Home » Celebrities » WHY I KILLED GANDHI – Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

WHY I KILLED GANDHI – Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

Gandhiji’s assassin, Nathuram Godse’s Final Address to the Court.

WHY I KILLED GANDHI - Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.
WHY I KILLED GANDHI - Nathuram Godse's Final Address to the Court.

Nathuram Godse was arrested immediately after he assassinated Gandhiji, based on a F. I. R. filed by Nandlal Mehta at the Tughlak Road Police staton at Delhi . The trial, which was held in camera, began on May 27, 1948 and concluded on February 10, 1949. He was sentenced to death.

An appeal to the Punjab High Court, then in session at Simla, did not find favour and the sentence was upheld. The statement that you are about to read is the last made by Godse before the Court on the May 5, 1949.

Such was the power and eloquence of this statement that one of the judges, G. D. Khosla, later wrote, “I have, however, no doubt that had the audience of that day been constituted into a jury and entrusted with the task of deciding Godse’s appeal, they would have brought a verdict of ‘not Guilty’ by an overwhelming majority”


Born in a devotional Brahmin family, I instinctively came to revere Hindu religion, Hindu history and Hindu culture. I had, therefore, been intensely proud of Hinduism as a whole. As I grew up I developed a tendency to free thinking unfettered by any superstitious allegiance to any isms, political or religious. That is why I worked actively for the eradication of untouchability and the caste system based on birth alone. I openly joined RSS wing of anti-caste movements and maintained that all Hindus were of equal status as to rights, social and religious and should be considered high or low on merit alone and not through the accident of birth in a particular caste or profession.

I used publicly to take part in organized anti-caste dinners in which thousands of Hindus, Brahmins, Kshatriyas, Vaisyas, Chamars and Bhangis participated. We broke the caste rules and dined in the company of each other. I have read the speeches and writings of Ravana, Chanakiya, Dadabhai Naoroji, Vivekanand, Gokhale, Tilak, along with the books of ancient and modern history of India and some prominent countries like England , France , America and Russia . Moreover I studied the tenets of Socialism and Marxism. But above all I studied very closely whatever Veer Savarkar and Gandhiji had written and spoken, as to my mind these two ideologies have contributed more to the moulding of the thought and action of the Indian people during the last thirty years or so, than any other single factor has done.

All this reading and thinking led me to believe it was my first duty to serve Hindudom and Hindus both as a patriot and as a world citizen. To secure the freedom and to safeguard the just interests of some thirty crores (300 million) of Hindus would automatically constitute the freedom and the well-being of all India , one fifth of human race. This conviction led me naturally to devote myself to the Hindu Sanghtanist ideology and programme, which alone, I came to believe, could win and preserve the national independence of Hindustan , my Motherland, and enable her to render true service to humanity as well.

Since the year 1920, that is, after the demise of Lokamanya Tilak, Gandhiji’s influence in the Congress first increased and then became supreme. His activities for public awakening were phenomenal in their intensity and were reinforced by the slogan of truth and non-violence which he paraded ostentatiously before the country. No sensible or enlightened person could object to those slogans. In fact there is nothing new or original in them.. They are implicit in every constitutional public movement. But it is nothing but a mere dream if you imagine that the bulk of mankind is, or can ever become, capable of scrupulous adherence to these lofty principles in its normal life from day to day.

In fact, honour, duty and love of one’s own kith and kin and country might often compel us to disregard non-violence and to use force. I could never conceive that an armed resistance to an aggression is unjust. I would consider it a religious and moral duty to resist and, if possible, to overpower such an enemy by use of force. [In the Ramayana] Rama killed Ravana in a tumultuous fight and relieved Sita.. [In the Mahabharata], Krishna killed Kansa to end his wickedness; and Arjuna had to fight and slay quite a number of his friends and relations including the revered Bhishma because the latter was on the side of the aggressor. It is my firm belief that in dubbing Rama, Krishna and Arjuna as guilty of violence, the Mahatma betrayed a total ignorance of the springs of human action.
In more recent history, it was the heroic fight put up by Chhatrapati Shivaji that first checked and eventually destroyed the Muslim tyranny in India . It was absolutely essentially for Shivaji to overpower and kill an aggressive Afzal Khan, failing which he would have lost his own life. In condemning history’s towering warriors like Shivaji, Rana Pratap and Guru Gobind Singh as misguided patriots, Gandhiji has merely exposed his self-conceit. He was, paradoxical as it may appear, a violent pacifist who brought untold calamities on the country in the name of truth and non-violence, while Rana Pratap, Shivaji and the Guru will remain enshrined in the hearts of their countrymen for ever for the freedom they brought to them.

