Home » Celebrities » WHY I KILLED GANDHI – Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

WHY I KILLED GANDHI – Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

Gandhiji’s assassin, Nathuram Godse’s Final Address to the Court.

WHY I KILLED GANDHI - Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

WHY I KILLED GANDHI - Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

Nathuram Godse was arrested immediately after he assassinated Gandhiji, based on a F. I. R. filed by Nandlal Mehta at the Tughlak Road Police staton at Delhi . The trial, which was held in camera, began on May 27, 1948 and concluded on February 10, 1949. He was sentenced to death.

An appeal to the Punjab High Court, then in session at Simla, did not find favour and the sentence was upheld. The statement that you are about to read is the last made by Godse before the Court on the May 5, 1949.

Such was the power and eloquence of this statement that one of the judges, G. D. Khosla, later wrote, “I have, however, no doubt that had the audience of that day been constituted into a jury and entrusted with the task of deciding Godse’s appeal, they would have brought a verdict of ‘not Guilty’ by an overwhelming majority”

WHY I KILLED GANDHI

Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined RSS wing of anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession.

I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other. I have read the speeches and writings of Ravana, Chanakiya, Dadabhai Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England , France , America and Russia . Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.

All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well-being of all India , one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan , my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.

Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them.. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day.

In fact, honour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita.. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.
In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India . It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to them.

The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way.

Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every thing; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible.

Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster. Gandhi’s pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India . It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India , Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani.. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect, it is spoken, but not written. It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma’s sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India . His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.

From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork. The Congress which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947.

Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’ and ‘peaceful transfer of power’. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called ‘freedom won by them with sacrifice’ – whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country – which we consider a deity of worship – my mind was filled with direful anger.

One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan , there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.

Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless. Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan . People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building.

After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House. I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi.

I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims. I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.

1,098 thoughts on “WHY I KILLED GANDHI – Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

  1. chanchal says:

    Can any body claim himself to be infallible. Godse has a view he lived for that. Killing of Gandhi ofcourse is not justifiable at any cost but at the same time one has to think and find out whether Godse was completely wrong?. Gandhi could not be always right , Godse was not completely wrong.

  2. Yash Desai says:

    The killing of mahatma gandhi was one of the greatest blunder which resulted in ten times more damage to its purpose than what it gained,by bolstering the agenda of pseudo secularism of Congress and shaming of the right wing RSS . This one event changed the entire course of INDIAN history. Every movement needs a hero and a villian, and by killing Gandhi, Godse presented one good example of that. See the result of his stupidity which led to open pasture for the congress and censuring of the RSS. The congress used the opportunity to decimate the opposition and till the shah bano and the babri masjid case, the right wing parties were languishing on the periphery on the national scene.
    If Gandhi was not assasinated, the congress would have lasted only 02 term. The congress in the meantime used all this time to strengthen their position by naming all the nations resources and it acts like adverisement.
    Whatever hard Modi govt tries improve the nation it will be difficult for them to get a second term and they have to thank Godse for that.

  3. rahul says:

    Pandey ji… You are right… It was Nathuram godse bcoz of whom we are independent. Other wise India would also have become islamic state…

  4. rahul says:

    I think You love to be slave of congress… Better get some knowledge and have some coinsiences…

  5. Rahul Chauhan says:

    I am sure even kasab and burhan wani would also have some justification for what they did. Godse is no better than kasab and wani, stop this hero worshipping of a terrorist otherwise u loose the moral ground to protest against any other form of terrorism. Rss has divided this country always. That is what they do. Propaganda and only propaganda. They believe in the laws of Manu.

    1. Shwet says:

      My friend, Godse in his times did not have support to fight against thoughts of Nehru and Gandhi like Vemula and kanaiyakumar get at present. Nehru and Gandhi always impose their thoughts on the people of the country irrespective of what people of the country want. They never thought about sentiments of the people of the country regarding Akhand Bharat and partitioned Akhand Bharat for their own publicity. Today we knew only positive history of Gandhi and Nehru because very few had daring / courage to oppose these two at that time. I am not supporter of the RSS but I strongly dislike Nehru and Gandhi for partition of Akhand Bharat. You are comparing Lion Pandit Nathuram with the mosquitoes,Kasab and Burhan but he was the true son of the Akhand Bharat Mata.अखंड भारत अमर रहे वंदे मातरम्।

  6. Deepak says:

    history can be manipulated differently , faith manipulates opinion , but truth is only truth. Friends, let the history in the past and think about solution for today’s corruption in India .

  7. Ajeet kumar says:

    Nehru jante the ki Jinnah ko cancer Hai phir bhi kehte the ki Jinnah ko apna chaprasi bhi nahi banaunga. Unki bhool ne lakho ko maut ke anjam tak pahunchaya. Vo bhale hi desh ke pradhanmantri the par fir bhi mere liye wo ek aasakt aur kaamuk vyakti se jyada kuch nahi the.

  8. Daniel says:

    The RSS ideology that Godse embraced clearly influenced him to assassinate Gandhiji. The RSS is the agency responsible for the death of India’s greatest hero. Gandhi was right to embrace nonviolence. The British wouldn’t have feared violence- they were the Empire that had the most powerful weapons. Godse wanted the massacre of millions of Muslims to appease the wrath and expectations of the Hindu majority. Godse is no different from a jihadi terrorist of today, because he chose to end someone’s life. This is why the saffron terror outfits ought to be banned and unmasked for what they really are- terrorist agencies. RSS, VHP, Sangh Parivar, Banrang Dal, Shiv Sena. They now have political power to do what they please- to cleanse India of Islam and Christianity and make Hinduism the single religion. That’s what the Modi government is doing.

    1. Gautam Chandra Deb says:

      Mr.Daniel…..i do not understand what u are telling about…its about history or about Modi Govt???

  9. Deepak says:

    I think Nathuram Godse miscalculated the situation and performed the act which created a black spot forever in the history. Post the assassination too, the communal violence did not stop. In fact, it went rampant. Regarding the use of force against the Britishers was not a good choice as they were the might one at that time. The history even witnessed the force used in the First independence revolt in 1857, where India got thoroughly suppressed by the Britishers.Hence, in my point of view resorting to the killing of someone, don’t yield the good result, but, creates vacuum in the of mature democracy of any country..

  10. Bhavna sharma says:

    I just want to say that ..gandhiji done a vry good job n had a great role in our indepndnc..
    But he was not as that great as we have read in our bks …there would be diff situation if gandhij took ryt step..

    1. sachin says:

      True ur right

  11. pandey ji says:

    Well done ! Nathuram godse. .. you’re the real hero..

    1. Anup says:

      Shame on you pande ji

    2. Aksen says:

      Shame on you pandeji

  12. Meet.parikh says:

    No one can kill any one,he has no rights to killing anyone. Nathuram did was wrong.

  13. Gocho Niji says:

    An Individual thinks and acts according to his/her environment, the way he lived, what he learnt, history of their ancestors.. Everyone has the mentality to stabilize their livelihood. For that stability, they destroy others peace.
    But what I have now is knowledge and information..everyone of my age is aware of mankinds fury, Right there from Alexander,Babar, Ashoka, Aurangzeb, British and finally Godse through series of Epics, scripts, Books and documentary.
    But these fury still prevails and exists even now,previously in the form of Al-qaeda and now Boko Haram and ISIS.
    Everybody is actually stable, but greed has poisioned men’s soul..
    GREED results HATRED which finally results into REVENGE,its natural and everybody knows that.
    Above all Im a mangoloid face Indian, from Arunachal recently under President rule, people call us chinkies and chinese even if Im ready to die for my country India..but those minds wont effect me, becoz I also have the knowledge of discrimination as done to Blacks in America few years back.
    And above all, Im also one of those angry young men who would have done what sir Godse had done..Becoz I too believe that true Historians will definitely scale the weight of action mankind has performed.But here I have a different theory-
    Why Mankind exist?
    Is their a task for them?
    Some kind of Game is being played with us?
    Yes..I believe something very fishy is going on with mankind.
    Mankind will definitely be judged according to their action..and we shall overcome someday..We will define God as mankind..Men will be God. There will be peace, there wont be any place for greed.We will live together as children of God, we will be Gods, we will pray to Mankind according to their deeds.
    Deeds like messi plays football, deeds like sachin Bats, deeds like Lataji sings deeds like ussain bolt runs, like sun shines to give life, nature’s way of fulfilling everyones need. ..which is only possible through true historians, providing right amount of information revealing what mankind has done.
    And thats why I believe in mankind.
    We will win against ourselves
    We will fight against ourselves till the end of time.

  14. Amit says:

    What Godseji did was his own perception. To me he punished Gandhiji without telling his crime which went really wrong on his part. He took his step in haste. He should have protested against Gandhiji. He should open discussion with him. But perhaps he was not confident to discuss this matter in open. Anyways Gandhiji passed away and Godseji got punishment.
    Now comes reservation. This is purely political term. Killing the interest of deserved candidates and giving chances to undeserved is a way to weakening country. You know human being respect the job only when he earned by putting his effort into it and hardly care the job which he get the job without putting his sweet. This is happening actually.For instance, A candidate securing 10% is getting job of teacher is really worrying. No matter whichever caste he belongs to. He is got to teach all. Can he really teach ? No…where is quality. At least minimum qualification should be there. Some arrangements should be made to provide financial help so that they can complete their education. Make them competent first then let them earn them job. Make them self dependent and not beggars. Modi ji asked capable ones to sacrifice lpg subsidy. Good, many has done that also. But can he dare to ask capable families to surrender reservation benefit . It would be interesting to find that numbers also because mostly jobs were not earned but were given to them.

  15. mona says:

    lets forget past and make better history- i love sikhisim – and married a jat sikh boy

  16. Abhishek Khanna says:

    As a hindu and also as an Indian I really agree with some of the things Godse gave in his final speech but having read so much about Gandhi from different sects and different authors I seriously think that the kind of independence Gandhi wanted for this nation was highly impractical, although it sounds noble but I don’t think India was ready for Gandhi kind of independence and for that matter even now and even in a distant future India would have never accepted that as a whole, it was simply impractical and probably that’s why the called him a soul that was not ordinary…now if he is a mahatma or a duratma that is for people to decide, everyone will have his/her own viewpoint, but even this impractical ideology made such a big impact on 20th century India, makes me solely believe that with sheer belief aap bulk mein ek desh k bht bade section ka bhi CHUTIYA KAAT SAKTE HO…in others word nothing is impossible…Take a Bow! Gandhiji. Well Done! And ofcourse don’t forget the mass support or rather I should say ‘selfish’ mass support he got from India.

  17. EarlyBird says:

    I am a Pakistani.I was born in Pakistan.Never been to India.Met nearly all people belonging to every part of India who had migrated to Pakistan after partition.Read history in school , college and through books plus verbal stories related by the then elders.After reading Nathuram’s statement I have only one thought…What a brilliant mind killed such a super Soul…tragic on both counts.Everybody has a right to their views but the difference between normal and abnormal is going with the flow , leading a life based upon universal values of coexistence and decency while going alone the complex road of life without any regard for the collective good of humanity or comrades is considered ‘abnormal’.Gandhiji having had a bigger canvas had greater influence on the majority of the then Indians plus great respect among all the people of Indo-Pak while Nathruram’s individual observations based upon his personal judgement and solo action resulted in the wate of not only a MAHATMA but maybe a great future Indian Leader …but one finds oneself helpless when it comes to Destiny.

  18. Nishant soni says:

    मुझे लगता है की गांधी जी और नेहरू दोनों ही भारत के विभाजन के लिए जिम्मेदार थे। ज्यादा तो नेहरू थे क्योंकि उन्हे प्रधानमंत्री बनने की बहुत जल्दी थी इसीलिए उन्होंने देश को तोड़ दिया। मैं मानता हूँ गांधी का योगदान बहत बड़ा है हमारे देश के लिए लेकिन जब मुस्लिमो के लिए अलग देश बन गया था तब क्या जरूत थी की भारत को हिन्दू और मुस्लिम दोनों के लिए। भारत सिर्फ हिन्दुओ के लिए होना चाहिए था क्योंकि बटवारा तो इसलिए हुआ था की मुसलमानो को एक अलग देश मिलेगा और हिन्दुओ को एक अलग देश। जब भारत हिन्दुओ के लिए बना था फिर इस में मुस्लिम की क्या जररूत थी। दंगा रोकने के लिए हिन्दू मुस्लिमो को अलग किया गया था। पाकिस्तन तो मुस्लिमो की लिए बन गया पर भारत हिन्दुओ का नहीं हुआ। secularism के नाम पर गांधी और नेहरू ने मुसलमानो का साथ दिया और हिन्दू का उसका हक़ नहीं दिया ।और वही आज हो रहा secularism के नाम पर आज के कांग्रेस वाले मुसलमानो का साथ देते पर हिन्दुओ के सैज गैरो जैसा व्यवाहर करते है। कितना दिख की बात है। गांधी महान थे इस कोई दोराय नहीं लेकिन गोडसे भी आतंकवादी नहीं वो गांधी जितन महान् तो नहीं पर पर वो एक सच्चा देश भक्त था भगत सिंह चन्द्र शेखर आज़ाद जैसा हमें अपना गोडसे के प्रति नजरिया बदलना होगा

    1. Ashok Arya says:

      इतिहास के बारे में पता क्या है तुम लोगो को |
      जब भारत के लोगो को साऊथ अफ्रीका ले जाया गया, और वहा उनसे जानवरों की तरह
      व्यवहार किया गया, तो कौन था जिसने उनके हक़ में आवाज उठाई | महात्मा गाँधी @

      जब भारत के बिहार के गाव चंपारण में किसानो से जबरदस्ती नील की खेती कराइ
      गई | और उसे खुद अंग्रेजो द्वारा ही कौड़ियो के भाव ख़रीदा गया, तो कौन था जो
      आगे आकर बोला, “किसान के खेत पर किसान का हक है, और ये उसकी मर्जी होना
      चाहिए की वो अपने खेत में क्या बोये |” वो कौन था जिसने किसानो पर हो रहे
      इस अत्याचार के खिलाफ आवाज उठाई | और अंग्रेजो को झुकाया और किसानो को सुखी
      बनाया | महात्मा गाँधी @

      गुजरात के खेडा गाव में जब अकाल की वजह से फसल बर्बाद हो गई थी तब कौन आया
      उनका कर माफ़ करवाने | किसने कह दिया की इस बार किसानो की फसल बर्बाद हो गई
      है इस बार कोई लगान नहीं दिया जाएगा | महात्मा गाँधी @

      जब अहमदाबाद के बारडोली में किसानो पर अन्यत्र 30% कर का भार जबरदस्ती डाला
      गया, तब कौन आया बारडोली सत्याग्रह लेकर किसानो को खुशहाल बनाने, अंग्रेजो
      को फिर से झुकाने | महात्मा गाँधी @

      जब नमक कानून आया और अंग्रेजो ने भारतीयों के नमक बनाने पर रोक लगा दी,
      अंग्रेजो ने भारतीयों के नमक बेचने पर भी रोक लगा दी | और नमक सिर्फ
      अंग्रेजो द्वारा, वो भी दुगुनी कीमत पर बेचा जाने लगा, तो कौन आया जिसने
      निर्भय होकर दांडी यात्रा की | महात्मा गाँधी @ इस यात्रा ने पूरी दुनिया
      का ध्यान भारत की और खीचा, और जिस तरह से अंग्रेजो ने भारतीयों का दमन किया
      उसकी पुरे विश्व में निंदा हुई और अंग्रेजो/इंग्लेंड वासियों पर एक
      अन्तराष्ट्रीय दबाव बनने लगा की वो भारत को आजाद करे |

      किसने असहयोग आन्दोलन चलाकर अंग्रेजो की सिट्टी पिट्टी गुम कर दी | महात्मा
      गाँधी @

      और जो लोग कहते की भारत का विभाजन गाँधी में किया वो सुन ले, भारत का
      विभाजन मोहम्मद अली जिन्ना, जो की मुस्लिम लीग का नेता था, उसने किया |
      जब गाँधी जी और बाकी लोगो ने जिन्ना के पाकिस्तान की बात नहीं मानी, तो
      जिन्ना ने डाइरेक्ट एक्शन डे का एलान कर दिया | जिसके चलते सारे मुस्लिम
      हाथो में हथियार लिए गैर मुस्लिमो को मारने लगे, और देखते ही देखते दंगे
      भड़क उठे | महात्मा गाँधी को सिविल वार की चिंता सताने लगी, और इस हिंसा के
      माहौल को देखते हुए वो विभाजन के लिए तैयार हो गए | जिन्ना ने तो विभाजन न
      मानने पर एक और डाइरेक्ट एक्शन डे के एलान की धमकी दे दी थी | सरदार वल्लभ
      भाई पटेल भी कहने लगे थे की यदि शरीर का कोई हिस्सा बीमार हो जाए, और
      बीमारी पुरे शरीर में फ़ैलाने का खतरा हो, तो अच्छा यही होगा की हम उस बीमार
      हिस्से को शरीर से काट कर फेंक दे | अलग कर दे उसे |

      जब देश में विभाजन के समय दंगे भड़के थे और लोग एक दुसरे को मारने के लिए
      हाथो में नंगे हथियार लिए घूम रहे थे, तब केवल एक ही महात्मा में वो जिगरा
      था की वो लोगो के बिच पहुच जाए और उन्हें खून खराबे से रोके | महात्मा
      गाँधी @
      परेशानी तो यह थी की उस वक्त दो पाकिस्तान बने थे, एक पश्चिम पाकिस्तान और
      एक पूर्वी पाकिस्तान | महात्मा गाँधी ने पूर्वी पाकिस्तान जाकर हिंसा रोकने
      का मन बनाया और इतिहास गवाह है की पूर्वी पाकिस्तान के विभाजन में बहुत कम
      हिंसा हुई, जो हिंसा हुई वो पश्चिम पाकिस्तान में हुई |

      जो लोग कहते है के गांधीजी पाकिस्तान को करोडो रुपये देना चाहते थे, उन्हें
      बता दू की विभाजन के समय जिन्ना ने होस्पिटल, शैक्षणिक संस्थानों, सैन्य
      तथा ख़ुफ़िया एजेंसी के बटवारे की बात की थी, जिसे नेहरू और सरदार पटेल ने
      नामंजूर कर दिया था, उन्होंने कह दिया था की, अब जो करना है अपने इलाके में
      करो हमारे इलाके की कोई चीज अब तुम्हारी नहीं रही | जिन्ना ने अंग्रेजो से
      मदद मांगी और कहा की इन सारी सुविधाओ के बिना पाकिस्तान देश तो अधुरा है |
      तब नेहरू और पटेल ने सुविधाओ के बदले 75 करोड़ रुपये पाकिस्तान को देने की
      बात कही | जिसे जिन्ना ने मान लिया |

      जब गाँधी की हत्या हुई उससे पहले वह पाकिस्तान यात्रा का मन बना चुके थे,
      और चाहते थे की पाकिस्तान में शांति व्यवस्था बनी रहे, वहा हमारे हिन्दू
      भाई सुरक्षित रहे | अगर गाँधी जी जिन्दा होते, तो आज पाकिस्तान इतना पगला
      नहीं होता, और वहा जो हिन्दुओ पर अत्याचार हुए है, शायद वो नहीं होते |
      क्या आप लोगो को पता है, की गाँधी जी ने अपनी जिंदगी के 2338 दिन जेल में
      बिताये | सिर्फ हमारे लिए |

      विश्व में महात्मा गाँधी सिर्फ़ एक नाम नहीं अपितु शान्ति और अहिंसा का
      प्रतीक है। महात्मा गाँधी के पूर्व भी शान्ति और अहिंसा की अवधारणा थी,
      लेकिन उन्होंने
      जिस प्रकार सत्याग्रह, शान्ति व अहिंसा के रास्तों पर चलते हुये अंग्रेजों
      को भारत छोड़ने पर मजबूर कर दिया, उसका कोई दूसरा उदाहरण विश्व इतिहास में
      देखने को नहीं मिलता। तभी तो दुनिया के सबसे बड़े और बुद्धिमान वैज्ञानिक
      आइंस्टीन ने कहा था कि
      -‘‘हज़ार साल बाद आने वाली नस्लें इस बात पर मुश्किल से विश्वास करेंगी कि
      हाड़-मांस से बना ऐसा कोई इन्सान धरती पर कभी आया था।’’

      संयुक्त राष्ट्र संघ ने भी वर्ष 2007 से गाँधी जयन्ती को ‘विश्व अहिंसा
      दिवस’ के रूप में
      मनाये जाने की घोषणा की।

      मार्टिन लूथर किंग जूनियर किससे प्रभावित थे | नेल्सन मंडेला किसकी फोटो
      अपने पास रखते थे | किसने विश्व के इन दिग्गज नेताओ को राह दिखाई | किसने
      भारत को विश्व में एक अलग ही पहचान दिलाई | The One And Only महात्मा गाँधी
      @

  19. vaishnavi says:

    Main sochti noon Gandhi ka naam gadha kyon nahi tha

    1. Rajeev says:

      Nathuram Godse may have given many explanations for killing Gandhiji . After reading it I came to the conclusion that it was only the thought of a sick upper caste people’s mentality. They couldn’t tolerate a lower caste thought or concept of non-violence and non-co-operation which lead India to freedom with lower casualties and loss of property. He , Nathuram Godse , along with people behind him had to prove that all the upper caste ruler, starting from Ramayana, Mahabharata and others have resorted to violence to win their war, were right. Gandhiji was very practical as our poor illiterate and divided people couldn’t have afforded the high cost of violence. Also British were very clever in dealing violence but they had no answer to non-violence and non-co-operation concept of Gandhiji. What ever the people say but I appreciate that Gandhiji brought freedom to Indian in cheapest and affordable effort. Gandhiji was not greedy of any post so any body, should be held responsible for division of India and Pakistan , are those who desired for top political position after partition.

      1. Manoj says:

        This is coming from a lower caste mentality.

      2. Mayank says:

        Mr Rajeev .I think due to Hindu like you whole political parties are targeting that community in India who are called minorities .Because they know, they can easily divide Hindus on basis of upper caste and lower caste.This cast ism exists in other religion also but they unite when any body talk about their Religion. And you guys just sought on your own religion.In today Politics what lower cast is not getting–>”RESERVATION”.Ha Ha you will get number of examples where meritorious student did not reach better institute and lower caste people go.but we are not shouting. So instead of shouting try to improve your thinking ,because it is direct fight of one religion to other ,they are not going to see you are lower or upper cast.

        1. Rajeev says:

          A assassin of father of Nation can’t be celebrated in a civilized society . One( after assassinating somebody) can’t prove himself right quoting religious books. Illegal assassination is always done to settle personal or communal scores (killer of innocent person is killer nothing else). Either Godse or the person who poisoned his mind settled theirs personal scores.

          Many people blames reservation system in India. Do anybody give time to think Who is responsible? And what should be done to eliminate the root cause? Are the responsible person belong to benefited castes and religion. I think the few greedy and corrupt people are responsible for the same. They characterized and classified different castes. They started mis-utilising their position to give the chance to their near and relative in various sectors of countries ignoring the deserving candidate. They created tussle between the different castes. All this just to make people busy in useless things and they can continue their corrupt practices. When things started getting out of control they passed the reservation bill in haste without giving the thoughts of unprivileged millions. Those who controls the system never made the system transparent and fair till now. No body want to talk of fair and transparent legal and administration in our country. All those who are at topmost postions still passing big tenders worth crores to their near and relative. But the lower people are busy in useless reservation issues. We want the best and competent teacher – doctor for our family but we never select the similar competent person for parliament. How can we expect good outcome. In the era of Science and Spirituality still there are many followers of plenty of blind faith. If reservations kept on continuing for few years it will turn out blind faith for our politicians similar to our religious books. Disease and body structures are same between different castes and religion. Drugs used for treatment are same. Even organ transplant between two individuals can be done regardless of castes and religion. We have progressed from dictatorship to democracy but still we have to learn a lot why God created us. But if anybody suppresses talent and opportunities to a deserving candidate our nation and systems get spoiled. It is just like adulterating milk – feeding a child and then expecting normal humane outcome.

          And about faith A water molecule travels through many mouth and urinary tracks of many organisms ( different species, castes, religion) but the molecule of water is always considered pure if collected from Ganges river. There are many castes and religion in India. Some educated individual can comment a whole caste community as dogs but no action taken, even it is mentioned in some so called pious book, but people consumes the food produced in the fields of THE caste community ( compared with dogs), with the help of their hand and sweat and probably their excreta also. How can a civilized individual compares a community with animals.

      3. Satya says:

        Rajeev plz read some more to know the reality. You are saying cheapest and affordable way !! plz read read and read some more before spreading this superficial propaganda by Nehru and Co.

      4. Sanjay says:

        Hinduism has evolved over time as a religion of reservation(based on caste). It is good to respect the religion and religious faith but it is sickness to get obsessed of it. We learnt to wear undergarments to coats-tie and eat with forks- spoon from western people. But still plenty about civilization has to be learnt from them. I want to add Who classified castes and then started reservations it was the Brahmins who demanded nearly 100%reservation in temples with free food and residence with no required qualifications / competitions. The pandits of temple enjoys the benefit of mostly tax free income plus reasonable to lavish lifestyle with lots of respect . They can capture any property with least effort/money and convert it into temple . All at the cost of just a mere birth in families of Brahmin caste . But till now no revolution done to eradicate this reservation. If India is projected as Hindu nation, it will be a nation of reservations based on castes. What a religion that don’t consider all individual same. How fake is the religious faith can be judged by the fact that An orthodox Brahmin will not eat from hand of a scheduled caste individual but he will eat grains raised in their farm with help of excreta and the same Brahmin will be ready to accept kidney from a street beggar without knowing his/her caste or religion in case of terminal chronic renal failure. It well known many great people have created different religion after knowing the incompleteness and unjustified rituals in their parent religion. People keeps talking of present social problems but don’t analyze that many social problems are deep rooted from past.

  20. vaishnavi says:

    Nathuram godse did well!!

    1. Tilak says:

      If u support Godse for killing Mahatma, there wl b no difference between u n ISIS Supporters.. both of u supports non voilence..

  21. vaishnavi says:

    Gandhi mahatma nahin duratma that:-(

  22. vaishnavi says:

    Gandhi mahatma nahin duratama tha

  23. Naz says:

    Nobody has the right to kill anyone. No religion teaches that killing someone is o.k. We are all equal in the eyes of God.

%d bloggers like this: