सताने लगी, और इस हिंसा के
      माहौल को देखते हुए वो विभाजन के लिए तैयार हो गए | जिन्ना ने तो विभाजन न
      मानने पर एक और डाइरेक्ट एक्शन डे के एलान की धमकी दे दी थी | सरदार वल्लभ
      भाई पटेल भी कहने लगे थे की यदि शरीर का कोई हिस्सा बीमार हो जाए, और
      बीमारी पुरे शरीर में फ़ैलाने का खतरा हो, तो अच्छा यही होगा की हम उस बीमार
      हिस्से को शरीर से काट कर फेंक दे | अलग कर दे उसे |

      जब देश में विभाजन के समय दंगे भड़के थे और लोग एक दुसरे को मारने के लिए
      हाथो में नंगे हथियार लिए घूम रहे थे, तब केवल एक ही महात्मा में वो जिगरा
      था की वो लोगो के बिच पहुच जाए और उन्हें खून खराबे से रोके | महात्मा
      गाँधी @
      परेशानी तो यह थी की उस वक्त दो पाकिस्तान बने थे, एक पश्चिम पाकिस्तान और
      एक पूर्वी पाकिस्तान | महात्मा गाँधी ने पूर्वी पाकिस्तान जाकर हिंसा रोकने
      का मन बनाया और इतिहास गवाह है की पूर्वी पाकिस्तान के विभाजन में बहुत कम
      हिंसा हुई, जो हिंसा हुई वो पश्चिम पाकिस्तान में हुई |

      जो लोग कहते है के गांधीजी पाकिस्तान को करोडो रुपये देना चाहते थे, उन्हें
      बता दू की विभाजन के समय जिन्ना ने होस्पिटल, शैक्षणिक संस्थानों, सैन्य
      तथा ख़ुफ़िया एजेंसी के बटवारे की बात की थी, जिसे नेहरू और सरदार पटेल ने
      नामंजूर कर दिया था, उन्होंने कह दिया था की, अब जो करना है अपने इलाके में
      करो हमारे इलाके की कोई चीज अब तुम्हारी नहीं रही | जिन्ना ने अंग्रेजो से
      मदद मांगी और कहा की इन सारी सुविधाओ के बिना पाकिस्तान देश तो अधुरा है |
      तब नेहरू और पटेल ने सुविधाओ के बदले 75 करोड़ रुपये पाकिस्तान को देने की
      बात कही | जिसे जिन्ना ने मान लिया |

      जब गाँधी की हत्या हुई उससे पहले वह पाकिस्तान यात्रा का मन बना चुके थे,
      और चाहते थे की पाकिस्तान में शांति व्यवस्था बनी रहे, वहा हमारे हिन्दू
      भाई सुरक्षित रहे | अगर गाँधी जी जिन्दा होते, तो आज पाकिस्तान इतना पगला
      नहीं होता, और वहा जो हिन्दुओ पर अत्याचार हुए है, शायद वो नहीं होते |
      क्या आप लोगो को पता है, की गाँधी जी ने अपनी जिंदगी के 2338 दिन जेल में
      बिताये | सिर्फ हमारे लिए |

      विश्व में महात्मा गाँधी सिर्फ़ एक नाम नहीं अपितु शान्ति और अहिंसा का
      प्रतीक है। महात्मा गाँधी के पूर्व भी शान्ति और अहिंसा की अवधारणा थी,
      लेकिन उन्होंने
      जिस प्रकार सत्याग्रह, शान्ति व अहिंसा के रास्तों पर चलते हुये अंग्रेजों
      को भारत छोड़ने पर मजबूर कर दिया, उसका कोई दूसरा उदाहरण विश्व इतिहास में
      देखने को नहीं मिलता। तभी तो दुनिया के सबसे बड़े और बुद्धिमान वैज्ञानिक
      आइंस्टीन ने कहा था कि
      -‘‘हज़ार साल बाद आने वाली नस्लें इस बात पर मुश्किल से विश्वास करेंगी कि
      हाड़-मांस से बना ऐसा कोई इन्सान धरती पर कभी आया था।’’

      संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ ने भी वर्ष 2007 से गाँधी जयन्ती को ‘विश्व अहिंसा
      दिवस’ के रूप में
      मनाये जाने की घोषणा की।

      मार्टिन लूथर किंग जूनियर किससे प्रभावित थे | नेल्सन मंडेला किसकी फोटो
      अपने पास रखते थे | किसने विश्व के इन दिग्गज नेताओ को राह दिखाई | किसने
      भारत को विश्व में एक अलग ही पहचान दिलाई | The One And Only महात्मा गाँधी
      @

    • Well Nishant.. i agree you at some points bt if you remember that ki india ko indipend karne ke liye muslims ne bhi sath diya tha so how can you say that jo ppl khud ko indian mante hai unko aap pakistan jjane ke liye kaise bol sakte ho..????

    • Nathuram Godse may have given many explanations for killing Gandhiji . After reading it I came to the conclusion that it was only the thought of a sick upper caste people’s mentality. They couldn’t tolerate a lower caste thought or concept of non-violence and non-co-operation which lead India to freedom with lower casualties and loss of property. He , Nathuram Godse , along with people behind him had to prove that all the upper caste ruler, starting from Ramayana, Mahabharata and others have resorted to violence to win their war, were right. Gandhiji was very practical as our poor illiterate and divided people couldn’t have afforded the high cost of violence. Also British were very clever in dealing violence but they had no answer to non-violence and non-co-operation concept of Gandhiji. What ever the people say but I appreciate that Gandhiji brought freedom to Indian in cheapest and affordable effort. Gandhiji was not greedy of any post so any body, should be held responsible for division of India and Pakistan , are those who desired for top political position after partition.

      • Mr Rajeev .I think due to Hindu like you whole political parties are targeting that community in India who are called minorities .Because they know, they can easily divide Hindus on basis of upper caste and lower caste.This cast ism exists in other religion also but they unite when any body talk about their Religion. And you guys just sought on your own religion.In today Politics what lower cast is not getting–>”RESERVATION”.Ha Ha you will get number of examples where meritorious student did not reach better institute and lower caste people go.but we are not shouting. So instead of shouting try to improve your thinking ,because it is direct fight of one religion to other ,they are not going to see you are lower or upper cast.

        • A assassin of father of Nation can’t be celebrated in a civilized society . One( after assassinating somebody) can’t prove himself right quoting religious books. Illegal assassination is always done to settle personal or communal scores (killer of innocent person is killer nothing else). Either Godse or the person who poisoned his mind settled theirs personal scores.

          Many people blames reservation system in India. Do anybody give time to think Who is responsible? And what should be done to eliminate the root cause? Are the responsible person belong to benefited castes and religion. I think the few greedy and corrupt people are responsible for the same. They characterized and classified different castes. They started mis-utilising their position to give the chance to their near and relative in various sectors of countries ignoring the deserving candidate. They created tussle between the different castes. All this just to make people busy in useless things and they can continue their corrupt practices. When things started getting out of control they passed the reservation bill in haste without giving the thoughts of unprivileged millions. Those who controls the system never made the system transparent and fair till now. No body want to talk of fair and transparent legal and administration in our country. All those who are at topmost postions still passing big tenders worth crores to their near and relative. But the lower people are busy in useless reservation issues. We want the best and competent teacher – doctor for our family but we never select the similar competent person for parliament. How can we expect good outcome. In the era of Science and Spirituality still there are many followers of plenty of blind faith. If reservations kept on continuing for few years it will turn out blind faith for our politicians similar to our religious books. Disease and body structures are same between different castes and religion. Drugs used for treatment are same. Even organ transplant between two individuals can be done regardless of castes and religion. We have progressed from dictatorship to democracy but still we have to learn a lot why God created us. But if anybody suppresses talent and opportunities to a deserving candidate our nation and systems get spoiled. It is just like adulterating milk – feeding a child and then expecting normal humane outcome.

          And about faith A water molecule travels through many mouth and urinary tracks of many organisms ( different species, castes, religion) but the molecule of water is always considered pure if collected from Ganges river. There are many castes and religion in India. Some educated individual can comment a whole caste community as dogs but no action taken, even it is mentioned in some so called pious book, but people consumes the food produced in the fields of THE caste community ( compared with dogs), with the help of their hand and sweat and probably their excreta also. How can a civilized individual compares a community with animals.

      • Rajeev plz read some more to know the reality. You are saying cheapest and affordable way !! plz read read and read some more before spreading this superficial propaganda by Nehru and Co.

      • Hinduism has evolved over time as a religion of reservation(based on caste). It is good to respect the religion and religious faith but it is sickness to get obsessed of it. We learnt to wear undergarments to coats-tie and eat with forks- spoon from western people. But still plenty about civilization has to be learnt from them. I want to add Who classified castes and then started reservations it was the Brahmins who demanded nearly 100%reservation in temples with free food and residence with no required qualifications / competitions. The pandits of temple enjoys the benefit of mostly tax free income plus reasonable to lavish lifestyle with lots of respect . They can capture any property with least effort/money and convert it into temple . All at the cost of just a mere birth in families of Brahmin caste . But till now no revolution done to eradicate this reservation. If India is projected as Hindu nation, it will be a nation of reservations based on castes. What a religion that don’t consider all individual same. How fake is the religious faith can be judged by the fact that An orthodox Brahmin will not eat from hand of a scheduled caste individual but he will eat grains raised in their farm with help of excreta and the same Brahmin will be ready to accept kidney from a street beggar without knowing his/her caste or religion in case of terminal chronic renal failure. It well known many great people have created different religion after knowing the incompleteness and unjustified rituals in their parent religion. People keeps talking of present social problems but don’t analyze that many social problems are deep rooted from past.

      • See. It’s not about killing,, anger,, hatred.When you are very deep and you can understand the situation and have the most righteous reason perhaps that step would be right but even then we should not be the person who believes in noone but himself like Gandhi was.perhaps godse wanted to have a discussion with others but can’t because of the time but anyway thinking about that may result in manipulating our minds and developing a hatred.

    • No you are wrong! He should not kill Ghandhi nor Nehru. He was a stupid man and so are you. Read textbooks to know more and gain knowledge.

      • Huma Tameem Khan: It is very suitable for you to say all this. You are living in a country where Hindus are in majority and you are safe here. Safer than many of the Islamic countries even the land which was created specially for Muslims by dismembering the great nation which I would call Bharat ( not India). It is very suitable for you not to speak of the atrocities committed on Hindus of Pakistan and Bangladesh where they have practically disappeared and your community is thriving here in Bharat with special pampering from all the “Secular” parties. Whether Nathuram Godse was right or wrong it will be judged by the history itself but Gandhi and Nehru failed this nation and Gandhi deserved what he got finally.

  44. I say that bhagat Singh ws da real hero of hero’s……bt mahatma Gandhi could save him …n bhagat Singh by his own didn’t want to live…his dream ws to die for us….coz he wanted us to b real hero’s of da future

  45. After reading many thoughts and conclusion therein with an repetetive attempt to malign Gandhi ji and associating his conduct with a favourism to muslims only to satisfy their own sentiments, I think now the time has come to reassess Godse and Gandhi case by today’s historians with a formal government order. Since a patriotic and Popular govt had sworned in after 5-6 decades after independent India first time, they should take up the issue seriously to make clear for coming generations whether Gandhi deserves to be called Father of Nation, Or Godse should be awarded Bharat Ratna.

    • Adding to your thought, get back the land that been partitioned, and for your information, those above topic for which we all are here had happened in the court in-front of the then judges, so question does not take birth to assess it now, Award must be bestowed upon GODSAY, Make changes in the primary School History.

  46. every one has thinking but all the thoughts are not correct, who knows that what godse did for his country, who knows that gandiji did for this country,, i am proud to say that bagat sigh is correct, but not the godse

  47. If it were all for Indian freedom then Gandhi had achieved all.

    Gandhiji would have lived on (not for a greater cause but) for a direction. If he would have got a break from the fighting men in his life…

    Looking for the “Ahimsa” evermore are the whole world generation. Gandhiji would have taken the world there.

    If his countryman (Godse the maniac?!) had not defeated his purpose!
    🙂

  48. This was really interesting article to read. History is something that has already happened and it cannot be changed. Our beliefs are influenced by the knowledge we gather and most schools make sure that we do not learn to think critically. We were taught that Mr. Godse was part of RSS. But, no one taught us he was also part of Indian National Congress. I have tremendous respect for Gandhiji and until recently I used to think that he was calm and at peace even when the bullet hit him, so much so that the phrase “Hey Ram” are taught as Gandhiji’s last words. But, that was a lie and who taught this lie to us? Distorting the facts is the game politicians play for self benefit. In this day and age, when facts can be found through many sources, why not study further from sources other than school textbooks or Internet. Let’s dig some archives and find the truth for ourselves and for the benefit of generations to come. My only regret is not knowing Nehru’s cunning nature. No longer call him Chacha Nehru or Pandit Nehru. Still have respect for Gandhiji and good to know the ideology of Mr Godse.

  49. Gandhiji is Father of Pakistan , for me Bhagat singh , Bose and savarkar are the real Heroes not this Bloody Old Man who forced the britishers to hang Bhagat singh

    • Seriously! Even Lokmanya Tilak had done great work! But all this Gandhi could to was to stand against real Patriots! :/ i wish Nathuram Godse get born again n kill all those remaining Gandhi’s that are against our national!

    • hey aditya..i hope u must b indian ryt..so u shud definetly hv respect towards gandhiji for sure..i dnt say dat hz true but hz d main rsns of independence for sure..n bhagath singh is sooper hero forvr

    • aditya, dont forget what gandhiji has done for us , the dandi march and so many things. and if you r so confident then go and ask bhagat singh now that does he still have respect for bapu or not. people like u are stupid and worst. if u were in the time of gandhiji would u have faught for independence . u should respect gandhiji people r mad and u r right is ti then die u have no right to live bluudy fool

    • That is not true! I believe they are the heroes but so is Ghandhi. But actually he could be called both “father of nation” and father of Pakistan because in the Pakistan the people of are only living. They were a part of us and so are now. Ghandi is was a super person

  50. Before partition india was secular still then muslim was in need to have a seperate land then why didnot Gandhi & Neheru as a gurdian of the nation allow all the muslim to leave this land to settle in Pakistan as who knows one day may be 100 yrs from now they need another seperate land as their fertility rate is much higher than any other religion.Hopeless as a father. Was he not a selfish to be a greatman only by sacrificing the interest of india belongs to.If British can go why not muslims to leave also.

  51. Half of this is bullshit. Its written and exaggerated by some hindu Author. In every line there is hinduism and not Indian patriotism.
    Whoever has written this is brain washing all people.

    • Give proper proof in favor of your comment or just shut up you shameless (I don’t know whether you are guy or girl)

    • Truth hurts. Know all facts, think critically with an open mind. Independence was sacrifice of not just Gandhiji, but many others. Mr. Godse gives credit to Gandhiji’s leadership. However at a certain point every leader faces a situation where he creates a very greedy, powerful and influential heir or next level. I think Nehru was such a person of greed and power. Did Pakistan exist before 1947? Did India not have many religious entities before that? So we need to know what went wrong in 1945-47. Greed for power and succession overtook the cause for freedom.

    • Its not written by any HINDU, its been spoken by GODSAY himself in the Court of this land, also called by the name of HINDUSTAN ! Where Ram,Krishna,Gutam Buddha,King Ashoka,Subhas Chandra Bose,Indra had toiled on this soil.I am Proud to be in India and its citizen @ HINDU.

  52. Peace to Godse and peace to Gandhi
    Im not in a position to tell anyone weather Gandhi or Godse was right…..
    Actually both of them were better than us(or maybe me) because we all give our comments and our views but when it actually comes to do something, more than 50%[which includes me] just sit there and watch.
    I think that they were great…just because they actually did something…they stood for their beliefs and their morals which they believed in.
    From their perspective they did what they could do to bring this nation up.

  53. Gandhiji deserve killing
    when all indians was with Sardar Patel to make him P.M , gandhiji made nehru as it and due to nehru our india was suffering from paying more taxes and due that we are much back -economically , in education , financially in compare to other countries.

  54. Dear Fools….don’t you have any other duty rather than thinking about who is right – Godse or Gandhi.I say,don’t believe anyone just because of his words.When someone make a speech he has the complete consideration that a group of people are there to judge him.We never know whether Gandhiji was selfish or not(there can be a chance I must say).Similarly simply because Godse killed Gandhiji doesn’t mean than he is courageous.He may be actually a person who pee through his pants on gunpoint.Who knows…?
    So dear friends,please use your brain.There is no hard and fast rule for right and wrong.There is no need to believe in a person whom you don’t know personally.Believe in yourself

    • What godse did was right…had he not killed gandhi den…half of india wud hav been captured by china(just like tibet) and half by pakistan. #bullshitnonvoilence #longlivegodse #respect.

      • Dear friend plz tell me where was this RSS during the whole movement of freedom struggle….. wat was its methods …. were they popular among masses…..

        Today it may claim that India should be on its line BUT where were they, when Gandhi was working 1920-1945…. It is easy for somebody to come in last and claim BUT the whole process was not so easy…

        ONE MORE QUESTION….wat was the self interest of Gandhiji? He was a son of rich person with high social status. He could enjoy much better life than he did in struggle……wat was the self interst pl tell…..

        • He was a selfish man who wanted the credit for others’ hard work. He played dirty politics when his candidate Pattabhi Sitaramayya lost against Shri Subhash Chandra Bose. The British left India because of their own reasons and not because of that rascal. Had we risen up in arms earlier and not listened to him, we would have been independet 50 years earlier. Today is also the birthday of Shri Lal Bahadur Shastri, he was twice the man Gandhi could ever dream of being. We should commemorate his memory not Gandhis. People like you should be ashamed of themselves. Read the reasons Nathuram Godse gave for killing Gandhi. They define logic and reason.

          Atakodeyenne.

      • I would say that,If gandhi ji existed,China would have become india If china were to ever attack & there would have been cordial relations between pakistan and india…See,these issues cant be solved with violence,They are to be solved through talks.Godse,instead of killing gandhi,could have discussed exchanged opinions at the time when gandhi was decisive.Probably this would have led to a better situation.I understand it is a f****d up situation but godse could at least see both sides of the situation.See its easy to be biased but it is hard to break the small bubble we are living in.But if he seriously wanted to release his pent up anger he could have killed nehru.gandhi according to me was not a conspirator but a real time strategist,He made such long term goals that many people could not percieve the long term positive impact…By the way if you see the jalianwalla bagh massacre those victims were not killed by general dyer but were killed by our own indian people under the orders of dyer.it is extremely shameful for them to backstab the country they were born in.

      • And to add the only fault of gandhi was that he was not killed or he did not sacrifice his life during the freedom struggle.But if he had sacrificed himself india would not have existed as we know today.It would either have been a part of Britain where the British guys would have treated us lie blacks in america or india would have broken down into smaller provinces.There would have been no unity or integrity among india.All the systems would have gone haywire .There would have been a lot of bloodshed.There would have been a lot of entropy…And dont forget Even the muslims took part in our sufferings…I cannot find any fault with gandhi i am sorry

    • Certain things you have to believe. because there is no alternate for the same. Am not arguing, who is correct, whether Gandhi Ji or Godse ??? But some certain things attract the acuteness of rights of the people of India. Still our country called as INDIA (Independent Nation Declared In August). Who has replaced the Bharat or Hindustan by India? So many questions are yet to be answered. If you advising that only to believe in a person whom you know personally. History is History. We cannot interact with everybody at every time and age. Certain things have to believe without interaction.

  55. I think this was all about communism ….everything created by the britishers……we should talk about humanity not about hindu muslim …before bengal seperation everybody was working for the nation not for community.but this has gobe into the roots of minds of people to talk about religon.this should not bedone

  56. Godse was great…Bose was strong…gandhi was weak…he could hav joined with bose..together they could hav beaten Britain to their knees…but gandhi was concerned abt the lives of indian ppl. Well, if he was truly concerned then he would’nt hav called for stupid meetings such as “jalian walah bagh”..I dont think more ppl could hav been killed in a war!…Without considering hindu-muslim problem…we can say that gandhi is the reason for the death of millions of “True freedom fighters”!••

  57. One bullet shoot is meant for the loast of not only what gandhiji has sacrifice thr own life but brutish role to the sentiments of billion not only from India, abroad as well

  58. There were lot of great freedom fighters than gandhi off course gandhi was one of them. But i feel proud of godse who was a great patriotic. His ideology was true and acceptable.

    • Absolutely brother. There is absolutely no need to eulogize a killer like Godse. Rather than killing a saint like Mahatma Gandhi, that mindless should have killed Jinnah and those who were butchering Hindus. Gandhiji tried hard to save Indians in pakistan, but Muslims there did not hear him. Poor soul.. and this idiot killed him for that. Actually Godse was trying to kill Gandhi since 1946 itself. He was nothing but a militant. And Hindus, or even Marathis should not associate with him. There are other great Marathis like Lokmanya Tilak, Gopalkrishna Gokhle, and off course Shivaji, who are the real pride of Great Maharashtra. Godse the killer has been a tainting blot ….

  59. Seriously?
    21st century, where we have people giving it up for unity and growth of India, and people respect a man who murdered a man with decent ideology and what for? RELIGION? Just tell me how different it is than terrorists doing the same for their religion. How in any world religion can be so dependable and act as a jury?
    For god’s sake, for some shame read something about gandhiji, please. Atleast 3 books or one documentary.
    A murderer being called as a hero is like yourselves being a part of that ungrateful act.
    Anyway,
    Still doing hindus and muslims ? Like Who is better? Still doing that?
    Ha! You learnt nothing from the history then. Neither from gandhiji or godse or any other being. We are equal. Like brothers.
    If you think India cannot change, then it’s because you are not changing.
    Peace.

    • if gandhi would had atleast emphasized on the releasing of bhagat singh, sukhdev, and rajguru today we people would had more effective and patriotic men. gandhi was never keen to talk erwin over their execution. so please brush up your memory sir .. today we lack those effective and courageous people like subhash chandra bose and lala lajpat rai who could had also been saved had only gandhi tried to protect them…..

  60. Everyone in this era only thinks of a persons bad quality….. Why? Hose was a patriot? How? No he was never. Indians itself are against the person who gave them independance . everything is not free. Yes india was partitioned. But think if india was not partitioned how terrorists would have emerged in our country… Now atleast there is a boder where india can fight against it. If partition didn’t happen the great malla would not have been recognised. Mahatma ghandi beleived that the unity of Muslims and Hindu was the only way of freedom. If godse wanted to kill the main people who was the reason of the partition kill all those rapists and all those lords who came to our country and the other exploited it. Modi Saab, instead of putting a statue of a killer, pls make india clean, pollution free, rapist free. Make it a country where women can walk without scare and fear instead of wasting the time for killers. Modse was brave but he didn’t need to show it by killing he had to know that without Gandhi ji we are wouldn’t have got freedom and the whole india can would have been perished. And there wouldn’t be india….. Long live INDIA.

    • looks like you are fool we did not get freedom because of Gandhi… there were hundreds of freedom fighters.. like Netaji, Tilak and meny more. Gandhi was responsible for killings of thousands of Hindus because of his stupid policy of Ahimsa… Godse was great he should have finished Gandhi much before.

    • Gandhi didnt gave India Independence. Partition was not bad but a great idea, but then why then the Muslims who created didnt move? What do you mean by rapist free, India is having lowest rape rate in the world?

    • I am ashamed of myself varsha, you and whole of India was/is been raped by the same traitors with whom you are colluding with.
      Is distortion of history not amount to crime? What an unfortunate tragedy and irony?

    • He just wanted to satisfy his evil mentality… Had he been really courageous… He should have assassinated Jinnah… Shooting an unarmed man who was already a role model of peace loving people, is the sign of a PURE COWARD WHO ONLY WANTED HIS NAME TO BE REMEMBERED… Godse is no better than Osama or other stupids like him…

      • You are right about Godse but kiling Jinnah would not helped anyway. Jinnah was not the alone leader, Indian Muslims in majority demanded, voted and fought for Pakistan.

      • THe reason why Godse chose to kill gandhi was his continued minority appeasement. if had decided to kill jinnah first(and obviously, the people there, would have beat him to death), gandhi would still have been alive and would have continued his appeasement policy. i personally feel,all 3(gandhi,jinnah as well as nehru )
        should have been killed

      • Parasite mentality aasim! u are not associating GODSAY but youself with osama? will you allow your own property to be partitioned between the thieves(stepbrothers/neighbor) who just broken into your ancestral home/property………..the same applies to our country too.

  61. i have read the statement of nathu ramji godse, given by him in the court- i have also read the biography of godse ji and gandhi ji- and on that basis i can say that in patriotism character and courage godse ji stands above ganghi ji–so if any body asks me that to whom i will like between godse ji nd gandhi ji–i will without any hesitation say that i like godse ji and not gandhi ji—t.d.chandna

  62. Extremists or hardliners do more harm to any country or religion they belong to than others. It can be argued if Godse wanted to kill he should have tried his hands on Jinnah, the crusader of separate state or Mountbatten who sped up the partition process.. Killing Gandhi did not serve any purpose but only highlighted the antics and rhetorics of extremists. Nationalism is definitely required but not based or related to any majority religion but as an Indian. Bcoz India is basically secular country and our politican know how to exploit it to fulfill their ulterior motives. Want to implement something sensible bring in law and implement it aggressively, but just playing the cards of majority-minority will definitely will create more misguided youths in this country.

    • You needn’t worry about creation of misguided youths ‘coz there are enough Jinnahs in the country ie. Mulayam Singh Yadav, Laloo Yadav, Nithish Kumar, Karunanidhi, Mamta & all congressmen. India soon will become Pakistan with the support of present day politicians.

    • for clarity of thought, the gandi, the gandi family, and the Congress makes us or the youths of this country fall into such trap what they did to Godsay, subhas chandra bose, you just name them and Numerous of other such freedom fighters, Surprisingly still Congress is doing the same thing since independence and with the present generation too.

  63. Everyone knows that the partition was effected due to power struggle of Nehru and Jinnah and nothing else. In fact, history makes it clear that Gandhi tried his best to strike a negotiation between the two but the ‘horned bulls’ didn’t budge. N for the record, Jinnah did not believe in Islam for an ounce, he never even practiced it. He only revered himself as the face of Islam only for the sake of his own political career. Religion has always been an evil when it seaps into the political structure of the country. Even now, look at us, we justify the deeds of godse on the basis of religious sentiments not the law of our land. As per the speech, yes, we can say that godse was ‘provoked’ into committing a murder (even though its a far fetched argument) but how can we even think of justifying his deeds. You see, our society has suffered since ages coz we are not ready to eliminate the divides, we are not ready to understand and be apprised of the laws of our own land let alone honour them n this sentiment stands as such irrespective of our caste, creed, religion or gender. How many of us can think rationally, logically without being moved by the religious sentiments. Religion was always a tool in the hands of politicians since the independence and continues to be till date. We have evolved as a race, as individuals. People talk abt jury, but are they even competent to institute a system of jury when they can’t even form a mature opinion free from extraneous considerations, when they still identify people as hindus, Muslims, Scheduled caste n so on. I think not…..we need to grow as a democracy, as Indians, n we need to form strong democratic opinions independent of extraneous considerations. Unless we do that, I do not think we can ever be competent to form legal opinions abt cases such as these.

    N as for Gandhi, please give him some respect. The man had his faults, made lots of mistakes, yet he did got us our independence. Instead of the contempt u guys express for his satyagraha n non violence movement, please understand the cunning politics he played n the amount of bloodshed he avoided. Of course, we the Indians were foolish enough to forego that advantage by fighting in the partition yet, why do u guys forget that we had already been fighting numerous battles with the british since 200 years before gandhi came along. The Punjabi’s, the Marathas, the mughals, the Mysore dynasty all fought with the British but were subjugated. Further, our hopes for violent removal of the Brits was thwarted when Japan fell in the hands of the allies. Hence, all political considerations of independence era should be carefully analysed before denying the credibility of gandhi.

    • well said….. I was feeling sad seeing the comments which praises a fascist propogator who killed gandhi. That too believing a bunch of lies and half truths.

    • Tanisha We had found another Vivekananda in you and it seems Geeta is born out of you, but unfortunately we the humanity race have very early on accepted the Chicago congregation which happened before your this comments.HINDUISM is the way of life so what’s wrong if it been raked upon. Hindu religion is without doubt the supreme fact on the face of Earth, the sooner we merge into it peace will prevail sooner otherwise every deeds have its fruits that has to be swallow like what’s happening around the world.

  64. Godse killed Gandhi because in his view there was no other alternative to stop him from harming a complete generation of hindus politically & socially. If one studies about those times, one may also agree with Godse. In fact that was the very reason the Nehru Government did not make his last speech public and all successive Congress Governments followed the same. Not only his speech was banned but also were his books. The successive Congress Governments allowed only one side of the story & the Godse story was completely banned. Many termed Godse as a terrorist or a mathefiru but actually he was a very intellectual person. His courtroom speech was so impressive that the judge himself remarked that if India had a Jury system, Godse would have walked free. He gave various reasons behind his act but asked for no mercy. The day he killed Gandhi, he went to see him earlier when Gandhi was alone sitting in the verhanda of Birla house alongwith a relative of Sardar patel. Godse had his Beretta in his pocket and could have killed him & ran away. But he deposed before the court that he did not want to do that and did want to kill Gandhi in a full public view of at least 300 to 400 people. So he came back at the prayer time. He said he wanted to kill Gandhi to show the world the assassination as a defeat of Ahinsa.

    • I agree with your argument in full! Had Gandhi lived on, Indian would have been in a worse situation even 60 years back.

  65. Nathuram Godse has done a fabulous job by killing gandhi …cause he was just not worth of all that!!!! I completely agree with Prakash Bedekar.

  66. The mistery of Subhashchandra Bose death also needs to solved. There was no plane crash or anything. The British ordered defeated Japanese to execute Subhash Bose. There was no plane in the control of Japanese. Japanese were already defeated..

    • Killing Subhashchandra Bose was also a plan of gandhi n the british goverment.. it was necessary to do so for the uprising of the congress goverment.. that’s why gandhi n british planned this fatal act..

    • You have totally missed my point. What I wanted to convey is that believing in ones faith does not entail anybody to kill somebody else. Then everybody will be killing everybody else. Godse was free to confront Gandhi politically.By choosing to kill Gandhi he has taken the extremist path. And Mr Roy, you have just called me mad and have not given any reason for the same. I suggest that you get out of your small world and start thinking logically and with reason. I have nothing for or against Godse or Gandhi. I have commented on Godse,s speech.

      • Kroy have rightly called mad and you are not only mad but parasite like gandi, you call your self human who doesnot even able to gauge between Godse or Gandi or rather trying to be apolitical, we are surviving on this land which we called MA Dharti or MOTHER LAND, our forefathers and all the coming generation too will live here in peace only when Gandi like people needs to be stoned in public, Jinnha,osama will come and go but before the world kills Jinnha or osama first I will kill Gandi and their supporters at my own land then the others can be justified on the international court.

  67. Excuse me…….Jinnah was a supporter of congress from 1904-1930………..It was all due to Gandhi he started opposing congress…It was gandhi who did not plead for bhagat singh’s death sentence….it is actually true that gandhi actually never saw Bhagat Singh….and he was against him….Actually gandhi just wanted to gain TRP…and nothing else….he was against every good leader be it Bose ..and Sardar Patel also.. For me Godse was absolutely right

  68. http://www.rediff.com/news/1999/aug/13india.htm
    Francois Gautier
    ‘Gandhi was a misfit in India’

    ‘Nationalism is not a mere political programme; nationalism is a religion’

    Nehru, writes French historian Alain Danielou, “was the perfect replica of a certain type of Englishman. He often used the expression ‘continental people’, with an amused and sarcastic manner, to designate French or Italians. He despised non-anglicised Indians and had a very superficial and partial knowledge of India. His ideal was the romantic socialism of 19th century Britain. But this type of socialism was totally unfit to India, where there was no class struggle and where the conditions were totally different from 19th century Europe.”

    It should be added that Nehru was not a fiery leader, maybe because of his innate “gentlemanship” and often succumbed not only to Gandhi’s views, with which he sometimes disagreed, not only to the blackmailing of Jinnah and the fanatical Indian Muslim minority, but also to the British, particularly Lord Mountbatten, whom history has portrayed as the benevolent last viceroy of India, but who actually was most instrumental in the Partition of India, whatever Freedom at Midnight a very romanticised book, says. (Remember Churchill’s words on learning about Partition: “At last we had the last word”!).

    It may be added that the British had a habit of leaving a total mess when they had to surrender a colony, witness Ireland, Palestine, or India-Pakistan.

    Mahatma Gandhi was indeed a great soul, an extraordinary human being, a man with a tremendous appeal to the people. But, unfortunately, he was a misfit in India. Karma or fate, or God, or whatever you want to call it, made a mistake when they sent him down to the land of Bharat. For at heart, Gandhi was a European, his ideals were a blend of Christianity raised to an exalted moral standard and a dose of liberalism ‘à la Tolstoy.’ The patterns and goals he put forward for India, not only came to naught, but sometimes did great harm to a country, which unquestionably he loved immensely.

    Furthermore, even after his death, Gandhism, although it does not really have any relevance to Modern India, is still used shamelessly by all politicians and intellectuals, particularly Congressmen, ‘secular’ Muslims and pseudo-Marxists, to smoke-screen their ineffectiveness and to perpetuate their power. To understand Gandhi properly, one has to put in perspective his aims, his goals, and the results today.

    One has to start at the beginning. There is no doubt that after his bitter experiences with racism in South Africa, he took to heart the plight of fellow Indians there. But what did he achieve for them? Second class citizenship! Worse, he dissociated them from their black Africans brothers, who share the same colour and are the majority. And today the Indians in South Africa are in a difficult position, sandwiched between the Whites who prefer them to the Blacks but do not accept them fully as their own, and the Blacks who often despise them for their superior attitudes.

    Ultimately, they sided with the Moderate Whites led by de Klerk and this was a mistake as Mandela was elected and the Blacks wrested total power in South Africa — and once more we might have an exodus of Indians from a place where they have lived and which they have loved for generations.

    The Mahatma did a lot for India. But the question again is: What remains today in India of Gandhi’s heritage? Spinning was a joke. “He made Charkha a religious article of faith and excluded all people from Congress membership who would not spin. How many, even among his own followers believe in the gospel of Charkha? Such a tremendous waste of energy, just for the sake of a few annas is most unreasonable,” wrote Sri Aurobindo in 1938 (India’s Rebirth, page 207). Does any Congress leader today still weave cotton? And has Gandhi’s Khadi policy of village handicrafts for India survived him? Nehru was the first to embark upon a massive “Soviet type” heavy industrialisation, resolutely turning his back on Gandhi’s policy, although handicrafts in India do have their place.

    Then, nowhere does Gandhi’s great Christian morality find more expression than in his attitude towards sex. All his life he felt guilty about having made love to his wife while his father was dying. But guilt is truly a Western prerogative. In India, sex has (was at least) always been put in its proper place, neither suppressed, as in Victorian times, nor brought to its extreme perversion, like in the West today. Gandhi’s attitude towards sex was to remain ambivalent all his life, sleeping with his beautiful nieces “to test his brahmacharya,” while advocating abstinence for India’s population control. But why impose on others what he practised for himself?

    Again, this is a very Christian attitude: John Paul II, or Mother Teresa, fifty years later, enjoined all Christians to do the same. But did Gandhi think for a minute how millions of Indian women would be able to persuade their husbands to abstain from sex when they are fertile? And who will suffer abortions, pregnancy and other ignominies? And again, India has totally turned its back on Gandhi’s policy: today its birth control programme must be the most elaborate in the world — and does not even utilise force (except for a short period during the Emergency), as the Chinese have done.

    For all the world, Gandhi is synonymous with non-violence. But once more, a very Christian notion. Gandhi loved the Mahabharata. But did he understand that sometimes non-violence does more harm than violence itself? That violence can also be “Dharma,” if it is done for defending one’s country, or oneself, or one’s mother, or sisters? Take the Cripps proposals for instance.

    In 1942, the Japanese were at the doors of India. England was weakened, vulnerable and desperately needed support. Churchill sent Sir Stafford Cripps to India to propose that if India participated in the war effort, Great Britain would grant her Dominion status (as in Australia or Canada) at the end of the war. Sri Aurobindo sent a personal letter to the Congress, urging it to accept. Nehru wavered, but ultimately, Gandhi in the name of non-violence put his foot down and the Cripps proposal was rejected. Had it been accepted, history might have been changed, Partition and its terrible bloodshed would have been avoided.

    Gandhi also never seemed to have realised the great danger that Nazism represented for humanity. A great Asuric wave had risen in Europe and threatened to engulf the world and it had to be fought — with violence. Calling Hitler “my beloved brother,” a man who murdered 6 million Jews in cold blood just to prove the purity of his own race, is more than just innocence, it borders on criminal credulity. And did not Gandhi also advise the Jews to let themselves be butchered?

    Ultimately, it must be said that whatever his saintliness, his extreme and somehow rigid asceticism, Gandhi did enormous harm to India and this harm has two names: Muslims and Untouchables.

    The British must have rubbed their hands in glee: here was a man who was perfecting their policy of rule-and-divide, for ultimately nobody more than Gandhi contributed to the Partition of India, by his obsession to always give in to the Muslims, by his obstinate refusal to see that the Muslims always started rioting, Hindus only retaliated. By his indulgence of Jinnah, going as far as proposing to make him the prime minister of India.

    Sri Aurobindo was very clear about Hindu-Muslim unity: “I am sorry they are making a fetish of Hindu-Muslim unity. It is no use ignoring facts; some day the Hindus may have to fight the Muslims and they must prepare for it. Hindu-Muslim unity should not mean the subjection of the Hindus. Every time the mildness of the Hindu has given way. The best solution would be to allow the Hindus to organise themselves and the Hindu-Muslim unity would take care of itself, it would automatically solve the problem. Otherwise we are lulled into a false sense of satisfaction that we have solved a difficult problem, when in fact we have only shelved it.” (India’s Rebirth, page 159)

    Gandhi’s love of the Harijans, as he called them, was certainly very touching and sprang from the highest motivations, but it had also as its base a Christian notion that would have found a truer meaning in Europe, where there are no castes, only classes. Glorifying the scavenger as a man of God makes good poetry, but little social meaning. In the words of Sri Aurobindo: “The idea that it needs a special ‘punya’ to be born a Bhangi is, of course one of these forceful exaggerations which are common to the Mahatma and impress greatly the mind of his hearers. The idea behind is that his function is an indispensable service to society, quite as much as the Brahmin’s, but that being disagreeable, it would need a special moral heroism to choose it voluntarily and he thinks as if the soul freely chose it as such a heroic service to the society and as reward of righteous acts, but that is hardly likely.

    “In any case, it is not true that the Bhangi life is superior to the Brahmin life and the reward of special righteousness, no more that it is true that a man is superior because he is born a Brahmin. A spiritual man of pariah birth is superior in the divine values to an unspiritual and worldly-minded Brahmin. Birth counts but the basic value is in the soul behind the man and the degree to which it manifests itself in nature”. (India’s Rebirth, page 201)

    Once more Gandhi took the European element in the decrying of the caste system, forgetting the divine element behind. And unfortunately he sowed the seeds of future disorders and of a caste war in India, of which we see the effects only today.

    Non-violence, you say? But Gandhi did the greatest violence to his body, in true Christian fashion, punishing it, to blackmail others in doing his will, even if he thought it was for the greater good. And ultimately, it may be asked, what remains of Gandhi’s non-violence today? India has fought three wars with Pakistan (four, if you count Kargil), had to combat the Chinese, has the second biggest army in the world and has to fight counter-insurgency movements in Punjab, Assam and Kashmir. Gandhi must have died a broken man indeed. He saw India partitioned, Hindus and Muslims fighting each other and his ideals of Charkha, non-violence and Brahmacharya being flouted by the very men he brought up as his disciples.

    However, his heritage is not dead, for it survives where it should have been in the first instance: in the West. His ideals have inspired countless great figures, from Martin Luther King, to Albert Einstein, to Nelson Mandela, the Dalaï Lama or Attenborough and continue to inspire many others. Gandhi’s birth in India was an accident, for here, there is nothing left of him, except million of statues and streets and saintly mouthings by politicians, who don’t apply the least bit what Gandhi had taught so ardently.

    History will judge. But with Nehru on one side and his Westernised concept of India and Gandhi on the other, who tried to impose upon India a non-violence which was not hers, India was destined to be partitioned. Thus when the time came, India was bled into two, in three even, and Muslims took their pound of flesh while leaving. India never recovered from that trauma and today she is still suffering from its consequences. Yet has anybody really understood the lessons of history?

    Francois Gautier

  69. How India got its Independence – The Real Story
    • View
    • RelatedContent
    • Track
    Submitted by Desh on Tue, 10/13/2009 – 20:20
    Utpal Dutt, the actor who played comedian in one of most memorable role in Hindi Cinema in Golmaal, was arrested on December 27, 1965 by the Government of West Bengal under the Preventive Detention Act. The Government of Bengal and India feared he was “subversive”. Why? Because he wrote a play called “Kallol” (Sound of Waves) on an important chapter of Indian Freedom that is never mentioned in any official History book. The Royal Indian Navy Mutiny (or Naval Uprising) of 1946.
    The Beginning
    British were in trouble in 1946. Indians in the Armed forces were no longer trust worthy. The mutiny, that no one in our generation has ever heard of, did to the British colonization, what no other action could have done in the long struggle of 250 years.
    Said Sir Stafford Cripps, intervening in the debate on the motion to grant Indian Indepence in the British House of Commons in 1947 (‘The Freedom Struggle and the Dravidian Movement’ by P.Ramamurti, Orient Longman, 1987)
    …The Indian Army in India is not obeying the British officers. We have recruited our workers for the war; they have been demobilized after the war. They are required to repair the factories damaged by Hitler’s bombers. Moreover, they want to join their kith and kin after five and a half years of separation. Their kith and kin also want to join them. In these conditions if we have to rule India for a long time, we have to keep a permanent British army for a long time in a vast country of four hundred millions. We have no such army….”
    In August 1945, Subhash Bose had reportedly died, while he collaborated with the Japanese and Hitler to fight the British. After the Second World War was over, three of the top officers of the Indian National Army (INA) – General Shah Nawaz Khan (Muslim), Colonel Prem Sehgal (Hindu) and Colonel Gurbaksh Singh Dhillon (Sikh) were put on trial at the Red Fort in Delhi. Their crime: “waging war against the King Emperor”

    While Nehru was busy “defending” the three; he (Nehru), Gandhi, Mohd. Ali Jinnah, and Maulana Abul Kalam Azad had come to a secret pact that if Subhash Bose was to enter India (as many knew he hadn’t died in 1945), he would be handed over and charged.
    Unprecedentedly, these trials were very public. Due to the sympathy toward Netaji and the INA in general, there was an instant and large outpouring of passion and patriotism in Indians. These stories were being shared via wireless sets and through media in general on the ships, where the sailors who were being given bad treatment (lack of proper service facilities), got inspired to go out and join together in a strike and rebel against the government.
    The Spread
    The mutiny started on 18 February 1946 and by next evening a Naval Central Strike Committee was formed where Leading Signalman M.S Khan and Petty Officer Telegraphist Madan Singh were unanimously elected President and Vice-President respectively.
    The spread of the Naval mutiny, which started in Bombay was complete – Karachi, Calcutta, Cochin and Vizag. 78 ships, 20 shore establishments and 20,000 sailors had been involved in the strike.
    Seeing this Naval strike, the Bombay-ites did a one day general strike. Even the Royal Indian Air Force and local police forces joined in the other cities. The NCOs in the British Indian army openly ignored and defied the orders of the British superiors. In Madras and Pune, the Indian Army revolted in the British Garrisons.
    Riots broke out all over the country. The mutineers were hoisting 3 flags – Indian National Congress, Muslim League and CPI. British people in cars were made to get off and shout “Jai Hind” by the mutineers. The Indian Tricolor was hoisted on many ships and establishments, by just the second day.
    Such was the crisis that destroyers were gotten and stationed at the Gateway of India in Bombay to deal with the mutineers. Navies of Australia and Canada were also summoned.
    The third day into this – the Royal Air Force flew an entire squadron of Bombers over Bombay Harbor to show support. Meanwhile the sailors had taken over HMIS Bahadur, Chamak and Himalaya and from the Royal Naval Anti-Aircraft School .
    It was by that time that the decision to confront the Navy ratings was taken by the British and the sailors aboard the destroyer Hindustan were challenged. The sailors lost many lives and could not fight back much and in the process the ship Hindustan was destroyed.
    Betrayal by Gandhi, Nehru, Jinnah and Azad
    Despite the extensive public support and support from all the wings of the Armed forces – Army, Navy, Air force, and even police – apart from unanimous coming together of people across religious groups at a time when the religious situation had been made really bad due to Partition debate and passion, ALL the National Leaders not only did NOT support the Navy Mutineers and their supporters but instead condemned them.
    They were leaderless, surely, but they had achieved what NO OTHER generation and group of Indians had achieved in 250 years – turn the Indian Armed forces personnel against their Masters. Subhash Bose had imagined this kind of situation. Little did he know that from the failure of his own Army, would arise a rebellion and a will to fight amongst the rank and file of Indian soldiers hitherto fighting dutifully for the British, often against their own countrymen, to strike back.
    The Mainstream politicians – from Jinnah to Gandhi, to Nehru to Maulana Azad – ALL let these final Freedom fighters down. They just abandoned them and except for preaching they did nothing to help them.
    In midst of one of most unprecedented religious tension in the sub-continent, this rebellion and its genesis was a Godsend to reinforce religious and class harmony, which was forged instantly WITHOUT any machination. Yet, it was squandered…. probably deliberately by all those who promised us peace and harmony.
    These people – the so-called Mainstream politicians spearheaded by Gandhi were interested in only their hold of their masses.. to see themselves being upstaged by a bunch of young upstarts with romantic patriotism in their eyes was unnerving. (James L. Raj; Making and unmaking of British India. Abacus. 1997. p598) Show of fake “constitutional process” and “principles” was a good way to brush them aside despite all they had been able to do.
    Real Reason for Independence
    So what were the three things which convinced the British that India could not be governed by force anymore?
    Subhash Bose, Indian National Army and the Royal Navy Uprising..
    When Justice P.B. Chakraborty, the Chief Justice of Calcutta High Court once asked the British PM Lord Clement Atlee – responsible for conceding India’s Independence, the all important question –
    “what was the extent of Gandhi’s influence upon the British decision to quit India”
    His response, with a smirk: “m-i-n-i-m-a-l!“
    So, then why did they have to leave if the Quit India movement of 1942 had subsided and nothing major happened in the mainstream politics – then why did the British have to leave so suddenly in 1947??
    Clement Atlee’s response:
    Erosion of loyalty to the British Crown among the Indian army and navy personnel as a result of the military activities of Netaji
    Such was the Congress party scared of the truth coming out that as late as 1965, a Marxist theater actor and writer Utpal Dutt was arrested for writing a passionate play on the VERY event that ensured India its Independence – the Royal Navy Uprising!
    But as the story goes in our History books…….
    Reference Links:
    1. Royal Indian Navy Mutiny
    2. Subhas Chandra Bose, the Indian National Army, and the War of India’s Liberation – Ranjan Borra, Journal of Historical Review, no. 3, 4 (Winter 1982)
    3. Inside the actor’s mind

  70. Account by a person who was all lost by over analysing the books he read and came to believe that he was the saviour of all …. the same way Hitler thought his thoughts were just right !
    These people are just afraid to speak to others to influence thier belief and rather think it is ok to kill and solve the problem. How stupid !!
    He would have done good to the mankind if he had rather killed a hundred rapists to make a point that this is not acceptable in India/ Hindu / Muslim / or whoever else,,
    One should reason with a person who reasons for societal changes and punish persons who tarnish the fabric of society by stealing public money, smuggling, raping women, etc.

  71. We cannot totally disagree with godse’s reasoning behind his bold step. Jinnah was the traitor,who was dancing to the tunes of britishers. Who wanted to create seperate state to secure army bases to keep russians at bay. They approached sardar patel first but upon being refused they shook their hands with jinnah. Jinnah was getting Rs600000 p.m from britishers through nizam of hyderabad. Jinnah had no regard for gandhi’s philosophy and gandhi made it easy for jinnah to have his way, which would have been difficult for him to get away. Pakistan shouldnt have been created with 1/3 of india’s prime and fertile land. India should have been united like before.

  72. Hmm.. After reading all those points highlighted by Godse, any emotional fool can easily be brought to tears and may probably hail him( as it happened with that stupid judge) But people who are blessed with adequate sanity and intelligence along with good grip on general knowledge can cleary debunk godse’s flawed philosophy of nationalism and sacrifice.

    The big problem with godse was his lack of bigger vision. Although he claims to have read many renowned books and voluntarily broken many Brahmanical ethos and rituals, he still ended up stuck neck deep in local hindu vs muslim fights, and kept his eyes wide shut over british’s larger evil designs of devide-n-conquer, loot-n-boot.

    Its the britishers alone who started first hindu muslim riots in late 1800AD over cow slaughter. Till that time muslims didnt ate cow nor do they crave to eat it even now in these times outside this subcontinent. Westerners ate beef all along and they still continue do so. After getting a big blow from revolt of 1857 by mangal pandey and bahadur zafar combined, britishers realized the potential of hindu-muslim unity and immediately started working on ideas to break it. One such idea was of opening slaughter houses and appointing muslims quresh tribes as butchers, so that they can get steady supply of beef, and also to blame up the muslims as-n-when needed to start a riot. Alas! We still fight over it even to this day.
    And no saffron party accuse a finger at british.

    Similarly about allegation of muslim appeasement by gandhi to extreme levels so much propagandized by saffron forces that have completely forgetten who has already looted us completely lock-stock-n-barrel. In India, just before british rule, there were 560 kingdoms with load of gold and silver, with thier own bullion as currency. All this wealth was systematically looted and shipped to Britain and a worthless paper currency was imposed by british by establishing a reserve bank in bengal now called as RBI. This is the biggest shame to a such a richest India to accept worthles paper as its currency. This is also the biggest calamity which has befallen on humanity as a whole as this can be printed and manipulated overnight by our controllers. Now no country in world out of 203 is free from this cheating. BUT THE SAFFRON BRIGADE TILL KEEP ON CURSING MULIM RULERS FOR LOOTING… WHILE 99% OF THEM INVADED INDIA AND SETLLED DOWN IN INDIA ONLY WITH ALL MONEY, UNLIKE BRITISH WHO CAME ONLY TO LOOT AND ENSLAVE. ALTHOUGH LOOTING IS OVER, THEY STILL CONTINUE TO ENSLAVE US BY LOANING U THEIR PAPER DOLLARS N POUNDS as DEBT MONEY, AND WE ARE KEEPING ON PAYING THEM INTEREST AFTER INTEREST FROM EVERY BUDGET. OMG!

    India was divided by british only to keep larger population of muslims and their rich king Nizam fully busy and preoccupied so that they can create a nation of ISRAEL inbetween palastine land. With this strategy they can keep balance of power both in sub-continent and middle east. Bcoz, just compare how the process of pakistan and israel creation went simultaneouly since ww1 and both got created back-to-back in 1947 & 1948. Arabs went into arms race purchasing all weapons with their petrol money, and we too went later with our man power earned money in arms race with pakistan. Both wars of 1967 and 1972 are did by pakis only at the behest of usa and uk.

    I can keep writing many more facts, but seems of no big use. Bcoz everybody want sensation and not common sense. Thats why i say any feeling of nationalism, or religious fundamentalism is not at all praiseworthy unless it has done encompassing all the knowledge of their contemporary times. This way both Gandhi N Godse are mere mortals and not mahatmas

    • @Abdul Azeem (AzeemAZM) It couldnt have been explained more simply than this..Hope such writings do bring in common sense to some fanatics. common sense which is so uncommon. Really appreciate what u highlited.

      • Mr Nilhat Shaikh, your appreciation does not prove that what Mr Abdul Azeem wrote is correct or you all are pure and dhuli hui tulsi too does not fit; and fact remains the fact that at the end Hindustan was divided,

    • Abdul Azzez..Ok British did all this and that and we fools of pre-parition India did not have the sense not to fight amonts ourselves over small things. If we accept everything you say, how is Godse’s elimination of Gandhi a problem? Did not Gandhi delay India’s independence by using non-violence that was so convenient for the British because now it became easier for them to control a nation of Gandhian followers by controlling/managing one person Gandhi. They indulged him when they found fit and when got out of control, they jailed him. This on and off satyagraha struggle was leading to freedom. Gandhi did commit many blunders..many innocents went to jail because Gandhi did not support them; Bose was booted out of Congress, Jinnah and Muslims unfair appeasement was ongoing. Can you not accept that he was trying to appease Muslims?

    • for your information: it speaks volumes about the peculiar mindset you still carry on in. The yesteryear’s forefathers and their progeny didn’t see the future,its their karma or deeds that when one pull out the rose you have to take the throne too, come out of your dream see the facts past history and decide the future course of existence & stop loose comments,grow-up ! introspect the existence on which land we all are………advice for u & others like u ! talk about A P J Abdul kalam and how he lead his life try to emulate that.

    • I agree and disagree. I agree that as a muslim, you are brought up to despise any other religion and call names. I disagree that there is not a thing called ‘Hindu Fanatic’ or else your religion would not have remained in Hindustan. Of course we frequently get to hear ‘Islamic terror, jihad’ etc. all over the world. A recent murders of journalists in Paris again establishes that fact.

  73. If you have to understand Gandhiji and his views regarding Pakistan you will need to know what was the feeling of thousands of migrants from Pakistan who had to leave behind every thing and they came here in anticipation that Govt or Gandhiji would help them. After more than 67 years after independence most of theses issues remain unresolved.

  74. I respect Gandiji as pitamaha bishma in Mahabarat in the same way I agree Godse act as Arjun in same yug. Personnaly Godse did not get any bebefits after killing Gandiji knowingly he done it for nation.

    • Godse did it for the nation. He put his family happiness on the line for the nation. Godse is also my hero as Gandhi is for his principles and leadership. We need to build a smarak for Godse, who sacrificed so much for the love of his country.

      • Your logic is flawed. There are hundreds of Islamic suicide bombers who are sacrificing their lives everyday for Islam. Hitler also committed suicide for the cause he believed. I have no doubt that Nathuram Godse was an honest righteous man. But that does not mean that we will have to support him as his logic was based on a narrow band of thinking.

        • Rather, it is your logic which is flawed, for it’s always advised the rotten apple to be taken out of the basket to save other fresh apples. Gandhi was not only an insane person but also a sexually perverted being. He used to sleep naked with young girls of around 16 to 24 years saying he is practicing self regulation(LOL). Basically Gandhi had a very soft corner for Nehru and had promised him supreme post in the Govt. of the Independent India. Jinnah was much much senior to Nehru as was Netaji and several others. The partition of India could have been easily avoided had Gandhi accepted Jinnah’s claim of becoming the first Prime Minister of Independent India specially keeping in view of Jinnah’s health (as he was suffering from Cancer/TB and was in the last stage of his ailment) for he had hardly 6 months to a year’s life left. But Gandhi was blinded by his love for Nehru and didn’t agree to Jinnah’s claim. Hence the inevitable happened. Keeping Gandhi alive would have or may have had disintegrated India to further fractions and this was the very reason why Godse took the extreme step of eliminating him(Gandhi).Had Godse been a religious fanatic he would have been involved in many Hindu/Muslim riots that happened in pre-independent India, but he was never involved in any such episode. So, you should now know that your understanding of Godse’s act was totally flawed….

  75. I do not think Gandhiji played any part in division. He was never the part of negotiations.He was left out.He never wanted division on a religious ground.

    • Gandhiji comments are well known that that Hindustan can only be devided over his body and one will have to accept that he did not do any thing to prevent the partition.

  76. This is the true power of India, our forefathers once thought of a nation where every one is free to express his views and we are living theirs dreams , please consider that PERCEPTION is what we all are applying here please do read my experiments with truth and Sir Godse’s whole trials writeups before commenting AND fighting

      • with all these facts its very unfortunate the gandi family is still controlling the nation for its own purpose. Still doing wrongs behind the scene, the whole system became paralyzed and oiling parts for their nefarious purpose.

  77. sab bakwas kar rahe ho, us samay desh ki halat kya thi wo to wahi log jante the. tum is naye yug me kewal comment & criticize karna jante ho aur kuch nahi, kahana assan hai.

  78. gandhi is a advertising fool……………………………but godse was real and powerstar……………………..hero…………………………………………………………….of indian………..proud to be godse’s india………………………..gandhi’s india…………………….from now godse is our father of nation………………………..

  79. “An eye for an eye will leave everyone blind?” word’s of MK GANDHI. Godse used violence as a way of achieving racial justice which is immoral, that’s a story from one side.He was executed by hanging inside the bars for killing a man who spared all his life for non-violence, sathyagrah that’s other side. If gandhi was right, hanging godse was definitely wrong.

  80. How stupid of people to actually change their views just by reading a single point of view ?? Think yourself that on one hand he (Godse) accepts the role of Gandhi in freedom struggle & on the other hand he calls him a politician whose actions were based on Muslim-appeasement policies ? Moreover its a book on How Personal Grudges lead to the Cold-Blooded murder of Gandhi ! It certainly never resonated the mindset of a million Indians who worshipped Gandhi and right now we are able to see the state of Indian Politics without Gandhi . Had Gandhi Ji lead us the story would have been different. Stupid as well shameful of RSS people to actually consider this piece if lame fiction & personal grudges as their Bible .

    PS: I am not a Congi !

    • It is your illusion and Nehruvian education system that said that Gandhi brought us freedom. Please read Prime Minister Attlee’s interaction with the Bar council of Calcutta in 1948. The man Gandhi exiled from India gave the jitters to the British who had no choice but to leave. It is an illusion that the British left because of Gandhi.
      Great men are never spoken of as heroes and many are never given the credit of their accomplishments. But I think that that is the true testament of their heroism. There cannot be a Ram rajya, as Gandhi wanted, without Ram having to fight when the people need it. Please read about the support of the Kilafat movement Gandhi endorsed. You will realize his fool hardy attitude. No one is opposed to his principles of harmony. But there has to be a sense of reality and practicality when you are a leader of a nation.
      Have you read about his forcing a democratically elected president of INC, Netaji, in the Tripura congress elections? or have you read about how he over ruled the congress election of Sardar Patel as the first PM of India?
      there are many things that are not talked about in the country about its history and the blunders some so called heroes.
      But the real heroes are the ones we seldom hear about and are the ones we need to dig to find. Once we take that trouble, we realize that there are great men and women who have helped us to be here but seldom did they get their appreciation nor did they want it. They truly and relentlessly worked, fought and died for their nation and some people tore the country and are called heroes now!
      Awaken and study beyond the text books that were approved by the government. You will realize that Ghodse was a patriot. I wouldnt call him a hero but his act was brave and completely selfless and in the interest of the Nation that was left after Nehru-Gandhi incompetency

  81. Talking about two G’s , Great,Giant,Gentle,Guts, God and even Ghost has the same , values and views differs , for me both of them were genuine with their attitudes,

    I wish all of us to be genius of all these things with great attitude to leave a better world for our followers,

    Generate a spark for our Guys and Girls to become Glossy with Genes.

    NSK

  82. I have been reading everyone’s comments on this article. It shocks me to see how easy people change their views by merely reading a person’s point of view. Godse would not have/could not have united India and he could not have gotten us freedom. Godse can’t be compared to Gandhi.

    2ndly and more importantly.If Gandhi had not agreed to the partition, what do you think India would be like today? We can all speculate but the fact is that India would have been 50% Hindu and 50% Muslim. Now, You can all take a guess on what the condition of our society would be if that were the case. What if Gandhi knew that the only was for Hindus and muslims to survive would be to separate them, otherwise a massive massacare would ensue.

    I hate who say this but people who think Gandhi was a failure are simply dumb. Gandhi influenced the whole nation, I bet these critics can’t influence even one. And still these critics feel that they have all the politics figured out by simply reading a few articles.

    • Gandhi also has not given us freedom. Gandhi was against partition. After partition Gandhi stopped many Muslims from leaving India. Gandhi supported Muslims Ummah, Muslim right to kill and rape non-muslims. The main reason Gandhi made Nehru as first PM against the wished of Indian people to stop Indian Muslims from leaving India. Patition credit should go to Jinnah and to some extend Patel. Ambedkar also supported partition. Except Nehru, Gandhi and Abdul Kalam Azad, everyone supported partition. Gandhi was a failure because India got partitioned in Gandhi own words. Gandhi was a failure because his Muslims appeasement didn’t work.

    • You mean that there was not any other way to stop them
      No it’s not the fact,when the Muslim leaders were planning riots and encouraging their community to kill the Hindus for the partition what was Nehru doing could he not dare to do the same
      And why did they created the conditions in Muslims favour,godse killed Gandhi after one year of partition because he had a telescopic vision,if the law book of our country was wwritten according to him,in result the conditions of Hindus would not had to be like this

    • Uhh…….India still houses Muslims. No offense but if MK Gandhi was such a “omnipotent” satyagrahi then shouldn’t India be Hindustan that is, a uni-religious State? No. The Muslims got to have their own nation and were even allowed to stay in OUR India. Gandhi was not a Martin Luther King Jr., a man who fought peacefully for the rights of his people and then took to the shadows(forget the pun please), but he was more of a Kwame Nkrumah, seeker of fame by just leading the people of his country on vain hopes which he shattered himself on his path to glory.

  83. Its proved already who is right and wrong, ghandi is respecting by not only indians but whole world and his views are more valueble todays. Godsya no one considering as a great person except some extreamists

  84. We can not say
    Godse is right of wrong.The partition of India is not done in a proper way. Because of this the hate between the Hindu and Muslim started increasing. Still our political leaders using this the means of vote bank. The new generations should understand this game and not became a prey in this. We have to develop good leaders.. Better to forget both Gandhi and Godse

    • Have u seen any leader in bharat working for the development of the country except NarendraModi ji and many other bjp leaders
      Every party except bjp try it’s best to secure it’s vote bank like:
      Tmc,Sp,Sp,congress,jdu,ddu,etc
      The bjp’s development report card is best in the country,and the crime graf is so thinner,and the women are much safer than any other state of India ruling by any other party
      Have u any other choice except bjp

  85. Its very sad that Nathuram Godse & his so called followers (Swayam Sevaks) are “deeply” misunderstanding what Gandhiji has said and preached throughout his life.. And to pass “such” misunderstanding and evil in the younger generations is even more sad and stupid….

    Feeling pity and ashamed of you people…

    • shame on you for not understanding true history and believing in twisted history created by the congress raj. Gandhi has no right to be called father of the nation . Instead he and Nehru should be labeled as dividers of the nation and traitors.

    • I am truly impressed by this true fireball N. Godse. Hail Him !!!
      Like me millions of minds in India has been regularly brainwashed to worship Gandhi and Nehru right from the initial days of childhood of each Indian through school text books. !!! And believe me it has worked beyond question !!!.
      But now I feel why should we succumb to the brainwashing formula of Congress to glorify these 2 culprit of my past india. Just by being half naked or by being called chacha , truth cannot be hidden.

  86. Assasinating MK Gandhi is not acceptable because under Mahatma Gandhi’s leadership, we secured country’s freedom. Nathuram Godse will remain the villain in the history of India.

    • India was saved by Bhagat Singh not Gandhi………………….it was saved by freedom fighters who sacrificed their lives for country …………………..non violence was carried out since 150 years but no result ……….we had had to attack the British to get freedom .

    • India didn’t get independence because of Gandhi. Gandhi also asked for giving right to kill and rape non-muslims. Then why Hindus have not done so till now.

  87. I can’t understand this one…if Muslims and Hindus wanted to be brothers and sisters, why they partitioned India into three(India , pakistan and Bangladesh).Also if they needed separate Muslim country, why India didn’t made as seperate Hindu country

  88. Nanthram Godse to be called as Mahatma Nanthuram Godse and the father of indian nation insted to call Ghandhi Mahatma, Ghandhi did nothing only split the nation.

  89. I support Nathuram Godse atleast he had the guts to kill a person who was only interested to appease a few muslims. My question is what has the nehru family given to the country in the 60 years of rule. Atleast in the good hold days kings had to fight to keep their dynasty now this family gets it for free and wmajority still vote for these agents of west wake up!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    May a maillion Nathuram godse be born to kill these gandhis.

  90. I agree with godse. He seems to b a pro muslim leader. He pretended to b a secularist bt during khilafat aandolan he proved himself a pro muslim. By supporting Muslims he hurt the sentiments of many hindus.
    Another thing wen he supported non violence for his whole life why did he send indian troops in world war to fight that bloody battle? Where was his non violence? Nd dat also without signing any agreement with dem.

  91. Why is it criminal in this country to proclaim a hindu identity ? If one says I am a Hindu one is automatically branded as an extremist. The same people who do this branding will vociferously support a Muslim doing the same. I do not think godse was a hero. Neither do I agree that gandhi got us independence. It was a England weakened by two world wars which gave India indepdence. Gandhi and the Congress were present to take the final prize with leaders like tilak and bose lost in the struggle. It has been the pacifist ideology of the Hindu which allowed both the mughals and then British to rule this country. The same ideology has allowed the corrupt nehru dynasty to rule us for 60 years. Hinduism is inclusive and not an exclusive religion. India needs nationalists and not religionists.

      • gandhi was not a nation lover he always tries to be a hero. SO only b’coz of his stupidity partition is possible and mostly when there was a vote for the president of congress to be the 1st prime minister neheru was voted just 1 out of 15 where Sardar patel was voted 14. so just think how he became the prime minister of independent India .it’s possible only B’coz of one stupid person. you know that,not necessary to mention his name .. i am telling just for your knowledge , neheru went to Gandhi and told if i will not be the primeminister of inidia then i will destroy the congress , thats why gandhi told that if neheru would be the prime minister else i will go for fasting

        ok
        this is the fact
        if u don’t know abt the history then go and read carefully
        then say godse was wrong
        he didn’t do for his own he did it for the betterment of country

      • You really did not read the full article and do not understand Godse’s actions. You are just a blind believer. Open your eyes and accept the truth.

  92. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  93. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  94. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  95. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  96. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  97. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  98. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  99. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  100. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  101. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  102. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  103. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  104. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  105. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  106. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  107. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  108. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  109. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  110. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  111. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  112. all of us want others to act.whatever is the problem, we are ready to advice. but, don't ask us to act. " if there were few more Godse today.." " Gandhi didn't do that.." "Gandhi ought to do that.." like wise we have so many reasons to shift our responsibility. Gandhi ligheted his own lamp. while sitting in the darkness it is foolishness to debate that whether his light had removed the darkness or not! now it is our time.let us light our lamp.please don't expect another Gandhi or Godse to act.we have to do it by ourself, nowitself. because India still need dedicated leaders.yes, we can; leave Gandhi and Godse here.

  113. the fact remains that every country is going through one challenge or the other……. i was actually disapointed on what was written about ghandi….. he did a great job in india. when you checked most countries that are having religious fight, they also wish they can all go thr seperate ways and form their own cuntries…. the fact remains that staying together as one or not thr is probability that india will still be going through what they are going through because ple have not learnt their lessons. we cant keep on complaining and not doing anything and be expecting result. history is of the past and we are the one to set the change for the future

    • Agreed he has done a great job!!!
      but what that job served in favour of india .. we still question that.

      what many Gandhi followers would say voilence, that may be just an act of self defence.

      Had Gandhi not signed the pact with british government, and before signing, had he insisted on release of bhagat singh, rajguru and sukhdev, we could have seen independence quite early.

      There were barely any attempts made for those three heros’, and the article by gandhi on 29 March 1931 issue of Young India, states :-

      “Bhagat Singh did not wish to live. ”

      “These heroes had conquered the fear of death. Let us bow to them a thousand times for their heroism.
      But we should not imitate their act.”

      “Our dharma is to swallow our anger, abide by the discipline of non-violence and carry out our duty.”

      When congress was pleading for dominian status, it was Bhagat singh who asked for COMPLETE INDEPENDENCE.

      Every one has their own methodology to deal with a situation! Gandhi had his own, and Rest all had their own. But the act of gandhi in which he justified more than billion times, that only his methodology is correct, can be seen as an act of misleading people.

      It was almost 50 % contribution from Germany, who broke the back of British in 2nd world war, that lead India’s independence in 1947.

      Points are countless, and pages will fall sort for any one to write upon supporting Gandhi or not.

      This is completly my opinion, and i have no intentions to hurt anyones sentiments.

      thanks

    • Yes, everyone knew about it. All these are true facts.
      Only the congress and its policies are responsible for bringing havoc to this country.
      For this rampant corruption, poverty, lawlessness only this congress govt is responsible

  114. The Muslim league under jinnah divided India on religious ground. When Hindus were fighting for freedom, the muslims instead of joining hands with the congress, supported the Britishers and were more concerned about a seperate muslim nation. What Nathuram anticipated was right, since most of the communal riots take place in muslim majority areas and the majority of victims are always the Hindus. This is because of the gandhi based mindset of Hindus. Recent example is the opposition of MIM party in Hyderabad for temple renovation and opposition of the kashmiris towards temporary land transfer to amarnath yatra. these same people go on Haj on subsidies from the tax payed by the Hindus The minorities are pampered at the cost of Hindus. Is this the secularism we are proud of.

  115. A common criminal, who killed an unarmed person because he disagreed with his policies. He deserved the penalty and got it. Even pick pocket will have a reason to justify why he steals.

  116. The great man has said “Be the change that you wish to see in the world.” He preached it only after practicing.

    The thing is that Godse thought if Gandhiji is not there, the others will be 'practical'. He had nothing to do with the problem, except killing the dictator, who happened to lose so called hindu values.Why did'nt he kill other leaders who 'surrendered' their will to Gandhiji too? Then it would be more easy to be 'practical'.

    What did he think of HINDU VALUES? Oh God! this is a shame on the eternal SANATHANA DHARMA. The essence of hindu is universal tolerance.

    I would like to share the meaning of the mantra GAYATHRI here.

    "BY THE GRACE OF GOD , THE WHOLE MANKIND, EXCEPT ME, MAY BE PROTECTED".

    Not hindus, but the mankind as a whole have to be protected. Naturally, he might have thought that, the HINDU know it well.The wrong done by Gandhiji is that, he failed to understant that the hindu had lost its values very earlier itself.

    Yes, we Indians do not deserve to be lead by such a great soul.
    The wrongs done by british to us may be forgotten, but what we hindus done to the mother india, by killing her child, can't be erased. As a hindu I feel ashame.

  117. who say’s we get independence,we didn’t earn it they gave it,we beg them as a beggar,a strong government will be formed form revolution only, but not from begging ,Gandhi is a stupid what gads e was right, did really non violence helped India ,it will never help our country ,god help my country from this corruption and slavery

  118. Mahatama Gandhi was a great man but now a day so many shameless Indian leader are.
    there who gives cheque to terrorist family after batala house encounter , who saves Kasab.
    and afzal Guru by taking money from Saudi Arabiya. May God save them from Any patriotic.
    Nathuram Gotse

  119. So friends don't be like the gandhi be like the common man with humanity don't follow the ganhi's trend you should only have set the your own new trend.

  120. If it was not Marathas, Rajputs, and Sikhs, Mughals would have converted everyone into muslims like they did to your ancestors….if anyone think i m wrong, go to the states which were ruled by these three rulers, u will know what i mean and why there are not many muslims. if muslim ruler’s intention was right then why did they built mosques in all hindu sacred places??? go ..look at mathura…the mosque is very next to krishan birth place temple.., why masque was built at Ram janam bhoomi?? why mosque at kaashi ?? when is see them my heart fills with anger …but we r not criminals like mughals….. so i request my muslim brothers to leave all this aside and come back to your own hindu brothers….. be a hindu, which you really are ..hinduism is the only religion which says that in this world every life is born as hindu,even the creators were hindus (followers of Sanatan Dharm) thats why we dont do khatna and baptize any child …bcoz its a process to convert them into other religion…. you are born as a hindu …be a hindu…

  121. If it was not Marathas, Rajputs, and Sikhs, Mughals would have converted everyone into muslims like they did to your ancestors….if anyone think i m wrong, go to the states which were ruled by these three rulers, u will know what i mean and why there are not many muslims. if muslim ruler’s intention was right then why did they built mosques in all hindu sacred places??? go ..look at mathura…the mosque is very next to krishan birth place temple.., why masque was built at Ram janam bhoomi?? why mosque at kaashi ?? when is see them my heart fills with anger …but we r not criminals like mughals….. so i request my muslim brothers to leave all this aside and come back to your own hindu brothers….. be a hindu, which you really are ..hinduism is the only religion which says that in this world every life is born as hindu,even the creators were hindus (followers of Sanatan Dharm) thats why we dont do khatna and baptize any child …bcoz its a process to convert them into other religion…. you are born as a hindu …be a hindu…

  122. Just as Krishna had to kill Kansa and the Arjuna had to kill Bhishma in the same way Ghandhi had to be killed by Godses. To bring the green shoots out nature has to start a fire and burn the old grass away. India needs to do the same, India needs to cleanse it self from the rot that is set by the so called Ghandhi family who really should be called ‘Khans’.

  123. if godse was wrong then why congress did not allow his last statements in courts to come out in public till 50+ yrs of independence. Obviously they know if public will read the nathu ram views , then public will accept gandhi was not a gud man he was having a psycological disorder to become a celebrity. that's y he did not save shaheed bhagat singh and all other revolutionaries even then he signed some pact with britishers….. shame on gandhi and nehru and I love godse he did right.

  124. All this thinking and reading led me to believe that it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (three hundred million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and well-being of all India, one fifth of the human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghatanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the National Independence of Hindustan, my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well. Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokmanya Tilak, Gandhi’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to these slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a dream if you imagine the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scruplous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day. In fact, honour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggressionis unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. (In the Ramayana) Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita. (In the Mahabharata) Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed the a total ignorance of the springs of human action. In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India. It was absolutely essential for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Govind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhi has merely exposed as self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever for the freedom they brought to them. The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good work in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India, he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on in his own way. Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the judge of everyone and everything; he was the master brain guiding the Civil Disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin it and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is.

  125. Nathu Ram Godse’s Speech At The Trial
    NATHU RAM GODSE’S SPEECH AT THE TRIAL

    Nathuram Godse’s speech at trial .. DO read it fully
    Full text of Godse’s speech at his trial…..

    ” On January 13, 1948, I learnt that Gandhiji had decided to go on fast unto
    death. The reason given was that he wanted an assurance of Hindu-Muslim
    Unity… But I and many others could easily see that the real motive…
    [was] to compel the Dominion Government to pay the sum of Rs 55 crores to
    Pakistan, the payment of which was emphatically refused by the
    Government…. But this decision of the people’s Government was reversed to
    suit the tune of Gandhiji’s fast. It was evident to my mind that the force
    of public opinion was nothing but a trifle when compared with the leanings
    of Gandhiji favourable to Pakistan.

    ….In 1946 or thereabout, Muslim atrocities perpetrated on Hindus under the
    Government patronage of Surhawardy in Noakhali made our blood boil. Our
    shame and indignation knew no bounds when we saw that Gandhiji had come
    forward to shield that very Surhawardy and began to style him as ‘Shaheed
    Saheb’ – a martyr – even in his prayer meetings…

    ….Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became
    supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their
    intensity and were reinforced by the slogans of truth and non-violence which
    he ostentatiously paraded before the country… I could never conceive that
    an armed resistance to the aggressor is unjust… Ram killed Ravan in a
    tumultuous fight… Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness… In
    condemning Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Govind as ‘misguided patriots,’
    Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit… Gandhiji was, paradoxically,
    a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name
    of truth and nonviolence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will
    remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen forever…

    ….By 1919, Gandhiji had become desperate in his endeavours to get the
    Muslims to trust him and went from one absurd promise to another… He
    backed the Khilafat movement in this country and was able to enlist the full
    support of the National Congress in that policy… very soon the Moplah
    Rebellion showed that the Muslims had not the slightest idea of national
    unity… There followed a huge slaughter of Hindus… The British
    Government, entirely unmoved by the rebellion, suppressed it in a few months
    and left to Gandhiji the joy of his Hindu-Muslim Unity… British
    Imperialism emerged stronger, the Muslims became more fanatical, and the
    consequences were visited on the Hindus…

    The accumulating provocation of 32 years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim
    fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhiji
    should be brought to an end immediately… he developed a subjective
    mentality under which he alone was the final judge of what was right or
    wrong… Either Congress had to surrender its will to him and play second
    fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality… or it had to carry on
    without him… He was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience
    movement… The movement may succeed or fail; it may bring untold disasters
    and political reverses, but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s
    infallibility… These childish inanities and obstinacies, coupled with a
    most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character, made
    Gandhiji formidable and irresistible… In a position of such absolute
    irresponsibility, Gandhiji was guilty of blunder after blunder…

    ….The Mahatma even supported the separation of Sindh from the Bombay
    Presidency and threw the Hindus of Sindh to the communal wolves. Numerous
    riots took place in Karachi, Sukkur, Shikarpur and other places in which the
    Hindus were the only sufferers…

    ….From August 1946 onwards, the private armies of the Muslim League began
    a massacre of the Hindus… Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi
    with mild reactions in the Deccan… The Interim government formed in
    September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members, but the more they
    became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part,
    the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them…

    ….The Congress, which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism,
    secretly accepted Pakistan and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was
    vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to
    us… This is what Gandhiji had achieved after 30 years of undisputed
    dictatorship, and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’…

    ….One of the conditions imposed by Gandhiji for his breaking of the fast
    unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by Hindu refugees. But
    when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much
    as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan government…

    Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so,
    he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously
    to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it… The people of
    this country were eager and vehement in their opposition to Pakistan. But
    Gandhiji played false with the people…

    ….I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the
    people would be nothing but hatred… if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the
    same time, I felt that Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would
    surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and be powerful with armed
    forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation
    would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan…

    ….I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action
    had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus… There was
    no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book, and
    for this reason I fired those fatal shots…

    ….I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me… I did fire shots at
    Gandhiji in open daylight. I did not make any attempt to run away; in fact I
    never entertained any idea of running away. I did not try to shoot myself…
    for, it was my ardent desire to give vent to my thoughts in an open Court.
    My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by
    the criticism levelled of against it on all sides. I have no doubt, honest
    writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some
    day in future. “

  126. GANDHI & GODSE. 5 FACTS YOU NEEDED TO KNOW …

    1. Yeah … so this Gandhi bloke. Know the name. Heard of the film …
    So, who has he?

    Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi was born on 2nd October 1869 in Porbandar, Gujarat. He was married at age thirteen to Kasturbai. At age eighteen, he set sail for England to study Law. After passing his exams, he practiced Law in Pretoria, South Africa.
    There, he was involved in a famous incident on a train, where a white man wanted him out of a particular carriage, but Gandhi stood his ground. He was forcibly thrown out. After that incident, he became a champion of Human Rights for Indians – and returned to a hero’s welcome in his Native India.

    2. The whole Indian Independence thing … what happened then?

    Gandhi became a household name, and a thorn in the side of the British. He was jailed on numerous occasions as the British feared his popularity could spark nationwide anti-British protests/riots.
    Gandhi’s core doctrines were:
    1. “ahimsa” or non-violence
    2. the ‘brotherhood’ of Hindus and Muslims, who according to him were one and them same(?!).
    Most famously, in 1930, Gandhi marched 240 miles upto the coastal shores of Gujarat in Dandi to protest against the British for not allowing Indians to make their own salt. Again, he was arrested for this and gained much iconic popularity.

    3. Godse … never heard of him.
    So who has he?

    NathuRam Godse was born on 19th May 1910 in Poona, Maharashtra. Godse was born into a pious family of Brahmin caste. NathuRam was known for his social work with (so-called) ‘untouchable’ castes, and during the tragic times of the partition in 1947, he aided many Hindu and Sikh refugees who had been victims of horrific injuries and rapes etc.

    4. So what did Godse do then?

    Godse will go down in history as the man who assassinated Gandhi at point blank rage on 30th January, 1948.

    5. Why did he do it?

    Gandhi, despite all the love and attention heaped on him by many, remained a power-hungry, extreme left-ist who was happy to put the needs of Hindus second to the appeasing of the Muslim minorities.

    In the late 1930’s, Gandhi was defeated by one Subhash Chander Bose in a Congress leadership election. Bose was renowned for his hatred of the British and his willingness to take up arms in the endeavour of Indian Independence. This conflicted with Gandhi’s doctrine of non-violence. So, Gandhi went on a hunger strike against Bose’s legitimate victory, and caused a rift in the Indian National Congress forcing other senior leaders like Nehru to not back Bose.

    In 1940, a Sikh by the name of Udham Singh travelled to England and assassinated Sir Michael O Dwyer. O Dwyer was the man who gave the go-ahead for the firing of innocents in the massacre of Jallianwala Bagh in Amritsar, Punjab back in 1919. This brutal attack took place on Vasakhi – a religious day for the Sikhs, and a state-wide holiday for all Punjabis. Upto a thousand men, women and children were gunned down in cold blood.
    Udham Singh waited twenty years to exact revenge for this terrible scar. After having assassinated O Dwyer, what did Gandhi do?
    Gandhi wrote a letter of apology to the British!!!

    And finally, during the tragic times of Partition, Gandhi went on a hunger strike because of the violence inflicted on Muslims by Hindus and Sikhs in the Punjab. The fact that brutalities had been meted out to Hindus in other states like Bengal at the behest of his Muslim League cronies was of little or no significance.
    Gandhi went on a hunger-strike and proposed that FIFTY-FIVE CRORE RUPEES (that’s £68million in today’s value – imagine how much it would have been 56 years ago) BE GIVEN TO PAKISTAN AS “GOODWILL” MONEY.

    This was the final insult, and Godse felt that Gandhi’s life had to be ended as this man who was so warped in his extreme left-ist ideals, would be the death of hindu pride or the concept of a hindu nation.

  127. गाँधी एक अंधविश्वास
    अब रंगरूट भर्ती का काम शुरू हुआ । गाँधी ने एक महान ब्रिटिश राज्यभक्त की तरह यह काम बडे मनोयोग से शुरू किया । गाँधी ने खुद लिखा है – “मेरी दूसरी जिम्मेदारी रंगरूट भर्ती करने की थी ।” अब उसने अपने अहिंषा के शिद्धान्त को ताक पर रखकर तर्क वितर्क करके लोगो को शस्त्र धारण करने का उपदेश देना शुरु किया। यह तो बस एक झलक थी गाँधी के अंग्रेज प्रेम की।

    • MAI SNEHA, ENGLISH PATA HAI AUR HINDI TYPE KARNI NI AATI, MAI MOBILE ME KIYE HUYE MSG KI TARAH LIKHUNGI HINDI…..
      GANDHI EK AISA NAAM JO LOG MAHATMA LAGA KR LETE HAI AUR RAASTRA PITA BHI KAHTE HAI, MANTE HAI WO RAASTRA PITA HAI KYO KI USKO BHI NI PATA HOGA KI USKE KITNE BACCHE HAI, EK GHATIYA INSAN JO HAMARE HINDUSTAN K BATWARE AUR ISKI BARBADI KA KARAN HAI USKO IZZAT DETE HAI BUT USE YAD BHI NI KARTE JO SACH ME IZZAT KE LAYAK HAI, MAI SAT -SAT NAMAN KARTI HU NATHURAN GODSE JI KO JINHONE ISH GHATIYA INSAAN KO GOLI MARA, LEKIN YE SHIKAYAT HAI UNSE MERI KI DER SE KYO MARA AUR PAHLE MARTE TO SHAAYAD KUCH ACCHE LOG HAMARE ISH DESH KI BHALAI KR PATE,AUR SIRF KUTTA GANDHI KO KYO MARA SATH ME UNKE CHAMCHO KO BHI MARNA THA FIR AATMA SAMARPAN KRTE,KYO KI MOHAN DAS KARAMCHAND GANDHI AUR USKE KUTTE (AP LOG TO JAANTE HE HO KAUN THEY)AISE JANWAR THE JO APNI SARJAMEE AUR APNI MAA, BAHEN , AUR BETIYO KO BECHNE ME YAKEEN RAKHTE THE AUR AJ BHI UNKI NAJAYAS AULAADE ISH KAAM KO ANZAAM DE RAHI HAI,GANDHI KABHI DESH KI AZAADI NI CHAAHTA THA, WO DESH KE SACCHE KRANTIKARIYO KO KHATM KARNA CHAHTA THA AUR WO YE KRNE ME SAFAL BHI RAHA JISME BALI CHADHE- SHRI SHARDAR BHAGAT SINGH, SHRI LALA LAJPAT RAI, SHRI SUBHAS CHANDRA BOSH, SHRI CHANDRA SEKHAR AZAAD,SHRI RAM PRASAD BISMIL, SHRI RAJ GURU, SHRI SUKHDEV AUR NA JAANE KITNE KRANTI KARI JINKO IS KUTTE GANDHI NI APNE NAAM KO UPPER KARNE K LIYE SHAHID KARWA DIYA,KYA KISI KO LAGTA HAI KI GANDHI K LIYE ISH DUNIYA ME KOI GAALI BANI HAI???? GANDHI SALA CHAPA BHI AISE KAAGAJ PER JISKE LIYE LOG APNA IMMAN BECH DETE HAI, AURTE APNI IZZAT BECH DETI HAI SALA GANDHI,KYA BOLU ISH SITE PE KABHI DEVA NE MAUKA DIYA TO ISH BHADHUYE KI ACCHE SE UTAARENGE PURI DUNIYA K SAMNE, MUJHE SHAARM AATI HAI KI MAI 2nd OCT KO PAIDA HUI HU,KASH MAI 31 JAN KO PAIDA HOTI.DEAR PRASHANTH SIR UPPER WALA HAME USH LAYAK BANAYE KI ISKI HAR ACCHI JAGAH SE KALMUHI PHOTO TO UTARWA HE DE AUR ISKI ASI KAM TAISI KAR DE. ‘I HATE GANDHI’.
      VANDE MATRAM.

  128. Before freedom, there were no two countries like india and pakistan… those people who are living in present pakistan were called Indians.. and today many people who are living there migrated from this part of India.. So, if u say gandhi did wrong by giving 55crore for those people, it is wrong as they were also indians.. they also fought against the Britishers.. there were many national leaders who were muslims and were not supporters of division.. the problem is with us people, when british torchered us for a long time, we didn't retaliate.. but when it comes to hindu-muslim religion, we fought like anything.. godse killed a man who devoted his whole life for the freedom of india, freedom of the poor and unouchables..Its not patrotism on the part of Godse, it was fanatism… Either you can love Gandhi or you can hate Gandhi but you cant ignore his contribution for freedom struggle of India…

    • Dear Yogesh, Ghandi did not love India, he loved himself. He was no freedom fighter, he was a coward. The Paks got freedom without fighting the British they fought the Indians. They were the chamchas of the British. Read about the Muslim league. Gandhi contributed nothing to the freedon of India. He sacrificed millions of Indians (Hindus and Sikhs). Read whay Mr Dey has writted above. That will open your eyes

  129. agar gandhi kuch samay aur jinda rehta to nischit hi bharat ke kum se kum char Tukre aur karwa deta lanat hai un logo par jo usey apney baap ko chor kar usey bapu aur rashtrapita kehte hein ,rahi kasar uske chamche nehru ne puri kar di ,galti kari in dono ne aur bhugat raha hai sara desh .

    • How can you say someone who advocates peace and freedom deserves death? What gandhi taught, that peaceful protest can overcome oppression, is true today. Good luck trying to get free using guns because you’ll only die. peaceful resistance or bust.

  130. Dont call gandhi as father of our nation,he is father of Muslims.He shotted him late thats why he became the master piece in india. whenever i see is statue in roads i will feel bad. No one knows about Godes goodness.

  131. History is written by them who wins. I would suggest you all to read NCERT class 8th book’s second last chapter. It bears all fact’s and figures supporting good’s about gandhi. And it depicts all Violent indians as “not respected INA”. Decide yourself!! No one is best judge when we have all facts and figures in hand.

  132. Dharma sukshma aur paristhithi janya hota hai
    Jaise Mahabharat me Bhisma,Arjun aur Karna teeno
    hi mahan the kyonki be apne apne raste per sahi the.
    Hum aaj system par baithkar aasani se tay kar sakte hai koun galat tha aur koun sahi parantu sahi ye hai ki samay nirnay leta hai, byakti nahi
    Ghabraiye nahi ek din sara vishwa ek rastra hoga
    aur hum sab ek hi des ke basi.

    Hindi kaha mohi ram pyara, turak kaha rahmana.
    Apas me doe lad lad mare, maram na konau jana.

    So at last I must say I respect Gandhi as a great man
    and also honour the feelings of Nathuram Godse.
    So the assasinasion of gandhi and execution of Godse both were the wrong dicision of indian history.

  133. koi batao yaar SAMBHAV ko ki ab baatein kis baareme chalre lagta hai ki M…. B…… aur B…..ku koi musalam utah legaya usliye bechara freedom ki baaton me hindu muslim bolra… gadhi(South African) ke waise baat mai nahi karta INDIAN hoon indian jaise bolunga…num del kar udhar nahi to sab log tere ghar guss baith karinge..bacha ghar ke aurato ko..

  134. Muslims hindus can never unite, today not but tommorow we will again face muslim extremism, i want all hindu and sikhs to unite against evil muslim powers and save ourselves and our loving sanatan dharma and hindustan. EVERY MUSLIM IS NOT TERRORIST BUT EVERY TERRORIST IS MUSLIM. Wake up my young brothers and fight for every drop of blood of our hindu sikh buddhists jains brothers killed by muslims without any reason. If anybody wants to talk me then call on 7737757032. JAI HIND

    • kya baat karte re terejaise chutiye se..insan hai baadme hindu muslim..tere maa se puch uske baap ka par dada kaun hai..

    • mere khayal me tera baap muslim tha aur teri maa choth ke sry chod ke chala gaya isliye badi dushmani hai musalman se..ya phir shayad teri biwi ya bahen ka koi muslim lover hoga aur unhe choth choth ke chod ra bhi nahi hoga musalman chothne me hai chodne me nahi…to tu bada paresha hora hoga ki kaise peecha chudao isse…par ha apni bahen aur biwi ku uske chothne ka mazaa puch shayad unhe bada mazaa aara hoga aur wo continue karna chahre..prostitue ka business karta kya apna number publicity karra..rates bhi to patade..per hour ya 1shot ka..kissi teri bahen aur biwi ku..tere jaise madarchodu ke liye jo muslim aur hindu ya sikh isai bolte..shayad tu OLD CITY ka OLD MINDED hoga..new city me aa bataenge tujhe hindu musalam kaun hai..sirf ghar aur religion alag hoga par dil sabka ek hi hai…aise baatein old city ke muslim bhi karte wo bhi hindus badi nafrat karte..mai ye nahi bolra ki tu hi hai jo ye bolra..grew up man..dil se bol kabhi kisi musalam ke haath ki koi koi bhi cheeze abhi tak nahi liya..bhuka mar jayega..new city ke hindu bhai musalamo par apni jaan chitakte….i hate old city old minded people like u…chahe wo hindu ho ya phir musalman..number del kar yaar nahito koi na koi amma bahen ginke choth ke call cut kardeta..tu sirf sunne me rahega aur wo choth ke jale jaata.

    • oops JAI HIND isliye daala…par wo pura nahi hoga wo sirf words hai…HINDUSTAN bol sahi aur solid hoga…chutiye…rates to mention kar per hour kitna hoga ya phir call karne par hi bataega…tere msg koi oldcity musalman dekhega to teri to band bajaadega…tu old minded wo old minded..isi baatpe ek shayari arz hai…gaadi gaadi raasukunte boodi ralutadi…ghate

    • what????????how can u tell that every terrorist is a muslim???? arent there any hindu terrorists at all in the country?????

    • Chootia comments likhay hain tun nay. RSS is the biggest terrorist organization. A ban should be imposed on this terrorist third class organization to save india.

    • That is wat i fail to understand !!! Even after watching & living such disastrous state today people dont act to correct it… even if not like HEROES yet can choose the right!!!! Wait … watch … crib … and continue is wat is understood to all i guess 🙁

    • No one is fool man , if they fool ask all Indian leaders about there account will they tell you ?
      They are exposing innocency to help Pakistan . Pakistan is going to do defence agreement
      with once Indian friend Russia but no agitation among Indian government . They broke all
      friendship to help Pakistan . I am not telling that they are funded by Saudi like rich musalim
      country but you can't deny that they are more wise then us then why they are not understanding that we can understand ??

  135. ಅಪ್ರತಿಮ ದೇಶ ಭಕ್ತಿಯ ನಿಮ್ಮ ಒಂದು ಕಹಿ ಕೃತ್ಯ ದೇಶವನ್ನು ಮತ್ತೊಮ್ಮೆ ತುಂಡರಿಸುವುದನ್ನು ತಪ್ಪಿಸೆತ್ತೆಂದು ಇತಿಹಾಸ ಓದಿದಾಗ ನನಗರಿವಾಗಿದೆ.
    ನಿಮ್ಮನ್ನು ಹಂತಕನೆನ್ನಬಹುದು. ಕೊಲೆಗಾರನೆನ್ನಬಹುದು. ಆದರೆ ಇಡೀ ರಾಷ್ಟ್ರವೇ ನಂಬಿದ್ದ ಹಾಗೂ ಅನುಸರಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದ ವ್ಯಕ್ತಿಯೋರ್ವ ಸತತ ತಪ್ಪು ಹೆಜ್ಜೆಗಳನಿಟ್ಟು ದೇಶವಾಸಿಗಳನ್ನು ಸಂಕಷ್ಠಕ್ಕೆ ಒಳಪಡಿಸುತ್ತಿದ್ದಾಗ ನೀವು ಗೈದ ಕಾರ್ಯ ತಾಯಿ ಭಾರತಾಂಬೆಯ ರಕ್ಷಣೆಯ ಕೃತ್ಯವೆಂದೇ ನನ್ನ ಅನಿಸಿಕೆ. ಜೈ ಭಾರತಾಂಬೆ….

    • ramesh ji apka baap koi musalman hoga isliye ap isi batha karr raha hai, nathuram gode mahan hai ,gandiji yek lafang hai,gandi ka family kuthe ka family hai isme teli ka yek kuthiya be hai ,sale gandi vamsh, jai nathuram godse aap bharath mahan hai

  136. I accept Gandhi is a great leader, But he has no right to divide country into two parts. Don’t for get that Muslims came like British people. India belongs to Hindus
    When country is divided we have made a deal and we have to stand on the deal, I accept that Muslims from India has to move to Pakistan might be pain for them, think about the Hindus who came from Pakistan, for Hindus there is no pain that they are leaving house’s and childhood memories ( in Pakistan).

    If Godse’s wouldn’t killed Gandhi, might be there is only one country (i.e Pakistan)

  137. I accept Gandhi is a great leader, But he has no right to divide country into two parts. Don’t for get that Muslims came like British people. India belongs to Hindus
    When country is divided we have made deal and we have stand on the deal, I accept that Muslims from India has to Pakistan might be pain for them, think about the Hindus who came from Pakistan, for Hindus there is no pain that we leaving our house and childhood memories.

    If Godse’s would have not been killed Gandhi, might be there is only one country (i.e Pakistan)

  138. See the real history of partition, Stop fighting on such useless topic which start from word and end at word.No body is going to do any thing except bullshit discussion. So please improve your gk.
    Story of indian partition
    Apart from revisionist historians, it was none other than Lord Clement Atlee himself, the British Prime Minster responsible for conceding independence to India, who gave a shattering blow to the myth sought to be perpetuated by court historians, that Gandhi and his movement had led the country to freedom. Chief justice P.B. Chakrabarty of Calcutta High Court, who had also served as the acting Governor of West Bengal in India, disclosed the following in a letter addressed to the publisher of Dr. R.C. Majumdar’s book A History of Bengal. The Chief Justice wrote:

    You have fulfilled a noble task by persuading Dr. Majumdar to write this history of Bengal and publishing it … In the preface of the book Dr. Majumdar has written that he could not accept the thesis that Indian independence was brought about solely, or predominantly by the non-violent civil disobedience movement of Gandhi. When I was the acting Governor, Lord Atlee, who had given us independence by withdrawing the British rule from India, spent two days in the Governor’s palace at Calcutta during his tour of India. At that time I had a prolonged discussion with him regarding the real factors that had led the British to quit India. My direct question to him was that since Gandhi’s “Quit India” movement had tapered off quite some time ago and in 1947 no such new compelling situation had arisen that would necessitate a hasty British departure, why did they have to leave? In his reply Atlee cited several reasons, the principal among them being the erosion of loyalty to the British Crown among the Indian army and navy personnel as a result of the military activities of Netaji. Toward the end of our discussion I asked Atlee what was the extent of Gandhi’s influence upon the British decision to quit India. Hearing this question, Atlee’s lips became twisted in a sarcastic smile as he slowly chewed out the word, “m-i-n-i-m-a-l!”[46]

  139. yaar sab chodo bus ye bata do ke us gandhi ne desh k liye kiya hi kya hai
    aur uski so called freedom fight mai aaj tak use kitne dande pade aur kitne torcher sahe jaise logo ne us k chakkar ma sahe saala jaha bhi dande padne ki naubat aati khud jail mai jaa kar baith jata aur logo ko pitwa deta
    saale ne non coperation movement wapas lene se pehle ye bhi nahi soocha k jin logo ne is madarc**d k chaakar mai apni naukri school chod diye hai unka kya hoga
    aur agar ye buddha itna bada ahinsa ka pujaari tha to world war 2 mai apni sena kyo bejhi aur bejhi to bejhi saale ne vijayi bhav ka aashorwaad diya ab us saale se poocho kya sena bine lade apna loda dikha k jeet jaati
    saala aur to aur apni beti ki umar ki ladkiyo k saath sota tha aur ye bat to usne khud kahi thi k use apni kaamvasna apne kaabu mai nahi rakhi jaati saala randi baaz

  140. I AM ASHAMED A ALL OF YOU WHO ARE VILIFYING GANDHI AND MAKING GODSE A HERO. There is dearth in history of leaders like Gandhiji , who bring about revolution with peace.It is very easy to take up a gun and kill a tyrant, but it is very difficult to bring about a change in a tyrant through your action. And that is what Gandhiji achieved he brought about a revolution with peace, something which had never been done before. As for you saying he was an agent of muslims.Gandhiji was a firm believer in Hindu Muslim unity. He wanted a country where we were all Indians and not Hindu , Muslims, Rajputs, Chamars. That is why he was against discrimination on all grounds.He belived that all men are created equal and defended that ideology to his last, our partition was inevitable.It occurred because all the lesser people like Godse, Savarkar, Jinnah could not grasp the depth of the Gandhian ideology. Both Nehru and Patel said yes to the partition only after the massive riots of 1946, led by the Muslim league’s Direct Action Day. Gandhi then asked Jinnah to be the first PM , but Jinnah, Nehru and Patel refused this offer citing this would hurt the hindu sentiments and this will only increase the riots. It was common folk like you and me who were rioting at that time, who made this partition inevitable.Had we been all like Gandhi ther would have been no problem like this.

    • I do think that Non Violence is great thing it is not easy to follow. You have good knowledge so I want to ask some question to you. Gandhij had recruited 15 lack army for Britisher’s during 1st world war So Gandhiji awarded as Kesre Hind & Recruitment Sergeant(read in Wikipedia or type Indian soldier in 1st world war in google).He said, fight for Britishers fight for Emperor . He give Rs 300 crore to Britishers. Gandhiji’s opinion is we were not able to fight 45000 Britishers So he could not support Subhash Chandra Bose but he had recruited 15lacs Indian soldier for Britishers in 1st world war. He withdraw Non Cooperation movement which was very good movement. The same Gandhi continue during 2nd world. Recently 1 ship found on Atlantick Mahasagar which was full of 225 ton Silver. Which was carried by Britishers from Kolkata to London during 1942. How it was possible when our leader was fighting against Britishers.

    • Sorry abhishek to hear this but just answer one question what will you do when some bloody outsiders came into your house and starts ruling on you and your family member? Will you be gentle or you will hit them and force them to leave your home. And if you still belive in gandhism then turn the pages of american history, i hope you’ll surely get the answer if you are willing to get the correct one

  141. Hum Us Desh ke Wasi Hain Jis Desh Me Ganga Behti Hain , Are Bhai AZADi Ki Liye Hum Sub milke Lade , kithnone jan diye fir ye kyoun hamare sat aisa hota hain Hindu Muslims kehke hum hum kyoun ladthe hain ye jivan boht chota hain kush raho aur dusroonko kush rahne do

  142. Are jeene do yaaro,koun mara,koun maara,bahot puraani baat ho gayee,hindustaan ko lutna thaa,lootero ki to ab tak mout bhi ho gayee,gadhe murdo ukhaadne me ab koi samajhdaari nahy hai,jindagy se kadam milaao….kya rakkha hai ladne me kabhi to sudhar jaao…..koun sach loun jhut iska faisla waqt k sivaa koi nahy karsakta,kiyaa na aap sabne yaad puraane jakhmo ko …kuch huva???? kuch nahy bas kadvi meethi yaade reh gayee – Nishan

  143. There are two sides of every story , and if the actual story is as emotionally charged as this one, i could not blaim my own judgments, which inevitably compare the present scenarios concerning our nation, past and post independence. I see that there are quite a few young participant in the comments which follows Godse’s address to court after his assassination of Mahatma Gandhi. To a young man like me who does not suffered any personal loss to Independence, the creation of Pakistan becomes major issue and possible justification for throwing abuses to Mahatma Gandhi, one reason could be my lack of genuine pre- independence history. But i somehow try to visualize things differently and then see if i could have such firm views.
    What if….
    1) Even after large amount of exodus and atrocities committed by both sides, Pakistan had survived like India after partition as a stable nation.
    2) Pakistan had accepted democracy then the military dictatorship it eventually fell into.
    3) Pakistan had not created the issue of Kashmir and never fought preposterous wars with India.
    4) It never have harbored fundamental ideologies and sent terrorists in India to support it.
    I wonder if i could have sticked to my firms views if such things might not have happened. It never justify the two nation theory which Muslim league and Jinnah propagated and which Gandhi always rejected, possibly the fundamental reason why the Muslims in India had full freedom if they chose to migrate to Pakistan or remain in India. Now for a leader of the stature of Gandhi or Nehru, the margin for any mistake is unacceptable when it affects the people and the future of the newly independent nation.And creation of Pakistan has proved to be a blunder rather then a mere mistake. Some people might argue that we are better off Pakistan as that country is slowly descending into chaos and anarchy, possibly a civil war. But given the thought that if there was no Pakistan, than there could not have been any Afghan war, creation of mujahedin and AL-quida by US to fight with Russian invasion, possibly no fundamental Muslim terrorism throughout the world. I wonder many sensible Pakistanis must be regretting the partition. But since all of this not transpired and Pakistan today is not only headache for India but the entire world,i dread that it exists and that to only as my closest neighbor. I am not taking sides but i feel that a leader must be a person who aim for a long term goals rather than succumbing to short lived solutions.I do not know if Gandhi was great leader but i think all of us should agree that he was a great man. Great for uniting India and accepting democracy when Pakistan chose the easiest but destructive way to dependance on forgine powers and military ruling,great for advocating one the most original ideas as Satyagraha and Ahinmsa for successful protests against oppressing British empire which was far superior militarily and technologically than pre- independent India, because India was just one of the British colonies, they piratically ruled half of the world. So when someone suggest that we should have fought with British empire, it becomes as laughable as when an economically broken Pakistan wants to invade India and win Delhi.And the ways Gandhi has adopted half a century ago are still quite effective when a powerless man like Anna Hzare use them to tame government. So i think it was a point of view which played important part in Gandhi’s assassination, and even today there are more Muslims residing in India than in Pakistan, who have suffered as we Hindus in communal riots perpetrated by power hungry politicians.

  144. ya we know gandhi is a good leader but he is a selfish person and he give a more preference to muslims…..NATHURAM think has a hindhu so he did do it……NATHURAM also a good person

  145. Gandhi was a great leader. He shouldn't have been killed like this. His murder is not justified. He probably wanted to win the hearts. If you win the hearts, that is the biggest victory. To agree to partition was a big mistake (end of the day, he was human being). Please confirm, if Gandhi wouldn't have agreed, India wouldn't have partitioned? Together we would be stronger and best country. All we need to do is to just eliminate hate and hopefully will be united again in future.

    • bhai mere wo dil kisika nahi jeeta sirf uske umar lehaz karke usko izzat diye warna uski koi aukat nahi..lekin wo ek real politician hai aur jo jaanta tha politics…jo kranthi kaari sirf 22,25 aur kamse kam umar me anpi jaan azaadi me kurban kare unki koi izzat nahi..ye aap jo bolre gandhi wo 78 me mar diya gaya warna shayad 100 saal pure karta tha…bhai apke ghar par koi agar buri nazar dala aur hum kahete satyagraha aur bhook hartal me usse ye kaha tu nazar hata aiseto mahine aur saalo guzar jaate aur apke haathon aur aagan me bhool bhool rahete gair mulk ke agar wahi dat ke ladoo jaise(Krathi kaari)to saale ki aankhon se khoon bahe..baat ku samjho..agar nahi samaj me aae to bola khulke sajhaonga..

    • You are ri8 Imraan bhai.In the sepoy mutiny of 1857, both Hindus and Muslims fought valiantly against the Goras. They slit throats of 3 lakh 64 thousand britishers. Inspite of the treacherous mughal rule, Hindu and muslim common ppl were never opposed to each other. Britishers tried to exploit their unity and brought 'cow slaughter' as the issue. Muslims(Qureshi) though reluctant were forced under british torture and mayhem to resort to this ugly job of 'Qatl khanas'. Among upper caste muslims, britishers bred hatred against innocent and helpless Qureshis. But the hatred bred among Hindus against Muslims was the craftmanship of bastard Britishers. The contempt grew so far that the fist ever hindu-muslim riot happened in 1897(40 yrs after sepoy mutiny).
      The second blow to Hindu-Muslim unity was in 1905 when the britishers divided Bengal, to curb the rising agitation of east Indians against the british raj. Even Gandhi fell prey to these ugly tactics when he promised self-rule(swaraj) to muslims after the non-cooperation movement. The muslims took part in khilafat movement against the british dominion of sunni caliphate in Turkey. Self-rule for muslims meant restoring the sunni caliphate all over the world. When they dicovered the true essence of Swaraj meaning a democratic govt, their aspirations broke apart and once again HIndus and Muslims drew swords against each other when Stupid Gandhi withdrew the Non-cooperation movement after the chauri-chaura massacre. The rift kept growing and the mahatma was utterly useless with his non-violence tantrums against the bloody britishers. Britishers saw no danger with this toothless aging bastards and kept carrying on their 'divide and rule' policy. Finally the brunt came in 1947 when the country got divided in the name of religion.
      To this day, CONGRESS as a faithful agent of britishers and US keeps continuing its agenda of breaking India. Pakistan is in ruins today bcoz of dirty tactics of US in giving birth to taliban. Divided we are weak. forgetting the differences and embracing the true history of our past we should strive for unity against the western hegemony. But the history-makers in your and our country keep preaching false history that keeps breeding discontent and bitterness. Ideology of we hindustanis should change. it can start from ppl as u and me.

    • Thanks brother.. we all need to understand that we are the country which was cut into pieces… we need an original/ genuine, united India. the poverty in the region will evaporate quickly once we unite… and the NRIs will return to the homeland and people for other countries will come here for jobs. i hope, the public will break "berlin wall" one day (in near future).

    • we cannot say he is a great leader imran there are thousands of people who lost their life because of gandhi they were never been known to many of us he is always spared soul n pain r common to all. further he deserves to b dead for the hatred he showed on nethaji (he never opposed nethaji's deporting) all he did is for fame just like politicians who knows if he is left to live he could hav been PM one fine day.we have more than 100s of great leaders dating back from 1700s ok

    • Sir, He was a human being, end of the day and probably had make few mistakes. There is no doubts that almost a million people lost their lives due to the mistakes/ crimes/ corruption of our leaders in 20th century. That is the past which we can't change, but we can try to change our future. Thanks

    • No but if Gandhi was great then Jinnah was atleast great if not greater … gandhi was too much wraped in his fatasy ideal world ….but rightly alll leaders of independence movement were not of great calibre or the results for india and pakistan would been better ….. we s asians are paradoxically marooned with chains ???? no hope .. eternal poverty , chaos and confusion is our fate ………….

  146. these debates do not provide any solution to the current problems of india , we have many problems to disscus about. for example ruppe is trying to commit suiside , a person who gets 9 percent marks , becomes second grade maths teacher in a govt school , now system requires changes and our constitution needs some amendments.

    • And the problem never gets solved… Problem is the brain, the humans, the people, we… You can train the present, not the future… it never fully gets solved… its like energy, can't be created, can't be destroyed… only changes form…

    • Never, Why would You stop Trying ?? Trying is a good thing, makes You learn many more things, the actuals and the overheads… gives You immense knowledge about the on screen and off screen scenarios, helps you become more practical and humble… makes You…

    • @laltitha thyagraj: sitting in england and commenting on indian affairs is very easy. Talented ppl lke u prefer to spend ur whole lfe in other country use ur knowlege for the benifit of other country and then talk abt development of India lol.

    • Hmm…interesting comment. Would you have said the same f I had agreed with your comments about Nathuram? Am I less entitled to expressing my thoughts and opinions simply because I'm in a different geographical location? Isn't it fantastic that we now have a tool which allows people from different parts of the world to get connected for a common goal? Could this not be a platform for positive discussions and exchange of ideas? Perspective Swapnil…it's all about perspective. Stay calm and focused 🙂

    • no it doesn't help too mch……..as there are too mch of so called scholars who cme with brilliant and innovative ideas in our country but practically no one implements it himself or herself……….so instead of ppl exchanging ideas, ppl actually implementing those ideas are truly required. So sitting there in other country really doesnt contribute to the countries progress unless n untill ur network is really strong with ppl those who work on ur advice in india inspite u being there.

      • gandhi was a bustard and congress too. some selfish leaders of congress like nehru had ambition to rule india for the sake of anything and our people were like cow they were fooled. congress has done only destruction in the country right from partition to till now. playing divide and rule game. when thousands of people were dying in jalia wala bagh where was gandhi when lala lajpat rai was killed were was gandhi when bhagat singh was hanged were was he?? he was totally bullshit and then he used to sleep with other ladies. he was a bustard and intentionally he killed bhagat singh. when bhagat singh succeeded to get equal rights for all prisoners by the method of non violence then where was the gandhi? is this nonviolence is only made for gandhi. as he criticized bhagat singh and his friends. gandhi was bullshit spit on his face.

        • Yes..i am agree with Harsha Ranjan..
          Most of the modern people unaware about gandhi tricks.That fellow is a british agent ,who put indian in sin.Other wise India should be freed before 1920’s…

    • Hahaha! I suppose nothing is going stop you and I from commenting further on topics that interest us. I hope your network is strong enough to contribute substantially toward the country's development (growth?). Personally, I believe everyone can make a difference. No matter how small his/her contribution is. Every little thing matters. And in order for change to happen,the mindset of the people has to change. You have to start from the grassroots. Gradual change. After all, Rome wasn't built in a day. Question is if India is ready for change?

  147. the day when people of india will start exploring and analysing rather just believing, ram will get a place he deserve….. jai hind

  148. I agree what nathuram godse did at that time was right, even today the congress party is doing the same thing ,u people might have seen
    during utter Pradesh election how they tried to flirt Muslim by incresing their quata,BEWARE OF CONGRESS PARTY

    • all the people who think nathuram godse is a patriot are from his family and in mere future they will follow his legacy and create disturbance in hindu muslim unity. beaware and stay united. coz fight leads to nothin…….

    • i think u r a SC or ST..darr lagaya hoga ki tere quota musalman ko mil jaayega bolke aur tere haath me lota aajayega…ye kya kare musalman tum log ko..musalman sirf 5% se 10% govt jobs me hai baaki aur log kyu musaman bhi insan hai unko bhi arman aur unko bhi bhuk lagti…yaar utna kyu agar private jobs me bhi lo musalman ka to sirf resume dekhkar bhej dete..chalo tumhari baat lo sc st kam caste ke bolte but unke pas hi sabse zyada properties aur unko hi govt jobs hai aisa kyu…oc bc bhi to hai…sirf caste bade rahene se kuch nahi..jeb me bhi to hona chahiye..sab sc st leliye aur oc bc ko kya hai..reddy’s oc ke hai meri comp me office boy reddy hai..ye kahaka insaaf hai…quota kisi ko nahi sirf widows aur handicap jaise logo dena chahiye bakhi ka jaise army selections karte waise kare jobs selections me..

      • Abbe, Tu Hindu ho ya Musalman. Jisse bole usse abuse kar raha hai. Kya samaj k rakha hai tu apne aap ko, Behan chodh. Teri Maa chodh dhunga. Tu Musalman reh kar Hindu k naam se sab ko abuse kar raha hai ya tera biwi musalman hogi. Behan chod. Hindus ka takaath nahi pata hai tujhe, Maa chodhoonga behna chodh kaha rehta re tu? Clear hai ki Hyderbad ka he hai, Hyd mein kaha rehta re behan k lode tu? Teri maa chodh dhoonga, cut bulli saale.

  149. I am an army officer’s daughter and patriotism has rushed through my veins from childhood. Today I speak, not just being an Indian, but above all a Human. All you people, defending Godse don’t know anything about Gandhi’s sacrifice. If Godse was a real patriot, he could have done a lot more other than brutally killing Gandhi and then defending himself with his long, well thought,cunning speech. He was weak and scared and that is what led to such a shameful act. Not once did he make an attempt to meet Gandhi although even after his unsuccessful attacks , Gandhi called to meet him. His ashram was open to everyone. But he refused. And if you get your facts straight, Godse attacked Gandhi around 10 times and more than half of these attacks were done long before partition was even being discussed. Shame on all of you to insult a simple man whose entire life revolved around love and peace. If violence is the answer to everything, kill everyone and kill yourself too. Let all mankind suffer death for none is perfect and everyone has sinned. None of you are even capable of dreaming of what Gandhi has achieved for our nation. So, keep rambling about whatever you want, I know it, the world knows it, Truth alone triumph. Godse never got the place he demanded in the history. And Gandhi became immortal.

    “Generations to come will scarce believe that such a one as this ever in flesh and blood walked upon this earth.” – Albert Einstein on Gandhi’s funeral.

    • we indians need to maintain our thinking like sneha singh and priya.and people like surjit are evil minded , need to beware of such guys.

    • Nice to see your comments.I am going through this
      web page very cauciously but most of the guys till now making heroic statement against Gandhi and making hero the person Nathu even though they have not even moved an ant in their whole life. Their are very few people who thinks like u. Nathu’s Ideologies are based on division of Hindu and Muslims and Gandhi’s are on unity. only this ideology make Nathu the killer of Great person Gandhi. Think about the people who have so much hate in their heart will do with their brothers. though many person should have experience hate from others community but still we should not hate each other. as Gandhi says, An eye for an Eye Makes the whole world Blind.
      Jai Hind

  150. Stop Writing about the persons who are no more here.
    Now its time for all of us to do something for our nation.
    Hum bhi to sirf internet par likhne mei apna time barbaad karte hai..sochne ki baat hai hammse kitne log apne desh ke future ke liye contribute kar rahe hai

    ye tume hai jaagne ka or kuchh kar dikhane ka

  151. Jai Hind, I want to say every personality has some negative and some positive features. And same was with Gandhi ji and Mr. Godse. I never denied that Gandhi ji did so many mistakes. But if we see from an outsider point of view and consider the partition was a disaster. If it was like that and we should consider that country was not partitioned then where did Muslim go? Should hindus shoot them in India? Even it was not partitioned them I think Godse ji also must not think of revenging from muslim. There is no doubt that hunduism the best living style teller religion. But it also tells that we should kill the person who is wrong not to the relatives. Second Godse ji’s thoughts were amazing for the country and he saved the country at one level. But I think it could have been better if these kind of freedom fighters stood against congress at that time. Because at that time more than 90% population were hindu in the country. Today people become more materialistic and difficult to make them understand about these facts and effects. I remember one of the gandhi quotes – A nation’s culture resides in the hearts and in the soul of its people. And if once the people and youth would get awake there would be again a great revolotion in India.

  152. @ALL who r against gandhi
    agar gandhi ji nai hote toh aaj bhi hum kisi angrez ke ghar toilet clean kar rahe hote.
    what type of independence u wanted.
    a man who sacrificed whole of his lyf for ths country ,doesn’t deserves this kind of comments!
    the only motive of ths nathuram was to get enlighted by killing mr.gandhi .
    a man has travelled and fought but still he is culprit ? buzzz off

    • @shikhar
      the thing he was really successfull to do was to fool people very nicely and and that can be read from your comment. Angrej kisi gandhi k karan nai chhode bharat kyuki wo is halat mai nai the ki wo desh chala payein to unhone bharat k sath usi time pe kai saare deshon k sath “Transfer of power” agreement kiya. Aur aaj bhi hum ghulam h!!!

      • boss transfer of power has to be signed bcoz jinnah has asked for it otherwise he would hav announced a civil war and on wht basis r u tellin tht we r not independent,for e.g whn u sell ur car u sign a transfer of authority tht doesn’t means tht u own tht car anymore.
        sowith due respect go n check ur knowledge first sir.

    • Mr. Shikhar main tumhare se agree nahi hu agar gandhi ji aaj hote to …..

      aaj jis kashmir ko tum bade shaan se kehte ho na ki hmare yahan hai woh aj pakistan ki shaan hota ? isme PUNJAB,RAJSTHAN, & gujrat ka name bhi aata hai

      kya aapko pta hai ki independence ke time pakistan ko 55 crore dena tha india ne jabki india ne diya 75 crore diya gandhi ji vjah se ……………

      kya aap ab bhi mante ho nathu ram godse ne galat kiya and jo aap keh rahe ho ki kisi angrej ke ghar ki oilet saff kar rhe hote to bahi aaj hum log jo foreign jate hain vahan par bhi yahi kam kar rhe hain

      to apne desh mein karne se kya hota hai aapko ya hme……….?

      • i agree wid u sir. but for that man life of the people was more important than money or land. don’t forget tht at that time pakistan was also included in india and they were our people.
        think!

    • Popularity in india is cheap sometimes. See the examples of Lalu, mulayam,mayawati etc…So the same to Gandhi and nehru.

      After world war II made britishers to leave india and not only india even thier other occupants.

      Nothing great Gandhi has done other than teaching lessons of cowardness …

    • abe o shikhar

      sale shikhar ki aulad tuje kya pata aazadi ka

      kisi ke dande khane se yan phir chup chap khade rahne se aazdi nahi milti
      without violation aazadi is not possible

      • Dear Sushil

        Stop living in fools’ paradise.

        Always remember – Muslims will be an oppressive majority and a turbulent minority.

        Look at what they did to Hindus in Kashmir where they were majority and in rest of India they have special demands for themselves.

        They owe their allegiance not to the country but to their religion. For them its Islam first and Bharat next

        So wake up. Though we cannot do anything about the ones who are now born in this country but we must face them properly and not give in to their absurd demands

        Muslims did not join 1857 independence struggle to free Bharat, but they wanted to get Bahadur Shah Zafar re-appointed as King of this country to continue Mughal rule

        Wake up

        Regards

      • Mr Sushil. On which world are you living? Wake up bro. There was an incident happened with me, I work for a BPO. Our is a multinational company works from 6pm to 5pm IST as it is a USA & Canadian process. One day there was a technical problem & we closed the office by 4 in the morning, cabs were not available at that time as they start operating from 5am. One of my colleague , she is a muslim girl. She asked me for a lift as she stays in a hostel near by to my apartment, I offered her life & on the way two guys chased us they saw Lord Ganesha’s sticker on bike & they hit me saying that where are you taking a muslim girl. They abused me & my colleague like anything. More over she was not sitting two sides, she was sitting to one side. They asked this girl one thing that “Office Musalman bandhe koi nahi hai kya? Hindu k sath aane k kya zaroori hai?” This hurted me very badly. He also said “Hindu log sab chinal k auladh hai” Which made me to cry. Then I hit both the guys & they registered a case against me. Now tell me kis nazar se aap ko Hindu – muslim bhai bahi lagra?

  153. But it is also wonder that many Indians think that Present future Gandhi Family is connected with Mahatma Gandhi. But it is not true present Gandhi Family is Pt. Jawahar Lal Nehru's Family and he is the one of the most butterer of Gandhi, Gandhi Has two sons Ram Das and Deodas Gandhi and there is no relation between both families except adulation.

  154. Many of us don't know that there were 9 persons arrested by the police Nathuram Godse, Nan Apte, Karkare, Madanlal, Shankar Kistaiya, Gopal Godse, Vinayak Damodar Sawarkar, Dr. Parchure, And Badge, Nathuram And Nana Apte was got death punishment Sawwarkar and Dr. Pachure acquitted by the Hon'ble High court of Punjab and Badge was excused due to government witness and other got life imprisonment, But all know that only Nathuram Godse hanged , Nana Apte was also hanged. But he was not present at that time in incident place then why he is guilty and got death sentence even though is accused for conspiracy, Nathuram was great freedom fighter, he never run away from his punishment, after shoot he was still there in the spot. And when the trial court has punished him death sentence he has not tried for appeal in his death sentence, he had filed an appeal just for conspiracy because he told there is no conspiracy for Gandhi 's death. Why the other accused will get sentence. He had argued for him self, he had never hire any lawyer for himself. Even after pronouncement of judgement in High Court of Shimla the Honb'le Jus. Khosla Judge of High Court appreciate the behavior of Nathuram when he was in jail during trial. It is also spectacular that the bullets which has been found in Gandhi's body that was not from the pistol shoot by Nathuram godse, There are five injuries in his body and only 3 bullets were shot by Nathuram. Ther are many things in this case to know, why Gandhi was shot by Nathuram. Gandhism Ahinsa was only for Hindu. After bifurcation of country he wants that government give 55 Crore Rs/- to Pakistan but Sardar Vallabh Bhai Patel and other leader don't want to give a single pie to them because it was Indians property, but Gandhi has decided to fast and pressurize to give them rupees.