The accumulating provocation of thirty-two years, culminating in his last pro-Muslim fast, at last goaded me to the conclusion that the existence of Gandhi should be brought to an end immediately. Gandhi had done very good in South Africa to uphold the rights and well-being of the Indian community there. But when he finally returned to India he developed a subjective mentality under which he alone was to be the final judge of what was right or wrong. If the country wanted his leadership, it had to accept his infallibility; if it did not, he would stand aloof from the Congress and carry on his own way.

Against such an attitude there can be no halfway house. Either Congress had to surrender its will to his and had to be content with playing second fiddle to all his eccentricity, whimsicality, metaphysics and primitive vision, or it had to carry on without him. He alone was the Judge of everyone and every thing; he was the master brain guiding the civil disobedience movement; no other could know the technique of that movement. He alone knew when to begin and when to withdraw it. The movement might succeed or fail, it might bring untold disaster and political reverses but that could make no difference to the Mahatma’s infallibility. ‘A Satyagrahi can never fail’ was his formula for declaring his own infallibility and nobody except himself knew what a Satyagrahi is. Thus, the Mahatma became the judge and jury in his own cause. These childish insanities and obstinacies, coupled with a most severe austerity of life, ceaseless work and lofty character made Gandhi formidable and irresistible.

Many people thought that his politics were irrational but they had either to withdraw from the Congress or place their intelligence at his feet to do with as he liked. In a position of such absolute irresponsibility Gandhi was guilty of blunder after blunder, failure after failure, disaster after disaster. Gandhi’s pro-Muslim policy is blatantly in his perverse attitude on the question of the national language of India . It is quite obvious that Hindi has the most prior claim to be accepted as the premier language. In the beginning of his career in India , Gandhi gave a great impetus to Hindi but as he found that the Muslims did not like it, he became a champion of what is called Hindustani.. Everybody in India knows that there is no language called Hindustani; it has no grammar; it has no vocabulary. It is a mere dialect, it is spoken, but not written. It is a bastard tongue and cross-breed between Hindi and Urdu, and not even the Mahatma’s sophistry could make it popular. But in his desire to please the Muslims he insisted that Hindustani alone should be the national language of India . His blind followers, of course, supported him and the so-called hybrid language began to be used. The charm and purity of the Hindi language was to be prostituted to please the Muslims. All his experiments were at the expense of the Hindus.

From August 1946 onwards the private armies of the Muslim League began a massacre of the Hindus. The then Viceroy, Lord Wavell, though distressed at what was happening, would not use his powers under the Government of India Act of 1935 to prevent the rape, murder and arson. The Hindu blood began to flow from Bengal to Karachi with some retaliation by the Hindus. The Interim Government formed in September was sabotaged by its Muslim League members right from its inception, but the more they became disloyal and treasonable to the government of which they were a part, the greater was Gandhi’s infatuation for them. Lord Wavell had to resign as he could not bring about a settlement and he was succeeded by Lord Mountbatten. King Log was followed by King Stork. The Congress which had boasted of its nationalism and socialism secretly accepted Pakistan literally at the point of the bayonet and abjectly surrendered to Jinnah. India was vivisected and one-third of the Indian territory became foreign land to us from August 15, 1947.

Lord Mountbatten came to be described in Congress circles as the greatest Viceroy and Governor-General this country ever had. The official date for handing over power was fixed for June 30, 1948, but Mountbatten with his ruthless surgery gave us a gift of vivisected India ten months in advance. This is what Gandhi had achieved after thirty years of undisputed dictatorship and this is what Congress party calls ‘freedom’ and ‘peaceful transfer of power’. The Hindu-Muslim unity bubble was finally burst and a theocratic state was established with the consent of Nehru and his crowd and they have called ‘freedom won by them with sacrifice’ – whose sacrifice? When top leaders of Congress, with the consent of Gandhi, divided and tore the country – which we consider a deity of worship – my mind was filled with direful anger.

One of the conditions imposed by Gandhi for his breaking of the fast unto death related to the mosques in Delhi occupied by the Hindu refugees. But when Hindus in Pakistan were subjected to violent attacks he did not so much as utter a single word to protest and censure the Pakistan Government or the Muslims concerned. Gandhi was shrewd enough to know that while undertaking a fast unto death, had he imposed for its break some condition on the Muslims in Pakistan , there would have been found hardly any Muslims who could have shown some grief if the fast had ended in his death. It was for this reason that he purposely avoided imposing any condition on the Muslims. He was fully aware of from the experience that Jinnah was not at all perturbed or influenced by his fast and the Muslim League hardly attached any value to the inner voice of Gandhi.

Gandhi is being referred to as the Father of the Nation. But if that is so, he had failed his paternal duty inasmuch as he has acted very treacherously to the nation by his consenting to the partitioning of it. I stoutly maintain that Gandhi has failed in his duty. He has proved to be the Father of Pakistan. His inner-voice, his spiritual power and his doctrine of non-violence of which so much is made of, all crumbled before Jinnah’s iron will and proved to be powerless. Briefly speaking, I thought to myself and foresaw I shall be totally ruined, and the only thing I could expect from the people would be nothing but hatred and that I shall have lost all my honour, even more valuable than my life, if I were to kill Gandhiji. But at the same time I felt that the Indian politics in the absence of Gandhiji would surely be proved practical, able to retaliate, and would be powerful with armed forces. No doubt, my own future would be totally ruined, but the nation would be saved from the inroads of Pakistan . People may even call me and dub me as devoid of any sense or foolish, but the nation would be free to follow the course founded on the reason which I consider to be necessary for sound nation-building.

After having fully considered the question, I took the final decision in the matter, but I did not speak about it to anyone whatsoever. I took courage in both my hands and I did fire the shots at Gandhiji on 30th January 1948, on the prayer-grounds of Birla House. I do say that my shots were fired at the person whose policy and action had brought rack and ruin and destruction to millions of Hindus. There was no legal machinery by which such an offender could be brought to book and for this reason I fired those fatal shots. I bear no ill will towards anyone individually but I do say that I had no respect for the present government owing to their policy which was unfairly favourable towards the Muslims. But at the same time I could clearly see that the policy was entirely due to the presence of Gandhi.

I have to say with great regret that Prime Minister Nehru quite forgets that his preachings and deeds are at times at variances with each other when he talks about India as a secular state in season and out of season, because it is significant to note that Nehru has played a leading role in the establishment of the theocratic state of Pakistan, and his job was made easier by Gandhi’s persistent policy of appeasement towards the Muslims. I now stand before the court to accept the full share of my responsibility for what I have done and the judge would, of course, pass against me such orders of sentence as may be considered proper. But I would like to add that I do not desire any mercy to be shown to me, nor do I wish that anyone else should beg for mercy on my behalf. My confidence about the moral side of my action has not been shaken even by the criticism levelled against it on all sides. I have no doubt that honest writers of history will weigh my act and find the true value thereof some day in future.


  1. I always salute to Nathu Ram Godse ji,because he was real patriot and Gandhi was real opportunist
    I think that the other who think Godse a terrorist they r big fool

  2. I agree with everything he said except his ideas on our ancient Varna Vyavastha. This vyavastha was created by our poorvajas for our benefit and we are nobody to defile this system. Infact caste system should be strengthened.

    • It is not about Hinduism but it is like appeasing one person at the cost of other .. was the actual problem ..

    • Yes, of course.. India is a land of diversity in religion, caste, region etc.. but All of the above is that Humanity.. do you think your religion people showered humanity to Our Hindus??

      Sarbe bhabantu sukhinah, sarbe santu niramaya,
      Sarbe Bhadrani pasyantu, Maa kaschit dukh ba bhabet.. –Hinduon ki yehi reet hai to iss lie bache ho..
      Show some humanity and you will get the same..

  3. Left wing anti Hindu historians and Congress party which now has illegitimate children of Gandhi have demonized a patriot like Godse. I wish to die in a country where Godse is treated with honour and the respect that he deserves.

  4. Gandhi just ruined Hindustan …he along with Nehru created 2 seperate countries which now are continously fighting with each other.
    Same countries which was home for all religion & keeping our history in mind …none of the religion ever fought with each other before the partition.
    As per my views Godse did the right thing otherwise Nehru & Gandhi would have eaten whole of our country. Gandhi would have saved Shaeed Bhagat Singh but due to his ego he didn’t saved him.
    Also I read one book named “Rangeela Gandhi” in which they have mentioned that Gandhi used to sleep with girls now what kind of Mahatama was he?
    On the other hand Nehru was very busy with his own family. We can find no. of pics in which he is busy with girls. ….Maze me the wo bhi …..
    It’s my personel view.

  5. Godse killed Gandhi wrongly & irrationally , but he did for the love of his country !
    He was a Patriot like Shahid Bhagat Singh .
    In retrospect , they both sacrificed their lives for the UNGRATEFUL , HIGHLY FRAGMENTED NATION – INDIA !
    Ironically , Sanjay Dutt , the convicted terrorist killed many people for communal hatred but has many defenders & sympathisers in Bollywood Crazed Celebrities & Crowd !
    Ultimately , the Greatness of a leader must be measured by the Legacy and Long Trem Results !

  6. The Nobel committee did the right thing not to award Gandhi with the peace prise. All hè did was in favour of moslims.

    • Hopefully Muslims around the world would learn that soon, my best wishes are with them, also it is much easier to preach than to practice, unfortunately those who don’t practice are the ones preaching most of the times these days, no I am not talking about Muslims only, others as well. I hope my comments would be taken positively and just to clarify I am not condoning what Godse did and I am not from the RSS.

  7. Nathu ram sahib did a great job I would if possible will give him bharat ratan or father of nation instead of a man who was not able to walk and support himself and had shoulders of two women instead of stick or men…. A man. Who confess raped his neice a man who cheated society when Indira got. Pregnant before marriage by feroz shah Gandhi changed named to Feroz shah Gandhi…. And a biggest supporter of Muslim despite their rejection…
    LIST is big for more references read freedom. In midnight…

    • I just wonder, why did this fool not consider killing Jinna, who was the root cause of the demand for partition and the aftermath of partition of India !!.
      His last statement reveals, how much he was biased already against Gandhiji from beginning and not at all against Jinna?

      • Dear babajee
        your philosophy should be preached universally,” if my house is not in order, kill the neighbor” ha ha

      • Baba Ganteshwar Traitors are dangerours than enemies please understand ( I am now 57 years if you have asked my comments some thirty to forty years back just by reading my history book my comment will be different)

  8. At that time major religion [ Hindus and Muslims ] were fought not just because of partition, hatred behaviour towards each other [BECAUSE OF POLITICAL SPLIT] was also a reason. Jinnah’s policy was only for Muslims not for Hindus this played a key role in riots also. if at that time, many ‘Godse’ were there, many ‘Abul kalam azad’ also served this country !

  9. I’m an Amrerican and black till the day I die. If what he have written is true, then I too, would have found his actions justified and worthy of impeccable honor for his heroism.

  10. What an Irony. A nationalist who eliminated a person who had parochial mind set against Hindus for the larger good of Nation was sent to Gallows. Because of MK Gandhi’s misplaced ideology and idol worship by others of that time resulted in present day misery of the Nation.

  11. There is only one way to overcome hatred and evil, that is love. Not everyone is great enough to understand this.

    • Thank you Amit Agrawal. Those commending Nathuram Godse with all due respect, do not know what they say. Nobody has the right to take another’s life except perhaps, in self-defence. I am surprised these supporters did not see that Nathuram eventually became what he accused Gandhi of- the judge and jury.

      • When a cat is cornered and knows that there is no escape from the coming enemy, it attacks. Gandhi destroyed Congress. He craftily eliminated every opposition against his heavy handed approach. Godse on the other hand believed use of violence for a just cause to be justified which is why he chose to eliminate Gandhi. A legend and a patriot like Godse are rare. He loved nothing but the country.

  12. These few historical people who spent entire their life to unite India.
    Chatrapati shivaji
    Nathuram Godse
    Sardar Patel.

    Below people who encourage or silent to divide country based on religions, and india still suffering to their mistake and betray.
    Raja Jaychand

  13. Nathuram Godse was the biggest fool Ever Good he was hanged. We all should respect both Hindus and Muslims. We should have love and friendship. Ghandi took equal parts of both the religions. Which is exelent. Never be fool like him. Love, dignity and happiness will always remain in our heart for Ghandhi

    • Sorry not agree Gandhi was father of hypocracy a dictator he was neither pro hindu nor Muslim he was opportunist

    • Lolz. Dont u think Muslims more inclined towards other Muslims and Pakistan? Moreover how do u know that Gandhi was not biased. These were his statements. How many Indian Muslims think of kashmiri pandits? and how many support separatists? Azar ko century maarna hai Pakistan ko jeetna hai this is the mentality of most of the Muslims. Tum logonka niyath main khot hai

    • khan sahab …..mulk batne se pehle kabhi hindu aur muslim nahi lade …..fir baad me itni nafrat kahan se aagyi ….both were used for personel benefits and godse was real patriot if he would have not killed Gandhi then India must havebeen divided into many parts.

  14. I believe that what he did was right. I mostly agree with him but there are few things I don’t he was right at, eg he just wanted the well-being of Hindus alone but as a country, it should treat every person equally irrespective of their religion.
    Gandhi was completely unfair as he just wanted Hindus to practice non-violence, but when Muslims were performing a violent act against Hindu, he was fine with that. He was very biased.
    I believe Gandhi was being unbiased because as he wanted to become the leader of Muslims too, just like he was the leader of Hindu, but as Godse said Muslims didn’t care about whether Gandhi lived or die.
    To the whole non-violence thing, it seems great on paper but in practicality is not very good. It only works when both sides are being non-violent, even then the problem can only be solved if they are reasonable.

Leave a Reply to As mall Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


%d bloggers like this: